Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44310   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7356   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2011-005375-16
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:A-99-52120-162
    National Competent Authority:Finland - Fimea
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2012-01-03
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedFinland - Fimea
    A.2EudraCT number2011-005375-16
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A PHASE III PROSPECTIVE, MULTI-CENTER, RANDOMISED, EVALUATOR-BLINDED STUDY TO COMPARE NEUROMUSCULAR JUNCTION (NMJ) TARGETED TECHNIQUE FOR DYSPORT INJECTIONS IN UPPER LIMB SPASTICITY POST STROKE OR TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY TO THE TECHNIQUE USED IN CURRENT CLINICAL PRACTICE
    Faasi III, prospektiivinen, satunnaistettu, arvioijan osalta sokkoutettu monikeskustutkimus, jossa verrataan Dysport pistosten hermo-lihasliitospistostekniikkaa nykyiseen vakiintuneeseen hoitokäytäntöön aivoinfarktin, verenvuodon tai vakavan aivoruhjeen jälkeisen yläraaja spastisuuden hoidossa (A-99-5210-162 NMJ-tutkimus)
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Study to compare the effect of two different injection techniques used for Dysport treatment of patients with upper limb spasticity post stroke or traumatic brain injury
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    The NMJ Study
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberA-99-52120-162
    A.5.2US NCT (ClinicalTrials.gov registry) numberNCT01682148
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorInstitut Produits Synthèse (IPSEN) AB
    B.1.3.4CountrySweden
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportIPSEN AB
    B.4.2CountrySweden
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationInstitut Produits Synthèse (IPSEN) AB
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointMedical Department
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressKista Science Tower, 15th floor, Färögatan 33
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityKista
    B.5.3.3Post code164 51
    B.5.3.4CountrySweden
    B.5.4Telephone number+46084516083
    B.5.5Fax number+46084516002
    B.5.6E-mailkia.bengtsson@ipsen.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Dysport
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderInstitut Produits Synthese (IPSEN)AB
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationFinland
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameDysport
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Powder for solution for injection
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntramuscular use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNClostridium Botulinum Toxin Type A-Hemagglutinin Complex
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameCLOSTRIDIUM BOTULINUM NEUROTOXIN TYPE A (150KD), FREE OF COMPLEXING PROTEINS
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB26174
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit U unit(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number300
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Upper limb spasticity post stroke or traumatic brain injury.
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Patients suffering from spasticity in their arm as a consequence to a previous stroke or traumatic brain injury.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Therapeutic techniques [E02]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 17.0
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10048970
    E.1.2Term Arm spasticity
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004852
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective is to compare Dysport treatment results after current clinical practice technique and 300U/mL dilution (high-concentration, Group 1) to the neuromascular junction (NMJ) targeted technique and 100U/mL dilution (low-concentration, Group 2), in the elbow joint assessed by Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS, Appendix 3) 4 weeks post treatment.
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    • Elbow joint, assessed by MAS, 12 weeks post treatment
    • Pain associated with spasticity, assessed by VAS, at visit 1(baseline, day 1), 4 and 12 weeks post treatment
    • Pain associated with injection technique, assessed by VAS, at visit 1
    • GAS responder rate, as defined by the achievement of the primary goal related to the elbow flexion from the GAS, 4 or 12 weeks post treatment depending on the time point defined at the baseline visit
    • Subject global evaluation of the treatment effect, at the end of the study (visit 3 or 4) compared to previous treatment cycle
    • Safety, based on treatment emergent adverse event
    - Investigator global preference of current clinical practice vs. the NMJ targeted injection technique when all subjects at the site have completed the study (LPLV of each site).
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    o Provision of written informed consent prior to any study related procedures,
    o Subjects male or female, aged 18 or older,
    o Upper limb spasticity post stroke or traumatic brain injury,
    o Spasticity position pattern type 1, 3 or 4,
    o Elbow flexor muscles spasticity MAS 2 to 3,
    o At least 2 consecutive previous treatment cycles of BoNT-A for current diagnosis,
    o The latest treatment cycle demonstrating good treatment efficacy where the Dysport dose administered was considered to be adequate according to Investigator judgement,
    oNeed of the same treatment modality in m. brachialis, m. biceps brachii, m. brachioradialis, m. flex. carpi ulnaris, m. flex. carpi radialis as the previous treatment cycle,
    o Last BoNT-A treatment 12-24 weeks ago
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Subjects will not be included in the study if they meet any or the following criteria:
    • Poor response to BoNT-A treatment, according to Investigator,
    • Need of Dysport doses >800U in the upper limb,
    • Concomitant treatment with BoNT-A for other indications than spasticity,
    • Any elbow flexor contracture prohibiting MAS evaluation and/or elbow flexion improvement of at least 1 step on the MAS
    • Cutaneous or joint inflammation in the affected upper limb,
    • Is likely to start other spasticity treatment during the study,
    • Is likely to start physiotherapy treatment during the study,
    • Other ongoing neurological disorder (e.g., myasthenia gravis),
    • History of dysphagia or aspiration,
    • Use of agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g., aminoglycosides),
    • Treated with an investigational medicinal product within 30 days before start of the study,
    • Known sensitivity to BoNT-A or any components of Dysport,
    • Is at risk of pregnancy or is lactating. Females of childbearing potential must provide a negative pregnancy test (U-hCG) at visit 1 and must be using adequate contraception. Non childbearing potential is defined as post-menopause for at least one year, surgical sterilisation or hysterectomy at least three months before the start of the study,
    • Has a history of, or known current, problems with alcohol or drug abuse,
    • Has a mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude,
    • Has abnormal baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the investigator, might jeopardise the subject’s safety or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objective(s) of the study.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    MAS of elbow flexors at 4 weeks
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    4 weeks post treatment
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    • MAS of elbow flexors at 12 weeks
    Change from baseline to week 12 for elbow flexors muscle tone as measured by the MAS.

    • Spasticity pain measured by VAS.
    Mean change from baseline to week 4 and 12 of spasticity related pain, assessed by the subject. The VAS ruler used in this study will be a straight 10 cm horizontal line with anchor points of No pain (score 0) and Worst pain imaginable (score 10).

    • Injection pain measured by VAS.
    Subject perceived injection site pain at day 1. The VAS ruler used in this study will be a straight 10 cm horizontal line with anchor points of No pain (score 0) and Worst pain imaginable (score 10).

    • Achievement of the primary goal measured by GAS.
    At baseline, the investigator will interview the subject to identify the main problem area and establish an agreed primary goal related to elbow flexion to be followed up at week 4 or 12 depending on the time point defined at the baseline visit.

    • Subject global evaluation of treatment effect. Comparison of treatment effect between previous (pre study) and study treatment cycles assessed by the subject at the end of study (visit 3 or 4) Categorised as follows: Much worse / Worse / Same / Better / Much better.

    • Investigator preference of injection technique.
    When all subjects at the site have completed the study (Last Patient Last Visit, LPLV) a global assessment of the preference of injection technique will be made by the Investigator.

    Safety Endpoints and Evaluations:
    • Adverse Events (AEs)
    Adverse events will be monitored from the subject gives informed consent (visit 1, day 1) to the time when the subject’s participation in the study has ended (visit 3 or 4). AEs will be elicited by direct, non-leading questioning at each clinic visit or by spontaneous reports.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    4, 12 and 13-24 weeks.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other Yes
    E.8.1.7.1Other trial design description
    Evaluator blinded
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    Same medicinal product but injected using a different technique.
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned15
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA30
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last patient, last visit.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months0
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 78
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 180
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state150
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 272
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 272
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Not applicable. Expected to go back to normal treatment.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2012-02-24
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2012-01-24
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2013-10-31
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA