Clinical Trial Results:
A Study of BR55 in Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging in Patients with Ovarian and Breast Cancer.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-000699-40 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
02 Apr 2014
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Mar 2021
|
First version publication date |
27 Mar 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
BR55-102
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
259 Prospect Plains Rd, , Cranbury, United States, 08512
|
||
Public contact |
Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Imaging spa, 609 514-2200,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Global Medical & Regulatory Affairs, Bracco Imaging spa, 609 514-2200,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
16 Jun 2014
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
02 Apr 2014
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
02 Apr 2014
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess ultrasound imaging results with BR55 in the detection of cancer lesions in patients with ovarian cancer or ovarian mass or patient with breast cancer using histology as the truth standard for the presence/absence of malignant lesions.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The safety endpoints for patients enrolled in the preceding (at least 4 patients) dose group were to be completed and reviewed for any unexpected safety risks before proceeding with the enrollment in the next dose group.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
25 Oct 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 47
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
47
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
47
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
38
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
9
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
First patient enrolled: 25 October 2012 Last patient completed: 2 April 2014 | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Two enrolled patients did not receive drug, one had suspected cardiac ischemia indicated at the predose ECG examination, and one had uncontrolled systemic hypertension at the predose clinical evaluation. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Ovary Patients | |||||||||
Arm description |
Ovary Patients scheduled to undergo surgery for primary ovarian cancer or ovarian mass | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
BR55
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Each patient in the 3 dose groups (Group A = 0.03 mL/kg, Group B = 0.05 mL/kg, and Group C = 0.08 mL/kg) received one injection of BR55 at the assigned dose. The maximum dose of BRU2248 for a patient cannot exceed 100 µg and therefore body weight could not be greater than 95 kg in this study. The calculated dose of BR55 was determined by body weight using a dosing calculation guide.
BR55 was administered as a slow intravenous bolus injection through an angiocatheter (20G). Each injection was followed immediately by a 10 mL 0.9% NaCl flush.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Breast Patients | |||||||||
Arm description |
Breast Patients scheduled to undergo primary breast cancer surgery or large core biopsy of the breast | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
BR55
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Each patient in the 3 dose groups (Group A = 0.03 mL/kg, Group B = 0.05 mL/kg, and Group C = 0.08 mL/kg) received one injection of BR55 at the assigned dose. The maximum dose of BRU2248 for a patient cannot exceed 100 µg and therefore body weight could not be greater than 95 kg in this study. The calculated dose of BR55 was determined by body weight using a dosing calculation guide.
BR55 was administered as a slow intravenous bolus injection through an angiocatheter (20G). Each injection was followed immediately by a 10 mL 0.9% NaCl flush.
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: Two enrolled patients did not receive drug, one had suspected cardiac ischemia indicated at the predose ECG examination, and one had uncontrolled systemic hypertension at the predose clinical evaluation. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Ovarian Patients
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Ovary Patients scheduled to undergo surgery for primary ovarian cancer or ovarian mass
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Breast Patients
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Breast Patients scheduled to undergo primary breast cancer surgery or large core biopsy of the breast
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Malignant Ovarian Lesions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Malignant Ovarian Lesions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Benign Ovarian Lesions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Benign Ovarian Lesionsc
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Malignant Breast Lesions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Malignant Breast Lesionsb
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Benign Breast Lesions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Benign Breast Lesionsb
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Ovary Patients
|
||
Reporting group description |
Ovary Patients scheduled to undergo surgery for primary ovarian cancer or ovarian mass | ||
Reporting group title |
Breast Patients
|
||
Reporting group description |
Breast Patients scheduled to undergo primary breast cancer surgery or large core biopsy of the breast | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Ovarian Patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Ovary Patients scheduled to undergo surgery for primary ovarian cancer or ovarian mass
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Breast Patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Breast Patients scheduled to undergo primary breast cancer surgery or large core biopsy of the breast
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Malignant Ovarian Lesions
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Malignant Ovarian Lesions
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Benign Ovarian Lesions
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Benign Ovarian Lesionsc
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Malignant Breast Lesions
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Malignant Breast Lesionsb
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Patients with Benign Breast Lesions
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients with Benign Breast Lesionsb
|
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
KDR Staining of Index Lesion versus CD31 Staining by Histopathology - Ovary [1] [2] | ||||||||||
End point description |
The number of index lesions with KDR and CD31 staining scores of high, intermediate, or weak by IHC assessment for both malignant and benign ovarian lesions.
Each of the 24 dosed patients had 1 index lesion identified by histopathology. Based on the histopathology analysis, 13 of the 24 (54.2%) index lesions were malignant and 11 (45.8%) lesions were benign.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Postdose
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. [2] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
BR55 Enhancement of Index Lesion versus CD31 Staining by Histopathology Using a Dichotomized Scale – Ovary [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
BR55 enhancement and CD31 staining of the ovarian index lesions. A BR55 enhancement score of the index lesion according to ultrasound images. BR55 enhancement scores of slight, moderate and strong enhancement were considered as Yes. All index lesions had CD31 staining.
13/13 (100%) malignant lesions had both CD31 staining and BR55 enhancement; among 11 benign lesions with CD31 staining, 9 (81.8%) had BR55 enhancement and 2 did not.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Postdose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
KDR Staining of Index Lesion versus CD31 Staining by Histopathology - Breast [4] [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The number of index lesions with KDR and CD31 staining scores of high, intermediate, or weak by IHC assessment for both malignant and benign breast lesions.
Each of the 21 dosed patients had 1 index lesion identified by histopathology. Based on the histopathology analysis, 17 of 21 (81.0%) index lesions were malignant and 4 (19.0%) index lesions were benign.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Postdose
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
BR55 Enhancement of Index Lesion versus CD31 Staining by Histopathology Using a Dichotomized Scale – Breast [6] | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
BR55 enhancement and CD31 staining of the breast index lesions. A BR55 enhancement score of the index lesion according to ultrasound images. BR55 enhancement scores of slight, moderate and strong enhancement were considered as Yes. All index lesions had CD31 staining.
16/17 (94.1%) malignant lesions had both CD31 staining and BR55 enhancement and among the 4 benign lesions with CD31 staining, 2 lesions (50.0%) had BR55 enhancement and 2 (50.0%) had none.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Postdose
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics are provided in the descriptions of the Primary Endpoint Results. No other statistical analyses were planned for the efficacy endpoints as the study was exploratory. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Patients were monitored for any untoward medical occurrences from the time of signing the Informed Consent through 72 hours after BR55 administration
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
16.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ovarian
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Breast
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
22 Jan 2013 |
The inclusion criteria was amended to also allow perimenopausal females to enroll, provided that they met the enrollment criteria and were not pregnant or breast-feeding. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |