Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Highlow study Low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent VTE in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial of two doses

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2012-001505-24
    Trial protocol
    NL   IE   BE   ES   DK  
    Global end of trial date
    31 Oct 2021

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    27 Jul 2023
    First version publication date
    27 Jul 2023
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Summary

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    2012-001505-24
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01828697
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Amsterdamumc
    Sponsor organisation address
    Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands,
    Public contact
    Project leader, AmsterdamUMC, +31 205669111na, saskia.middeldorp@radboudumc.nl
    Scientific contact
    Project leader, AmsterdamUMC, +31 205669111na, saskia.middeldorp@radboudumc.nl
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    31 Oct 2021
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    31 Oct 2021
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    31 Oct 2021
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermediate dose LMWH versus fixed low dose LMWH in pregnant women with a history of previous VTE.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Insurance
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Jul 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy
    Long term follow-up duration
    12 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 516
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Norway: 28
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 42
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ireland: 99
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 388
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 3
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    1110
    EEA total number of subjects
    1088
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    1110
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Between April 24, 2013, and Oct 31, 2020, 1339 women were screened.516 (46%) women were recruited from the Netherlands, 388 (35%) from France, 99 (9%) from Ireland, 42 4%) from Belgium, 28 (3%) from Norway, 15 (1%) from Denmark, 12 (1%) from Canada, seven (1%) from the USA, and three (<1%) from Russia.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Between April 24, 2013, and Oct 31, 2020, 1339 women were screened.516 (46%) women were recruited from the Netherlands, 388 (35%) from France, 99 (9%) from Ireland, 42 4%) from Belgium, 28 (3%) from Norway, 15 (1%) from Denmark, 12 (1%) from Canada, seven (1%) from the USA, and three (<1%) from Russia.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded
    Blinding implementation details
    Eligible women were randomly assigned (1:1), using a web-based system and permuted block randomisation with a block size of six, stratified by centre, to weightadjusted intermediate-dose or fixed low-dose low molecular-weight heparin once daily. Physicians and participants were unmasked to treatment allocation because medication was supplied by local pharmacies in usual patient care settings or as study drug in accordance with national regulatory requirements.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH
    Arm description
    The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Nadroparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Fraxiparin, clexane, fragmin, innohep
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for infusion in pre-filled syringe
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants were instructed to self-administer their allocated dose of low-molecular-weight heparin once daily from pre-filled syringes subcutaneously. The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin (table 1). The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum.

    Arm title
    fixed low-dose LMWH
    Arm description
    The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Nadroparin, Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Tinzaparin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Fraxiparin, Fragimin, Clexane, Innohep
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants were instructed to self-administer their allocated dose of low-molecular-weight heparin once daily from pre-filled syringes subcutaneously. The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin (table 1). The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH
    Started
    555
    555
    Completed
    555
    555

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH
    Reporting group description
    The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin

    Reporting group title
    fixed low-dose LMWH
    Reporting group description
    The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre.

    Reporting group values
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH Total
    Number of subjects
    555 555 1110
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (standard deviation)
    32 ( 4.8 ) 32 ( 4.8 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    555 555 1110
        Male
    0 0 0
    Subject analysis sets

    Subject analysis set title
    Intention to treat
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly assigned to treatment, and included all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    We assessed safety in all women who received at least one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a known date of end of on-treatment period, and included in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.

    Subject analysis sets values
    Intention to treat Safety analysis
    Number of subjects
    1110
    1045
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
        Newborns (0-27 days)
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
        Children (2-11 years)
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
        Adults (18-64 years)
        From 65-84 years
        85 years and over
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        median (standard deviation)
    na ( )
    na ( )
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    1110
    1045
        Male
    0
    0

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH
    Reporting group description
    The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin

    Reporting group title
    fixed low-dose LMWH
    Reporting group description
    The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre.

    Subject analysis set title
    Intention to treat
    Subject analysis set type
    Intention-to-treat
    Subject analysis set description
    We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly assigned to treatment, and included all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.

    Subject analysis set title
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set type
    Safety analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    We assessed safety in all women who received at least one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a known date of end of on-treatment period, and included in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.

    Primary: Primary efficacy outcome

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Primary efficacy outcome
    End point description
    The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic, objectively confirmed, venous thromboembolism (ie, a thromboembolism that is diagnosed by compression ultrasound examination, venography, CT or pulmonary angiography, or obduction and confirmed by the independent central adjudication committee)which was defined as an occurrence of new deep-vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or unusual site venous thrombosis (eg, splanchnic vein or cerebral sinus thrombosis). After a diagnosis of recurrent thrombosis, patients were censored from the study.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Any time from randomization up to 6 weeks postpartum
    End point values
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH Intention to treat
    Number of subjects analysed
    555
    555
    1110
    Units: number of events
        Pulmonary embolism
    1
    9
    10
        DVT
    8
    6
    14
        unusual site
    2
    1
    3
    Statistical analysis title
    statistical analysis primary efficacacy
    Statistical analysis description
    We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly assigned to treatment, and included all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum. Secondary efficacy analyses were also assessed in the ITT population. We also did prespecified analyses of the primary efficacy outcome from randomisation until 3 months post partum.
    Comparison groups
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH v fixed low-dose LMWH
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1110
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.05 [1]
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -
         upper limit
    -
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Notes
    [1] - we used the two-sided χ² test (or Fisher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) isher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) to compare the intermediate-dose group with the low-dose group.

    Primary: Primary safety outcome

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Primary safety outcome
    End point description
    The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, which included antepartum, early post-partum (within 24 h after delivery), and late post-partum major bleeding (24 h or longer after delivery until 6 weeks post partum), based on population-specific definitions proposed by the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    from randomisation up to 6 weeks postpartum
    End point values
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH Safety analysis
    Number of subjects analysed
    520
    525
    1045
    Units: number of bleeding events
        Antepartum major bleeding
    2
    2
    4
        Early post-partum
    19
    18
    37
        Late post-partum
    2
    0
    2
    Statistical analysis title
    primary safety analysis
    Statistical analysis description
    We assessed safety in all women who received at least one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a known date of end of on-treatment period, and included in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum. On-treatment was defined as the time from randomisation to the last day of allocated low-molecularweight heparin dose plus 2 days.
    Comparison groups
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH v fixed low-dose LMWH
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1045
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.05 [2]
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -
         upper limit
    -
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Notes
    [2] - For all outcomes, we used the two-sided χ² test (or Fisher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) to compare the intermediate-dose group with the low-dose group.

    Secondary: Secondary efficacy outcomes

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary efficacy outcomes
    End point description
    Secondary efficacy outcomes were the three components of the primary outcome, objectively confirmed superficial thrombophlebitis, and a composite of venous thromboembolism or superficial thrombophlebitis,
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    , at any time from randomisation until 6 weeks post partum, and until 3 months post partum.
    End point values
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH Intention to treat
    Number of subjects analysed
    555
    555
    1110
    Units: number of events
    13
    18
    31
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: secondary safety outcomes

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    secondary safety outcomes
    End point description
    Secondary safety outcomes were a composite of major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor bleeding using population-specific definitions, maternal mortality, bruises, skin reactions around the injection site (type IV allergy), type I allergic reaction to low-molecular weight heparin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and congenital anomalies or birth defects
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    from randomization up to 6 weeks postpartum
    End point values
    weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH fixed low-dose LMWH Safety analysis
    Number of subjects analysed
    520
    525
    1045
    Units: number of events
        major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding
    50
    45
    95
        clinically relevant non-major bleeding
    27
    25
    52
        minor bleeding
    76
    66
    142
        maternal mortality
    0
    0
    0
        bruises
    248
    184
    432
        type 1 skin reaction
    8
    2
    10
        type 4 skin reaction
    180
    115
    295
        congenital anomalies or birth defects
    9
    5
    14
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    from randomization to 6 weeks postpartum
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    This is a thromboprophylaxis study. SAE for the primary and secundary outcomes such as VTE mortality, congential abnormalities, and bleeding, we refer to the primary and secudary efficacy and safety outcomes of the study.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    not applicable
    Dictionary version
    1
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: This is a thromboprophylaxis study. SAE/AE for the primary and secondary outcomes such as VTE, mortality, congenital abnormalities, and bleeding we refer to the primary and secudary efficacy and safety outcomes of the study.

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354038
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 07:10:54 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA