Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase II Randomized, Controlled Parallel-Group Pilot Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Kék Lukács Ointment Compared to Standard Silver Sulphadiazine (Dermazin®, SSD) Therapy in the Wound-healing of Patients With Deep Partial Thickness (Second-Degree) Burns
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-005037-39 |
Trial protocol |
HU |
Global end of trial date |
12 Sep 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
20 Oct 2021
|
First version publication date |
20 Oct 2021
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Report Synopsis |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
KEKLUKACS-CLIN-01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Kék-Lukács Kft.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Mártírok street 53, Iharosberény, Hungary, 8725
|
||
Public contact |
KÉKLUKÁCS Help Desk, AdWare Research Ltd., 36 87789073, info@adwareresearch.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
KÉKLUKÁCS Help Desk, AdWare Research Ltd., 36 87789073, info@adwareresearch.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
12 May 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
12 May 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
12 Sep 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To compare the clinical efficacy of Kék Lukács ointment treatment with standard silver sulphadiazine (SSD) therapy in wound healing; degree of epithelisation of wound until Day 22 of treatment compared to Day 1.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Wound pain management
|
||
Background therapy |
Only physical bound care management was applied. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Standard Silver Sulphadiazine (Dermazin®, SSD) therapeuthic product was applied as a same therapeutic indication for approved standard treatment. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
12 Sep 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Hungary: 22
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
22
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
22
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
21
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
1
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Patient recruitment took place in Hungary in 2012 | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
The total number of 44 patient was expected to enrolled to the study, 20 evaluable subjects per group were needed. 20 g/200 cm2 ointment was applied in the case of the active group and the control group got 10-20 g/200 cm2 Dermazin cream. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined in the final study protocol. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Active | |||||||||
Arm description |
Kék Lukács ointment group received 20 g/200 cm2 once daily for maximum 21 days. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Kék Lukács ointment
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Skin scarification
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The ointment should be applied to a thickness between 1-2 mm onto the sterile gauze before covering the burned surface once daily for maximum 21 days, dose 20 g/200 cm2
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
Silver Sulphadiazine (SSD, Dermazin®)) cream group received 10-20 g/200 cm2 once daily for maximum 21 days. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dermazin®
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cream
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Skin scarification
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The cream should be applied to a thickness between 2-4 mm onto the gauze before covering the burned surface once daily for maximum 21 days, dose 10-20 g/200 cm2
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis set:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized and receiving at least one treatment are included in the safety analysis set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Intent-to-treat analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized, receiving at least one treatment and having at least one post-baseline evaluation of the wound healing area included in the intent to-treat analysis set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Per protocol analysis set
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized, receiving at least one treatment and having at least one post-baseline evaluation of the wound healing area, and having no major protocol deviations are included in the per protocol analysis set.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Active
|
||
Reporting group description |
Kék Lukács ointment group received 20 g/200 cm2 once daily for maximum 21 days. | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Silver Sulphadiazine (SSD, Dermazin®)) cream group received 10-20 g/200 cm2 once daily for maximum 21 days. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis set:
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized and receiving at least one treatment are included in the safety analysis set.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Intent-to-treat analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized, receiving at least one treatment and having at least one post-baseline evaluation of the wound healing area included in the intent to-treat analysis set.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Per protocol analysis set
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects randomized, receiving at least one treatment and having at least one post-baseline evaluation of the wound healing area, and having no major protocol deviations are included in the per protocol analysis set.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Reduction in wound surface area | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The study was stopped earlier because of the slow patient recruitment. However, planned analysis was performed with the available (smaller) sample size. The aims of this analysis were:
to appropriately perform analyses described by the study protocol,
obtain relevant pharmacokinetic information and
confirm the sample size calculation of the following clinical study of Kek Lukacs ointment
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 to Day 22 (3 weeks after treatment start)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
random coefficient model | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Active v Placebo v Per protocol analysis set
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
42
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.5645 [1] | ||||||||||||
Method |
random coefficient model | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - For treatment is 0.6346, for Day p-value is less than 0.0001. Descriptive Statistics are also provided in the report. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of complete wound healing full epithelisation within 22 days | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The scores assigned by the Investigator to the signs of wound infection and inflammation were compared across the two treatment groups by a Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, for each timepoint separately
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
within 22 days for each timepoint
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percent reduction of wound surface area, on Day 8, 15 and 22 from Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 8, 15 and 22 from Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Incidence of treatment- related adverse events during the whole study period. | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from the sign of the informed consent to the end of the study
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From 2012.09.12. to 2013.09.19.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
25 adverse events were reported during the study. Relationship between the treatment and the adverse event was examined. Adverse events were presented in summary tables by severity, outcome and relation to the study and tabulated by the action taken in relation to the study treatment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
16.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Severity
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Adverse events were presented by severity: mild, moderate and severe events were determined. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
28 Oct 2012 |
The number of the sites, the post-burn status, the leaflet (number of sites, post-burn status were changed and reimbursement fee were included) were changed. Urine pregnancy test for female patients with childbearing potential was needed. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
Planned analysis was performed with the available (smaller) sample size, because of the slow patient enrollment. |