Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43861   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once a Day, TAK-375 (Ramelteon) Tablet for Sublingual Administration (TAK-375SL Tablet) 0.1 mg and 0.4 mg as an Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Depressive Episodes Associated With Bipolar 1 Disorder in Adult Subjects

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2012-001357-10
    Trial protocol
    GB   DE   CZ   PL   BG  
    Global end of trial date
    03 Sep 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    23 Mar 2016
    First version publication date
    23 Mar 2016
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    TAK-375SL_301
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01677182
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    U1111-1129-5184
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Takeda
    Sponsor organisation address
    61 Aldwych, London, United Kingdom,  WC2B 4AE
    Public contact
    Clinical Study Manager, Takeda Global Research & Development Centre (Europe) Ltd (TGRD), +44 203116 8000, clinicaloperations@tgrd.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical Study Manager, Takeda Global Research & Development Centre (Europe) Ltd (TGRD), +44 203116 8000, clinicaloperations@tgrd.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    14 Sep 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    03 Sep 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy of TAK-375SL tablet 0.1 mg and 0.4 mg once daily at bedtime (QHS) compared with placebo as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) after 6 weeks of treatment in subjects with acute depressive episodes associated with Bipolar 1 Disorder.
    Protection of trial subjects
    All study subjects were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    29 Aug 2012
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 88
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 24
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 11
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Romania: 24
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 34
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 67
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ukraine: 57
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 219
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    535
    EEA total number of subjects
    158
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    520
    From 65 to 84 years
    15
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Subjects took part at 98 sites in Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Great Britain, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Ukraine, and the United States from 29 August 2012 to 03 September 2014.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Subjects with a historical diagnosis of bipolar 1 disorder were enrolled in 1 of 3 treatment groups as follows: placebo; TAK-375 0.1 milligram (mg); TAK-375 0.4 mg.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) placebo-matching tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Sublingual use
    Dosage and administration details
    TAK­375SL (ramelteon) placebo­matching tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Arm title
    TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Arm description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.1 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    TAK-375SL
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ramelteon
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Sublingual use
    Dosage and administration details
    TAK­375SL (ramelteon) 0.1 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Arm title
    TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Arm description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.4 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    TAK-375SL
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Ramelteon
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Sublingual use
    Dosage and administration details
    TAK­375SL (ramelteon) 0.4 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Started
    184
    169
    182
    Completed
    150
    141
    143
    Not completed
    34
    28
    39
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    7
    12
    10
         Protocol violation
    5
    1
    4
         Study termination
    12
    9
    11
         Other
    1
    5
    2
         Adverse event
    2
    1
    8
         Lost to follow-up
    4
    -
    3
         Lack of efficacy
    3
    -
    1

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) placebo-matching tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.1 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.4 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg Total
    Number of subjects
    184 169 182 535
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Less than or equal to (<=) 50 years
    105 100 107 312
        Greater than (>) 50 years
    79 69 75 223
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    46.67 ( 11.332 ) 45.44 ( 11.49 ) 44.87 ( 11.608 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    119 98 108 325
        Male
    65 71 74 210
    Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
    Units: Subjects
        Hispanic or Latino
    12 10 9 31
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    63 61 63 187
        Unknown or Not Reported
    109 98 110 317
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized
    Units: Subjects
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    1 1 0 2
        Asian
    0 1 2 3
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    1 1 1 3
        Black or African American
    11 12 12 35
        White
    171 154 166 491
        More than one race
    0 0 1 1
    Region of Enrollment
    Units: Subjects
        Bulgaria
    31 27 30 88
        Czech Republic
    9 7 8 24
        Germany
    3 5 3 11
        United Kingdom
    1 0 0 1
        Poland
    2 4 4 10
        Romania
    8 7 9 24
        Russian Federation
    12 9 13 34
        Serbia
    22 20 25 67
        Ukraine
    20 19 18 57
        United States
    76 71 72 219
    Smoking Classification
    Units: Subjects
        Had Never Smoked
    84 75 79 238
        Current Smoker
    75 70 82 227
        Ex-smoker
    25 24 21 70
    Subject Drinking Status
    Units: Subjects
        Had Never Drunk
    97 92 109 298
        Ex-Drinker
    51 41 36 128
        Current Drinker
    36 36 37 109
    Amount of Alcohol Consumed if Current Drinker
    Subjects evaluable for this measure included only those who were current drinkers (36, 36, and 37 for each group, respectively).
    Units: Subjects
        < 4 drinks per day
    36 36 37 109
        >= 4 drinks per day
    0 0 0 0
        Non consumer
    148 133 145 426
    Consumption of Caffeine
    Units: Subjects
        Consumer
    140 128 144 412
        Not a consumer
    44 41 38 123
    Psychiatric History for response to Lithium treatment for Bipolar 1 Disorder
    Units: Subjects
        Failed to Respond
    7 7 7 21
        Responded
    101 92 100 293
        Not Applicable
    69 63 68 200
        Unknown
    7 7 7 21
    Psychiatric History for response to Valproic Acid Treatment of Bipolar 1 Disorder
    Units: Subjects
        Failed to Respond
    6 8 9 23
        Responded
    133 124 136 393
        Not Applicable
    35 29 27 91
        Unknown
    10 8 10 28
    Female Reproductive Status
    Units: Subjects
        Postmenopausal
    44 30 34 108
        Surgically Sterile
    20 14 12 46
        Child-Bearing Potential
    55 54 62 171
        Not applicable (male subjects)
    65 71 74 210
    Height
    Units: centimeter (cm)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    168.86 ( 9.227 ) 170.66 ( 8.423 ) 169.8 ( 8.87 ) -
    Weight
    Units: kilogram (kg)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    80.82 ( 23.503 ) 83.21 ( 18.638 ) 82.38 ( 19.202 ) -
    Body Mass Index (BMI)
    Units: kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    28.25 ( 7.583 ) 28.57 ( 6.13 ) 28.52 ( 6.156 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) placebo-matching tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.1 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.4 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Primary: Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6
    End point description
    The MADRS is a clinician rated, validated and widely used scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 10-item rated from 0(normal) to 6(most abnormal) with a total score range from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: units on scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 179, 167, 176)
    30.8 ( 0.28 )
    30.2 ( 0.29 )
    30.4 ( 0.29 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 149, 139, 143)
    -14.7 ( 0.69 )
    -14 ( 0.71 )
    -15.1 ( 0.7 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures (MMRM) model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.783
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Differences
    Point estimate
    0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.4
         upper limit
    3
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.98
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.329
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Differences
    Point estimate
    -0.4
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -2.6
         upper limit
    1.7
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.97

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) Total Score at Week 6
    End point description
    The YMRS is a 11-item scale to assess manic symptoms. Four items are rated on a scale from 0 (symptom not present) to 8 (symptom extremely severe), and 7 items are rated on a scale from 0 to 4 with higher scores reflecting greater levels of mania. The YMRS total score is calculated as the sum of the 11 individual item scores and ranges from 0-60. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: units on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 179, 167, 176)
    4.4 ( 0.16 )
    4.3 ( 0.16 )
    4.4 ( 0.16 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 149, 139, 143)
    -1.4 ( 0.19 )
    -0.9 ( 0.2 )
    -1.5 ( 0.2 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.088
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.5
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.1
         upper limit
    1.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.27
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.642
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    -0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.7
         upper limit
    0.5
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.27

    Secondary: Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement (CGI-I) Score
    End point description
    The CGI-I assesses the clinician’s impression of the subject’s state of mental illness improvement and consists of 1 question for the investigator: “Compared to his condition at the start of the study, how much has this patient changed?” which is rated on a 7-point scale (1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change relative to baseline; 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse). In all cases, the assessment was independent of whether the rater believed the improvement was drug-related or not. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    149
    139
    143
    Units: units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    2.5 ( 0.08 )
    2.5 ( 0.09 )
    2.3 ( 0.09 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.792
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2
         upper limit
    0.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.12
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    292
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.171
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    -0.2
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.4
         upper limit
    0.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.12

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) to Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) to Week 6
    End point description
    The CGI-S assesses the clinician’s impression of the subject’s current state of mental illness and consists of 1 question for the investigator: “Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?” which is rated on a 7-point scale (1=normal, not ill at all; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill). FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: units on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 179, 167, 176)
    4.5 ( 0.04 )
    4.5 ( 0.04 )
    4.5 ( 0.04 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 149, 139, 143)
    -1.4 ( 0.08 )
    -1.3 ( 0.09 )
    -1.4 ( 0.08 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.653
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.2
         upper limit
    0.3
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.12
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.673
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.3
         upper limit
    0.2
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.12

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated16 (QIDS-SR16) Total Score at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Rated16 (QIDS-SR16) Total Score at Week 6
    End point description
    The 16-item QIDS-SR16 version is a widely used validated scale designed to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The subject was asked to rate the severity and frequency of specific symptoms present over the last 7 days. The QIDS-SR16 total scores range from 0 to 27, where higher scores indicate higher severity of symptoms. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: units on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 178, 167, 176)
    14.8 ( 0.26 )
    14.5 ( 0.27 )
    14.2 ( 0.26 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 148, 139, 143)
    -7.2 ( 0.36 )
    -6.4 ( 0.38 )
    -7.3 ( 0.37 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.119
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.4
         upper limit
    2
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.51
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.791
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    -0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.3
         upper limit
    1
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.51

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6
    End point description
    The SDS is a 3-item rating scale to assess functional impairment (panic, anxiety, phobic and depressive symptoms) over 3 inter-related domains (work/school, social life, and family life/home responsibilities) rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 10 (extremely) with a total score range from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicates greater severity of impairment. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: units on a scale
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 174, 163, 172)
    18.1 ( 0.43 )
    17.1 ( 0.44 )
    15.9 ( 0.43 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 148, 139, 143)
    -6.8 ( 0.51 )
    -6.2 ( 0.52 )
    -6.4 ( 0.51 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.422
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.6
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1
         upper limit
    2.1
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.7
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.655
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.3
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.3
         upper limit
    1.9
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.7

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Total Score at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Quality of Life, Enjoyment, and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) Total Score at Week 6
    End point description
    Q-LES-Q-SF is a self-administered, widely used 16-item questionnaire to assess the degree of enjoyment and satisfaction experienced by subjects in various areas of daily functioning, such as social relationships, living/housing, physical health, medication, and global satisfaction. The questionnaire consists of 16 items rated by the subjects on a 5-point scale. Of these, 14 items are summed to produce a total quality of life score with a maximum of 70 points. In addition, there are 2 global items that are scored individually. These items rate satisfaction with study medication and overall life satisfaction. The questionnaire is usually scored as a percent of the total possible score, with higher scores indicating better health status. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline and Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: percentage of total possible score
    least squares mean (standard error)
        Baseline (n= 174, 163, 172)
    38.3 ( 0.93 )
    38.8 ( 0.95 )
    41 ( 0.93 )
        Change at Week 6 (n= 148, 139, 143)
    15.6 ( 1.19 )
    14.7 ( 1.22 )
    15.7 ( 1.21 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.696
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    -0.8
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -4.5
         upper limit
    2.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    1.64
    Statistical analysis title
    Week 6: Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    MMRM model with baseline by week interaction, pooled center, week, treatment, baseline, and week by treatment interaction as factors was used for the analysis.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.472
    Method
    Mixed Model Repeated Measures
    Parameter type
    Least Squares Mean Difference
    Point estimate
    0.1
    Confidence interval
         level
    97.5%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -3.6
         upper limit
    3.8
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    1.63

    Secondary: Percentage of Subjects With MADRS Response

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Subjects With MADRS Response
    End point description
    MADRS response is defined as greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) decrease in the MADRS total score from baseline. The MADRS is a clinician rated, validated and widely used scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 10-item rated from 0 (normal) to 6 (most abnormal) with a total score range from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    43.6
    43.1
    40.3
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and p-values are analyzed from logistic regression with explanatory variables for treatment and baseline MADRS total score.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.994
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.998
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.651
         upper limit
    1.53
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and p-values are analyzed from logistic regression with explanatory variables for treatment and baseline MADRS total score.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.575
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.886
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.58
         upper limit
    1.352

    Secondary: Percentage of Subjects in MADRS Remission

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Subjects in MADRS Remission
    End point description
    MADRS remission is defined as a MADRS total score less than or equal to (<=) 10. The MADRS is a clinician rated, validated and widely used scale to measure overall severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 10-item rated from 0 (normal) to 6 (most abnormal) with a total score range from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate greater severity of symptoms. FAS included all randomized subjects who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication and who had a baseline value and at least 1 valid post-baseline value for assessment of primary efficacy. LOCF method was used to impute missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6
    End point values
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects analysed
    179
    167
    176
    Units: percentage of subjects
        number (not applicable)
    26.8
    26.9
    24.4
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and p-values are analyzed from logistic regression with explanatory variables for treatment and baseline MADRS total score.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    346
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.927
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.978
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.606
         upper limit
    1.577
    Statistical analysis title
    Placebo, TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Statistical analysis description
    Odds ratio, 95% confidence intervals and p-values are analyzed from logistic regression with explanatory variables for treatment and baseline MADRS total score.
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    355
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.553
    Method
    Regression, Logistic
    Parameter type
    Odds ratio (OR)
    Point estimate
    0.865
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.536
         upper limit
    1.397

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Treatment-emergent adverse events are adverse events that started after the first dose of double-blind study drug and no more than 30 days after the last dose of double-blind study drug.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the subject or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) placebo-matching tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.1 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.1 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Reporting group description
    TAK-375SL (ramelteon) 0.4 mg, tablet, sublingually, once daily for up to 6 weeks.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 184 (0.54%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    5 / 182 (2.75%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 184 (0.00%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    1 / 182 (0.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypomania
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 184 (0.00%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    1 / 182 (0.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mania
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 184 (0.00%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    1 / 182 (0.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric symptom
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 184 (0.54%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    0 / 182 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 184 (0.00%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    1 / 182 (0.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyelonephritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 184 (0.00%)
    0 / 169 (0.00%)
    1 / 182 (0.55%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo TAK-375SL 0.1 mg TAK-375SL 0.4 mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 184 (9.78%)
    14 / 169 (8.28%)
    10 / 182 (5.49%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    18 / 184 (9.78%)
    14 / 169 (8.28%)
    10 / 182 (5.49%)
         occurrences all number
    19
    20
    10

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    20 Jun 2012
    Addition of vitals and Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale during the safety follow-up visit to assess general health and suicide ideation/behavior.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes
    Date
    Interruption
    Restart date
    30 Jul 2014
    An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) performed a planned interim analysis of efficacy and safety data from this study. Results of the interim analysis indicated a lack of efficacy after 6 weeks double-blind treatment and the DMC advised that the un blinded interim data met the predefined efficacy criteria for study termination for futility. Therefore, the sponsor terminated the study early.
    -

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 18:50:08 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA