Clinical Trial Results:
Calcium electroporation for the treatment of cutaneous metastases.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-005704-17 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
23 Jan 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
15 Aug 2021
|
First version publication date |
15 Aug 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AA1232
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01941901 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Department of Oncology, University Hospital Herlev
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herlev Ringvej 75, Herlev, Denmark, 2730
|
||
Public contact |
Department of Oncology, Herlev Hosp. In 2017 Julie Gehl changed position to Zealand Uni. Hosp., Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, 45 93577626, kgeh@regionsjaelland.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Department of Oncology, Herlev Hosp. In 2017 Julie Gehl changed position to Zealand Uni. Hosp., Department of Oncology, Herlev Hospital, 45 93577626, kgeh@regionsjaelland.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
23 Jan 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Sep 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Jan 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Evaluate tumorresponse of calcium elctroporation and eletrochemotherapy with intratumoral bleomycin on cutaneous metastases, and compare the effect of the two treatments.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Patients included had consented in writing and fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Standard safety monitoring was performed during treatment.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Mar 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 7
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
7
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
7
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
2
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
5
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Patients were recruited from one site (Herlev Hospital). | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Patients with any solid cancer and cutaneous metastases could be screened for inclusion. Patients could recieve other treatment, and could be included if there was no sign of regression of the cutaneous metastases - or progression. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
inclusion, treatment and follow-up (overall period)
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Monitor, Carer, Assessor, Subject | ||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Patients with cutaneous metastases were included in the study. The cutaneous metastases were identified by a number and measured. The measurements of these numbered metastases were given to the pharmacy unit through a hatch. The pharmacy mixed the correct volume of either calcium og bleomycin in one syringe per identified metastasis. Treatment proceded without the subject or investigator knowing whether the injected matter was calcium or bleomycin. At 6 monhts follow up the code was revealed.
|
||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment | ||||||
Arm description |
All patients were treated. Individual metastases were assigned to either calcium electroporation or electroporation with bleomycin. | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
calcium chloride
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intratumoral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The dose of calcium chloride was estimated from preclinical studies and set to 9 mg/ml (220 mmol/l). Initially, the injected volume for both bleomycin and calcium chloride were 0.5 ml/cm3 tumor volume. After treatment of five patients, the volume for the smaller tumors (0.5 cm3) was amended to 1 ml/cm3. Tumor volume was calculated as axbxbxpi/6, a = largest diameter, b = largest diameter perpendicular to a.
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
bleomycin
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Powder for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intratumoral use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The dose of bleomycin was set to 1000 IU/ml in accordance with European Standard Operating Procedures for Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE). Initially, the injected volume for both bleomycin and calcium chloride were 0.5 ml/cm3 tumor volume. After treatment of five patients, the volume for the smaller tumors (0.5 cm3) was amended to 1 ml/cm3. Tumor volume was calculated as axbxbxpi/6, a = largest diameter, b = largest diameter perpendicular to a.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
inclusion, treatment and follow-up
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
||
Reporting group description |
All patients were treated. Individual metastases were assigned to either calcium electroporation or electroporation with bleomycin. |
|
|||||||||||
End point title |
Response to treatment [1] | ||||||||||
End point description |
This reporting system does not allow reporting results from all treated metastases (as there a 7 subjects treated, but 37 metastases evaluated), which is the primary endpoint as reported in the paper listed. This endpoint reporting then lists the number of patients who have experienced response of treated lessions in the reporting period. Response is then that one or more treated metastases have at least a partial response (reduction of lesion by 30% or more, up to compete remission), and the number listed is the amount of patients which had at least one partial or complete response in the treated lesions.
|
||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||
End point timeframe |
6 months
|
||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The endpoint of this trial is based on evaluating treatment of 37 cutaneous metases, in 7 patients that each had one or more metastases. The paper from the study describes this including statistical analysis. It was not possible to report number of metastases across patients in the EudraCT reporting system, so we had to list the patients experiencing response. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From baseline through completion of last follow-up
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CTCAE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
4.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All patients were treated. Individual metastases were assigned to either calcium electroporation or electroporation with bleomycin. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28816072 |