Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43858   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    The effect of a single-dose of d-cycloserine on the basic effects of cognitive-behaviour therapy for panic disorder - a randomized placebo-controlled trial

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2012-003191-39
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    27 Sep 2017

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    17 Jul 2019
    First version publication date
    17 Jul 2019
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Study summary

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    12/SC/0686- version 5
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01680107
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    University of Oxford
    Sponsor organisation address
    Churchill Drive, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 7GB
    Public contact
    Heather House, Clinical Trials and Research Governance Research Services, ctrg@admin.ox.ac.uk
    Scientific contact
    Dr Andrea Reinecke, Department of Psychiatry, andrea.reinecke@psych.ox.ac.uk
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    20 Sep 2018
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    27 Sep 2017
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Does the combination of a single-session of cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) with the cognitive enhancer d-cycloserine (compared to placebo) lead to greater reduction in threat bias (computerised behavioural reaction tasks) on the day after treatment?
    Protection of trial subjects
    Fifty per cent of patients were randomised to taking the drug d-cycloserine which can cause CNS manifested side effects such as headaches, drowsiness or tremor. However, such effects are usually not seen when using single doses and doses below 500mg (see Summary of Product Characteristics), and DCS has had MHRA market authorisation for more than 15 years (license number King Pharmaceuticals: 143850005). Participants were monitored closely by a physician after drug intake, and if judged to be at any risk, or if they did not wish to continue, were withdrawn from the study (no cases of withdrawal for that reason) . Moreover, they received an emergency phone number at the end of the Treatment Visit to be able to get in touch with one the researchers 24hrs after drug intake. Also, patients were required to be in an MRI scanner. For most subjects, MRI is a safe, non-invasive imaging technique. However, as the scanner consists of a powerful magnet, it may attract certain metallic objects, leading to several situations in which it may be unsafe to scan a subject (e.g. metal implant). All subjects were therefore screened prior to being scanned, following the Oxford Centre for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research standard operating procedure for safety screening . In the case of an incidental finding of a suspected brain abnormality, the Principal Investigator would alert the OCMR/FMRIB Contact Radiographer who, if appropriate (i.e. not a simple artefact) would independently inform a dedicated local hospital NHS consultant clinician. They would in turn obtain the opinion of the Contact Radiologist, and decide on the appropriate course of action, which might involve contact with the individual at the earliest opportunity and possible further investigation. This would all take place within the NHS framework and in communication with the volunteer’s GP. Subjects are informed of this standard procedure for incidental findings.
    Background therapy
    Single-session cogniitve behaviour therapy, exposure-based. Two hours after capsule intake (d-cycloserine or placebo), participants received a single session of CBT. To achieve a high level of standardization in treatment delivery, the CBT session followed a strict protocol (Reinecke et al., Biol Psych 2013; Salkovskis et al., 1999), including written delivery of the treatment rationale and 15 mins exposure to an individually relevant moderately agoraphobic situation chosen out of a pool of standard situations (e.g. being in a small cleaning closet). In particular, the role of safety seeking behaviour (i.e. behaviours to quickly reduce anxiety, e.g. leaving the situation early, sitting down) in the maintenance of the disorder was explained (e.g. I haven't had a heart attack because I have left on time.), and how dropping safety behaviour during exposure to fear-provoking symptoms and situations would help to effectively reduce anxiety (e.g. Even if I jump up and down in a crowded supermarket when my heart starts racing I won't have a heart attack.). Patient and therapist then agreed on exposure to an individually threatening situation while dropping all safety behaviour. A Standard Operating Procedure document for CBT delivery was in place at the start of the study.
    Evidence for comparator
    Placebo as a standard comparator in active drug trials
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Jan 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 33
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    33
    EEA total number of subjects
    33
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    32
    From 65 to 84 years
    1
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Recruitment from the general public, through advertisements in newspapers, anxiety groups and websites, through radio advertisements, and through posters and flyers in GP practices, psychological outpatient clinics and counselling services, universities and other public places.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Via email or phone, assessing age, medication during the last 6 weeks and psychological treatment in the past, serious physical illnesses, pregnancy, MRI contraindications, type of anxiety.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Baseline
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    D-cycloserine
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    d-cycloserine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    250 mg single dose, oral

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    -
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    microcrystalline cellulose
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    oral single dose

    Number of subjects in period 1
    D-cycloserine Placebo
    Started
    17
    16
    Completed
    17
    16
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Outcome: Next-day, 1-M, 6-M
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    D-cycloserine
    Arm description
    active drug
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    d-cycloserine
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    250 mg single dose, oral

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    non-active placebo
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    microcrystalline cellulose
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    oral single dose

    Number of subjects in period 2
    D-cycloserine Placebo
    Started
    17
    16
    Completed
    17
    16

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    D-cycloserine
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    -
    Reporting group title
    D-cycloserine
    Reporting group description
    active drug

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    non-active placebo

    Subject analysis set title
    Baseline
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    baseline data in the two arms

    Primary: threat bias dot probe

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    threat bias dot probe
    End point description
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Next-day testing
    End point values
    D-cycloserine Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    17
    16
    Units: dot probe effect
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.1 ( 17.2 )
    21.3 ( 30.8 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Next-day threat bias
    Comparison groups
    D-cycloserine v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    33
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.042
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    -19
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -38.04
         upper limit
    0.14
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    9.3

    Secondary: amygdala response

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    amygdala response
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Next-day
    End point values
    D-cycloserine Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    13
    14
    Units: BOLD % signal change
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.08 ( 0.35 )
    0.25 ( 0.27 )
    Statistical analysis title
    amygdala response
    Comparison groups
    Placebo v D-cycloserine
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    27
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.023
    Method
    Mixed models analysis
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (net)
    Point estimate
    -0.32
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.61
         upper limit
    -0.03
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean
    Dispersion value
    0.14

    Secondary: 1-M recovery rates

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    1-M recovery rates
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    1-M follow-up
    End point values
    D-cycloserine Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16
    15
    Units: patients
    12
    4
    Statistical analysis title
    recovery rates 1-M FU
    Comparison groups
    D-cycloserine v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    31
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.015
    Method
    Chi-squared corrected
    Parameter type
    Risk ratio (RR)
    Point estimate
    2.55
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1.16
         upper limit
    5.61
    Variability estimate
    Standard error of the mean

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All SAEs had to be reported to the sponsor within 24 hours of discovery or notification of the event. No such events occured throughout the study.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    21
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: There have been no adverse events seen in this study, probably due to the nature of this study (only a single dose of a drug or placebo).

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    31 Jan 2013
    prior to trial start: study drug turns out not to be red-white but red-grey, therefore change of placebo capsules to red-grey as well, allows full blinding.
    12 Sep 2013
    recruitment strategy is extended to radio advertisement
    25 May 2017
    be able to look at ‘genes associated with emotional processing’ rather than ‘serotonin transporter gene’ only

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    early termination leading to small number of subjects (although in line with amended pwoer analysis)
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 13:14:32 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA