Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43861   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7284   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    PROSPER: A Multinational, Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Enzalutamide in Patients With Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2012-005665-12
    Trial protocol
    SE   IT   AT   BE   GB   SK   FI   NL   ES   GR   FR   DK   DE  
    Global end of trial date

    Results information
    Results version number
    v2(current)
    This version publication date
    31 Oct 2020
    First version publication date
    15 Jul 2018
    Other versions
    v1
    Version creation reason

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    C3431005
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02003924
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Other trial identifiers
    MDV3100-14: Alias Study Number
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Pfizer, Inc.
    Sponsor organisation address
    235 E 42nd Street, New York, United States, NY 10017
    Public contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer, Inc., 001 18007181021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Scientific contact
    Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center, Pfizer, Inc., 001 18007181021, ClinicalTrials.gov_Inquiries@pfizer.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Interim
    Date of interim/final analysis
    15 Oct 2019
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    28 Jun 2017
    Global end of trial reached?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To determine the efficacy of enzalutamide compared with placebo as assessed by Metastasis-free survival (MFS).
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was in compliance with the ethical principles derived from the Declaration of Helsinki and in compliance with all International Council for Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Guidelines. All the local regulatory requirements pertinent to safety of trial subjects were followed.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    26 Nov 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy
    Long term follow-up duration
    7 Years
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 99
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 105
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Austria: 7
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Belgium: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Denmark: 83
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Finland: 33
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    France: 103
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 9
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Greece: 42
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Italy: 58
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Netherlands: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 35
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 23
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Serbia: 13
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Slovakia: 47
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 47
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Sweden: 30
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Turkey: 14
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ukraine: 52
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 70
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Argentina: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Australia: 136
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Brazil: 104
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Chile: 12
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    China: 79
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hong Kong: 10
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: 54
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Malaysia: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    New Zealand: 27
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Singapore: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Taiwan: 48
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Thailand: 14
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    1401
    EEA total number of subjects
    588
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    190
    From 65 to 84 years
    1108
    85 years and over
    103

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    The study was conducted at 254 sites in 32 countries. Data reported based on primary analysis date (28 June 2017).

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall period
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Arm description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily in double-blind and open-label phase (up to a maximum of 68.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days, and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) from last dose to the death date or last known survival date.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Enzalutamide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    MDV3100
    Other name
    Xtandi
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Four capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily in double blind phase (up to a maximum of 51.3 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects were given an opportunity to switch to open-label enzalutamide after completion of double blind phase. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Four capsules of Placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily.

    Arm title
    Placebo Subjects Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Arm description
    Subjects who received placebo in double-blind phase and who agreed to proceed to open-label phase, received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose of 160 mg per day), orally once daily (up to a maximum of 18.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Enzalutamide
    Investigational medicinal product code
    MDV3100
    Other name
    Xtandi
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, soft
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Four capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo Placebo Subjects Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Started
    933
    468
    87
    Treated in double blind phase
    930
    465
    0 [1]
    Completed in double-blind phase
    478 [2]
    87 [3]
    0 [4]
    Treated in open label phase
    478 [5]
    0 [6]
    87
    Completed in open label phase
    378 [7]
    0 [8]
    70 [9]
    Completed
    566
    231
    80
    Not completed
    367
    237
    7
         Withdrew Consent to Be Followed
    66
    55
    1
         Death
    288
    174
    4
         Unspecified
    5
    2
    1
         Lost to follow-up
    8
    6
    1
    Notes
    [1] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [2] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [3] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [4] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [5] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [6] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [7] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [8] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.
    [9] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left.
    Justification: Subjects in Enzalutamide 160 mg continued treatment in double blind and open-label phase. Subjects in placebo arm received treatment only in double blind phase and after protocol amendment they had an opportunity to receive open label Enzalutamide 160 mg. Subjects who discontinued treatment were followed up in long term phase.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Overall period
    Reporting group description
    All subjects those who were randomized.

    Reporting group values
    Overall period Total
    Number of subjects
    1401 1401
    Age categorical
    The intent-to-treat (ITT) population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    190 190
        From 65-84 years
    1108 1108
        85 years and over
    103 103
    Age Continuous
    The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    73.5 ± 7.77 -
    Sex: Female, Male
    The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    0 0
        Male
    1401 1401
    Race/Ethnicity, Customized
    The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    Units: Subjects
        Asian
    230 230
        Black or African American
    31 31
        Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
    5 5
        White
    991 991
        Multiple
    8 8
        Other
    20 20
        Missing
    116 116

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily in double-blind and open-label phase (up to a maximum of 68.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days, and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) from last dose to the death date or last known survival date.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily in double blind phase (up to a maximum of 51.3 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects were given an opportunity to switch to open-label enzalutamide after completion of double blind phase. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Subjects Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who received placebo in double-blind phase and who agreed to proceed to open-label phase, received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose of 160 mg per day), orally once daily (up to a maximum of 18.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.

    Primary: Metastasis Free Survival (MFS)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Metastasis Free Survival (MFS) [1]
    End point description
    MFS:time from randomization to first date of radiographic progression (RP) at any time or death within 112 days of treatment discontinuation without evidence of RP.RP for bone disease:appearance of 1 or more metastatic lesions on bone scan.RP for soft tissue disease:per RECIST,v1.1-at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions,reference to smallest sum on study.Subjects who did not have MFS event at the time of analysis data cut-off (28 June 2017) were censored at date of last assessment showing no objective evidence of RP prior to skeletal-related event or two or more consecutive missed tumor assessments. Subjects randomized but later confirmed to have metastatic disease before randomization were censored on date of randomization.ITT population:subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until radiographic progression at any time, or death within 112 days of treatment discontinuation, whichever occurred first (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    36.6 (33.1 to 99999)
    14.7 (14.2 to 15.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [2]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.292
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.241
         upper limit
    0.352
    Notes
    [2] - P-value was based on stratified log-rank test by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no). Threshold for significance at 0.05 level.

    Secondary: Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Progression [3]
    End point description
    Time to PSA progression:time from randomization to the date of first PSA value indicating progression,which was subsequently confirmed. For subjects with PSA decline at Week 17,PSA progression was defined according to PCWG2 guidelines as date that a 25% or greater increase and an absolute increase of 2 nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir (or baseline for subjects with no PSA decline by Week 17) was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained at least 3 weeks or later.Subjects without confirmed PSA progression at the time of analysis were right censored at the date of last PSA assessment before the analysis data cut-off date for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.ITT population:all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until first PSA progression (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    37.2 (33.1 to 99999)
    3.9 (3.8 to 4.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    To maintain the family-wise 2-sided type I error rate at 0.05, a parallel testing strategy between OS (with allocated type I error rate 0.03) and remaining key secondary endpoints (time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy with allocated type I error rate 0.02) was performed. Testing was performed only if the primary endpoint was statistically significant.
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [4]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.066
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.054
         upper limit
    0.081
    Notes
    [4] - P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS. Threshold for significance at 0.02 level.

    Secondary: Time to First Use of New Antineoplastic Therapy

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to First Use of New Antineoplastic Therapy [5]
    End point description
    Time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy was defined as the time from randomization to first use of new antineoplastic for prostate cancer. Subjects not starting treatment with a new antineoplastic therapy at the time of analysis were right censored at the date of last assessment before the analysis data cutoff date for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until first use of new antineoplastic therapy(until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [5] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    39.6 (37.7 to 99999)
    17.7 (16.2 to 19.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    To maintain the family-wise 2-sided type I error rate at 0.05, a parallel testing strategy between OS (with allocated type I error rate 0.03) and remaining key secondary endpoints (time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy with allocated type I error rate 0.02) was performed. Testing was performed only if the previous endpoint was statistically significant.
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [6]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.208
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.168
         upper limit
    0.258
    Notes
    [6] - P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS. Threshold for significance at 0.02 level.

    Secondary: Overall Survival

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Overall Survival [7]
    End point description
    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death from any cause. For subjects who were alive at the time of the analysis data cutoff, OS time was censored at the last date the subject was known to be alive or analysis data cutoff date, whichever was earlier. Subjects with no post baseline survival information were censored on the date of randomization. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as '99999'.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until death (up to a maximum of 68.8 months)
    Notes
    [7] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    67.0 (64.0 to 99999)
    56.3 (54.4 to 63.0)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    To maintain family-wise 2-sided type I error rate at 0.05,parallel testing strategy between OS(with allocated type I error rate 0.03)and remaining key secondary endpoints(time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy with allocated type I error rate 0.02)was performed.OS tested at error rate 0.05 when both time to PSA progression and time to first use of new antineoplastic therapy were significant. When either failed to show significance.OS was tested at error 0.03.
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.0011 [8]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.734
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.608
         upper limit
    0.885
    Notes
    [8] - P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per interactive voice/web recognition system (IXRS).

    Secondary: Time to Pain Progression

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to Pain Progression [9]
    End point description
    Pain was assessed using the score from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) question 3: “Please rate your pain by marking the box beside the number that best describes your pain at its worst in the last 24 hours.” Time to this event was defined as the time from randomization to onset of pain progression, where pain progression was defined as a 2-point or more increase from baseline in the question 3 score. Subjects without observed pain progression at the time of analysis were right censored at the date of last pain assessment for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until onset of pain progression (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [9] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    18.5 (17.0 to 22.1)
    18.4 (14.8 to 22.1)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    = 0.6534 [10]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.959
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.801
         upper limit
    1.149
    Notes
    [10] - P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS.

    Secondary: Time to First Use of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time to First Use of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy [11]
    End point description
    Time to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time from randomization to the first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer. Subjects not starting treatment with a cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer at the time of analysis were right censored at the date of last assessment before the analysis data cutoff date for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The median and upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization up to the first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [11] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    99999 (38.1 to 99999)
    39.7 (38.9 to 41.3)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [12]
    Method
    Logrank
    Parameter type
    Hazard ratio (HR)
    Point estimate
    0.378
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.282
         upper limit
    0.507
    Notes
    [12] - P-value was based on a stratified log-rank test by PSA doubling time (< 6 months, >= 6 months) and prior or concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS.

    Secondary: Chemotherapy-Free Disease Specific Survival

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Chemotherapy-Free Disease Specific Survival [13]
    End point description
    Chemotherapy-free disease-specific survival was defined as the time from randomization to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer or death due to prostate cancer as assessed by the investigator. Subjects not starting treatment with a cytotoxic chemotherapy or not known to have died due to prostate cancer at the time of analysis were right censored at the date of last assessment before the analysis data cutoff date for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization up to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer or death due to prostate cancer (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [13] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    39.6 (37.7 to 99999)
    38.9 (30.9 to 41.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Chemotherapy-Free Survival

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Chemotherapy-Free Survival [14]
    End point description
    Chemotherapy-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer or death due to any cause. Subjects not starting treatment with a cytotoxic chemotherapy or not known to have died at the time of analysis were censored at the date of last assessment before the analysis data cutoff date for the purposes of analysis. Analysis was based on Kaplan-Meier estimates. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. The upper limit of 95% CI was not reached and has been denoted as 99999.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization up to first use of cytotoxic chemotherapy for prostate cancer or death due to any cause (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [14] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: months
        median (confidence interval 95%)
    38.1 (37.7 to 99999)
    34.0 (30.3 to 39.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Subjects With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response [15]
    End point description
    PSA response was calculated at each visit as a decline from baseline in PSA (ng/mL) to the maximal PSA response with thresholds at 50% and 90%. Additionally, PSA response was assessed as a decline to undetectable levels, where undetectable level was defined as below the limit of quantification of the centrally assessed PSA results (the lower limit of quantification was 0.02 ng/mL). PSA response was confirmed by a second consecutive value at least 3 weeks later. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From randomization until first PSA progression (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [15] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: percentage of subjects
    number (confidence interval 95%)
        Decrease from Baseline >= 50%
    76.3 (73.5 to 79.0)
    2.4 (1.2 to 4.2)
        Decrease from Baseline >= 90%
    55.9 (52.7 to 59.2)
    0.4 (0.1 to 1.5)
        Decrease to Undetectable Level
    9.6 (7.8 to 11.7)
    0.0 (0 to 0.8)
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Decrease from Baseline >= 50%
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [16]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Difference in Response Rate
    Point estimate
    73.96
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    70.91
         upper limit
    77.02
    Notes
    [16] - P-value was based on a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score test stratified by PSA doubling time (<6 months, >= 6 months) and prior concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS.
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Decrease from Baseline >= 90%
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [17]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Difference in Response Rate
    Point estimate
    55.52
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    52.28
         upper limit
    58.76
    Notes
    [17] - P-value was based on a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score test stratified by PSA doubling time (<6 months, >= 6 months) and prior concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS.
    Statistical analysis title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Vs. Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    Decrease to Undetectable Level
    Comparison groups
    Enzalutamide 160 mg v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    1401
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [18]
    Method
    Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
    Parameter type
    Difference in Response Rate
    Point estimate
    9.65
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    7.75
         upper limit
    11.54
    Notes
    [18] - P-value was based on a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel mean score test stratified by PSA doubling time (<6 months, >= 6 months) and prior concurrent use of a bone targeting agent (yes, no) as per IXRS.

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Quality of Life as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) Global Score [19]
    End point description
    The FACT-P questionnaire is a multidimensional, self-reported quality of life instrument consisting of 27 core items that assess subject function in 4 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being, and supplemented by 12 site-specific items to assess prostate-related symptoms. Each item was rated on a 0 to 4 Likert-type scale, and then combined to produce subscale scores for each domain, as well as a global quality of life score which ranged from 0 to 156 where higher scores represented better quality of life. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points. Standard deviation was not analyzed since only 1 subject was evaluable and has been denoted by '99999'.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [19] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Baseline(n=887,439)
    119.5 ± 17.75
    120.8 ± 16.73
        Change at Week 17(n=815,403)
    -4.0 ± 14.03
    -3.0 ± 13.87
        Change at Week 33(n=718,329)
    -4.6 ± 14.82
    -3.5 ± 13.74
        Change at Week 49(n=621,239)
    -3.9 ± 14.70
    -5.0 ± 15.71
        Change at Week 65(n=522,183)
    -4.0 ± 15.84
    -5.7 ± 15.04
        Change at Week 81(n=427,139)
    -4.1 ± 15.01
    -7.5 ± 16.42
        Change at Week 97(n=354,90)
    -4.9 ± 15.31
    -5.9 ± 15.80
        Change at Week 113(n=264,68)
    -5.5 ± 16.07
    -5.8 ± 13.16
        Change at Week 129(n=186,37)
    -6.3 ± 17.33
    -8.1 ± 13.99
        Change at Week 145(n=109,17)
    -5.5 ± 18.75
    -9.8 ± 15.47
        Change at Week 161(n=38,6)
    -8.9 ± 19.88
    -7.0 ± 10.95
        Change at Week 177(n=5,1)
    -4.8 ± 13.19
    -5.0 ± 99999
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Domain Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Domain Score [20]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Number of subjects with various responses to the mobility questionnaire are reported. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [20] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline-No problem in walking(n=884,439)
    578
    298
        Baseline-slight problem in walking(n=884,439)
    183
    100
        Baseline-moderate problem in walking(n=884,439)
    100
    33
        Baseline-severe problem in walking(n=884,439)
    21
    7
        Baseline-unable to walk(n=884,439)
    2
    1
        Week 17-no problem in walking(n=840,419)
    526
    274
        Week 17-slight problem in walking(n=840,419)
    190
    88
        Week 17-moderate problem in walking(n=840,419)
    87
    50
        Week 17-severe problem in walking(n=840,419)
    32
    6
        Week 17-unable to walk(n=840,419)
    5
    1
        Week 33-no problem in walking(n=738,342)
    431
    223
        Week 33-slight problem in walking(n=738,342)
    162
    85
        Week 33-moderate problem in walking(n=738,342)
    103
    24
        Week 33-severe problem in walking(n=738,342)
    36
    10
        Week 33-unable to walk(n=738,342)
    6
    0
        Week 49-no problem in walking(n=635,250)
    362
    156
        Week 49-slight problem in walking(n=635,250)
    158
    57
        Week 49-moderate problem in walking(n=635,250)
    86
    27
        Week 49-severe problem in walking(n=635,250)
    25
    8
        Week 49-unable to walk(n=635,250)
    4
    2
        Week 65-no problem in walking(n=536,193)
    319
    121
        Week 65-slight problem in walking(n=536,193)
    109
    44
        Week 65-moderate problem in walking(n=536,193)
    75
    22
        Week 65-severe problem in walking(n=536,193)
    29
    6
        Week 65-unable to walk(n=536,193)
    4
    0
        Week 81-no problem in walking(n=435,148)
    236
    88
        Week 81-slight problem in walking(n=435,148)
    111
    39
        Week 81-moderate problem in walking(n=435,148)
    61
    15
        Week 81-severe problem in walking(n=435,148)
    26
    4
        Week 81-unable to walk(n=435,148)
    1
    2
        Week 97-no problem in walking(n=365,95)
    189
    59
        Week 97-slight problem in walking(n=365,95)
    94
    24
        Week 97-moderate problem in walking(n=365,95)
    54
    8
        Week 97-severe problem in walking(n=365,95)
    22
    4
        Week 97-unable to walk(n=365,95)
    6
    0
        Week 113-no problem in walking(n=275,73)
    140
    45
        Week 113-slight problem in walking(n=275,73)
    76
    14
        Week 113-moderate problem in walking(n=275,73)
    41
    11
        Week 113-severe problem in walking(n=275,73)
    14
    2
        Week 113-unable to walk(n=275,73)
    4
    1
        Week 129-no problem in walking(n=193,41)
    94
    26
        Week 129-slight problem in walking(n=193,41)
    48
    9
        Week 129-moderate problem in walking(n=193,41)
    36
    5
        Week 129-severe problem in walking(n=193,41)
    15
    1
        Week 129-unable to walk(n=193,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145-no problem in walking(n=116,21)
    56
    13
        Week 145-slight problem in walking(n=116,21)
    35
    5
        Week 145-moderate problem in walking(n=116,21)
    18
    2
        Week 145-severe problem in walking(n=116,21)
    7
    1
        Week 145-unable to walk(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161-no problem in walking(n=40,8)
    22
    2
        Week 161-slight problem in walking(n=40,8)
    7
    5
        Week 161-moderate problem in walking(n=40,8)
    6
    1
        Week 161-severe problem in walking(n=40,8)
    5
    0
        Week 161-unable to walk(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177-no problem in walking(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177-slight problem in walking(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        Week 177-moderate problem in walking(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177-severe problem in walking(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177-unable to walk(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Domain Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Domain Score [21]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Number of subjects with various responses to the self-care questionnaire are reported. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (B), Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [21] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        B:no problems washing/dressing(n=884,439)
    805
    415
        B:slight problems washing/dressing(n=884,439)
    51
    23
        B:moderate problems washing/dressing(n=884,439)
    22
    1
        B:severe problems washing/dressing(n=884,439)
    2
    0
        B:unable to wash/dress(n=884,439)
    4
    0
        Week 17:no problems washing/dressing(n=840,419)
    752
    388
        Week 17:slightproblems washing/dressing(n=840,419)
    60
    26
        Week17:moderateproblems wash/dressing(n=840,419)
    21
    5
        Week 17:severe problems wash/dressing(n=840,419)
    6
    0
        Week 17:unable to wash/dress(n=840,419)
    1
    0
        Week 33:no problems washing/dressing(n=738,342)
    642
    310
        Week 33:slight problems wash/dressing(n=738,342)
    64
    20
        Week 33:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=738,342)
    21
    10
        Week 33:severe problems wash/dressing(n=738,342)
    4
    1
        Week 33:unable to wash/dress(n=738,342)
    7
    1
        Week 49:no problems washing/dressing(n=635,250)
    546
    230
        Week 49:slight problems wash/dressing(n=635,250)
    59
    9
        Week 49:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=635,250)
    23
    7
        Week 49:severe problems wash/dressing(n=635,250)
    3
    3
        Week 49:unable to wash/dress(n=635,250)
    4
    1
        Week 65:no problems wash/dressing(n=536,193)
    453
    179
        Week 65:slight problems wash/dressing(n=536,193)
    57
    11
        Week 65:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=536,193)
    14
    3
        Week 65:severe problems wash/dressing(n=536,193)
    9
    0
        Week 65:unable to wash/dress(n=536,193)
    3
    0
        Week 81:no problems wash/dressing(n=435,148)
    356
    132
        Week 81:slight problems wash/dressing(n=435,148)
    57
    11
        Week 81:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=435,148)
    17
    3
        Week 81:severe problems wash/dressing(n=435,148)
    3
    1
        Week 81:unable to wash/dress(n=435,148)
    2
    1
        Week 97:no problems wash/dressing(n=365,95)
    292
    85
        Week 97:slight problems wash/dressing(n=365,95)
    51
    8
        Week 97:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=365,95)
    16
    2
        Week 97:severe problems wash/dressing(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97:unable to wash/dress(n=365,95)
    5
    0
        Week 113:no problems wash/dressing(n=275,73)
    214
    60
        Week 113:slight problems wash/dressing(n=275,73)
    46
    7
        Week 113:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=275,73)
    11
    5
        Week 113:severe problems wash/dressing(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113:unable to wash/dress(n=275,73)
    4
    1
        Week 129:no problems wash/dressing(n=193,41)
    147
    35
        Week 129:slight problems wash/dressing(n=193,41)
    28
    5
        Week 129:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=193,41)
    16
    1
        Week 129:severe problems wash/dressing(n=193,41)
    2
    0
        Week 129:unable to wash/dress(n=193,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145:no problems wash/dressing(n=116,21)
    92
    15
        Week 145:slight problems wash/dressing(n=116,21)
    16
    5
        Week 145:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=116,21)
    6
    0
        Week 145:severe problems wash/dressing(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145:unable to wash/dress(n=116,21)
    0
    1
        Week 161:no problems wash/dressing(n=40,8)
    33
    7
        Week 161:slight problems wash/dressing(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        Week 161:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=40,8)
    2
    1
        Week 161:severe problems wash/dressing(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161:unable to wash/dress(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 177:no problems wash/dressing(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177:slight problems wash/dressing(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177:moderate problems wash/dressing(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177:severe problems wash/dressing(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 171:unable to wash/dress(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Domain Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Domain Score [22]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Number of subjects with various responses to the usual activities questionnaire are reported. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (B), Weeks (W) 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [22] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        B:no problems doing usual activities(n=884,439)
    646
    356
        B:slightproblems doing usual activities(n=884,439)
    167
    64
        B:moderate problems(n=884,439)
    56
    14
        B:severe problems(n=884,439)
    10
    5
        B:unable to do usual activities(n=884,439)
    5
    0
        W 17:no problems in usual activities(n=840,419)
    571
    305
        W 17:slightproblems in usual activities(n=840,419)
    181
    89
        W 17:moderate problems(n=840,419)
    60
    24
        W 17:severe problems(n=840,419)
    21
    0
        W 17:unable to do usual activities(n=840,419)
    7
    1
        W 33:no problems doing usual activities(n=738,342)
    474
    249
        W 33:slightproblems in usual activities(n=738,342)
    170
    68
        W 33:moderate problems(n=738,342)
    68
    18
        W 33:severe problems(n=738,342)
    21
    7
        W 33:unable to do usual activities(n=738,342)
    5
    0
        W 49:no problems doing usual activities(n=635,250)
    418
    185
        W 49:slightproblems in usual activities(n=635,250)
    137
    43
        W 49:moderate problems(n=635,250)
    55
    14
        W 49:severe problems(n=635,250)
    20
    6
        W 49:unable to do usual activities(n=635,250)
    5
    2
        W 65:no problems doing usual activities(n=536,193)
    338
    136
        W 65:slightproblems in usual activities(n=536,193)
    123
    42
        W 65:moderate problems(n=536,193)
    60
    11
        W 65:severe problems(n=536,193)
    5
    4
        W 65:unable to do usual activities(n=536,193)
    10
    0
        W 81:no problems doing usual activities(n=435,148)
    267
    106
        W 81:slightproblems in usual activities(n=435,148)
    105
    29
        W 81:moderate problems(n=435,148)
    49
    7
        W 81:severe problems(n=435,148)
    10
    3
        W 81:unable to do usual activities(n=435,148)
    4
    3
        W 97:no problems doing usual activities(n=365,95)
    224
    69
        W 97:slightproblems in usual activities(n=365,95)
    90
    16
        W 97:moderate problems(n=365,95)
    39
    8
        W 97:severe problems(n=365,95)
    9
    0
        W 97:unable to do usual activities(n=365,95)
    3
    2
        W 113:no problems doing usual activities(n=275,73)
    165
    47
        W 113:slightproblems in usual activities(n=275,73)
    69
    16
        W 113:moderate problems(n=275,73)
    33
    6
        W 113:severe problems(n=275,73)
    5
    3
        W 113:unable to do usual activities(n=275,73)
    3
    1
        W 129:no problems doing usual activities(n=193,41)
    108
    30
        W 129:slightproblems in usual activities(n=193,41)
    56
    8
        W 129:moderate problems(n=193,41)
    26
    3
        W 129:severe problems(n=193,41)
    3
    0
        W 129:unable to do usual activities(n=193,41)
    0
    0
        W 145:no problems doing usual activities(n=116,21)
    67
    14
        W 145:slightproblems in usual activities(n=116,21)
    35
    4
        W 145:moderate problems(n=116,21)
    11
    2
        W 145:severe problems(n=116,21)
    3
    1
        W 145:unable to do usual activities(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        W 161:no problems doing usual activities(n=40,8)
    23
    5
        W 161:slightproblems in usual activities(n=40,8)
    9
    2
        W 161:moderate problems(n=40,8)
    5
    1
        W 161:severe problems(n=40,8)
    2
    0
        W 161:unable to do usual activities(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        W 177:no problems doing usual activities(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        W 177:slightproblems in usual activities(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        W 177:moderate problems(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        W 177:severe problems(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        W 177:unable to do usual activities(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Domain Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Domain Score [23]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Number of subjects with various responses to the pain/discomfort questionnaire are reported The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (B), Weeks (W) 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [23] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        B:no pain or discomfort(n=884,439)
    546
    292
        B:slight pain or discomfort(n=884,439)
    240
    117
        B:moderate pain or discomfort(n=884,439)
    86
    25
        B:severe pain or discomfort(n=884,439)
    10
    4
        B:extreme pain or discomfort(n=884,439)
    2
    1
        W17:no pain or discomfort(n=840,419)
    464
    248
        W17:slight pain or discomfort(n=840,419)
    269
    128
        W17: moderate pain or discomfort(n=840,419)
    92
    41
        W17:severe pain or discomfort(n=840,419)
    13
    2
        W17:extreme pain or discomfort(n=840,419)
    2
    0
        W33:no pain or discomfort(n=738,342)
    405
    204
        W33:slight pain or discomfort(n=738,342)
    237
    110
        W33:moderate pain or discomfort(n=738,342)
    79
    21
        W33:severe pain or discomfort(n=738,342)
    16
    7
        W33:extreme pain or discomfort(n=738,342)
    1
    0
        W49:no pain or discomfort(n=635,250)
    340
    134
        W49:slight pain or discomfort(n=635,250)
    209
    82
        W49:moderate pain or discomfort(n=635,250)
    75
    32
        W49:severe pain or discomfort(n=635,250)
    10
    1
        Week49:extreme pain or discomfort(n=635,250)
    1
    1
        W65:no pain or discomfort(n=536,193)
    298
    102
        W65:slight pain or discomfort(n=536,193)
    162
    72
        W65:moderate pain or discomfort(n=536,193)
    61
    15
        W65:severe pain or discomfort(n=536,193)
    11
    3
        W65:extreme pain or discomfort(n=536,193)
    4
    1
        W81:no pain or discomfort(n=435,148)
    231
    86
        W81:slight pain or discomfort(n=435,148)
    133
    45
        W81:moderate pain or discomfort(n=435,148)
    61
    13
        W81 :severe pain or discomfort(n=435,148)
    10
    2
        W81:extreme pain or discomfort(n=435,148)
    0
    2
        W97:no pain or discomfort(n=365,95)
    202
    58
        W97:slight pain or discomfort(n=365,95)
    115
    28
        W97:moderate pain or discomfort(n=365,95)
    43
    7
        W97:severe pain or discomfort(n=365,95)
    5
    2
        W97:extreme pain or discomfort(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        W113:no pain or discomfort(n=275,73)
    152
    47
        W113:slight pain or discomfort(n=275,73)
    80
    19
        W113:moderate pain or discomfort(n=275,73)
    37
    5
        W113:severe pain or discomfort(n=275,73)
    6
    2
        W113:extreme pain or discomfort(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        W129:no pain or discomfort(n=193,41)
    108
    27
        W129:slight pain or discomfort(n=193,41)
    55
    11
        W129:moderate pain or discomfort(n=193,41)
    28
    3
        W129:severe pain or discomfort(n=193,41)
    2
    0
        W129:extreme pain or discomfort(n=193,41)
    0
    0
        W145:no pain or discomfort(n=116,21)
    62
    12
        W145:slight pain or discomfort(n=116,21)
    38
    8
        W145:moderate pain or discomfort(n=116,21)
    15
    1
        W145:severe pain or discomfort(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        W145:extreme pain or discomfort(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        W161:no pain or discomfort(n=40,8)
    24
    2
        W161:slight pain or discomfort(n=40,8)
    8
    5
        W161:moderate pain or discomfort(n=40,8)
    5
    1
        W161:severe pain or discomfort(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        W161:extreme pain or discomfort(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        W177:no pain or discomfort(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        W177:slight pain or discomfort(n=6,1)
    1
    1
        W177:moderate pain or discomfort(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        W177:severe pain or discomfort(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        W177:extreme pain or discomfort(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/ Depression Domain Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/ Depression Domain Score [24]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Number of subjects with various responses to the anxiety/depression questionnaire are reported. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [24] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        B:not anxious or depressed(n=884,439)
    595
    310
        B:slightly anxious or depressed(n=884,439)
    231
    100
        B:moderately anxious or depressed(n=884,439)
    51
    24
        B:severely anxious or depressed(n=884,439)
    6
    5
        B:extremely anxious or depressed(n=884,439)
    1
    0
        W17:not anxious or depressed(n=840,419)
    517
    265
        W17:slightly anxious or depressed(n=840,419)
    251
    119
        W17:moderately anxious or depressed(n=840,419)
    62
    31
        W17:severely anxious or depressed(n=840,419)
    7
    4
        W17:extremely anxious or depressed(n=840,419)
    3
    0
        W33:not anxious or depressed(n=738,342)
    458
    223
        W33:slightly anxious or depressed(n=738,342)
    208
    89
        W33:moderately anxious or depressed(n=738,342)
    61
    23
        W33:severely anxious or depressed(n=738,342)
    9
    5
        W33:extremely anxious or depressed(n=738,342)
    2
    2
        W49:not anxious or depressed(n=635,250)
    410
    155
        W49:slightly anxious or depressed(n=635,250)
    172
    72
        W49:moderately anxious or depressed(n=635,250)
    41
    20
        W49:severely anxious or depressed(n=635,250)
    8
    2
        W49:extremely anxious or depressed(n=635,250)
    4
    1
        W65:not anxious or depressed(n=536,193)
    336
    128
        W65:slightly anxious or depressed(n=536,193)
    149
    56
        W65:moderately anxious or depressed(n=536,193)
    43
    8
        W65:severely anxious or depressed(n=536,193)
    8
    1
        W65:extremely anxious or depressed(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        W81:not anxious or depressed(n=435,148)
    288
    86
        W81:slightly anxious or depressed(n=435,148)
    106
    48
        W81:moderately anxious or depressed(n=435,148)
    34
    9
        W81:severely anxious or depressed(n=435,148)
    7
    3
        W81:extremely anxious or depressed(n=435,148)
    0
    2
        W97:not anxious or depressed(n=365,95)
    220
    61
        W97:slightly anxious or depressed(n=365,95)
    114
    27
        W97:moderately anxious or depressed(n=365,95)
    26
    6
        W97:severely anxious or depressed(n=365,95)
    4
    0
        W97:extremely anxious or depressed(n=365,95)
    1
    1
        W113:not anxious or depressed(n=275,73)
    167
    43
        W113:slightly anxious or depressed(n=275,73)
    87
    27
        W113:moderately anxious or depressed(n=275,73)
    18
    3
        W113:severely anxious or depressed(n=275,73)
    3
    0
        W113:extremely anxious or depressed(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        W129:not anxious or depressed(n=193,41)
    121
    28
        W129:slightly anxious or depressed(n=193,41)
    51
    10
        W129:moderately anxious or depressed(n=193,41)
    18
    2
        W129:severely anxious or depressed(n=193,41)
    2
    1
        W129:extremely anxious or depressed(n=193,41)
    1
    0
        W145:not anxious or depressed(n=116,21)
    73
    12
        W145:slightly anxious or depressed(n=116,21)
    30
    8
        W145:moderately anxious or depressed(n=116,21)
    10
    1
        W145:severely anxious or depressed(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        W145:extremely anxious or depressed(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        W161:not anxious or depressed(n=40,8)
    23
    3
        W161:slightly anxious or depressed(n=40,8)
    16
    4
        W161:moderately anxious or depressed(n=40,8)
    0
    1
        W161:severely anxious or depressed(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        W161:extremely anxious or depressed(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        W177:not anxious or depressed(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        W177:slightly anxious or depressed(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        W177:moderately anxious or depressed(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        W177:severely anxious or depressed(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        W177:extremely anxious or depressed(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Status Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Status Visual Analog Score (VAS) [25]
    End point description
    EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument that measures health-related quality of life for men with prostate cancer. EQ-5D consists of EQ-5D descriptive system and EQ VAS. EQ-5D-5L-VAS records subject’s self-rated health on a vertical VAS that allows them to indicate their health state that can range from 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable), higher scores indicating a better health state. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points. Standard deviation was not analysed since only 1 subject was evaluable and has been denoted by '99999'.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [25] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Baseline (n=884,439)
    76.2 ± 16.92
    77.5 ± 15.97
        Week 17 (n=840,419)
    74.7 ± 17.19
    74.9 ± 16.79
        Week 33 (n=738,342)
    74.6 ± 16.69
    74.0 ± 17.51
        Week 49 (n=635,250)
    74.7 ± 18.02
    73.7 ± 18.28
        Week 65 (n=536,193)
    74.5 ± 17.79
    73.0 ± 17.11
        Week 81 (n=435,148)
    75.5 ± 17.06
    73.3 ± 16.82
        Week 97 (n=365,95)
    74.4 ± 17.39
    75.2 ± 17.88
        Week 113 (n=275,73)
    73.6 ± 18.05
    74.7 ± 15.06
        Week 129 (n=193,41)
    72.8 ± 18.25
    77.1 ± 12.83
        Week 145 (n=116,21)
    75.3 ± 17.02
    74.2 ± 18.13
        Week 161 (n=40,8)
    74.6 ± 21.28
    73.8 ± 17.60
        Week 177 (n=6,1)
    74.5 ± 19.31
    69.0 ± 99999
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 31

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 31 [26]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 31 are reported. Question 31 was following: “Have you had to urinate frequently during the day?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [26] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    285
    162
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    348
    160
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    207
    92
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    44
    25
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    275
    134
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    324
    168
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    194
    90
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    46
    27
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    236
    105
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    285
    145
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    176
    70
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    40
    21
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    200
    82
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    260
    92
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    148
    67
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    27
    9
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    172
    54
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    209
    79
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    125
    48
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    30
    12
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    141
    46
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    181
    60
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    92
    31
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    20
    11
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    118
    33
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    146
    40
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    80
    19
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    21
    3
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    101
    17
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    112
    40
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    46
    14
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    16
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    70
    11
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    79
    16
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    39
    10
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    4
    4
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    42
    2
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    51
    14
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    20
    4
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    3
    1
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    9
    2
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    20
    4
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    7
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    4
    1
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    4
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 32 [27]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 32 are reported. Question 32 was following: “Have you had to urinate frequently at night?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [27] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    193
    108
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    423
    195
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    200
    103
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    68
    33
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all (n=839,419)
    194
    88
        Week 17: a little (n=839,419)
    407
    199
        Week 17: quite a bit (n=839,419)
    184
    98
        Week 17: very much (n=839,419)
    54
    34
        Week 17: not answered (n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    173
    83
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    351
    161
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    169
    69
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    44
    28
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    148
    59
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    313
    116
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    141
    59
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    33
    16
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    118
    41
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    266
    89
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    111
    48
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    41
    15
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    91
    38
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    231
    60
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    89
    38
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    23
    12
        Week 81: not answeredv(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    88
    19
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    169
    53
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    82
    19
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    26
    4
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    67
    16
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    137
    32
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    54
    23
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    17
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    50
    9
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    97
    18
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    37
    10
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    8
    4
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    31
    2
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    59
    14
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    24
    5
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    9
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    23
    7
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    5
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    3
    1
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 33

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 33 [28]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 33 are reported. Question 33 was following: “When you felt the urge to pass urine, did you have to hurry to get to the toilet?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [28] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    406
    197
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    266
    147
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    150
    70
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    62
    25
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    350
    191
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    297
    150
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    127
    55
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    65
    23
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    279
    147
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    278
    126
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    126
    48
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    54
    20
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    272
    100
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    222
    95
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    96
    38
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    45
    17
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    213
    76
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    213
    72
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    71
    31
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    39
    14
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    181
    63
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    157
    52
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    69
    27
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    27
    6
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    146
    40
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    131
    40
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    59
    12
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    29
    3
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all|(n=275,73)
    114
    29
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    106
    34
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    40
    9
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    15
    1
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    86
    10
        Week 129: a little (n=192,41)
    72
    21
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    26
    6
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    8
    4
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    51
    5
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    39
    12
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    21
    4
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    5
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    17
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    19
    5
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    3
    3
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    1
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 34

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 34 [29]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 34 are reported. Question 34 was following: “Was it difficult for you to get enough sleep, because you needed to get up frequently at night to urinate?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [29] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    479
    235
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    273
    146
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    93
    40
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    39
    18
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    437
    214
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    295
    144
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    75
    45
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    32
    16
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    392
    180
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    246
    112
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    75
    33
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    24
    16
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    340
    119
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    211
    94
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    65
    28
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    19
    9
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    286
    92
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    183
    67
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    47
    29
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    20
    5
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    221
    70
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    165
    55
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    37
    18
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    11
    5
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    185
    47
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    122
    33
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    43
    14
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    15
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    135
    31
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    102
    33
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    29
    7
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    9
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    103
    13
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    67
    23
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    19
    4
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    1
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    59
    9
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    44
    10
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    11
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    2
    1
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    21
    2
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    16
    5
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    1
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    1
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 35

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 35 [30]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 35 are reported. Question 35 was following: “Have you had difficulty going out of the house because you needed to be close to a toilet?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [30] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    646
    330
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    177
    84
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    45
    18
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    16
    7
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    604
    295
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    174
    100
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    46
    15
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    15
    9
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    501
    242
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    171
    74
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    50
    20
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    15
    5
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    436
    174
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    153
    53
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    38
    20
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    8
    3
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    369
    132
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    125
    50
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    28
    9
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    14
    2
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    308
    105
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    94
    35
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    23
    8
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    9
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    241
    67
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    91
    21
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    26
    6
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    7
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    180
    47
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    70
    21
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    18
    5
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    7
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    131
    26
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    48
    13
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    8
    1
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    5
    1
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    74
    13
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    36
    6
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    6
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    2
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    24
    4
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    13
    4
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 36 [31]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 36 are reported. Question 36 was following: “Have you had any unintentional release (leakage) of urine?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [31] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    550
    283
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    273
    124
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    36
    20
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    25
    12
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    511
    255
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    264
    126
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    39
    27
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    25
    11
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    428
    208
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    246
    104
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    34
    19
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    29
    10
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    369
    146
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    209
    78
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    41
    22
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    16
    4
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    307
    115
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    170
    66
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    47
    8
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    12
    4
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    248
    93
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    158
    41
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    23
    11
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    5
    3
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    195
    55
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    134
    33
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    25
    7
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    11
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    160
    42
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    91
    28
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    17
    3
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    7
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    109
    22
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    68
    13
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    13
    5
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    2
    1
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    58
    9
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    45
    11
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    10
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    3
    1
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    18
    3
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    21
    4
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    0
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 37

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 37 [32]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 37 are reported. Question 37 was following: “Did you have pain when you urinated?” The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [32] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    775
    380
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    92
    47
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    10
    8
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    7
    4
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    762
    351
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    65
    58
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    12
    8
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    0
    2
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    662
    291
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    63
    39
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    11
    8
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    1
    3
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    577
    209
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    49
    34
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    6
    3
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    3
    4
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    492
    161
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    32
    29
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    9
    2
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    3
    1
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    389
    119
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    40
    27
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    4
    2
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    1
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    332
    84
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    28
    11
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    4
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    247
    57
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    26
    13
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    1
    3
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    173
    34
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    16
    7
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    2
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    102
    15
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    14
    6
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    36
    6
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    3
    1
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    6
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 38

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 38 [33]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 38 are reported. Question 38 was following: “Has wearing an incontinence aid been a problem for you?” This question was answered by only those subjects who wore incontinence aid. The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [33] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=144,67)
    83
    37
        Baseline: a little(n=144,67)
    40
    19
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=144,67)
    15
    3
        Baseline: very much(n=144,67)
    6
    8
        Baseline: not answered(n=144,67)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    77
    34
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    48
    21
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    15
    7
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    6
    6
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    693
    351
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    76
    30
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    47
    28
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    16
    4
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    5
    4
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    593
    275
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    73
    18
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    43
    16
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    12
    9
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    4
    2
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    503
    205
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    63
    12
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    40
    17
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    9
    5
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    3
    1
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    421
    158
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    52
    15
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    33
    9
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    10
    1
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    3
    3
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    336
    120
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    50
    8
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    28
    8
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    7
    2
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    3
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    277
    77
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    31
    12
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    18
    7
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    8
    2
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    2
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    216
    52
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    27
    5
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    18
    5
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    2
    1
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    145
    30
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    16
    2
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    10
    4
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    5
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    85
    15
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    10
    1
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    3
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    26
    4
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    2
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 39

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 39 [34]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 39 are reported. Question 39 was following: “Have your daily activities been limited by your urinary problems?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [34] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    666
    338
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    173
    80
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    35
    11
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    10
    10
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    632
    305
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    160
    99
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    36
    6
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    11
    9
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    523
    242
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    172
    79
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    31
    14
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    11
    6
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    444
    173
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    152
    58
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    31
    18
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    8
    1
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    382
    128
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    124
    51
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    20
    12
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    10
    2
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    310
    103
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    98
    35
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    21
    8
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    5
    2
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    242
    72
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    100
    18
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    18
    4
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    5
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    188
    54
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    71
    14
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    13
    3
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    3
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    127
    25
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    55
    14
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    7
    1
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    1
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    77
    11
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    34
    9
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    4
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    27
    2
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    10
    6
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 40

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 40 [35]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 40 are reported. Question 40 was following: “Have your daily activities been limited by your bowel problems?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [35] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    758
    393
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    112
    40
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    9
    4
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    5
    2
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    707
    352
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    107
    57
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    19
    6
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    6
    4
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    621
    292
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    98
    40
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    14
    8
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    4
    1
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    525
    211
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    88
    29
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    20
    7
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    2
    3
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    441
    165
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    78
    24
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    11
    3
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    6
    1
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    360
    121
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    56
    23
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    17
    3
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    1
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    289
    84
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    58
    11
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    17
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    219
    62
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    46
    11
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    8
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    2
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    153
    36
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    33
    5
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    5
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    93
    17
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    19
    4
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    4
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    29
    8
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    9
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    2
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    4
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 41

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 41 [36]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 41 are reported. Question 41 was following: “Have you had any unintentional release (leakage) of stools?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [36] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    794
    404
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    78
    32
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    11
    2
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    1
    1
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    751
    372
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    79
    43
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    8
    3
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    1
    1
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    638
    307
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    92
    32
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    4
    1
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    3
    1
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    554
    221
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    73
    25
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    5
    4
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    3
    0
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    467
    175
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    57
    16
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    9
    1
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    3
    1
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    380
    136
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    51
    12
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    2
    0
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    1
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    315
    86
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    47
    9
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    3
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    233
    66
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    40
    7
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    2
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    167
    39
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    25
    2
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    93
    20
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    22
    1
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    30
    8
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    9
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    4
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 42

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 42 [37]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 42 are reported. Question 42 was following: “Have you had blood in your stools?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [37] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    836
    422
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    48
    17
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    801
    399
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    36
    18
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    2
    2
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    707
    330
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    29
    11
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    1
    0
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    608
    245
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    27
    5
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    514
    180
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    19
    13
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    3
    0
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    420
    143
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    14
    4
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    0
    1
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    357
    93
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    8
    2
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    262
    72
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    13
    1
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    186
    41
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    5
    0
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all|=(n=116,21)
    114
    21
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    38
    8
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    2
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    6
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 43

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 43 [38]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 43 are reported. Question 43 was following: “Did you have a bloated feeling in your abdomen?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [38] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    667
    320
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    190
    103
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    22
    16
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    5
    0
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    601
    283
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    199
    121
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    31
    13
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    8
    2
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    526
    235
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    183
    95
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    22
    8
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    6
    3
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    449
    174
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    163
    63
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    20
    11
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    3
    2
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    381
    135
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    132
    51
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    19
    7
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    4
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    304
    103
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    110
    44
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    18
    1
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    2
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    258
    72
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    87
    23
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    19
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    199
    55
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    66
    18
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    9
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    139
    25
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    43
    16
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    8
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    2
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    87
    13
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    24
    8
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    4
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    33
    6
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    7
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    4
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 44

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 44 [39]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 44 are reported. Question 44 was following: “Did you have hot flushes?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [39] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    374
    177
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    314
    166
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    151
    68
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    45
    28
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    265
    182
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    311
    153
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    189
    62
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    74
    22
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    253
    144
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    268
    116
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    155
    60
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    61
    21
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    227
    112
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    235
    94
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    130
    30
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    43
    14
        Week 49: not answered|(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    203
    79
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    194
    77
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    104
    30
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    35
    7
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    175
    69
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    157
    58
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    75
    16
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    27
    5
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    155
    48
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    126
    34
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    57
    12
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    27
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    114
    33
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    102
    24
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    44
    14
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    15
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    84
    22
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    74
    16
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    23
    3
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    11
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    45
    10
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    46
    10
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    18
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    7
    1
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    18
    3
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    14
    3
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    5
    2
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    3
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    1
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 45

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 45 [40]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 45 are reported. Question 45 was following: “Have you had sore or enlarged nipples or breasts?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [40] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    688
    333
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    146
    80
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    38
    24
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    12
    2
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    626
    315
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    160
    80
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    39
    18
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    14
    6
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    526
    260
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    164
    62
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    34
    15
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    13
    4
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    444
    188
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    138
    52
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    41
    5
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    12
    5
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    371
    149
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    119
    37
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    31
    7
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    15
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    306
    115
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    84
    26
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    34
    6
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    10
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    239
    80
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    92
    13
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    30
    1
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    4
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    190
    55
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    62
    12
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    19
    5
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    4
    1
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    128
    30
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    51
    8
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    9
    3
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    4
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    78
    17
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    29
    3
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    7
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    26
    4
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    11
    3
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    2
    1
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    2
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 46

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 46 [41]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 46 are reported. Question 46 was following: “Have you had swelling in your legs or ankles?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [41] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    663
    323
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    189
    89
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    22
    22
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    10
    5
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    625
    284
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    179
    112
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    30
    21
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    5
    2
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    530
    243
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    159
    76
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    41
    20
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    7
    2
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    453
    176
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    155
    58
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    23
    15
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    4
    1
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    378
    135
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    127
    48
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    27
    10
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    4
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    301
    104
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    102
    36
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    27
    7
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    4
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    259
    69
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    79
    20
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    19
    5
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    8
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    191
    40
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    65
    27
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    16
    6
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    3
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    134
    27
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    48
    14
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    8
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    2
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    76
    15
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    34
    5
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    5
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    31
    6
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    8
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    1
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 47

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 47 [42]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 47 are reported. Question 47 was following: “Has weight loss been a problem for you?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [42] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    820
    399
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    48
    25
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    10
    10
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    6
    5
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    733
    375
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    81
    28
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    15
    13
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    10
    3
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    643
    296
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    72
    35
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    13
    5
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    9
    5
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    553
    215
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    61
    29
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    15
    3
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    6
    3
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    479
    168
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    39
    20
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    11
    4
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    7
    1
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    371
    136
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    46
    10
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    14
    1
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    3
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    314
    84
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    36
    10
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    10
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    5
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    235
    62
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    27
    8
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    9
    1
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    4
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    169
    37
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    17
    4
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    5
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    95
    20
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    17
    1
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    4
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    34
    8
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    5
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    5
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 48

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 48 [43]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 48 are reported. Question 48 was following: “Has weight gain been a problem for you?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [43] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    677
    315
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    153
    95
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    40
    16
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    14
    13
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    674
    316
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    118
    74
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    30
    19
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    17
    10
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    570
    259
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    133
    59
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    21
    18
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    13
    5
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    479
    193
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    125
    44
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    18
    10
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    13
    3
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    410
    155
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    92
    27
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    26
    9
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    8
    2
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    327
    115
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    71
    27
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    28
    5
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    8
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    267
    76
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    70
    16
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    24
    2
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    4
    1
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    200
    60
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    56
    10
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    10
    3
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    9
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    156
    32
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    27
    8
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    5
    1
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    4
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    89
    16
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    18
    5
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    7
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    31
    6
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    6
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    2
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    2
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 49

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 49 [44]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 49 are reported. Question 49 was following: “Have you felt less masculine as a result of your illness or treatment?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [44] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    435
    214
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    234
    131
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    138
    59
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    77
    35
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    400
    210
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    244
    115
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    109
    57
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    86
    37
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    345
    167
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    207
    107
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    109
    38
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    76
    29
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    302
    127
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    187
    68
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    84
    36
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    62
    19
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    263
    90
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    142
    57
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    71
    24
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    60
    22
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    206
    74
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    124
    38
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    57
    17
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    47
    19
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    175
    46
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    98
    28
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    47
    10
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    45
    11
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    136
    31
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    78
    27
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    30
    8
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    31
    7
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    91
    18
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    49
    16
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    27
    5
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    25
    2
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    59
    9
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    31
    9
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    18
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    8
    2
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    18
    2
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    15
    3
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    3
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    4
    2
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    3
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    3
    1
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 50

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 50 [45]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 50 are reported. Question 50 was following: “To what extent were you interested in sex?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [45] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    586
    291
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    204
    101
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    67
    32
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    27
    15
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    637
    293
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    136
    92
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    45
    20
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    21
    14
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    542
    251
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    136
    66
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    37
    18
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    22
    6
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    483
    180
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    106
    50
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    33
    12
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    13
    8
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    417
    143
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    78
    37
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    27
    9
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    14
    4
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    320
    114
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    76
    24
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    26
    9
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    12
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    286
    65
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    52
    19
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    20
    8
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    7
    3
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    218
    59
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    36
    11
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    14
    1
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    7
    2
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    156
    33
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    24
    6
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    9
    2
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    92
    14
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    16
    3
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    7
    4
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at al(n=40,8)
    30
    5
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    5
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    4
    1
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    4
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 51

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 51 [46]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 51 are reported. Question 51 was following: “To what extent were you sexually active (with or without intercourse)?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [46] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=884,439)
    735
    374
        Baseline: a little(n=884,439)
    98
    38
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    41
    19
        Baseline: very much(n=884,439)
    10
    8
        Baseline: not answered(n=884,439)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    734
    354
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    71
    44
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    24
    13
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    10
    8
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    0
    0
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    642
    299
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    68
    28
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    20
    9
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    7
    5
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    0
    0
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    569
    214
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    46
    26
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    15
    6
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    5
    4
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    0
    0
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    485
    170
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    37
    14
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    12
    7
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    2
    2
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    0
    0
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    381
    130
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    32
    13
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    15
    5
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    6
    0
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    333
    79
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    20
    12
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    9
    4
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    3
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    0
    0
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    250
    68
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    16
    3
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    6
    2
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    3
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    176
    37
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    8
    3
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    5
    1
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    106
    17
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    4
    3
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    5
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    35
    6
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    3
    2
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    5
    1
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    1
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 52 [47]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 52 are reported. Question 52 was following: “To what extent was sex enjoyable for you?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [47] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=50,24)
    5
    6
        Baseline: a little(n=50,24)
    23
    11
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=50,24)
    14
    5
        Baseline: very much(n=50,24)
    8
    2
        Baseline: not answered(n=50,24)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    7
    3
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    13
    9
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    16
    11
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    3
    4
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    800
    392
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    8
    4
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    17
    8
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    11
    5
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    4
    0
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    697
    324
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    3
    4
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    6
    5
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    9
    5
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    3
    4
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    614
    232
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    4
    2
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    6
    4
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    9
    4
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    3
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    514
    183
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    5
    2
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    7
    3
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    4
    2
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    5
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    413
    140
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    2
    2
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    5
    0
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    3
    3
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    3
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    352
    90
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    0
    1
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    5
    1
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    2
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    2
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    266
    71
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    188
    41
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    1
    1
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    114
    20
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    38
    8
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    6
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 53

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 53 [48]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 53 are reported. Question 53 was following: “Did you have difficulty getting or maintaining an erection?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [48] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=50,24)
    6
    4
        Baseline: a little(n=50,24)
    19
    5
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=50,24)
    4
    4
        Baseline: very much(n=50,24)
    21
    11
        Baseline: not answered(n=50,24)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    10
    8
        Week 17: a little(n=884,439)
    8
    8
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=884,439)
    8
    4
        Week 17: very much(n=884,439)
    13
    7
        Week 17: not answered(n=884,439)
    800
    392
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    6
    2
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    8
    6
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    8
    3
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    18
    6
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    697
    324
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    4
    6
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    6
    5
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    0
    1
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    11
    6
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    614
    232
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    3
    1
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    4
    4
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    4
    2
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    11
    3
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    514
    183
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    7
    3
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    2
    2
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    3
    2
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    9
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    413
    140
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    2
    1
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    5
    1
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    1
    1
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    5
    2
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    352
    90
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    3
    1
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    4
    1
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    266
    71
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    188
    41
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    0
    1
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    1
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    114
    20
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    38
    8
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    6
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 54

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 54 [49]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 54 are reported. Question 54 was following: “Did you have ejaculation problems (e.g, dry ejaculation)?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [49] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=50,24)
    11
    7
        Baseline: a little(n=50,24)
    14
    4
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=50,24)
    3
    2
        Baseline: very much(n=50,24)
    22
    11
        Baseline: not answered(n=50,24)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    13
    11
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    5
    5
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    3
    1
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    18
    10
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    800
    392
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    12
    10
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    9
    1
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    5
    0
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    14
    6
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    697
    324
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    7
    6
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    3
    5
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    1
    1
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    10
    6
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    614
    232
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    8
    3
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    2
    1
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    1
    2
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    11
    4
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    514
    183
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    7
    4
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    0
    0
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    3
    0
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    11
    4
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    413
    140
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    5
    2
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    3
    0
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    0
    1
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    5
    2
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    352
    90
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    3
    2
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    5
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    266
    71
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    3
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    188
    41
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    2
    0
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    0
    1
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    114
    20
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    38
    8
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    6
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 55

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Prostate 25 (QLQ-PR25) Module Score for Question 55 [50]
    End point description
    The EORTC QLQ-PR25, a module of the EORTC QLQ-30 questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. It consisted of 25 questions (Question 31 to 55) distributed on 6 domains: urinary symptoms (8 items), incontinence aid (1 item), bowel symptoms (4 items), hormonal treatment-related symptoms (HTRS) (6 items), sexual activity (2 items), and sexual functioning (4 items). Subjects answered each of these questions using 4 point scale (1=not at all, 2=a little, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). Number of subjects with various responses to the question 55 are reported. Question 55 was following: “Have you felt uncomfortable about being sexually intimate?" The ITT population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to study treatment and was based on randomized treatment assignment regardless of whether or not treatment was administered. Here, ‘n’ = subjects evaluable for this end point at specified time points.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline, Weeks 17, 33, 49, 65, 81, 97, 113, 129, 145,161 and 177
    Notes
    [50] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    933
    468
    Units: subjects
        Baseline: not at all(n=50,24)
    31
    13
        Baseline: a little(n=50,24)
    13
    8
        Baseline: quite a bit(n=50,24)
    4
    0
        Baseline: very much(n=50,24)
    2
    3
        Baseline: not answered(n=50,24)
    0
    0
        Week 17: not at all(n=839,419)
    23
    14
        Week 17: a little(n=839,419)
    11
    7
        Week 17: quite a bit(n=839,419)
    2
    3
        Week 17: very much(n=839,419)
    3
    3
        Week 17: not answered(n=839,419)
    800
    392
        Week 33: not at all(n=737,341)
    24
    10
        Week 33: a little(n=737,341)
    6
    4
        Week 33: quite a bit(n=737,341)
    6
    2
        Week 33: very much(n=737,341)
    4
    1
        Week 33: not answered(n=737,341)
    697
    324
        Week 49: not at all(n=635,250)
    16
    10
        Week 49: a little(n=635,250)
    4
    6
        Week 49: quite a bit(n=635,250)
    1
    1
        Week 49: very much(n=635,250)
    0
    1
        Week 49: not answered(n=635,250)
    614
    232
        Week 65: not at all(n=536,193)
    13
    5
        Week 65: a little(n=536,193)
    7
    3
        Week 65: quite a bit(n=536,193)
    1
    2
        Week 65: very much(n=536,193)
    1
    0
        Week 65: not answered(n=536,193)
    514
    183
        Week 81: not at all(n=434,148)
    13
    5
        Week 81: a little(n=434,148)
    6
    1
        Week 81: quite a bit(n=434,148)
    1
    1
        Week 81: very much(n=434,148)
    1
    1
        Week 81: not answered(n=434,148)
    413
    140
        Week 97: not at all(n=365,95)
    8
    3
        Week 97: a little(n=365,95)
    3
    2
        Week 97: quite a bit(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97: very much(n=365,95)
    1
    0
        Week 97: not answered(n=365,95)
    352
    90
        Week 113: not at all(n=275,73)
    7
    2
        Week 113: a little(n=275,73)
    0
    0
        Week 113: quite a bit(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: very much(n=275,73)
    1
    0
        Week 113: not answered(n=275,73)
    266
    71
        Week 129: not at all(n=192,41)
    3
    0
        Week 129: a little(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: quite a bit(n=192,41)
    1
    0
        Week 129: very much(n=192,41)
    0
    0
        Week 129: not answered(n=192,41)
    188
    41
        Week 145: not at all(n=116,21)
    2
    1
        Week 145: a little(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: quite a bit(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: very much(n=116,21)
    0
    0
        Week 145: not answered(n=116,21)
    114
    20
        Week 161: not at all(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: a little(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: quite a bit(n=40,8)
    1
    0
        Week 161: very much(n=40,8)
    0
    0
        Week 161: not answered(n=40,8)
    38
    8
        Week 177: not at all(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: a little(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: quite a bit(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: very much(n=6,1)
    0
    0
        Week 177: not answered(n=6,1)
    6
    1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) [51]
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. A treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) was defined as an AE that occurred from the date and time of the first dose of study drug through the date of last dose +30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first). AEs included both non-serious adverse events (AEs) and SAEs.The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [51] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
        AEs
    808
    360
        SAEs
    226
    85
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3, Based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for AEs (CTCAE), Version 4.0

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Greater Than or Equal to Grade 3, Based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) for AEs (CTCAE), Version 4.0 [52]
    End point description
    AE:any untoward medical occurrence in subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI CTCAE, Grade 3 events =medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, unacceptable or intolerable events,significantly interrupting usual daily activity,require systemic drug therapy/other treatment, Grade 4 events=subject to be in imminent danger of death.Grade 5 events=death.A treatment-emergent AE(TEAE) was defined as an AE that occurred from the date and time of the first dose of study drug through the date of last dose +30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first).Number of subjects with AEs of any of the Grade3 or above(Grade 4, 5) were reported. The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [52] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
    292
    109
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Discontinuations From Study Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Discontinuations From Study Treatment Due to Adverse Events (AEs) [53]
    End point description
    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included both non-serious adverse events (AEs) and SAEs. The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [53] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
    87
    28
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Increase of 2 or More National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Toxicity Grades Above Baseline - Hematology

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Increase of 2 or More National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Toxicity Grades Above Baseline - Hematology [54]
    End point description
    Hematology parameters: Haemoglobin (grams per liter [g/L]); leukocytes (log 10 raised to power 9 per liter [10*9/L]); lymphocytes (log 10 raised to power 6 per liter [10*6/L]); neutrophils (log 10 raised to power 6 per liter [10*6/L]); platelets (log 10 raised to power 9 per litre [10*9/L]). The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [54] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
        Haemoglobin (Low)
    12
    7
        Leukocytes (Low)
    7
    7
        Lymphocytes (High)
    4
    2
        Lymphocytes (Low)
    44
    26
        Neutrophils (Low)
    13
    4
        Platelets (Low)
    3
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects With Increase of 2 or More National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Toxicity Grades Above Baseline – Chemistry

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects With Increase of 2 or More National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (NCI CTCAE) (Version 4.0) Toxicity Grades Above Baseline – Chemistry [55]
    End point description
    Chemistry parameters: Alanine aminotransferase (units per liter [U/L]); albumin (g/L); alkaline phosphatase (U/L); bilirubin (micromoles per liter [umol/L]); calcium (millimoles per liter [mmol/L]); creatine kinase (U/L); creatinine (umol/L); glucose, magnesium, phosphate, potassium, sodium (mmol/L). The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [55] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
        Alanine Aminotransferase (High)
    4
    1
        Albumin (Low)
    7
    0
        Alkaline Phosphatase (High)
    3
    6
        Aspartate Aminotransferase (High)
    3
    1
        Bilirubin (High)
    4
    1
        Calcium (High)
    1
    1
        Calcium (Low)
    2
    1
        Creatine Kinase (High)
    4
    3
        Creatinine (High)
    1
    7
        Glucose (High)
    26
    8
        Glucose (Low)
    5
    1
        Magnesium (High)
    1
    0
        Magnesium (Low)
    1
    0
        Phosphate (Low)
    30
    13
        Potassium (High)
    14
    5
        Potassium (Low)
    0
    3
        Sodium (High)
    2
    1
        Sodium (Low)
    12
    7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Subjects with Clinically Significant Vital Signs

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Subjects with Clinically Significant Vital Signs [56]
    End point description
    Vital signs included Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) and heart rate. The safety population was defined as all subjects randomly assigned to receive at least 1 dose or partial dose of study drug (enzalutamide or placebo) according to the actual treatment received (not the treatment assigned).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From first dose of study drug to the last dose + 30 days (or the day before initiation of a new antineoplastic treatment, whichever occurred first) (until the data cut-off date of 28 June 2017, maximum duration of treatment: 42.8 months)
    Notes
    [56] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: This endpoint was analyzed only in reporting arms: Enzalutamide 160 mg and placebo
    End point values
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    930
    465
    Units: subjects
        SBP
    738
    328
        DBP
    563
    229
        Heart rate
    7
    4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug or till death, whichever occurred first (up to a maximum duration of 69.8 months)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Same event may appear as both an AE and SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as SAE in 1 subject and as Non-SAE in another, or a subject may have experienced both a SA and Non-SAE.Data reported in this section was collected and analyzed only for subject who were treated with at least 1 dose of study drug.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    16.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose 160 mg per day) orally, once daily in double-blind and open-label phase (up to a maximum of 68.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days, and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) from last dose to the death date or last known survival date.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received 4 capsules of placebo (matched to Enzalutamide) orally, once daily in double blind phase (up to a maximum of 51.3 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects were given an opportunity to switch to open-label enzalutamide after completion of double blind phase. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo Patients Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who received placebo in double-blind phase and who agreed to proceed to open-label phase, received 4 capsules of Enzalutamide 40 mg each (total dose of 160 mg per day), orally once daily (up to a maximum of 18.8 months) until radiographic progression. Subjects after last dose of study drug, were followed up for safety up to 30 days and were long term followed up (for survival status and new prostate cancer therapies) to the death date or last known survival date.

    Serious adverse events
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo Placebo Patients Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    372 / 930 (40.00%)
    100 / 465 (21.51%)
    12 / 87 (13.79%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    285
    173
    4
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Acute myeloid leukaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Adenocarcinoma of colon
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Basal cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder neoplasm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder papilloma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder transitional cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Brain neoplasm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colon cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colorectal adenocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastric cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malignant neoplasm of unknown primary site
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mesothelioma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to bone
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to liver
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to lymph nodes
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to peritoneum
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to rectum
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastases to spine
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metastatic neoplasm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neoplasm
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neoplasm progression
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Non-small cell lung cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pancreatic carcinoma metastatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Pituitary tumour benign
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostate cancer metastatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rectal adenocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rectal adenoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small cell lung cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small intestine adenocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Transitional cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Waldenstrom's macroglobulinaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder Cancer Recurrent
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Glioblastoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypopharyngeal Cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Laryngeal Cancer Recurrent
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung Adenocarcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung Cancer Metastatic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malignant Melanoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pancreatic Carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostate Cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Squamous Cell Carcinoma Of Skin
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Clear cell renal cell carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neuroendocrine carcinoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vascular disorders
    Aortic aneurysm
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic dissection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Deep vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 5
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral arterial occlusive disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral artery stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peripheral ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angiopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic Rupture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypertensive Crisis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Venous Thrombosis Limb
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Surgical and medical procedures
    Bladder calculus removal
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cystoprostatectomy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Transurethral prostatectomy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatic Operation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Asthenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 930 (0.75%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 7
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Device occlusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Disease progression
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General physical health deterioration
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 3
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Non-cardiac chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Stent-graft endoleak
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sudden death
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vessel puncture site haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Performance Status Decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sudden Cardiac Death
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Swelling
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Malaise
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Immune system disorders
    Anaphylactic reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Anaphylactic shock
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Iodine allergy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    Benign prostatic hyperplasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Penile pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatic cyst
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatic haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatic obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatomegaly
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Prostatitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Acute respiratory failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Choking
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Interstitial lung disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Laryngeal oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pleural effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pleurisy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia aspiration
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary embolism
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 5
    1 / 4
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Epistaxis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung Disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pulmonary Oedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Psychiatric disorders
    Anxiety
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Depression
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mania
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Alcohol Abuse
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Confusional State
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood creatinine increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood pressure decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood urea increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemoglobin decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    International normalised ratio increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Ankle fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Clavicle fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Comminuted fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Concussion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cystitis radiation
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Excoriation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    12 / 930 (1.29%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 15
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Femoral neck fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Femur fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fibula fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Forearm fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Heat stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hip fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Humerus fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infusion related reaction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lumbar vertebral fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 4
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Patella fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pelvic fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pubis fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Radius fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rib fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Subdural haematoma
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tendon rupture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tibia fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ulna fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper limb fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urostomy complication
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Venous injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cervical Vertebral Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Chemical Cystitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Facial Bones Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Laceration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal Compression Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thoracic Vertebral Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Toxicity To Various Agents
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
    Phimosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute coronary syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 6
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acute myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 930 (1.08%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 12
    1 / 2
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Angina unstable
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic valve incompetence
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aortic valve stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Arrhythmia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atrial fibrillation
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 930 (0.97%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 10
    1 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atrial flutter
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atrioventricular block complete
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bradycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac arrest
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Cardiac failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 930 (1.08%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 10
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardio-respiratory arrest
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Conduction disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Coronary artery disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 930 (0.86%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 8
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Left ventricular failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Mitral valve incompetence
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 930 (1.08%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 11
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 6
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Myocardial ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pericardial effusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Right ventricular failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sick sinus syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sinus bradycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ventricular arrhythmia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ventricular extrasystoles
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Atrioventricular Block Second Degree
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac Aneurysm
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac Failure Congestive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiogenic Shock
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiovascular Insufficiency
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Left Ventricular Dysfunction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pericarditis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sinus Arrest
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tricuspid Valve Disease
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ventricular Tachycardia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac Failure Acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Carotid artery occlusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Carotid artery stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 5
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebral ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cerebrovascular accident
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 930 (0.75%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 8
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cognitive disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cranial nerve disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diplegia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Encephalopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Grand mal convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ischaemic stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 6
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lacunar infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lethargy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Loss of consciousness
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Presyncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal cord compression
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Syncope
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 930 (0.75%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 7
    1 / 2
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Transient ischaemic attack
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    4 / 6
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Aphasia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Basal Ganglia Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dementia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemorrhagic Stroke
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lumbar Radiculopathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neuralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sciatica
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vertigo Cns Origin
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    10 / 930 (1.08%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 13
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Anaemia macrocytic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemolytic anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Thrombocytopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Normochromic Normocytic Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Splenic Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Eye disorders
    Cataract
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Abdominal hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Acquired oesophageal web
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Duodenal stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Dysphagia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Faecaloma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastric haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal mucosal disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hiatus hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ileus
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Inguinal hernia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 4
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal congestion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal ischaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Large intestinal stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Melaena
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mesenteric vein thrombosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Oesophageal varices haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peptic ulcer
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peptic ulcer haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pharyngo-oesophageal diverticulum
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small intestinal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small intestinal obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Abdominal Distension
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal Necrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Inguinal Hernia Strangulated
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intestinal Obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower Gastrointestinal Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Periproctitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rectal Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Volvulus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Cholangitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholecystitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholecystitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholelithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatic cirrhosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatic failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bile Duct Stone
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Biliary Colic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cholelithiasis Obstructive
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatic Function Abnormal
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Azotaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder hypertrophy
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bladder outlet obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Calculus bladder
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Calculus ureteric
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cystitis haemorrhagic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cystitis noninfective
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haematuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    31 / 930 (3.33%)
    15 / 465 (3.23%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    3 / 40
    0 / 22
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hydronephrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 5
    1 / 3
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hypertonic bladder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nephrolithiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Obstructive uropathy
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Postrenal failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal colic
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal failure
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal failure acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 930 (0.75%)
    8 / 465 (1.72%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 7
    0 / 8
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal failure chronic
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal impairment
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Renal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ureteric obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Ureteric stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urethral obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urethral stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary fistula
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary incontinence
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary retention
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 930 (1.40%)
    12 / 465 (2.58%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 19
    3 / 13
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract obstruction
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Vesical fistula
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Anuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Stress Urinary Incontinence
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary Bladder Haemorrhage
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary Tract Disorder
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bone pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cervical spinal stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Flank pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Intervertebral disc protrusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lumbar spinal stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Mobility decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Muscular weakness
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Musculoskeletal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteoarthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 930 (0.54%)
    3 / 465 (0.65%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 5
    0 / 3
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteonecrosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pathological fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rheumatoid arthritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Rotator cuff syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Spinal column stenosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Osteoporotic fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pain In Extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Appendicitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Arthritis bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacteraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Biliary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bronchopneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cellulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 7
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diverticulitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Enterocolitis infectious
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastroenteritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Herpes zoster
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lung infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 930 (2.15%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 23
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pneumonia bacterial
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyelonephritis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 3
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Septic shock
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sinusitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 930 (0.22%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Small intestine gangrene
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Soft tissue infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tracheobronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    11 / 930 (1.18%)
    6 / 465 (1.29%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 11
    0 / 6
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Urosepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 930 (0.97%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 9
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Viral diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Viral infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Bacterial Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Device Related Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cystitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea Infectious
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Erysipelas
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Lobar Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nail Bed Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Peritonsillar Abscess
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Pyelonephritis Acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    2 / 465 (0.43%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Sepsis
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 930 (0.65%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 7
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Tooth Infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 930 (0.43%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Haemochromatosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyperkalaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hyponatraemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 930 (0.32%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 4
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Decreased Appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 930 (0.00%)
    1 / 465 (0.22%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 930 (0.11%)
    0 / 465 (0.00%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Enzalutamide 160 mg Placebo Placebo Patients Crossover to Enzalutamide 160 mg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    762 / 930 (81.94%)
    299 / 465 (64.30%)
    45 / 87 (51.72%)
    Vascular disorders
    Hot flush
         subjects affected / exposed
    132 / 930 (14.19%)
    38 / 465 (8.17%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    151
    40
    3
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    158 / 930 (16.99%)
    27 / 465 (5.81%)
    6 / 87 (6.90%)
         occurrences all number
    214
    34
    6
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Asthenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    93 / 930 (10.00%)
    32 / 465 (6.88%)
    10 / 87 (11.49%)
         occurrences all number
    170
    36
    13
    Fatigue
         subjects affected / exposed
    344 / 930 (36.99%)
    72 / 465 (15.48%)
    13 / 87 (14.94%)
         occurrences all number
    513
    80
    13
    Oedema Peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    59 / 930 (6.34%)
    23 / 465 (4.95%)
    4 / 87 (4.60%)
         occurrences all number
    74
    25
    5
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    47 / 930 (5.05%)
    15 / 465 (3.23%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences all number
    55
    19
    1
    Psychiatric disorders
    Insomnia
         subjects affected / exposed
    54 / 930 (5.81%)
    16 / 465 (3.44%)
    2 / 87 (2.30%)
         occurrences all number
    60
    18
    2
    Investigations
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    80 / 930 (8.60%)
    11 / 465 (2.37%)
    4 / 87 (4.60%)
         occurrences all number
    93
    11
    5
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Fall
         subjects affected / exposed
    159 / 930 (17.10%)
    24 / 465 (5.16%)
    2 / 87 (2.30%)
         occurrences all number
    223
    25
    2
    Rib Fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    63 / 930 (6.77%)
    6 / 465 (1.29%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences all number
    76
    7
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    112 / 930 (12.04%)
    27 / 465 (5.81%)
    6 / 87 (6.90%)
         occurrences all number
    138
    35
    6
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    102 / 930 (10.97%)
    23 / 465 (4.95%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    122
    28
    3
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Anaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    60 / 930 (6.45%)
    19 / 465 (4.09%)
    6 / 87 (6.90%)
         occurrences all number
    85
    30
    6
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Constipation
         subjects affected / exposed
    120 / 930 (12.90%)
    39 / 465 (8.39%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences all number
    145
    43
    1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    123 / 930 (13.23%)
    42 / 465 (9.03%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    160
    48
    3
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    110 / 930 (11.83%)
    63 / 465 (13.55%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    137
    46
    5
    Renal and urinary disorders
    Haematuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    79 / 930 (8.49%)
    33 / 465 (7.10%)
    2 / 87 (2.30%)
         occurrences all number
    113
    42
    2
    Urinary retention
         subjects affected / exposed
    37 / 930 (3.98%)
    31 / 465 (6.67%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    43
    37
    0
    Pollakiuria
         subjects affected / exposed
    43 / 930 (4.62%)
    25 / 465 (5.38%)
    0 / 87 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    44
    28
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Arthralgia
         subjects affected / exposed
    118 / 930 (12.69%)
    36 / 465 (7.74%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    145
    48
    3
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    119 / 930 (12.80%)
    38 / 465 (8.17%)
    4 / 87 (4.60%)
         occurrences all number
    139
    38
    4
    Musculoskeletal Pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    61 / 930 (6.56%)
    15 / 465 (3.23%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences all number
    72
    18
    1
    Pain In Extremity
         subjects affected / exposed
    56 / 930 (6.02%)
    15 / 465 (3.23%)
    2 / 87 (2.30%)
         occurrences all number
    64
    15
    2
    Infections and infestations
    Urinary tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    63 / 930 (6.77%)
    28 / 465 (6.02%)
    1 / 87 (1.15%)
         occurrences all number
    82
    34
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Decreased appetite
         subjects affected / exposed
    108 / 930 (11.61%)
    22 / 465 (4.73%)
    3 / 87 (3.45%)
         occurrences all number
    138
    24
    3

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    16 May 2013
    Requirement for continuing the use of BTAs for bone health during the study for subjects who received prior bisphosphonates or denosumab 4 weeks before enrollment was clarified. Rationale for why progression did not mandate discontinuation of study drug; information on the method for calculating PSA DT, rationale for allowing the use of concomitant medications that lowered the seizure threshold was provided. Determination of radiographic events for the primary efficacy endpoint analysis was clarified. Additionally, the acronym for the clinical trial name was added to the study title.
    31 May 2017
    The timing and plan for the analyses of the primary endpoint of MFS, as well as the secondary endpoints, based on results from the nonmetastatic CRPC subgroup in the Phase 2 study MDV3100-09 and outcomes of 2 other controlled studies of enzalutamide in chemotherapy-naïve metastatic CRPC (MDV3100-03 and 9785-CL-0222) was revised. Medivation,Inc. became a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc as of 28 September 2016. Medivation/Pfizer remained the Sponsor and the responsibility for expedited and periodic safety reporting was transferred to Pfizer Inc from ProductLife.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu Apr 25 21:50:44 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA