Clinical Trial Results:
Diagnostic efficacy and prognostic method [18F] DOPA-PET/CT in study of neuroblastoma: comparison with 123I-MIBG scintigraphy
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-005398-30 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
31 Jan 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
01 Aug 2024
|
First version publication date |
01 Aug 2024
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Diagnosis, Treatment Response, and Prognosis: The Role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in Children Affected by Neuroblastoma in Comparison with 123I-mIBG Scan: The First Prospective Study |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
dopa
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
E.O. Ospedali Galliera
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Mura delle Cappuccine 14, Genoa, Italy, 16128
|
||
Public contact |
S.S. Gestione attività di ricerca e Gran Office E.O. Ospedali Galliera, S.S. Gestione attività di ricerca e Gran Office E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 0039 0105634541, arnoldo.piccardo@galliera.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
S.S. Gestione attività di ricerca e Gran Office E.O. Ospedali Galliera, S.S. Gestione attività di ricerca e Gran Office E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 0039 0105634541, arnoldo.piccardo@galliera.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
28 Feb 2018
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
31 Jan 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
31 Jan 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
check the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DOPA-PET/TC compared with scintigraphy with 123I-MIBG during the staging of disease in patients with NB
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
A median clinical and follow-up of 29.3 mo (range, 19–53 mo) was available for each patient.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Feb 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 18
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
18
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
18
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
18
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
neuroblastoma ( NB) patients | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
-age > 12 months <18 years - patients affected by NB at onset with a high probability of returning to stage 3 and 4 of the disease based on ultrasound or CT images. Stage 2 with N-MYC amplification - histological diagnosis of NB may also be included - no previous lines of chemotherapy with the exception of steroid treatment -informed consent | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Neuroblastoma patients | ||||||
Arm description |
16 high-risk and 2 intermediate-risk patients | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
6-[18F]fluoro-L-dopa
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular and intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
(4 MBq/Kg) never < 80 MBq
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Neuroblastoma patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
16 high-risk and 2 intermediate-risk patients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Neuroblastoma NB patients
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosticrole of 18F-DOPA PET/CT at the time of first diagnosis in childrenwith neuroblastoma.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Neuroblastoma patients
|
||
Reporting group description |
16 high-risk and 2 intermediate-risk patients | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Neuroblastoma NB patients
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnosticrole of 18F-DOPA PET/CT at the time of first diagnosis in childrenwith neuroblastoma.
|
|
||||||||||
End point title |
the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-DOPA-PET/CT compared to 123I-MIBG scintigraphy [1] | |||||||||
End point description |
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT at the time of first diagnosis in children with neuroblastoma. We also investigated the ability of this procedure to assess response to chemotherapy. Lastly, we evaluated the prognostic role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in high-risk neuroblastoma patients on diagnosis and after induction chemotherapy by testing the relationship between WBMB, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
48 month
|
|||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Diagnostic accuracy was considered as the primary endpoint ratio between [true positives (VP) + true negatives (VN)] / [total of subjects (N)]. Each subject will be subjected to both reference tests ( experimental and standard ), for the calculation of the sample was used the McNemar statistical test, A power of 80% was calculated with a total (minimum) sample of 40 subjects, it is necessary to detect a difference of 30% in terms of the discordant proportions (p21 and p12 of the aforemention |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [2] - .. [3] - .. |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
The impact on prognosis and clinical management will be a secondary end-point of our evaluation. | |||||||||
End point description |
Lastly, we evaluated the prognostic role of 18F-DOPA PET/CT in high-risk neuroblastoma patients on diagnosis and after induction chemotherapy by testing the relationship between WBMB, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
48 month
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The adverse event will be notified to the Galliera Coordinating Center within 24 hours of the principal investigator becoming aware of it and subsequent relevant information will be communicated within eight days of the first report
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
no adverse event reported
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
16
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: The adverse event will be notified to the Galliera Coordinating Center within 24 hours of the principal investigator becoming aware of it and subsequent relevant information will be communicated within eight days of the first report |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
01 Oct 2015 |
- update of the protocol (statistical part )
- Closure of three satellite centers due to lack of enrollment |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |