Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2012-004944-31
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:EVE-AT-0412
    National Competent Authority:Poland - Office for Medicinal Products
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Prematurely Ended
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2014-09-11
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedPoland - Office for Medicinal Products
    A.2EudraCT number2012-004944-31
    A.3Full title of the trial
    Comparison of Cerebrolysin and donepezil: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on efficacy and safety in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Comparison of Cerebrolysin and Donepezil: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial on safety and efficacy in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberEVE-AT-0412
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorEVER Neuro Pharma GmbH
    B.1.3.4CountryAustria
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportEVER Neuro Pharma GmbH
    B.4.2CountryAustria
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationEVER Neuro Pharma GmbH
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Research & Development
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressOberburgau 3
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityUnterach
    B.5.3.3Post code4866
    B.5.3.4CountryAustria
    B.5.4Telephone number+43 7665 20555 415
    B.5.5Fax number+43 7665 20555 910
    B.5.6E-mailchristian.langelueddecke@everpharma.com
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Cerebrolysin
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderEVER Neuro Pharma GmbH
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationAustria
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product nameCerebrolysin
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Concentrate for solution for infusion
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPIntravenous use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNCerebrolysin
    D.3.9.1CAS number RN12656-61-0
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB74627
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg/ml milligram(s)/millilitre
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number215.2
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin No
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) Yes
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleComparator
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Donesyn 5 mg Filmtabletten
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderSynthon BV
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationGermany
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNDONEPEZIL HYDROCHLORIDE
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameDONEPEZIL HYDROCHLORIDE
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB13647MIG
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number5
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboSolution for injection/infusion
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboIntravenous use
    D.8 Placebo: 2
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboTablet
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOral use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Mild to moderate dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT)
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Mild to moderate dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT)
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 17.0
    E.1.2Level LLT
    E.1.2Classification code 10012292
    E.1.2Term Dementia of the Alzheimer's type NOS
    E.1.2System Organ Class 100000004852
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    The objective of this trial is the global risk-benefit assessment of Cerebrolysin as compared to donepezil in patients with mild to moderate dementia of Alzheimer type (DAT). In addition, a traditional approach will be taken based on an evaluation of the
    separate risk and benefit domains in comparison with donepezil
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Safety as compared to donepezil will be analyzed stand-alone by determining, whether the Cerebrolysin group shows non-inferiority with regard to the combined primary safety endpoints.
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion
    1. Male and female patients ≥50 years of age
    2. Diagnosis of probable mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease according to DSM-IV-TR and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria (see section 18.2.1)
    3. Screening MMSE score between 15 and 24, both inclusive
    4. Modified Hachinski Ischemic score of ≤4
    5. Hamilton Depression Scale score ≤10
    6. Brain computerized tomography (CT) or brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans within 12 months prior to screening without evidence of infection, infarction, or other focal lesions and without clinical symptoms suggestive of intervening neurological disease. If no brain CT or brain MRI is available, a brain MRI shall be performed to exclude other causes of dementia-like syndromes. Patients who have had a single, clinically silent lacunar infarct are eligible provided the lacunar infarct is not felt to be responsible for the patient’s symptoms, is less than 1 cm maximal diameter in any dimension, is not present in hippocampus of either hemisphere, head of the left caudate, or the thalamus. Patients with scans showing atrophy, ventricular enlargement or mild to moderate white matter changes (involving up to approximately 25% of hemispheric white matter) are eligible in the study if otherwise normal
    7. Adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing
    8. Sufficient language skills to complete all testing without assistance of a language interpreter
    9. Ability to perform all sections of the ADAS-cog
    10. Good general health without additional diseases expected to interfere with the study
    11. Normal B12, folic acid, VDRL, and TSH or without any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that would be expected to interfere with the study
    12. ECG and chest x-ray if available without clinically significant laboratory abnormalities that would be expected to interfere with the study.
    13. Patient is not of childbearing potential (i.e., women must be two years postmenopausal or surgically sterile)
    14. Responsible caregiver (individual who continuously attends to the needs of the person or dependent adult), who agrees to be present during administration of study drug, monitor the patient’s compliance with study procedures and adverse events, accompanies the patient to all clinical visits and is willing and able to perform questionnaires as required by the study protocol
    15. Written informed consent obtained from the patient and caregiver (and legally authorized representative or guardian if different from caregiver) prior to entry into the study (Screening Visit)
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    Exclusion criteria
    1. Any abnormalities associated with significant central nervous disease other than Alzheimer’s Disease (e.g. Parkinson’s Disease, epilepsy, multi-infarct
    dementia, Huntington’s Disease, brain tumor, progressive supranuclear palsy, seizure disorder, subdural hematoma, multiple sclerosis, history of head injury with loss of consciousness for a longer period than one day within the past five years, or with residual effects) or focal lesions, which may be responsible for the cognitive status of the patient such as infectious disease, space-occupying lesions, normal pressure hydrocephalus
    2. Severe psychotic features, confusion, agitation or behavioral problems within the last three months that could lead to difficulties complying with the protocol
    3. Delusional symptoms are often characteristic of Alzheimer’s disease, but patients with symptoms so pronounced that they warrant an alternative
    psychiatric diagnosis are excluded
    4. History of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence within the past two years (DSM-IV-TR criteria, see also sections 18.3.1 and 18.3.2)
    5. History of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar affective disorder (DSM-IV-TR criteria)
    6. History of newly identified major depressive disorder within eight weeks before Screening Visit (DSM-IV-TR) (see also exclusion criteria 11 and inclusion
    criteria 5)
    7. Any significant systemic illness (or unstable medical condition that could lead to difficulties complying with the protocol). Patients with a history of systemic cancer within the past two years are excluded
    8. History of myocardial infarction in the past year or unstable or severe cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension
    9. Any clinically significant laboratory abnormalities on the battery of screening tests (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis, ECG, chest x-ray (if available))
    10. Uncontrolled insulin-requiring diabetes or non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (HbA 1c >10.0)
    11. Use of any concomitant medication that could affect functioning of the CNS or interfere with efficacy assessment including:
    - Cerebrolysin and/or donepezil, and/or other cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine or other NMDA antagonists and/or other investigational
    medications within four weeks prior to Baseline
    - Anticonvulsant or stimulating agents within the past four weeks
    - Use of systemic corticosteroids for more than one week within three months prior to Baseline
    - Anti-Parkinsonian agents (e.g., Sinemet®, amantadine, bromocriptine, pergolide and selegiline) within two months prior to Baseline
    - Treatment with high potency antipsychotics or narcotic analgesics within four weeks prior to Baseline
    - Cimetidine within four weeks prior to Baseline
    - Sedatives more frequently than two times per week for anxiety or restlessness within four weeks prior to Baseline
    - No sedatives are allowed within 12 hours before performing clinical evaluation scales
    - Hypnotics more frequently than 3 times per week within four weeks prior to Baseline
    - Antidepressants prescribed for period shorter than four weeks prior to screening, and/or unstable dosages within four weeks before the Screening Visit
    - Monoaminooxidase inhibitors within four weeks prior to Baseline Visit
    - Nootropics, and products on basis of Ginkgo Biloba, within four weeks prior to Baseline
    12. Patients who in the Investigator’s opinion would not comply with study procedures
    13. Patients with fragile or thin veins who may not be able to receive many i.v. infusions
    14. Patients who in the past have not tolerated treatment with 10 mg donepezil or treatment with a corresponding dose of another cholinesterase inhibitor
    15. Patients with history of any epileptic seizure
    16. Patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to Cerebrolysin, donepezil hydrochloride, piperidine derivates or any of the IMPs’excipients.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Global risk-benefit as compared to donepezil will be analyzed by determining whether the Cerebrolysin group shows a statistically significant non-inferiority with regard to the combined primary safety and efficacy endpoints (weighted multivariate ensemble).The endpoints will be combined by a global multivariate non-parametric procedure, weighting the safety and efficacy part 50:50 (regarding equally balancing risk and benefit see also O’Neill, FDA [O’Neill R 2008]). The individual weights are given as follows:
    Risk (relative sum of weight factors: 6)
    - (1) Proportion of patients with at least one AE during the main part of the study (Week 24), weight factor: 1
    - (2) Proportion of patients with at least one SAE during the main part of the study (Week 24), weight factor: 2
    - (3) Proportion of patients with premature discontinuation due to adverse event during the main part of the study (Week 24), weight factor: 3
    Benefit (relative sum of weight factors: 6)
    - (4) ADAS-cog changes Week 24, weight factor: 3
    - (5) CIBIC+ Week 24, weight factor: 3
    Thus, a total of 6 weighting points is given to the safety ensemble, and a total of 6 weighting points is also given to the efficacy ensemble, resulting in an overall 50:50 weighting of risk and benefit. This way, a combined and equally balanced global test for risk and benefit is obtained.
    The weighting of the safety endpoints within the multivariate safety ensemble is the same as described above for the global risk-benefit assessment (AE: weight factor 1, SAE: weight factor 2, premature discontinuation due to AE: weight factor 3).
    The multiple level alpha of the study (multiple level of significance) is defined as alpha = 0.025 (one-sided).
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    24 weeks
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Efficacy:
    o ADAS-cog responders at Visit 5
    o ADAS-cog+ responders at Visit 5
    o CIBIC+ responders at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in ADAS-cog+ at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in ADCS-ADL at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in NPI at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in QoL-AD at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in the LARS at Visit 5
    o Change from Baseline in the LARS-I at Visit 5

    Safety:
    o Adverse events
    o Vital signs
    o Laboratory tests (hematology, blood chemistry, urinalysis)
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    week 24
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) Yes
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) Yes
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA16
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Argentina
    Austria
    Canada
    Chile
    Germany
    Mexico
    Poland
    Spain
    United Kingdom
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    Last Patient Last Visit
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years1
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months0
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days0
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 255
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 255
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception No
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally Yes
    F.3.3.6.1Details of subjects incapable of giving consent
    Patients with mild to moderate dementia of Alzheimer type. Written informed consent must be obtained from the patient and caregiver (and legally
    authorized representative or guardian if different from caregiver) prior to entry into the study
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state34
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 300
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 510
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    Patients who are withdrawn from the study due to AEs are treated and followed according to established acceptable medical practice and are followed up at least until the event has subsided, the condition is considered medically stable, or the patient is no longer available to follow-up. All pertinent information concerning the outcome of the AE is documented in patient’s chart.Withdrawn patients are requested to return for efficacy and safety assessment (described in sec.n 8.3.1 of Protocol).
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2014-12-08
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2014-08-26
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusPrematurely Ended
    P.Date of the global end of the trial2015-08-30
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 02:39:37 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA