Clinical Trial Results:
Direct thrombin inhibitors versus low molecular weight heparins as thromboprophylaxis in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. A prospective randomized controlled academic single-centre feasibility study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-004863-29 |
Trial protocol |
BE |
Global end of trial date |
08 Aug 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Feb 2021
|
First version publication date |
28 Feb 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
1M
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
University Hospitals Leuven
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium, 3000
|
||
Public contact |
Peter Verhamme, university hospitals Leuven (Gasthuisberg), +32 16341463,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Peter Verhamme, university hospitals Leuven (Gasthuisberg), +32 16341463,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
08 Aug 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
08 Aug 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
08 Aug 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Feasibility and safety of direct thrombin inhibitors (dabigatran or argatroban) versus LMWH (clexane) in patients with staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Effect on coagulation parameters.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
0
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jan 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety, Scientific research | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
3 Months | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 94
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
94
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
94
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
42
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
52
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
All patients aged 18 years and older with blood cultures growing S. aureus and with symptoms or signs of infection, for whom prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism was indicated, were eligible for the study. Between March 2013 and July 2016, 303 patients were eligible. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Regarding feasibility, 209 of the 303 patients were excluded from the trial. The main reasons for exclusion were kidney or liver failure, planned surgery, recent bleeding, thrombocytopenia and contraindications related to study drug administration. The remaining 94 patients were randomized 1:1. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Due to
different routes of administration of dabigatran, argatroban
and LMWH, the study physician and data collection team,
nor the patient were blinded for the intervention during the trial. The technicians who performed laboratory analyses,
the investigators who performed and interpreted the medical imaging and the investigators performing bleeding
severity adjudication were blinded to treatment group.
|
|||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Direct thrombin inhibitor | |||||||||
Arm description |
Dabigatran or argatroban | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
dabigatran
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
110 mg BID
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
argatroban
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection/infusion
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous drip use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
argatroban according to aPTT 1.5-2ULN
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Enoxaparin | |||||||||
Arm description |
enoxaparin 40 mg OD SC | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
enoxaparin
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
enoxaparin 40 mg
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Direct thrombin inhibitor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Dabigatran or argatroban | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Enoxaparin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
enoxaparin 40 mg OD SC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Direct thrombin inhibitor
|
||
Reporting group description |
Dabigatran or argatroban | ||
Reporting group title |
Enoxaparin
|
||
Reporting group description |
enoxaparin 40 mg OD SC |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Bleeding | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Bleeding
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During study drug treatment and until 3 days after the end of the study period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
intention to treat | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The study was not powered to detect significant differences in the Clinical outcomes due to the small study population. Statistical analysis was done in an intention to treat model (retaining all participants in their originally assigned group), as well as per protocol (defined as patients that received at least 80% of sheduled doses of DTI from randomization to day 4, compared with control patients). We uses GraphPad Prism and utilzed appropriate tests to compare variables between groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Direct thrombin inhibitor v Enoxaparin
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
GraphPad Prism | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - An intention to treat model. A preliminary power calculation was based on a differential evolution of D dimers in DTI treated versus control patients. We hypothesized that DTIs would result in a more rapid resolution of coagulation activation in S Aureus bacteraemia. With an estimated D dimer decline of 1.000 ng/mL in the DTI group versus 500 ng/mL in the control group, a sample size 2X50 patients has 80% power to detect such difference. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
hospital stay | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
whole study
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
intention to treat | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The study was not powered to detect significant differences in the Clinical outcomes due to the small study population. Statistical analysis was done in an intention to treat model (retaining all participants in their originally assigned group), as well as per protocol (defined as patients that received at least 80% of sheduled doses of DTI from randomization to day 4, compared with control patients). We uses GraphPad Prism and utilzed appropriate tests to compare variables between groups.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Direct thrombin inhibitor v Enoxaparin
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [2] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.27 | |||||||||
Method |
GraphPad Prism | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [2] - An intention to treat model. A preliminary power calculation was based on a differential evolution of D dimers in DTI treated versus control patients. We hypothesized that DTIs would result in a more rapid resolution of coagulation activation in S Aureus bacteraemia. With an estimated D dimer decline of 1.000 ng/mL in the DTI group versus 500 ng/mL in the control group, a sample size 2X50 patients has 80% power to detect such difference. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
90 day mortality | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
whole study
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
intention to treat | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The study was not powered to detect significant differences in the Clinical outcomes due to the small study population. Statistical analysis was done in an intention to treat model (retaining all participants in their originally assigned group), as well as per protocol (defined as patients that received at least 80% of sheduled doses of DTI from randomization to day 4, compared with control patients). We uses GraphPad Prism and utilzed appropriate tests to compare variables between groups.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Direct thrombin inhibitor v Enoxaparin
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [3] | |||||||||
P-value |
> 0.99 | |||||||||
Method |
GraphPad Prism | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [3] - An intention to treat model. A preliminary power calculation was based on a differential evolution of D dimers in DTI treated versus control patients. We hypothesized that DTIs would result in a more rapid resolution of coagulation activation in S Aureus bacteraemia. With an estimated D dimer decline of 1.000 ng/mL in the DTI group versus 500 ng/mL in the control group, a sample size 2X50 patients has 80% power to detect such difference. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Thrombosis | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Total Thrombosis
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
whole study
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
intention to treat | ||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The study was not powered to detect significant differences in the Clinical outcomes due to the small study population. Statistical analysis was done in an intention to treat model (retaining all participants in their originally assigned group), as well as per protocol (defined as patients that received at least 80% of sheduled doses of DTI from randomization to day 4, compared with control patients). We uses GraphPad Prism and utilzed appropriate tests to compare variables between groups.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Direct thrombin inhibitor v Enoxaparin
|
||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other [4] | ||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
> 0.99 | ||||||||||||||||||
Method |
GraphPad Prism | ||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||
Notes [4] - An intention to treat model. A preliminary power calculation was based on a differential evolution of D dimers in DTI treated versus control patients. We hypothesized that DTIs would result in a more rapid resolution of coagulation activation in S Aureus bacteraemia. With an estimated D dimer decline of 1.000 ng/mL in the DTI group versus 500 ng/mL in the control group, a sample size 2X50 patients has 80% power to detect such difference. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Defervescence | |||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||
End point type |
Other pre-specified
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
whole study
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
intention to treat | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The study was not powered to detect significant differences in the Clinical outcomes due to the small study population. Statistical analysis was done in an intention to treat model (retaining all participants in their originally assigned group), as well as per protocol (defined as patients that received at least 80% of sheduled doses of DTI from randomization to day 4, compared with control patients). We uses GraphPad Prism and utilzed appropriate tests to compare variables between groups.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Direct thrombin inhibitor v Enoxaparin
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
94
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [5] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.3 | |||||||||
Method |
GraphPad Prism | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [5] - An intention to treat model. A preliminary power calculation was based on a differential evolution of D dimers in DTI treated versus control patients. We hypothesized that DTIs would result in a more rapid resolution of coagulation activation in S Aureus bacteraemia. With an estimated D dimer decline of 1.000 ng/mL in the DTI group versus 500 ng/mL in the control group, a sample size 2X50 patients has 80% power to detect such difference. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
3 months after inclusion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
ISTH major bleeding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Direct thrombin inhibitor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Enoxaparin
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
The feasibility of the broad application of DTI in septic patients is limited by their anticoagulant action, hence explaining the large proportion of excluded patients (with bleeding risk) and the non-negligible number of bleeding events. | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29614521 |