Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Phase 3 Study to Assess Characteristics of S-303 Treated RBC Components and Evaluate Safety and Efficacy in Patients Requiring Transfusion Support of Acute Anemia
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2011-006253-29 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
10 Dec 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
16 Apr 2023
|
First version publication date |
16 Apr 2023
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CLI 00070
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01716923 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Cerus Corporation
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
1220 Concord Avenue, Concord/CA, United States, 94520
|
||
Public contact |
Carol M.Moore, Cerus Corporation, 1 9258766819, cmoore@cerus.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Richard J. Benjamin, MS PhD FRCPath, Cerus Corporation, 1 9252886020, rbenjamin@cerus.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Dec 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
07 Aug 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
10 Dec 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the study was to assess the in vitro characteristics of S-303 treated RBCs suspended in SAG-Mannitol; including mean hemoglobin per RBC component and other biochemical/metabolic properties recognized to correlate with RBC viability.
The secondary objective of the study was to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of S-303 treated RBC components in patients requiring transfusion support for acute anemia (during or shortly after a cardiac surgery).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This study was conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) according to the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) guidelines, and local ethical and legal requirements that are consistent with the Declaration of Helsinki. The risks and hazards of study participation were explained to the potential study subjects, under the supervision of a qualified, licensed physician. Written informed consent was obtained from all study subjects prior to any tests or evaluations. A copy of the signed informed consent was provided to each subject and was also maintained in the subject’s medical record. Patient confidential information was protected through compliance with study and/or site specific privacy protection procedures. Personal Data of the Study Subjects were handled in accordance with the data protection laws applicable and all study activities were carried out under the Agreement as required by Article 30 of the GDPR.
|
||
Background therapy |
All patients were subjected to cardio surgical procedures. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
The study was a conducted as a two-group (Test and Control) study consisting of two portions: in vitro and clinical. The in vitro characteristics of the study RBCs were compared to the EDQM criteria for RBCs, leukocyte-depleted in additive solution (Council of Europe Guide for the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components, 16th edn. Strasbourg, France, Council of Europe Publishing 2010). The clinical safety and efficacy of S-303 treated RBC were compared to conventional RBC when transfused in support of acute anemia during or following cardiac surgery. The study was divided into an acute surgical care period starting at the day of surgery until 7 days post-surgery during which RBC (Test or Control) were administered and a post-surgical follow-up period of a minimum of 90 days to collect additional safety data. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
26 Oct 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 87
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
87
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
87
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
7
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
80
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
The study was conducted in Germany at 1 blood center in Frankfurt and 2 clinical centers located in Frankfurt and Bad Nauheim. Initiation (first patient enrolled): October 26, 2013 Completion (last patient completed): August 7, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
In order to minimize the number of patients who enrolled in the study but did not require RBC transfusion, only patients with a relatively high likelihood to receive a transfusion as determined by the Investigator, or patients with a Transfusion Risk Understanding Screening Tool (TRUST) Score of 3 or greater were eligible for enrollment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Blinding was achieved by transferring the Control RBC components to a Storage Container identical to the Storage Container used for the Test RBC components processed with the S-303 Treatment System. The labels for Test and Control RBC components were identical. Blood Center personnel involved in processing, preparation, storage, cross-matching, and distribution of study RBC components were not blinded.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Test | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
S-303 RBC components (Test) were prepared at a licensed Blood Center following training and completion of the S-303 Treatment System for RBC process validation studies. The S-303 treatment process was performed on RBC components prepared from leukocyte reduced whole blood collections. Prior to treatment, a sample of the input RBCs was retained for assessment of RBC in vitro characteristics on Day 0. The S-303 RBC Treatment System consists of 4 components: Processing set, Filter set, Amustaline dihydrochloride (S-303), Glutathione sodium Salt (GSH). For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
INTERCEPT Blood System for Red Blood Cells
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
INTERCEPT treated Red Blood Cells
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dosage (transfusion) depended on Investigators decision and patients actual need (actual Hb/Hematocrit requirement)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Control | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The Control RBC components were prepared by conventional methods approved for use in the blood centers participating in the clinical study but were stored in the same type of storage bag as that of the Test RBCs to facilitate blinding of hospital personnel and clinicians administering the Test and Control RBC units to patients in the clinical study. For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Conventional Red Blood Cells
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Physician decision and patient need (actual Hb/Hematocrit requirement)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Test
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
S-303 RBC components (Test) were prepared at a licensed Blood Center following training and completion of the S-303 Treatment System for RBC process validation studies. The S-303 treatment process was performed on RBC components prepared from leukocyte reduced whole blood collections. Prior to treatment, a sample of the input RBCs was retained for assessment of RBC in vitro characteristics on Day 0. The S-303 RBC Treatment System consists of 4 components: Processing set, Filter set, Amustaline dihydrochloride (S-303), Glutathione sodium Salt (GSH). For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Control
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The Control RBC components were prepared by conventional methods approved for use in the blood centers participating in the clinical study but were stored in the same type of storage bag as that of the Test RBCs to facilitate blinding of hospital personnel and clinicians administering the Test and Control RBC units to patients in the clinical study. For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Intent to Treat (ITT) Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients regardless of surgical or transfusion status.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Modified intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients exposed to any on-study RBC components during the study transfusion period (includes patients who were only exposed due to the priming of a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Randomized Non Treated Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients who were not exposed to any on-study RBC components (regardless of surgical status).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Test
|
||
Reporting group description |
S-303 RBC components (Test) were prepared at a licensed Blood Center following training and completion of the S-303 Treatment System for RBC process validation studies. The S-303 treatment process was performed on RBC components prepared from leukocyte reduced whole blood collections. Prior to treatment, a sample of the input RBCs was retained for assessment of RBC in vitro characteristics on Day 0. The S-303 RBC Treatment System consists of 4 components: Processing set, Filter set, Amustaline dihydrochloride (S-303), Glutathione sodium Salt (GSH). For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||
Reporting group title |
Control
|
||
Reporting group description |
The Control RBC components were prepared by conventional methods approved for use in the blood centers participating in the clinical study but were stored in the same type of storage bag as that of the Test RBCs to facilitate blinding of hospital personnel and clinicians administering the Test and Control RBC units to patients in the clinical study. For the in vitro portion of the study, RBC components were processed using the Test or Control procedure based on simple randomization. For the clinical portion of the study, anticipated prognostic factors including the clinical site and elective cardiac procedure were balanced using a stratified randomization scheme. Randomized patients who did not require any RBC transfusions during the 7-day transfusion period were replaced. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Intent to Treat (ITT) Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients regardless of surgical or transfusion status.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Modified intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients exposed to any on-study RBC components during the study transfusion period (includes patients who were only exposed due to the priming of a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Randomized Non Treated Group
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Included all randomized patients who were not exposed to any on-study RBC components (regardless of surgical status).
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-Production Hemoglobin Content | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary efficacy endpoint was the hemoglobin content per RBC component derived from the in-vitro portion of the study (grams of hemoglobin per processed component). This endpoint was captured after the INTERCEPT process and after the bag transfer for Test and Control components, respectively. The study employed an equivalence design to test the hypothesis that S-303 treated RBC components (Test) were equivalent to conventional RBC components (Control) with respect to mean grams of hemoglobin per component processed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-production
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Number of test components produced: 389 [2] - Number of control components produced: 365 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [3] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-2.61 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-1.92 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Hemoglobin Content | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - Number of test components produced: 301 [5] - Number of control components produced: 261 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [6] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-2.76 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-1.92 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Post-production Hematocrit | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-production
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - Number of test components produced: 389 [8] - Number of control components produced: 367 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [9] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.209 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.1 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.45 | ||||||||||||
Notes [9] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Hematocrit | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [10] - Number of test components produced: 301 [11] - Number of control components produced: 261 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [12] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.149 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.81 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.12 | ||||||||||||
Notes [12] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Hemolysis | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Number of test components produced: 301 [14] - Number of control components produced: 261 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 [15] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.09 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.04 | ||||||||||||
Notes [15] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Normalized ATP (BCW) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [16] - Number of test components produced: 257 [17] - Number of control components produced: 222 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 [18] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.3 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.44 | ||||||||||||
Notes [18] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Normalized ATP (DRK) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Number of test components produced: 294 [20] - Number of control components produced: 262 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 [21] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.33 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.59 | ||||||||||||
Notes [21] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
End of Storage Plasma Free Hemoglobin | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy endpoints included the post-storage measurements of Hct, hemolysis, normalized ATP, plasma-free hemoglobin, and hemoglobin content. These endpoints were only collected from the non-transfused RBC components held until the end of storage (Day 35 to 38). Note that the hgb content at the end of storage was calculated by multiplying the hgb concentration (g/dL, measured at the end of storage) by the volume (mL, measured at post-production). The analysis was conducted using all RBC components available at the end of storage where:
- Proportion of T and C RBC components satisfying the EU guidelines for Hct, hemolysis, and hgb content were computed. The guidelines are: Between 50-70% for Hct; < 0.8% for hemolysis; and, ≥ 40 g/component for hgb content.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had normalized ATP levels >2 μmol/g (of Hgb) were computed.
- Proportion of T and C RBC components that had plasma-free hgb levels < 6 g/L (< 0.8% hemolysis) were computed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
End of Storage (Day 35-38)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [22] - Number of test components produced: 263 [23] - Number of control components produced: 225 |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
ANCOVA model | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
p-values were obtained from the full model where each covariate was included regardless of statistical significance; 95% CIs for the LS mean treatment difference (Test – Control) are based on a mixed effects ANCOVA model controlling for the treatment, gender, blood type, input hematocrit, and input
volume.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Test v Control
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
51
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 [24] | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.49 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.23 | ||||||||||||
Notes [24] - Equivalence between the Test and Control RBC components post production, prior to storage, was declared since the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was well within the a-priori defined margins of -5 to 5 g/component. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse events were collected from informed consent signature until study completion.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Time of consent to the day of surgery (Day 0) - All AEs & SAEs (spontaneously reported to the attending physician)
Day 0 to Day 13 or discharge (whichever occurs first) - All AEs & SAEs (active surveillance by study staff)
Day 14 or day of discharge (whichever occurs first) to Day 90 - All SAEs (spontaneously reported to the attending physician)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Test RBC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Treatment assessments were divided into an acute surgical care period starting at the day of surgery until 7 days post-surgery during which RBC (Test or Control) were administered and a post-surgical follow-up period of a minimum of 90 days to collect additional safety data. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Control RBC
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Treatment assessments were divided into an acute surgical care period starting at the day of surgery until 7 days post-surgery during which RBC (Test or Control) were administered and a post-surgical follow-up period of a minimum of 90 days to collect additional safety data. The control article was conventional RBC components stored at 2°C to 6°C for up to 35 days post-donation and administered intravenously. Dose and schedule of RBC transfusions were determined by the treating physician. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
03 Mar 2012 |
The updates to the CLI 00070 Protocol are as follows:
- Provide the EUDRA CT Number for the Clinical Trial Application.
- Add the competency in cardiovascular surgery at the clinical sites participating in this study.
- Present the differences between the two blood centers in France and Germany in collection of whole blood and the overnight whole blood conditions prior to the production of RBC components.
- Provide details on QP review and release of the RBC components prepared with the Second Generation S-303 Treatment Process. Also, provide details on the criteria for release of the RBC components into the clinical inventory.
- Add clarification that Blood Center standard practices will be followed for matching the age of Test and Control RBC components.
- Add details on the procedures for blinding Test and Control RBC units and differentiate between clinical site staff and Blood Center staff about blinding.
- Provide details on the risks related to the user and patients and describe the procedures implemented to eliminate or reduce these potential risks.
- Add two new exclusion criteria, to exclude patients with special requirements for gamma irradiated RBCs or removal of plasma and anyone with prior severe allergic transfusion reactions.
- Provide description that effort will be made to match the age of Test and Control RBC components. Provide clarification that during the study, compatibility and phenotyping will be performed according to local standard practices and Good Transfusion Practices.
- Include Direct and Indirect Antiglobulin Test at the end of study at Day 90 to detect any immunological changes after transfusion of study RBC units.
|
||
12 Jun 2012 |
The updates to the CLI 00070 Protocol are as follows:
- Updated the protocol per PEI recommendations
- Updated the protocol title match the protocol synopsis title that is more detailed in describing the protocol design and to reflect the new version.
- Updated the abbreviations and definitions list to add ANCOVA – Analysis of Covariance, and ANOVA - Analysis of Variance
- Updated Incubation time from 16 hours to 18 hours
- Overall changes made for clarification purposes and also per the request from PEI several Quality Control measurements were added.
- Investigational Plan- Inclusion Criteria: Add other criteria to be used by the Investigators along with the TRUST score to identify patients to include in the study. Add both genders to the inclusion criteria. Delete inclusion criteria “Must be willing to participate in the second 6MWT at 7 to 10 days after discharge”.
- Revise Six Minute Walk Test from “2-3 days prior to discharge” to “at the time of first ambulation”. Update timing of Six Minute Walk Test and make reference to the study operations manual
- Serum sample for S-303 antibody screening at pre-op (Day -7-0) removed as it is performed during screening (Day -30 – 0).
- Revise the formatting to separate Exclusion criteria number 8 into 8, 9, and 10, then renumber the current numbers 9 and 10 to 11 and 12.
|
||
07 Sep 2012 |
The updates to the CLI 00070 Protocol are as follows:
- Updated the incubation time for the preparation of test RBC components from 18 to 24 hours.
- Updated the temperature for overnight incubation to 20-25°C.
- Add the requirement to have an FDA Form 1572 included in the study files in addition to the MDA form
|
||
30 Aug 2013 |
The updates to the protocol include the following:
-Updated to be more generic with regards to site and blood center, to avoid any future protocol amendments in the event additional sites or blood centers are added. For a multi-center study a Coordinating Investigator is required therefore the administrative structure was updated to reflect this. An external reviewer for telemetry will not be used for this study therefore this reference was deleted
- Revised the text regarding the disposal of Test and Control components to clarify that study units must be retained until all study-specified assessments have been performed. The revised text provides clear instructions on timing of discarding of study components. To provide clarification to study sites on the timing and sequence for discarding component
- Updated inclusion criteria regarding contraception and acceptable forms as well as the requirement for a negative pregnancy test for consistency. Remove the inclusion criteria for the requirement for a negative S-303 crossmatch at study entry
- Added a new section titled, ‘Additional Criteria to Satisfy Prior to Transfusion’ to instruct the clinical site that patients must have a confirmed negative crossmatch for S-303 prior to receiving their first study transfusion
- Added clarification that patients who receive a study transfusion but discontinue the study early must have their study assessments completed at the end of study. Clarification was made that only subjects who are exposed to study RBCs will be included in the total of 3 patients who demonstrate a confirmed positive crossmatch to S-303 RBCs. Add language around confirmed negative crossmatch requirement prior to study RBC transfusion and timing of follow-up
- Changes made to reflect that quantitative safety data will be summarized descriptively, without formal statistical hypothesis testing
- Updated the formula to identify site as the blood center and NOT the clinical site |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
N/A | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29498049 |