E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Patients suspected to be affected by neuroendocrine duodeno-pancreatic neoplasm. |
Pazienti con sospetta neoplasia neuroendocrina duodeno-pancreatica. |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Patients suspected to be affected by neuroendocrine duodeno-pancreatic neoplasm. |
Pazienti con sospetta neoplasia neuroendocrina duodeno-pancreatica. |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Hormonal diseases [C19] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 14.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | HLGT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10014713 |
E.1.2 | Term | Endocrine neoplasms malignant and unspecified |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | Yes |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
to compare accuracy of MDCT and PET in the diagnosis of primary duodeno-pancreatic NET. |
confrontare l'accuratezza della TC mutistrato multidetectore e della PET nella diagnosi dei NET primitivi duodeno-pancreatici |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
to compare accuracy of MDCT, EUS and PET in the diagnosis of primary duodeno-pancreatic NET. To evaluate clinical impact of PET. To compare accuracy of MDCT and PET in the staging of duodeno-pancreatic NET. |
Confrontare l'accuratezza di TC,EUS e PET nella diagnosi dei NET primitivi duodeno-pancreatici.Valutare l'impatto clinico della PET.Confrontare l'accuratezza di TC e PET nella stadiazione dei NET duodeno-pancreatici. |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
1. Patients affected by proved MEN-I, in whom a neoplasm in the duodenopancreatic area is suspected. 2. Patients with clinical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome. 3. Patients with insulinoma, as proved by fasting test. 4. Patient with clinical pictures and laboratory findings suggesting other infrequent islet cell tumours. 5. Patients with subtle clinical abnormalities, or laboratory findings (for instance elevated serum chromogranine A levels) suggesting a NET. 6. Patients who had previously undergone surgery intended as curative for a histologically confirmed NET. 7. Patients undergoing diagnostic work-up for a periduodenal or pancreatic lesion incidentally found during abdominal ultrasound (not performed for suspicion of a NET) and with ultrasonographic characteristics (rounded, hypoechoic or egg-eye, well demarcated) suspicious for NET. 8. Patients who were diagnosed with NET metastasis with unknown primary location of the disease. |
1,. Pazienyi affetti da NEN-I, nei quai si sospetti una neoplasia nell'area duodeno-pancreatica. 2 pazienti con diagnosi clinica di sindrome da carcinoide o di sindrome di Zollinger Ellison. 3 Pazienti con insulinoma dimostrato da test del digiuno, 4 pazieni con quadri clinici o rilievi di laboratorio che suggerisccano altre infrequenti patologie neuroendocrine. 5. Pazienti con sottili anormarmalità cliiche, o rilievi di laboratorio (ad esempio valori elevati di cromogranina A), che suggeriscano comunque una NET,6 pazienti precedentemente sottoposti a chirurgia, intesa come curativa di un NET. 7. Pazienti avviati a valutazione clinica in seguito al riscontro casuake di una lesione periduodenale e pamctratica, riscontrata acccidentalemnte in corso di ecigrafia diagnostica e con caratteristiche ultrasonografiche suggestive di NET. 8. pazienti affetti da metastasti da NET a primitibità ignota. |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
1. Patient unwilling, or unable to consent. 2. Pregnancy, or lactation. 3. Age < 18 years 4. Known diagnosis of duodeno-pancreatic NET. 5. Patients with concomitant life-threatening disease. 6. Patients who had already undergone any of the tests under investigation (MDCT, PET, EUS) in the last six months. In particular patients should be excluded from the study, when a lesion in the duodeno-pancreatic area, with characteristic suspicious for a NET, is incidentally diagnosed by any of the techniques object of the study, namely MDCT, PET, or EUS. 7. Patients who had previously undergone total gastrectomy or pancreasectomy will be included in the study, but they will not undergo EUS. |
1. rifiuto del consenso o incapacità a fornirlo; 2 gravidanza, allattamento 3 età < 18 anni 4 diagnosi nota di NET duoeno-pancreatico 5 pzaziente con patologia a rischio immedeiato per la vita, 6 pazienti che sono già sottoposti ai test nei sei mesi precedenti 7 i pazienti che sono srari proposti a gastrectomia totale o a pancreasctomia totale saranno inlusi nello stdudio ma non eseguiranno EUS. |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
to compare accuracy of MDCT and PET in the diagnosis of primary duodeno-pancreatic NET, calculated on a patient basis. |
confrontare l'accuratezza della TC mutistrato multidetectore e della PET nella diagnosi dei NET primitivi duodeno-pancreatic, calcolate sulla base del singolo paziente. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
1.Impact of PET.2.Operative characteristics of MDCT, EUS and PET, in the diagnosis of primary duodeno-pancreatic NET, calculated on a patient basis and on lesion basis. 3.Median diameter and ranges of lesions diagnosed by each techniques. 4.Changes in EUS findings, after disclosure of PET results.5.Operative characteristics of MDCT and PET in the diagnosis of secondary NET, calculated on a patient basis and on a lesion basis 6.Incidence of secondary lesions, according to the T of the primary tumour.7.Diagnosis of new lesions during the follow up.8.Incidence of adverse events of the technique under investigation 9. Accuracy of EUS-FNA, according to the histological diagnosis (when available) and/or to the clinical follow |
1.Impatto della PET.2.Caratteristiche operative della MDCT, dell'EUS e della nella diagnosi delle lesioni primitive duodeno-pancreatiche, valuatate rispettivamente sulla base del paziente e delle lesioni. 3 Diametro mediano e range del diametro delle lesioni diagnsoticate da ciascuna tecnica.4.Modifica dei reperti della EUS dopo aver conosciuto il risultato della PET. 5.Caratteristiche operative della MDCT e della PET, nella diagnosi di lesioni secondarie, calcolate sulla base del paziente e della singola lesione. 6. Incidenza di lesioni secondarie, in accordo con il T della lesione. 7 Diasnosi di nuove lesioni durante il follow up.8.Incidence di eventi avversi 9 Accuratezza dell'EUS-FNA, in riferimentio alla diagnosi istologicica o al follow up clinico, |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | Yes |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | No |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | No |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | No |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Information not present in EudraCT |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 1 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 20 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | Yes |
E.8.5.1 | Number of sites anticipated in the EEA | 1 |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 3 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 3 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |