Clinical Trial Results:
A placebo controlled evaluation of a developmental gel for the treatment of atopic eczema.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-004184-79 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
08 Apr 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
12 Jul 2016
|
First version publication date |
31 Jul 2015
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
NIAD-01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Dermal Laboratories Limited
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Tatmore Place, Gosmore, Hitchin, United Kingdom, SG4 7QR
|
||
Public contact |
Amanda Wigens, Dermal Laboratories Limited, 0044 01462458866, clinical@dermal.co.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Amanda Wigens, Dermal Laboratories Limited, 0044 01462458866, clinical@dermal.co.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
11 Sep 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
08 Apr 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
08 Apr 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The objective of this study was to find out whether the 4% nicotinamide gel (NIAD Gel) offers therapeutically relevant treatment of mild to moderate atopic eczema compared to placebo, using a bilateral (within subject comparison) study design. If the active gel is beneficial in treating the very itchy, red and inflamed ‘flared’ atopic eczema skin areas, this may help us develop a new product which can help reduce the impact of atopic eczema on the lives of patients and their families.
This study was powered for two endpoints: the difference between the improvement from baseline Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) for the NIAD Gel treated areas compared to the Placebo treated areas after the 4 weeks treatment period, and the change from baseline Three Item Severity Score (TISS = erythema + oedema + excoriation) for the NIAD treated areas compared to the Placebo treated areas after the 4 week treatment period.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Topical application of the product was consistent with standard care. The main risk to the participants presented by this research was that of the treatment (active and placebo) not working. This was mitigated by the chosen study design and methodology, which restricted the application of both active and placebo gels to relatively small areas of the body while allowing other topical treatments to continue elsewhere. Also, reported placebo effects are not uncommon in similar studies, therefore significant worsening of the skin condition on the treatment areas was not likely.
|
||
Background therapy |
The use of the IMPs was restricted to the patient's volar forearms only. Elsewhere, they were allowed to carry on applying their usual topical treatments to manage their eczema. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Use of a placebo comparison involving limited treatment areas only (the volar forearms) was chosen because this offers the advantages of scientific rigor (from placebo control) whilst also permitting patients to continue using their normal eczema treatments elsewhere; thereby minimising ethical issues associated with a placebo. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
10 Jun 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 54
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
54
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
54
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
7
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
47
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Potential participants were primarily identified from a review of the study centre's patient volunteer database. In addition, a study poster/advert was displayed in local GP surgeries and other locations, in order to publicise the study to the wider community. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
68 patients were screened of which 54 were consented and randomised into the study. Of these, 51 patients were included in the Intention-To-Treat (ITT) population used in the outcome analysis. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Active and Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active and Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
NIAD Gel
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Gel
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The product was applied topically three times daily for four weeks. Patients were asked to apply a sufficient amount of gel to ensure complete coverage of the treatment area in the left or right volar forearm (from the front of the wrist to just above the creases of the elbow) with a thin film of the product.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo Gel
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PL1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Gel
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Cutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The product was applied topically three times daily for four weeks. Patients were asked to apply a sufficient amount of gel to ensure complete coverage of the treatment area in the other volar forearm (from the front of the wrist to just above the creases of the elbow) with a thin film of the product.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All randomised patients. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
ITT analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
N/A (bilateral study design)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Active and Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
ITT analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis set.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
N/A (bilateral study design)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Baseline improvement IGA, NIAD arm minus Placebo arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary endpoint is the difference between the improvement from baseline Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) for the NIAD Gel treated areas compared to the Placebo treated areas after the 4 weeks treatment period.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Difference in improvement from baseline to final assessment (after 4 weeks of treatment).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attachments |
Primary outcome |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary outcome | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The number of subjects included in this analysis is 51 (not 102), this is because it is a bilateral study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ITT analysis set v N/A (bilateral study design)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
102
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.032 [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon signed ranks test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Analysed on a paired basis to reflect the bilateral study design. [3] - Significant at 5% level (2-sided). |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Baseline improvement TISS, NIAD arm minus Placebo arm | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The secondary outcome is the change from baseline Three Item Severity Score (TISS) for the NIAD treated areas compared to the Placebo treated areas after the 4 week treatment period. TISS is the sum of the SCORAD intensity item scores for Erythema, Oedema/papulation and Excoriations/scratches (each on a 0 to 3 scale).
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Difference in improvement from baseline to final assessment (after 4 weeks of treatment).
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Bilateral design - all patients received active and placebo. |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Secondary outcome | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
This endpoint was analysed by fitting the data using a mixed model taking into account the bilateral study design, with baseline TISS as covariate, randomised group, arm and treatment as fixed effects and subject as a random effect. The treatment effect was assessed using the within subject error term and the arm effect was assessed using the between subject error term. The number of subjects included in this analysis is 51 (not 102), this is because it is a bilateral study.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
ITT analysis set v N/A (bilateral study design)
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
102
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.04 [5] | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Mixed models analysis | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Significant at 5% level (2-sided). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Baseline to 6 weeks (this includes 2 weeks late onset).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
As reported in CRF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
N/A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
All randomised patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |