Clinical Trial Results:
Liraglutide in PCOS (LIPOS) Study: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Liraglutide on Menstrual Cyclicity in Women with PCOS - a prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-002073-60 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
15 Oct 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Oct 2017
|
First version publication date |
27 Oct 2017
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
REGO-2012-011
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
U1111-1126-3292 | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Warwick Medical School
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, United Kingdom, CV4 7AL
|
||
Public contact |
LIPOS study team, Warwick Medical School, LIPOS@warwick.ac.uk
|
||
Scientific contact |
LIPOS study team, Warwick Medical School, LIPOS@warwick.ac.uk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
24 Jan 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
15 Oct 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
15 Oct 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study is to investigate whether adding liraglutide (at a maximum dose of 1.8 mg once daily) to metformin (at a maximum dose of 1000 mg twice daily) for 48 weeks of treatment has a significant benefit in improving the regularity of periods (menstruation) in PCOS women.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was approved by a Research Ethics Committee and received authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority. Patients received verbal and written information prior to consenting to the trial and had the time to consider their participation and opportunity to ask questions.
Patient data were anonymised to ensure information was kept confidential. Identifiable information was kept separately in a secure location
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Oct 2012
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 80
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
80
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
80
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
80
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were recruited from local PCOS clinics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
496 patients were screened for eligibility, with 105 patients consented and registered with the study. Registered patients were prescribed metformin and followed up for four weeks before being randomized into the study. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor, Subject | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Placebo injections were used to blind medication use. The participant, clinical team and data analyst were blinded to treatment arm. A remote randomisation service independent from the trial management team was used to conceal allocation. Data which could un-blind treatment arm was not analysed until data collection was complete
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Liraglutide arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Liraglutide and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Liraglutide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled pen
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Starting dose for liraglutide is 0.6 mg once daily. Daily dose of liraglutide is increased by a dose level increment of 0.6 mg every 7 days, until maintenance dose of 1.8 mg once daily has been achieved. Dose remains at 1.2mg if maintenance level not tolerated.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Metformin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The starting dose of Glucophage SR was 500mg once daily, titrated weekly over four weeks to a maintenance dose of 1,000mg twice daily.
If 1,000mg twice daily was not tolerated, then the maximum dosage tolerated was maintained.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Control arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo injection and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Metformin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Tablet
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The usual starting dose is one tablet of Glucophage SR 1,000 mg twice daily.
If 1,000mg twice daily was not tolerated, then the maximum dosage tolerated was maintained.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Liraglutide arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Liraglutide and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Control arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo injection and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Liraglutide arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
Liraglutide and metformin | ||
Reporting group title |
Control arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo injection and metformin | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Completed follow up - liraglutide arm
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants who were randomized to the liraglutide arm, completed all 48 weeks of follow up and returned at least one month of diary data.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Completed follow up - control arm
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Sub-group analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Participants who were randomized to the control arm, completed all 48 weeks of follow up and returned at least one month of diary data.
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Median number of menstrual cycles per participant during intervention | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Median number of menstrual cycles per participant during study follow up:
A menstrual cycle is defined as at least two consecutive days of bleeding separated by 14 or more days. At least one day of bleeding must be heavier than spotting. Women who withdraw from the trial due to pregnancy will have experienced ovulation and hence have a “masked” period during follow up. This will be estimated by assigning day 0 of the pregnancy (as approximated by the pregnancy dating scan) as the last observed period.
To be entered into the analysis, participants must also have returned at least one month of diary data.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
48 weeks after randomization
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No. of women who returned diary data [2] - No. of women who returned diary data [3] - No. of women who returned diary data [4] - No. of women who returned diary data |
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary analysis | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The number of menstrual cycles will be modelled by a Poisson regression model with the addition of a single binary variable denoting treatment group and an offset term denoting time in follow up.
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Liraglutide arm v Control arm
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
67
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.07 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Poisson regression model | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate ratio | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.3
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.98 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.71 | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Completed follow-up | |||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Completed follow up - control arm v Completed follow up - liraglutide arm
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
47
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [5] | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.01 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Poisson regression | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Rate ratio | |||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.43
|
|||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.07 | |||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.91 | |||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - Sensitivity analysis of the primary analysis, restricting the data to those 47 women who completed follow-up |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From randomisation to end of follow up (56 weeks)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
10
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Liraglutide arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Liraglutide and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Control arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo injection and metformin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
11 Mar 2013 |
Diagnosis criteria changed to PCOS based 2/3 of Rotterdam criteria, instead of 3/3. |
||
07 Oct 2013 |
1) R&D/SSI: Expansion of recruitment sites to include local GP practices.
2) Design and display of a poster for display at PCOS clinics and GP surgeries.
3) Inclusion criteria amended:
- Upper age limitation removed; replaced with ‘pre-menopausal’
- Upper BMI limitation removed
- Non-smoking requirement removed
- Restrictions based on IGT testing removed
|
||
25 Feb 2014 |
Condensed Patient Information Sheet |
||
13 Aug 2014 |
Reduced number of women to be recruited; amended visit schedule to be fewer visits and to allow home pregnancy testing |
||
14 Nov 2014 |
1) Amendment to protocol (section on power calculation amended, inclusion of Bodpod assessments for body composition)
2) Changes to Patient Information Scheet (to include Bodpod, undesirable effects, minor corrections)
3) Extension of end date to 31/03/16 |
||
17 Jul 2015 |
1) New document: end-of-study letter (thanking participants; stating what happens to their care and how to access study results. Enclosing shopping voucher)
2) Approval for use of shopping vouchers as reward for patients who have completed the study |
||
11 Aug 2016 |
1) Amendment to protocol (clarifications withdrawal process, EudraCT number included, updated statistical analysis plan and changed study windows).
2) New documents: follow up letter template, template text messages, email to participants and letter to employer. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
84% of the participants returned evaluable primary outcome data. There were participants who did not return data for the whole of the follow up. There was a higher than expected rate of loss to follow up. The initial targeted power was not achieved. |