E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Sub-study 1: women delivering a child by caesarean section
Sub-study 2: Women, who are hospitalized at the obstetrical ward for reoperation because of superficial or deep infection or haematoma after caesarean section
|
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Sub-study 1: women delivering a child by caesarean section
Sub-study 2: Women, who are hospitalizedfor reoperation because of infection or haematoma after caesarean section
|
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment [E] - Surgical Procedures, Operative [E04] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Sub-study 1: Whether and by how much iv Cefuroxim 1,5g administered 15-60 minutes before incision versus after umbilical cord clamping reduces the rate of postpartum infection in a Danish population of women undergoing caesarean section
Sub-study 2: Whether NPWT is effective compared to conventional wound treatment in the period of time from reoperation to re-suturing in women having surgical wound rupture after caesarean section, assessed by the frequency of re-rupture, the cosmetic outcome and a quality of life measurement? |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
The health economic cost and consequences of prophylaxis of and intervention for infections post-CS.
a) Are antibiotics administered before incision cost-effective, compared to administration after umbilical cord clamping, measured by post-caesarean section
infection and as cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY)?
b) Is NPWT cost-effective, compared to conventional treatment, measured as cost per QALY gained?
c) Do women treated with NPWT experience a greater HRQoL than women receiving conventional treatment?
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Sub-study 1:
- Age ≥ 18 year
- Women, who can read and understand Danish
- A gestational age ≥ completed 28 weeks of gestation
- Rupture of membranes and active labour (uterine contractions) is allowed
Sub-study 2:
- Age ≥ 18 year
- Women, who can read and understand Danish
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Sub-study 1:
- Hypersensitivity to cefuroxim or to any other cephalosporin antibiotics
- Previous immediate and/or severe hypersensitivity reaction to penicillin or any other beta-lactam antibiotic.
- Systemic exposure to any antibiotic agent within 1 week before delivery Antibiotic indicated due to PROM, fever, GBS or other indications at the time of caesarean section.
- Women being immunologically incompetent (e.g. HIV positive)
Sub-study 2:
- Serious illness requiring medical treatment, such as cancer
- Stillborn child
- If the fascia is ruptured
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
Sub-study 1:
Maternal: The incidence of post-caesarean section infection (endometritis, UTI and WI) in each study group.
Infant: Admission to special care unit
Sub-study 2: The frequency of re-rupture in each study group |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Sub-study 1: Estimated 30 days post-caesarean section (To be able to collect information about symptoms of infection after discharge the paticipant need to fill out a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire will be sent to all participants within 30 days post-caesarean section).
Sub-study 2: Approximately 6 months after the reoperation |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
Sub-study 1:
Maternal: Length of the primary and any secondary hospitalization, readmissions to hospital/contact to the general practitioner on suspicion of infection after caesarean section and antibiotic treatment
Infant: Use of antifungal treatment against oral thrush, NEC (necrotizing enterocolitis), antibiotic treatment during hospital stay, the need for intensive care treatment and length of stay in hospital. Long-term adverse effects will be evaluated three years after CS (not part of the PhD), including frequency of visits to hospital, and use of antibiotics, asthma inhalation medicine, and systemic and topical steroids).
Sub-study 2: The cosmetic outcome and the HRQoL, measured in QALYs at the two interventions, wound healing rate in percent from the dehiscence/opening of the surgical wound to re-suturing, measured at the 0th, 2nd and 4th day, and the time to 100% wound healing. |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Sub-study 1: Approximately 30 days after LPLV. Microbiological analyzes and data processing is expected to be completed one year after the LPLV
Sub-study 2: LPLV |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | Yes |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | Yes |
E.6.13.1 | Other scope of the trial description |
A Health Economic Assessment |
|
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
A quality assurance trial of two methods of wound treatment |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 3 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
Sup-study 1: Estimated 30 days after LPLV (To be able to collect information about symptoms of infection after discharge the paticipant need to fill out a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire will be sent to all participants within 30 days post-caesarean section).
Sub-study 2: LPLV
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 2 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |