Clinical Trial Results:
RETIC trial: Reversal of Trauma Induced Coagulopathy by using Coagulation factor concentrates or Fresh frozen Plasma
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-004139-29 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
20 Feb 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
25 Oct 2020
|
First version publication date |
25 Oct 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
RETIC
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01545635 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Medical University Innsbruck
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Christoph-Probst-Platz 1, Innrain 52 A, Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
|
||
Public contact |
Univ.Doz. Dr. Petra Innerhofer, Medical University Innsbruck, University Hospital for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, +43 (0)50504-28503, petra.innerhofer@tirol-kliniken.at
|
||
Scientific contact |
Univ.Doz. Dr. Petra Innerhofer, Medical University Innsbruck, University Hospital for Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, +43 (0)50504-28503, petra.innerhofer@tirol-kliniken.at
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
20 Feb 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
20 Feb 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
20 Feb 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
Yes
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess the difference in incidence of multi organ failure (MOF) after treatment of trauma induced coagulopathy with Fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or Coagulation factor concentrates (CFC).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Fibrinogen administration is calculated and aimed to maintain fibrinogen concentration and polymerization within the lower normal levels of healthy adults. In addition, ROTEM assays are performed following each therapeutic step and enable detection of hypercoagulability.
Several cases of thrombembolismn have been reported after PCC administration. However the majority of data refers to patients receiving huge doses and continuous administration such as needed in patients with haemophilia and antibody formation. The doses used in the present study will be low and are aimed to raise factors levels up to 50% which is the lower normal level. Furthermore patients are closely monitored by ROTEM and a shortened ExTEM CT value should warrant against overdosing. Regarding FXIII concentrate no cases of thrombembolism following FXIII administration have been reported so far.
Finally the amount of blood loss (120ml total, about 2% of calculated blood volume in a 70kg patient) due to study related blood sampling should not harm the patient.
|
||
Background therapy |
TXA will be administered to all included study patients as a single bolus of 20mg/kg immediately after inclusion. Additional doses will be administered if indicated by ROTEM assays. Red blood cells will be transfused to maintain haemoglobin between 8-10mg/dl. Autologous salvaged red cells will be re-transfused irrespective of actual hemoglobin levels. Platelet concentrates (1-2 U PC) will be administered if clot firmness remains poor to maintain platelet count between 50-100 G/L or (ExTEM A10 <35mm) albeit sufficient fibrinogen polymerization (FibTEm A10 >10mm). Crystalloid fluids and 4% modified gelatin solution should be used preferently to maintain normovolemia in amounts disrected by the treating anaesthesist. Because of the profound effect of HES solutions on haemostasis HES should be avoided and only used if gelatin is contraindicated (known or new allergy). The use of HES will be documented and explained. All patients receive prewarmed iv fluids. In both groups pH, Ca++, BE and temperature are monitored and corrected as possible (targets pH>7.2, Ca++ >1mmol/L, BE >-4, temperature >35°C). | ||
Evidence for comparator |
We hypothesize that the exclusively use of CFC improves outcome of severely traumatized patients. The administration of CFC should effectively and timely raise coagulation factor levels, thereby limiting coagulopathic bleeding. Because volume expansion and dilution can be avoided with use of CFC the numbers of red cell and platelet transfusion should be reduced. As all types of blood components increase susceptibility to nosocomiale infection and sepsis a reduction in allogeneic transfusions and avoidance of FFP should result in a lower incidence of sepsis and multi organ failure. To test the hypothesis we will conduct a prospective study in adult patients with major trauma and coagulopathy randomly receiving CFC or FFP for correcting TIC. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Mar 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 100
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
100
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
100
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
1
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
88
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
11
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Adult patients (aged 18–80 years) with trauma exhibiting an Injury Severity Score (ISS) greater than 15 and clinical signs or risk of substantial haemorrhage were screened for trauma-induced coagulopathy, which was defined as abnormally low fibrin polymerisation (measured with FibTEM assay) and/or prolonged initiation of coagulation (ExCT). | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Between March 3, 2012, and Feb 20, 2016, 292 trauma patients with an expected ISS greater than 15 were screened for eligibility, of whom 192 were found ineligible. 100 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either FFP (n=48) or CFC (n=52). | |||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment period (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Single blind | |||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject | |||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to FFP or CFC. An independent statistician determined random codes using permuted blocks with varying block size and Stata/MP 10.1 for Windows Statistical Software. Randomisation was stratified for presence or absence of brain injury, and patients were stratified into three ISS groups (ISS 16–30, 31–50, or >50).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
CFC group | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
We started bleeding management with CFC immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 50 patients completed the treatment period, of which 38 patients received a single dose of CFC, 10 patients recieved a double dose of CFC and 2 patients received a double dose of CFC and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Haemocomplettan P
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Blutgerinnungsfaktor 1, Human Fibrinogen
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solution for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The used dosage of fibrinogen (50mg/kg), refer to he European Guidelines of trauma management (published 2010, 2013, 2016).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fibrogammin P 250E
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
FACTOR XIII
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solution for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The FXIII concentrate were administered at 20IU/kg.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Beriplex P/N 500 I.E
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder and solution for solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The 4 factor-PCC and FXIII concentrate were administered at 20IU/kg.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
FFP group | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
We started bleeding management with FFP immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 44 patients completed the treatment period, of which 12 patients received a single dose of FFP, 9 patients recieved a double dose of FFP and 23 patients received a double dose of FFP and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. | |||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Octaplas SD Blutgruppe A
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
For the FFP group, transfusion of FFP (Octapharma, Vienna, Austria) delivered by the local blood bank was done in a single dose of 15 mL/kg of bodyweight.
Octaplas shows activity that is comparable to that of normal fresh-frozen human plasma. The final product contains 45-70 mg/mL of plasma protein.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
CFC group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with CFC immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 50 patients completed the treatment period, of which 38 patients received a single dose of CFC, 10 patients recieved a double dose of CFC and 2 patients received a double dose of CFC and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
FFP group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with FFP immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 44 patients completed the treatment period, of which 12 patients received a single dose of FFP, 9 patients recieved a double dose of FFP and 23 patients received a double dose of FFP and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
CFC group
|
||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with CFC immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 50 patients completed the treatment period, of which 38 patients received a single dose of CFC, 10 patients recieved a double dose of CFC and 2 patients received a double dose of CFC and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. | ||
Reporting group title |
FFP group
|
||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with FFP immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 44 patients completed the treatment period, of which 12 patients received a single dose of FFP, 9 patients recieved a double dose of FFP and 23 patients received a double dose of FFP and in a crossover fashion rescue medication. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Multiple organ failure | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0- day 30
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Multiple organ failure | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CFC group v FFP group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.15 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.92
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.78 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.86 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Massive transfusions of RBC | ||||||||||||
End point description |
As further secondary efficacy endpoint, we also addressed frequency of massive transfusions of RBC during the first 24 h.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Massive tranfusions of RBC | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CFC group v FFP group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.042 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.04
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.95 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.87 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Frequency of transfusions of platelet concentrates | ||||||||||||
End point description |
As further secondary efficacy endpoint, we also addressed frequency of transfusions of platelet concentrates during the first 24 h.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Frequency of tranfusions of platelet concentrate | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
FFP group v CFC group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0078 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
3.6
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.35 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
10.18 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Bleeding score of 2 or 3 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Bleeding score is defined as number fom 0-3, dependent on severity of bleeding. A coagulopathic bleeding score of 2 or 3 after first study drug administration was more frequently observed in the FFP group.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Bleeding score of 2 or 3 | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CFC group v FFP group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.004 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Bleeding score of 2 or 3 and massive transfusion | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CFC group v FFP group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Rescue therapy | ||||||||||||
End point description |
20 (87%) of the 23 patients in the FFP group who required rescue medication needed rescue already in the first treatment loop, whereas three other patients in the FFP group and the two patients in the CFC group received rescue therapy in later treatment loops.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 0
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Rescue medication | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CFC group v FFP group
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Fisher exact | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
25.34
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
5.47 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
240.03 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Day 0- day 30
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
4.03
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
CFC group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with CFC immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 50 patients completed the treatement period, of which 38 patients received a single dose of CFC, 10 patients recieved a double dose of CFC and 2 patients received a double dose of CFC and rescue medication. In these patients, rescue therapy was initiated, meaning FFP was administered to patients in the CFC group. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
FFP group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
We started bleeding management with FFP immediately after randomisation and during surgical or radiological interventions, and continued study-specific coagulation management during the first 24 h at the intensive care unit (ICU). Considering that coagulopathy might reoccur, one or several treatment loops were administered during the entire study period (lasting from admission to the emergency department until 24 h at the ICU). In total 44 patients completed the treatement period, of which 12 patients received a single dose of FFP, 9 patients recieved a double dose of FFP and 23 patiens received a double dose of FFP and rescue medication. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
14 Mar 2012 |
substantial amendments: another trial monitor, another member in study team (a medical doctor for transfusion medicine), definition for platelet transfusion trigger (50.000-100.000) |
||
14 Jul 2012 |
Substantial amendment of an inclusion criterium: Limit of FibTEM was changed from <7mm to <9mm |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28457980 |