Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43861   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2011-004887-31
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:OPN-FLU-NP-3102
    National Competent Authority:UK - MHRA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2014-08-27
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedUK - MHRA
    A.2EudraCT number2011-004887-31
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A 16-Week RaNdomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, PArallel-Group, Multicenter Study EValuatInG the Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of FluticAsone Propionate Twice a Day (BID) Using a Novel
    Bi-DirecTional DEvice in Subjects with Bilateral Nasal Polyposis Followed by an 8-Week Open-Label Extension Phase to Assess Safety
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Not applicable
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    NAVIGATE II
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberOPN-FLU-NP-3102
    A.5.2US NCT (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) numberNCT01624662
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorOptiNose US, Inc
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportOptiNose US, Inc
    B.4.2CountryUnited States
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationOptiNose US, Inc
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointSr Director Clinical Development
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street Address1010 Stony Hill Road, Ste 375
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityYardley
    B.5.3.3Post codePA 19067
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited States
    B.5.4Telephone number+1267 364-3507
    B.5.5Fax number+1267 395 2119
    B.5.6E-mailcolette.kosik-gonzalez@optinose.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameOPTINOSE FLUTICASONE
    D.3.2Product code OPTINOSE FLUTICASONE
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Nasal spray, suspension
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntranasal use (Noncurrent)
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.1CAS number 80474-14-2
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB02241MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit % (W/W) percent weight/weight
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number0.022
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation No
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameOPTINOSE FLUTICASONE
    D.3.2Product code OPTINOSE FLUTICASONE
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Nasal spray, suspension
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntranasal use (Noncurrent)
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.1CAS number 80474-14-2
    D.3.9.2Current sponsor codeFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameFLUTICASONE PROPIONATE
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB02241MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit % (W/W) percent weight/weight
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number0.090
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboNasal spray, suspension
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntranasal use (Noncurrent)
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Bilateral Nasal Polyposis
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Ear, nose and throat diseases [C09]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 17.0
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10028754
    E.1.2Term Nasal polyp
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004855
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of intranasal administration of 100, 200, and 400 μg of fluticasone propionate twice a day delivered by the OptiNose device with placebo in subjects with bilateral nasal polyposis. Two co-primary endpoints will be used in the study: reduction of nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms at the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase measured by the 7-day average instantaneous AM diary symptom scores, and reduction in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    To compare the effect of intranasal administration of fluticasone propionate twice a day during the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP) of the study with placebo on:
    • Change in polyp grade
    • Change in nasal congestion/obstruction symptoms, sense of smell, rhinorrhea symptoms, and facial pain or pressure symptoms
    • Change in subject symptoms and functioning
    • Change in nasal patency
    • Change in monthly use of rescue medication
    • In subjects with comorbid asthma, change:
    - in asthma symptoms
    - in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV-1)
    • Change in patient-reported outcomes
    • Improvement in sleep quality
    • Assessment of health economic measures related to bilateral nasal polyposis
    • Subject assessment of current/most recent nasal spray and of the study drug
    • Subject assessment of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    • Men or women aged 18 years and older
    • Must have bilateral nasal polyposis with a grade of 1 to 3 in each of the nasal cavities as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy at Visit 1 (Screening)
    • Must have at least moderate symptoms (as defined in the protocol) of nasal congestion/obstruction as reported by the subject, on average, for the 7 day period preceding Visit 1 (Screening)
    • At Visit 2, Day 1 (Baseline), must have a morning score of at least 2 (moderate) on nasal congestion/obstruction recorded on the subject diary for at least 5 of the last 7 days of the 7- to up to 14 day run-in period
    • Must demonstrate an ability to correctly complete the daily diary during the run-in period to be eligible for randomization
    • Subjects with comorbid asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) must be stable with no exacerbations (eg, no emergency room visits, hospitalizations, or oral or parenteral steroid use) within the 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening). Inhaled corticosteroid use must be limited to stable doses of no more than 1,000 μg/day of beclomethasone (or equivalent) for at least 3 months before Visit 1 (Screening) with plans to continue use throughout the study.
    • Must be able to cease treatment with intranasal medications including, but not limited to, intranasal steroids, intranasal sodium cromolyn, nasal atropine, nasal ipratropium bromide, inhaled corticosteroids (except permitted doses listed above for comorbid asthma and COPD) at Visit 1 (Screening)
    • Must be able to cease treatment with oral and nasal decongestants and antihistamines at Visit 1 (Screening)
    • Must be able to use the OptiNose device correctly; all subjects will be required to demonstrate correct use of the practice placebo device at Visit 1 (Screening)
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    • Have complete or near-complete obstruction of the nasal cavities
    • Inability to achieve bilateral nasal airflow for any reason including nasal septum deviation
    • Inability to have each nasal cavity examined for any reason including nasal septum deviation
    • Nasal septum perforation
    • Has had more than 1 episode of epistaxis with frank bleeding in the month before Visit 1 (Screening)
    • Have evidence of significant mucosal injury, ulceration or erosion (eg, exposed cartilage, perforation) on Visit 1 (Screening) nasal examination/nasoendoscopy
    • History of more than 5 sinonasal surgeries for either nasal polyps or nasal/sinus inflammation (lifetime)
    • History of sinus or nasal surgery within 6 months before Visit 1 (Screening)
    • History of any surgical procedure that prevents the ability to accurately grade polyps
    • Have symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis at Visit 1 (Screening) or Visit 2, Day 1 (Baseline) and/or, based on time of year, would anticipate onset of symptoms within 4 weeks of randomization
    • Purulent nasal infection, acute sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection within 2 weeks before Visit 1 (Screening). Potential subjects presenting with any of these infections may be rescreened 4 weeks after symptom resolution
    • Planned sinonasal surgery during the period of the study
    • History or current diagnosis of any form of glaucoma or ocular hypertension (ie, >21 mmHg)
    • History of intraocular pressure elevation on any form of steroid therapy
    • Current diagnosis of the presence (in either eye) of a cataract of Grade 1 or greater as defined on the Eye Examination Worksheet (see Attachment 2) OR, less than a Grade 1 cataract with associated visual impairment
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    • Mean change from baseline to the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase in average instantaneous AM nasal congestion/obstruction scores; scores are the averaged instantaneous AM scores over the 7 days before Visit 2, Day 1 (Baseline) and over the 7 days before the Week 4 visit from the subject diary
    • Mean change from baseline over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    • Mean change from baseline to the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase in average instantaneous AM nasal congestion/obstruction scores; scores are the averaged instantaneous AM scores over the 7 days before Visit 2, Day 1 (Baseline) and over the 7 days before the Week 4 visit from the subject diary
    • Mean change from baseline over the 16 weeks of the double-blind treatment phase in total polyp grade (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    • Mean change from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, end of double-blind treatment phase, and Week 24/end of open-label extension phase in polyp grade (total and worst nostril) as determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy
    • Mean change from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and the end of the double-blind treatment phase:
    • in average instantaneous and reflective AM scores and in average instantaneous and reflective PM scores, averages are based on scores recorded in the diary for the 7 days before each time point for:
    - nasal congestion/obstruction score
    - sense of smell score
    - rhinorrhea score
    - facial pain or pressure score
    Note: For the nasal congestion/obstruction score, the instantaneous AM score for the end of Week 4 of the double-blind treatment phase time point is also part of the co-primary endpoint.
    • in the Sinonasal Outcome Test - 22 (SNOT-22) total score (also calculated at Week 24/end of open-label extension phase)
    • in the SNOT-22 nasal symptom-related items score; items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 21, and 22 (also calculated at Week 24/end of open-label extension phase)
    • in peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF)
    • For subjects with comorbid asthma:
    • in Asthma Control Test (ACT) total score
    • in FEV-1
    • Average monthly use of rescue medication (loratadine or another country-available, non sedating antihistamine) after the Week 4 visit during the double-blind treatment phase
    • The proportions of subjects who have reductions in the AM and PM, instantaneous and reflective, average nasal congestion/obstruction symptom scores by 0.5 or more points from baseline to the end of the double blind treatment phase
    • The proportion of subjects who have a reduction in the total polyp grade score (sum of scores from both nasal cavities) by 1 or more points from baseline to the end of the double-blind treatment phase
    • Mean change from baseline to the end of the double-blind treatment phase for:
    • Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI) total score
    • 36-Item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-36v2) scores (also calculated at Week 24/end of open-label extension phase)
    • Mean change from baseline to Week 4, 8, 12, 16, and the end of the double-blind treatment phase in the Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale – Revised (MOS Sleep-R) scores
    • Comparison of health economic measures during the double-blind treatment and open-label extension phases related to bilateral nasal polyposis (eg, criteria for surgical intervention for nasal polyps is met [independent of actual surgery performed], missed work or school days/lost productivity)
    • Subject evaluation of current/most recent nasal spray at screening and subject evaluation of study drug during double-blind treatment and open-label extension phases will be summarized
    • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores at Week 4, 16, and 24 will be summarized
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    For timepoints please refer to protocol, Section 9.2.2
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy No
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other Yes
    E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
    8-Week Open-Label Extension Phase
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial4
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned8
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA26
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    European Union
    South Africa
    Ukraine
    United States
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last visit of last subject
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months0
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 320
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 320
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state40
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 301
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 320
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    not different from the expected normal treatment of that condition
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2014-10-07
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2014-11-04
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2015-07-03
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri Apr 26 10:42:31 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA