Clinical Trial Results:
Highlow study
Low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent recurrent VTE in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial of two doses
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-001505-24 |
Trial protocol |
NL IE BE ES DK |
Global end of trial date |
31 Oct 2021
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Jul 2023
|
First version publication date |
27 Jul 2023
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Summary |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2012-001505-24
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01828697 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Amsterdamumc
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, Netherlands,
|
||
Public contact |
Project leader, AmsterdamUMC, +31 205669111na, saskia.middeldorp@radboudumc.nl
|
||
Scientific contact |
Project leader, AmsterdamUMC, +31 205669111na, saskia.middeldorp@radboudumc.nl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
31 Oct 2021
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 Oct 2021
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 Oct 2021
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intermediate dose LMWH versus fixed low dose LMWH in pregnant women with a history of previous VTE.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Insurance
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jul 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety, Efficacy | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
12 Months | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 516
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Norway: 28
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 42
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 15
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Ireland: 99
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 388
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 12
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 7
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Russian Federation: 3
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
1110
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
1088
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
1110
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Between April 24, 2013, and Oct 31, 2020, 1339 women were screened.516 (46%) women were recruited from the Netherlands, 388 (35%) from France, 99 (9%) from Ireland, 42 4%) from Belgium, 28 (3%) from Norway, 15 (1%) from Denmark, 12 (1%) from Canada, seven (1%) from the USA, and three (<1%) from Russia. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Between April 24, 2013, and Oct 31, 2020, 1339 women were screened.516 (46%) women were recruited from the Netherlands, 388 (35%) from France, 99 (9%) from Ireland, 42 4%) from Belgium, 28 (3%) from Norway, 15 (1%) from Denmark, 12 (1%) from Canada, seven (1%) from the USA, and three (<1%) from Russia. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Eligible women were randomly assigned (1:1), using a web-based system and permuted block randomisation
with a block size of six, stratified by centre, to weightadjusted intermediate-dose or fixed low-dose low molecular-weight heparin once daily. Physicians and
participants were unmasked to treatment allocation because medication was supplied by local pharmacies in usual patient care settings or as study drug in accordance
with national regulatory requirements.
|
|||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH | |||||||||
Arm description |
The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Nadroparin, enoxaparin, dalteparin, tinzaparin
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Fraxiparin, clexane, fragmin, innohep
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were instructed to self-administer
their allocated dose of low-molecular-weight heparin
once daily from pre-filled syringes subcutaneously.
The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin
regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose,
categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed
during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less
than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than
100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged
from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for
nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to
15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin (table 1). The fixed low-dose regimen was
based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or
≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and
suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline and the
dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post
partum.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
fixed low-dose LMWH | |||||||||
Arm description |
The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Nadroparin, Dalteparin, Enoxaparin, Tinzaparin
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
Fraxiparin, Fragimin, Clexane, Innohep
|
|||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants were instructed to self-administer
their allocated dose of low-molecular-weight heparin
once daily from pre-filled syringes subcutaneously.
The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin
regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose,
categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed
during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less
than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than
100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged
from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for
nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to
15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin (table 1). The fixed low-dose regimen was
based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or
≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and
suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline and the
dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post
partum.
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
fixed low-dose LMWH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Intention to treat
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly
assigned to treatment, and included all data and
adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks
post partum.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
We assessed safety in all women who received at least
one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a
known date of end of on-treatment period, and included
in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from
randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH
|
||
Reporting group description |
The intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin regimen was approximately half of a therapeutic dose, categorised by actual bodyweight and adjusted if needed during pregnancy or post partum, with cutoffs of less than 50 kg, 50 kg to less than 70 kg, 70 kg to less than 100 kg, and 100 kg or more. Once-daily doses ranged from 3800 to 9500 international units (IU) for nadroparin, 6000 to 12 000 IU for enoxaparin, 7500 to 15 000 IU for dalteparin, or 4500 to 12 000 IU for tinzaparin | ||
Reporting group title |
fixed low-dose LMWH
|
||
Reporting group description |
The fixed low-dose regimen was based on bodyweight at randomisation (<100 kg or ≥100 kg), per clinical practice in many centres and suggested by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists’ Green-top guideline, and the dose was not changed throughout pregnancy or post partum. The preferred type of low-molecular-weight heparin varied per centre. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Intention to treat
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly
assigned to treatment, and included all data and
adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks
post partum.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety analysis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
We assessed safety in all women who received at least
one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a
known date of end of on-treatment period, and included
in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from
randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Primary efficacy outcome | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary efficacy outcome was symptomatic,
objectively confirmed, venous thromboembolism (ie, a
thromboembolism that is diagnosed by compression
ultrasound examination, venography, CT or pulmonary
angiography, or obduction and confirmed by the independent central adjudication committee)which was
defined as an occurrence of new deep-vein thrombosis,
pulmonary embolism, or unusual site venous thrombosis
(eg, splanchnic vein or cerebral sinus thrombosis). After a
diagnosis of recurrent thrombosis, patients were censored
from the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Any time from randomization up to 6 weeks postpartum
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
statistical analysis primary efficacacy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
We did the primary efficacy analysis in the intention-totreat (ITT) population, defined as all women randomly
assigned to treatment, and included all data and
adjudicated outcomes from randomisation up to 6 weeks
post partum. Secondary efficacy analyses were also
assessed in the ITT population. We also did prespecified
analyses of the primary efficacy outcome from
randomisation until 3 months post partum.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH v fixed low-dose LMWH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1110
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - we used the two-sided χ² test (or Fisher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) isher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) to compare the intermediate-dose group with the low-dose group. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Primary safety outcome | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, which
included antepartum, early post-partum (within 24 h after
delivery), and late post-partum major bleeding (24 h or
longer after delivery until 6 weeks post partum), based on
population-specific definitions proposed by the Scientific
and Standardization Committee of the International
Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from randomisation up to 6 weeks postpartum
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
primary safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
We assessed safety in all women who received at least
one dose of allocated study treatment and who had a
known date of end of on-treatment period, and included
in our analyses all data and adjudicated outcomes from
randomisation up to 6 weeks post partum. On-treatment was defined as the time from
randomisation to the last day of allocated low-molecularweight heparin dose plus 2 days.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
weight-adjusted intermediate dose LMWH v fixed low-dose LMWH
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
1045
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Risk ratio (RR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - For all outcomes, we used the two-sided χ² test (or Fisher’s exact test if fewer than five observations) to compare the intermediate-dose group with the low-dose group. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Secondary efficacy outcomes | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary efficacy outcomes were the
three components of the primary outcome, objectively
confirmed superficial thrombophlebitis, and a composite
of venous thromboembolism or superficial thrombophlebitis,
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
, at any time from randomisation until 6 weeks
post partum, and until 3 months post partum.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
secondary safety outcomes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Secondary safety outcomes were a
composite of major or clinically relevant non-major
bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding and minor
bleeding using population-specific definitions, maternal
mortality, bruises, skin reactions around the injection site
(type IV allergy), type I allergic reaction to low-molecular weight heparin, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and
congenital anomalies or birth defects
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
from randomization up to 6 weeks postpartum
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from randomization to 6 weeks postpartum
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
This is a thromboprophylaxis study. SAE for the primary and secundary outcomes such as VTE mortality, congential abnormalities, and bleeding, we refer to the primary and secudary efficacy and safety outcomes of the study.
|
||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
not applicable | ||
Dictionary version |
1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: This is a thromboprophylaxis study. SAE/AE for the primary and secondary outcomes such as VTE, mortality, congenital abnormalities, and bleeding we refer to the primary and secudary efficacy and safety outcomes of the study. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36354038 |