Clinical Trial Results:
Pharmacokinetics and safety of the intravenous human immunoglobulin product Nanogam 100 mg/ml
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2012-005727-32 |
Trial protocol |
NL |
Global end of trial date |
09 Mar 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
05 Dec 2021
|
First version publication date |
05 Dec 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
MD2012.02
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01985373 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Prothya Biosolutions Netherlands B.V. (previously Sanquin Plasma Products B.V.)
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Plesmanlaan 125, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1066CX
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Operations, Prothya Biosolutions, +31 205123537, ilona.kleinebudde@prothya.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Operations, Prothya Biosolutions, +31 205123537, ilona.kleinebudde@prothya.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
14 Jul 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
09 Mar 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Objective of the study is to show bioequivalency between Nanogam® 50 mg/ml and Nanogam 100 mg/ml by comparing the pharmacokinetics.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Risk minimal. Patients are already stabilised on treatment with Nanogam 50 mg/ml.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
08 Jan 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 23
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
23
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
23
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
18
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
5
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||
Recruitment details |
Recruitment from 08-01-2014 till 07-11-2014. Four clinical sites in the Netherlands. | ||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||
Screening details |
Primary a- or hypogammaglobulinemia, particularly patients with XLA or CVID, stabilised on treatment with Nanogam 50 mg/ml . A stable clinical situation. | ||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||
Period 1 title |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Nanogam 50 mg/ml | ||||||
Arm description |
One infusion Nanogam 50 mg/ml | ||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Advised dose for Nanogam 50 mg/ml: 0.2-0.8 g/kg every 3-4 weeks. Patients included in current study received one infusion Nanogam 50 mg/ml following their current treatment regimen.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||
Period 2 title |
Nanogam 100 mg/ml
|
||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||
Arms
|
|||||||
Arm title
|
Nanogam 100 mg/ml | ||||||
Arm description |
Four infusions Nanogam 100 mg/ml | ||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Nanogam 100 mg/ml
|
||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||
Other name |
|||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for infusion
|
||||||
Routes of administration |
Intravenous use
|
||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Advised dose for Nanogam: 0.2-0.8 g/kg every 3-4 weeks. Patients in current study continued treatment with Nanogam 100 mg/ml at the same dose (in grams) and interval as their regular treatment with Nanogam 50 mg/ml.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Cross-over | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml
|
||
Reporting group description |
One infusion Nanogam 50 mg/ml | ||
Reporting group title |
Nanogam 100 mg/ml
|
||
Reporting group description |
Four infusions Nanogam 100 mg/ml |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
C trough [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
predose plasma concentration
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
t1/2 term [2] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
C min | ||||||||||||
End point description |
minimum plasma concentration during the dosing interval
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Bioequivalence C min | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Cmin logarithmic scale. All paired observations for test and reference were included in the statistical analysis. The LSmeans and intrasubject variance of the parameters for each treatment group were estimated with a linear mixed effects model, controlling for treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects, and subject as a random effect. A 90% CI were constructed around the difference between the LS means of test and reference. Difference LSmeans/CI were retransformed to the original scale.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml v Nanogam 100 mg/ml
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
46
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [3] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS means ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
98.58
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
96.43 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
100.77 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Nanogam 100 mg/ml was bioequivalent to Nanogam 50 mg/ml Nanogam if the 90% confidence intervals for IgG Cmin (Test vs Reference) were within 80.00% to 125.00%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
C max [4] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Maximum plasma concentration. Cmax is dependent on the rate of infusion, which varied between subjects. Therefore Cmax needs to be interpreted with caution.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
t max [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
time to reach maximum plasma concentration. tmax is dependent on the rate of infusion and infusion duration which varied between subjects. Therefore tmax needs to be interpreted with caution.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
AUC lctp | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Area under the plasma concentration time curve from start of infusion up to the last common time point between treatments within one subject; calculated by linear-linear trapezoidal summation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Bioequivalence AUClctp | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
AUClctp logarithmic scale. All paired observations for test and reference were included in the statistical analysis. The LSmeans and intrasubject variance of the parameters for each treatment group were estimated with a linear mixed effects model, controlling for treatment, sequence and period as fixed effects, and subject as a random effect. A 90% CI were constructed around the difference between the LS means of test and reference. Difference LSmeans/CI were retransformed to the original scale
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml v Nanogam 100 mg/ml
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
46
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [6] | ||||||||||||
Method |
|||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LS means ratio | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
97.6
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
90% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
95.02 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
100.25 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - Nanogam 100 mg/ml was bioequivalent to Nanogam 50 mg/ml if the 90% confidence intervals for IgG AUClctp (Test vs Reference) were within 80.00% to 125.00%. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
C avg [7] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Average plasma concentration at steady-state over the dosing interval (τ) calculated by AUCτ/τ at steady-state.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Fluctuation (FI) [8] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Fluctuation between the maximum and minimum analyte concentration (FI)
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Apparent terminal elimination rate constant (λz) [9] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Apparent terminal elimination rate constant, determined by linear regression of the terminal points of the ln-linear plasma concentration-time curve
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Vss [10] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Volume of distribution. Calculations of Vss are reported as approximations, as extrapolations of more than 20.00% of the total AUC and/or R2adj < 0.80 were used for the calculation of AUC∞ (needed for the calculation of Vss).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
PK profiles of total IgG on Visit 1 (Nanogam 5%) and Visit 5 (Nanogam 10%): directly after infusion (within 5 min) and 1 hour, 2 hours, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14 and 21 days after infusion
|
||||||||||||
Notes [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive statistics were performed. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
The period of observation for adverse events extended from the time the patient gave informed consent till the end of the observation period.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety was monitored by measuring vital signs (blood pressure, heart rate, temperature) and recording all adverse events during and after the infusions with Nanogam.
NB All SAEs occured in same patient, who met the exclusion criterion: 'had a known insufficiency of coronary or cerebral circulation', which was considered a major protocol deviation.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Nanogam 50 mg/ml (1 infusion)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Period between study start and first infusion Nanogam 100 mg/ml. Dosing interval ranged between 13 and 35 days. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Nanogam 100 mg/ml (4 infusions)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Period between first dose Nanogam 100 mg/ml and End of Observation (=first regular infusion). Four dosing periods; dosing interval ranged between 13 and 43 days. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 4.5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |