Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2011-005397-34
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:Issue1
    National Competent Authority:UK - MHRA
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Completed
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2012-02-03
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedUK - MHRA
    A.2EudraCT number2011-005397-34
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Xenon and cooling therapy in babies at high risk of brain injury following poor condition at birth: Randomised pilot study. (CoolXenon2 study)
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Randomised pilot study of cooling therapy (standard treatment) versus inhaled xenon gas in combination with cooling, in babies at high risk of brain injury following poor condition at birth.
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    CoolXenon2 study
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberIssue1
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorUniversity Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
    B.1.3.4CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorNon-Commercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportMoulton Foundation
    B.4.2CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportInspiration Healthcare Ltd: Some equipment support.
    B.4.2CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationUniversity Hospitals Bristol
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointProfessor Marianne Thoresen
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressSt Michael's Hospital, Level D, Southwell Street
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityBristol
    B.5.3.3Post codeBS2 8EG
    B.5.3.4CountryUnited Kingdom
    B.5.4Telephone number01173425607
    B.5.6E-mailmarianne.thoresen@bris.ac.uk
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name LENOXe
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderAIR LIQUIDE Medical GmbH
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationGermany
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameLENOXe
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Inhalation gas
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPInhalation use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNXenon
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeAS1
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit % (V/V) percent volume/volume
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number100%
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product Yes
    D.3.11.13.1Other medicinal product typeXenon is an elemental noble gas extracted from atmospheric air during the process of oxygen manufacture by fractional distillation of air. It is known to have anaesthetic and analgesic effects.
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Neonatal hypoxia-ischaemia (HI). There is no exact MedDRA term for this.
    The closest MedDRA terms matching this are neonatal asphyxia and neonatal hypoxia.
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Lack of blood flow and oxygen delivery to the brain of a bay at or around the time of birth. Causes can be multifactorial.
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Therapeutic techniques [E02]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 14.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10050081
    E.1.2Term Neonatal hypoxia
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 14.1
    E.1.2Level HLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10028946
    E.1.2Term Neonatal hypoxia and asphyxia
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10036585 - Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 14.1
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10028923
    E.1.2Term Neonatal asphyxia
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10038738 - Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    Primary Objective:
    This is a randomised two group pilot study comparing;
    i) xenon inhalation for 18 hours in combination with whole body cooling to 33.5 °C for 3 days, to
    ii) the established treatment of cooling the body down to 33.5 °C for 3 days.

    This will be applied in term newborn babies who are at moderate or high risk of brain injury following poor condition around the time of birth.


    Our hypothesis is that during the first 2 weeks after birth using a combination of validated (in our own and others cohorts) early predictors of outcome we may observe an enhanced neuroprotective effect of the xenon-cooling combination over cooling alone and this will allow us to perform power calculations for a larger definitive neurological outcomes study of otherwise similar design.

    Outcome predictors are based on a combination of:
    1) Time in hours after birth when background activity as recorded by amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG: from single channel EEG) [1] and onset of sleep
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Secondary Objectives:
    We will monitor a number of variables before/during and after the period of xenon delivery. This group of physiological and biochemical parameters includes those recorded during our recently completed xenon+cooling feasibility/safety study in neonates and a few more are added .
    They are:

    Gas exchange: Transcutaneous oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, blood gas data (from arterial sample), mechanical ventilation requirements (rate, peak inspiratory pressure, PEEP settings).

    Haemodynamic: Systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressure, heart rate.

    Any problems during weaning and extubation, such as post-extubation stridor, use of steroids.

    We have also looked at other variables in the infants cooled in our hospital (inborn or outborn) ca 30/year since 1/12/06. We chose the best matched controls (3:1) from this cooling database and compared them with the 14 infants in the recent Xenon + cooling human feasibility study ( the
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Inclusion Criteria
    Patients meeting the following criteria will be considered eligible for the study:

    Infants will be eligible for inclusion in this study if the St Michael�??s hospital standard inclusion criteria for cooling are met and additional inclusion criteria for xenon administration are met.

    St Michael�??s hospital standard inclusion criteria for cooling
    Standard Hypothermia Treatment Criteria for 72 hrs of cooling �?� all of criteria A, B, and C.
    A Infants > 36.0 weeks gestation (clinical assessment) with at least ONE of the following:
    1 Apgar score of <5 at ten (10) minutes after birth
    2 Continued need for resuscitation, including endotracheal or mask ventilation, at ten minutes after birth
    3 Acidosis defined as either umbilical cord pH or any arterial, venous or capillary pH within 60 minutes of birth less than pH 7.00
    4 Base deficit greater than or equal to 16 mmol/L in umbilical cord blood sample or any blood sample within 60 minutes of birth (arterial or venous blood). If the infant meets criterion A then assess for neurological abnormality using criterion B and C (by trained personnel):

    B Moderate or Severe encephalopathy as evidenced by any of the following --
    1 Altered state of consciousness (reduced or absent responses or pathological irritability and hyper responsive and at least ONE or more of the following:
    2 Hypotonia
    3 Abnormal reflexes including oculomotor or pupillary abnormalities
    4 Absent or weak suck
    5 Clinical seizures, as recorded by trained personnel
    And
    C At least 30 minutes duration of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) recording that shows abnormal background aEEG activity. The decision to cool is based on the worst section of the aEEG, not the best (al Naqeeb, et al, 1999) or seizures (clinical or electrical) thus meeting ONE of the following:
    1 Normal background with some electrical seizure activity
    2 Moderately abnormal activity (upper margin of trace >10μV and lower margin <5μV)
    3 Suppressed activity (upper margin of trace <10μV and lower margin of trace <5μV)
    4 Definite seizure activity
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additional inclusion criteria for xenon
    Before being considered for additional inhaled xenon therapy via the breathing gas mixture, the infant would need to meet further additional entry criteria (all must be met):
    1) Intubated, ventilated, sedated, being cooled.
    2) <5 hours old
    3) Any seizures under control.
    4) Weight > 2nd centile for gestational age
    5) Stable cardiovascular parameters; Mean arterial pressure >40mmHg.
    6) Oxygen requirement via mechanical ventilator < 40%.
    7) Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) requirement < 6cm H2O
    8) Arterial pCO2 within the accepted range (4.0-6.5 kPa)
    9) Postnatal age <5 hours
    10) Absence of major congenital abnormalities, imperforate anus and in particular any bowel obstruction, congenital abnormalities suggestive of chromosomal anomaly or other syndromes that include brain dysgenesis. Neonates with congenital syndromes affecting the brain should be excluded when diagnosed (see exclusion criteria below)
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Exclusion Criteria


    Exclusion criteria for cooling
    1. Infants expected to be greater than 5 hours of age at the time of starting cooling treatment.
    2. Futility. Where prognosis is considered to be hopeless e.g. no cardiac output for 20 minutes.

    Additional exclusion criteria for xenon
    Failure to meet any of the additional inclusion criteria for xenon listed in section 5.1.
    Patients meeting the following criteria are NOT eligible for the study:
    Presence of any of:
    Major congenital abnormalities, imperforate anus and in particular any bowel obstruction, congenital abnormalities suggestive of chromosomal anomaly or other syndromes that include brain dysgenesis. (Neonates with congenital syndromes affecting the brain should be excluded when diagnosed).
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Primary Objective:
    This is a randomised two group pilot study comparing;
    i) Adding xenon inhalation for 18 hours in combination with the (existing) whole body cooling to 33.5 °C for 3 days.
    ii) The established treatment of cooling the body down to 33.5 °C for 3 days.

    This will be applied in term newborn babies who are at moderate or high risk of brain injury following poor condition around the time of birth, the purpose being to reduce long term neurological impairment resulting from their condition.


    Our hypothesis is that early predictors of outcome* will show a trend towards an enhanced neuroprotective effect of the xenon-cooling combination over cooling alone. The early predictors will allow us to perform power calculations for a much larger neurological outcomes study of otherwise similar design.
    In addition we will examine the feasibility of earlier recruitment and start of xenon and whether we obtain the same early predictor data in the hypothermia-only group as we have in our previous hypothermia database.
    (*the total clinical follow up period will be much longer than this as is already the case for cooled babies in Bristol)
    2.1 Primary Endpoint

    This is a randomised two group pilot study comparing;
    1) xenon inhalation for 18 hours in combination with whole body cooling to 33.5 °C for 3 days, to
    2) the established treatment of cooling the body down to 33.5 °C for 3 days.

    This will be applied in term newborn babies who display signs indicating moderate or severe brain injury following poor condition at birth.


    Our hypothesis is that we may observe an enhanced neuroprotective effect of the xenon-cooling combination over cooling alone assessed initially by early outcome predictors. This will allow us to perform power calculations for a much larger neurological outcomes study of otherwise similar design. We have tested a combination of our early predictors (using our TOBY registry cooling data in 80 infants) against Bailey outcome at 18 months and found they have a positive predictive value of 94% in cooled infants

    Early predictors of outcome
    For the main analysis we will use
    Time to recovery after birth of a normal aEEG [1]
    MRI scan before 14 days of life [32, 2]
    Peak LDH value within 72h of life [4, 33]
    We will also collect data on:
    Plasma glucose at birth (in cord blood)
    Age in hours after birth when plasma lactate is normalised
    Different inotropic drugs needed and the total duration in hours of any inotropic support
    Number of anticonvulsants given
    Amount and duration of sedation (e.g.morphine)
    Age at full oral feeds (breast or bottle)
    Neonatal hearing screening before 14 days of life
    Clinical examination at birth, at 7 days of age and at discharge including weight and head circumference

    Neurodevelopmental follow up is a part of the routine follow up of infants with HIE, Bayley examination at 18 months of age.
    Disability will be defined as any of:
    Bayley II mental developmental scale (MDI) score less than 70.
    Bayley II motor development scale (PDI) score less than 70. MDI and PDI will also be calculated as DQ, developmental score as this allows a larger range of score for those functioning at a low level [34]. Bilateral cortical visual impairments
    Hearing loss needing amplification > 40 DB.

    In addition any Adverse Events will be recorded and criteria have been devised for stopping the study early if necessary. This includes a Data Review Panel to review data when 4 xenon infants have undergone xenon treatment.
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    The early predictors of outcome will be completed by 2 weeks of age.

    The neurodevelopmental follow up will be completed by 2 years of age.
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    A series of variables that are among the most relevant for evaluation of safety (see endpoints below) were examined closely in the previous 14 baby feasibility/safety study. We will continue to routinely monitor and record the same set of physiological variables in the proposed study, for a subset of data for a longer time period until after rewarming.


    �?� Endpoint 1 �?� defined as Mechanical ventilation and gas exchange parameters
    �?? The following variables will be measured before (from start cooling), during and after xenon administration (for 12h or until 12h after end of cooling hours pending which variable):Transcutaneous Oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide concentration, blood gas data, mechanical ventilation requirements (rate, peak inspiratory pressure, inspiratory time, PEEP settings),FiO2. Average percentage xenon in inspired gas mixture (when applicable). Tracheal tube cuff pressure.
    �?� Endpoint 2 �?� defined as Haemodynamic parameters
    �?? The following variables will be measured before, during and after xenon administration: Systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures, Heart rate.

    �?� Endpoint 3 �?� defined as Inotropic drug requirements
    �?? These (drug, dose and duration) will be recorded before, during and after xenon administration until 12h after end of cooling.

    �?� Endpoint 4 �?� defined as Marker of myocardial impairment/insult
    The following will be recorded before and after xenon administration: Plasma levels Troponin T (marker of myocardial cell death) recorded before and after xenon administration until 12h after end of cooling:
    �?� Endpoint 5 �?� defined as timecourse and peak value of Markers of hepatic impairment
    �?? These will be recorded before and after xenon administration until 12h after end of cooling: [Alanine aminotransferase , Alkaline phosphatase and Lactate Dehydrogenase]
    �?� Endpoint 6 �?� defined as timecourse and peak value of Markers of renal impairment
    �?? These will be recorded before, during and after xenon administration until 12h after end of cooling: oliguria is defined as [urine output < 1 ml/kg/h] from age > 24h, raised creatinine > 100 at > 24h of age.

    �?� Endpoint 7 �?� defined as Evidence of infection
    �?? These will be recorded: [culture proven, need for antibiotics for 5 or more days, raised CRP occurring within 24h or later.

    �?� Endpoint 8 �?� defined as Length of hospital stay including duration of stay in local hospital after discharge from St Michaels hospital
    �?? This will be recorded

    �?� Endpoint 9 �?� defined as age when full oral feeding was achieved by breast or bottle
    �?? This will be recorded


    �?� Endpoint 10 �?� defined as Haematology measurements
    �?? These will be recorded before and after xenon administration (these are routinely recorded 24 hrly): Coagulopathy [INR >2 and/or APTT> 50]. Full blood count.
    �?� Endpoint 11 �?� defined as Serum chemistry measurements
    �?? These will be recorded before and after xenon administration: Serum sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium, phosphate, calcium, (urea, creatinine as above), glucose, (liver enzymes as above), bilirubin, albumin. Drug levels may be analysed on clinical indication (Gentamicin levels, Phenobarital levels).
    �??

    �?� Endpoint 12 �?� defined as aEEG background pattern and Evidence of seizures
    �?? These will be recorded before, during and after xenon administration until 12h after end of cooling: Evidence from continuous aEEG/EEG recording and any anticonvulsant treatments given.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    These measures will be completed by 2 weeks of age.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety No
    E.6.5Efficacy No
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) Yes
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) No
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open Yes
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind No
    E.8.1.5Parallel group No
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo No
    E.8.2.3Other Yes
    E.8.2.3.1Comparator description
    Cooling for 72h (the conventional treatment for this condition)
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned1
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States No
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA No
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee Yes
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Once last case has been recruited and left the Special Care Baby Unit the main trial will be completed.
    Long term follow up is routine practice in these neonates and all aspects of the trial will be completed when the last baby enrolled is seen in clinic at 18m follow up visit. Enrollment period is up to 2 years and if a neonate is enrolled at 2 years they will still be followed up until 18 months. Therefore maximum potential trial duration is 3.5 years so this is the value we have given.
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years4
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months0
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years4
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 Yes
    F.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 24
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.1.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) Yes
    F.1.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 24
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.4.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.5.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.1.6.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) No
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) No
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 0
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations No
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state24
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 24
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 24
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Regular routine follow up as normal procedure (cooled babies, the standard treatment, are routinely followed up very closely).

    No further use of xenon would be appropriate.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    G.4 Investigator Network to be involved in the Trial: 1
    G.4.1Name of Organisation Western Comprehensive Research Network
    G.4.3.4Network Country United Kingdom
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2012-01-23
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2012-02-24
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusCompleted
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2015-03-01
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 10:47:30 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA