Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Multicenter, Open Label, Phase IIIb Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Tocilizumab as Monotherapy and/or in Combination with Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-000359-42
    Trial protocol
    GR  
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jul 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    20 Jul 2017
    First version publication date
    20 Jul 2017
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    ML28695
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01941095
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
    Sponsor organisation address
    Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Switzerland, CH-4070
    Public contact
    Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
    Scientific contact
    Roche Trial Information Hotline, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    10 Jul 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    10 Jul 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The main objective of the trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) tocilizumab, administered as monotherapy and/or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for 52 weeks duration.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was conducted in full conformance with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E6 guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, or the laws and regulations of the country in which the research was conducted, whichever affords the greater protection to the individual. The study complied with the requirements of the ICH E2A guideline (Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting).
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    20 Nov 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Greece: 97
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    97
    EEA total number of subjects
    97
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    68
    From 65 to 84 years
    29
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 100 participants were enrolled, out of which 97 participants received treatment. Analyses were performed in 97 participants.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Arm title
    Tocilizumab
    Arm description
    Participants received tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) SC injection once a week (QW) either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs during the treatment period of 52 weeks. The choice of monotherapy or combination treatment was according to the physician's judgment up to Week 24. Depending upon the participant's response to study regimen at Week 24, participant might either continue/discontinue/switch to tocilizumab monotherapy or may lead to intensification of methotrexate/non-biologic DMARDs with tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg SC QW till Week 52.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tocilizumab
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    RoActemra, Actemra
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants received tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg SC QW either as monotherapy or in combination with non-biologic DMARDs.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Tocilizumab
    Started
    97
    Completed
    41
    Not completed
    56
         Anaphylaxis or serious hypersensitivity
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    17
         Physician decision
    3
         Insufficient therapeutic response
    13
         Adverse event
    11
         Lost to follow-up
    10

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Tocilizumab
    Reporting group description
    Participants received tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) SC injection once a week (QW) either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs during the treatment period of 52 weeks. The choice of monotherapy or combination treatment was according to the physician's judgment up to Week 24. Depending upon the participant's response to study regimen at Week 24, participant might either continue/discontinue/switch to tocilizumab monotherapy or may lead to intensification of methotrexate/non-biologic DMARDs with tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg SC QW till Week 52.

    Reporting group values
    Tocilizumab Total
    Number of subjects
    97 97
    Age Categorical
    Units: Subjects
    Age Continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    56.27 ( 12.77 ) -
    Gender Categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    86 86
        Male
    11 11

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Tocilizumab
    Reporting group description
    Participants received tocilizumab 162 milligrams (mg) SC injection once a week (QW) either as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs during the treatment period of 52 weeks. The choice of monotherapy or combination treatment was according to the physician's judgment up to Week 24. Depending upon the participant's response to study regimen at Week 24, participant might either continue/discontinue/switch to tocilizumab monotherapy or may lead to intensification of methotrexate/non-biologic DMARDs with tocilizumab at a fixed dose of 162 mg SC QW till Week 52.

    Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (DAS28-ESR) Remission at Week 24 [1]
    End point description
    DAS28-ESR score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using tender joint count in 28 joints (TJC28), swollen joint count in 28 joints (SJC28), patient global assessment of disease activity (PGA) (general health [GH]) using visual analog scale (VAS): 0 millimeter (mm)=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity, displayed on the 100 mm horizontal VAS, and acute phase response (ESR in millimeters per hour [mm/hr]). The score is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-ESR = [0.56 multiplied by (*) square root (√) of TJC28] plus (+) [0.28*√SJC28]+[0.70*the natural logarithm (ln) ESR]+[0.014*GH]. DAS28-ESR score varies from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent greater disease activity. DAS28-ESR score of less than (<) 2.6 represents DAS28-ESR remission. Full analysis set included all recruited participants who received at least one dose of SC tocilizumab. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No inferential statistics was planned for this endpoint
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    80
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    40
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Maintained DAS28-ESR Remission From Week 24 up to Week 52 Among Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy Since Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Maintained DAS28-ESR Remission From Week 24 up to Week 52 Among Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy Since Week 24
    End point description
    DAS28-ESR score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGA using VAS 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity, displayed on the 100 mm horizontal VAS, and acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. The score is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-ESR = [0.56 * √TJC28 + [0.28*√SJC28]+[0.70*ln ESR]+[0.014*GH]. DAS28-ESR score varies from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent greater disease activity. DAS28-ESR score <2.6 represents DAS28-ESR remission. Per protocol analysis. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    80
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 24 (n=80)
    38.7
        Week 28 (n=79)
    34.2
        Week 32 (n=74)
    36.5
        Week 36 (n=74)
    36.5
        Week 40 (n=74)
    36.5
        Week 44 (n=71)
    35.2
        Week 48 (n=70)
    35.7
        Week 52 (n=67)
    38.8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission/Low Disease Activity (LDA) From Week 28 up to Week 52 Among Participants With Intensification of Methotrexate/Other Non-Biologic DMARDs in Combination with Tocilizumab Since Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28-ESR Remission/Low Disease Activity (LDA) From Week 28 up to Week 52 Among Participants With Intensification of Methotrexate/Other Non-Biologic DMARDs in Combination with Tocilizumab Since Week 24
    End point description
    DAS28-ESR score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGA using VAS 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity, displayed on the 100 mm horizontal VAS, and acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. The score is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-ESR = [0.56 * √TJC28 + [0.28*√SJC28]+[0.70*ln ESR]+[0.014*GH]. DAS28-ESR score varies from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent greater disease activity. DAS28-ESR score <2.6 represents DAS28-ESR remission. DAS28-ESR score greater than or equal to (>/=) 2.6 and <3.2 represents LDA. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    79
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 28 (n=79): Remission
    5.1
        Week 32 (n=74): Remission
    8.1
        Week 36 (n=74): Remission
    4.1
        Week 40 (n=74): Remission
    9.5
        Week 44 (n=72): Remission
    6.9
        Week 48 (n=71): Remission
    8.5
        Week 52 (n=67): Remission
    6
        Week 28 (n=79): LDA
    7.6
        Week 32 (n=74): LDA
    1.4
        Week 36 (n=74): LDA
    6.8
        Week 40 (n=74): LDA
    6.8
        Week 44 (n=72): LDA
    6.9
        Week 48 (n=71): LDA
    4.2
        Week 52 (n=67): LDA
    9
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR up to Week 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in DAS28-ESR up to Week 52
    End point description
    DAS28-ESR score is a measure of participant's disease activity calculated using TJC28, SJC28, PGA using VAS 0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity, displayed on the 100 mm horizontal VAS, and acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr) for a total possible score of 0 to 10. The score is calculated using the following formula: DAS28-ESR = [0.56 * √TJC28 + [0.28*√SJC28]+[0.70*ln ESR]+[0.014*GH]. DAS28-ESR score varies from 0 to 10, where higher scores represent greater disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Change at Week 2 (n=96)
    -0.99 (-1.33 to -0.64)
        Change at Week 4 (n=95)
    -1.7 (-2.06 to -1.36)
        Change at Week 8 (n=93)
    -2.2 (-2.54 to -1.84)
        Change at Week 12 (n=87)
    -2.56 (-2.91 to -2.2)
        Change at Week 16 (n=85)
    -2.59 (-2.91 to -2.27)
        Change at Week 20 (n=82)
    -2.93 (-3.24 to -2.62)
        Change at Week 24 (n=80)
    -3.14 (-3.45 to -2.83)
        Change at Week 28 (n=79)
    -3.22 (-3.53 to -2.9)
        Change at Week 32 (n=74)
    -3.34 (-3.66 to -3.01)
        Change at Week 36 (n=74)
    -3.32 (-3.64 to -3)
        Change at Week 40 (n=74)
    -3.4 (-3.73 to -3.07)
        Change at Week 44 (n=71)
    -3.45 (-3.78 to -3.11)
        Change at Week 48 (n=70)
    -3.42 (-3.76 to -3.08)
        Change at Week 52 (n=67)
    -3.4 (-3.73 to -3.07)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response
    End point description
    ACR20 response was defined as >/=20% improvement from baseline in both TJC28 and SJC28 as well as in 3 out of 5 additional parameters: Separate patient and physician’s global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0 mm=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity), patient’s assessment of pain on VAS (0 mm=no pain to 100 mm=unbearable pain), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do), and acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr, for a total possible score of 0 to 10). Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed=participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n=number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: participants
        Week 2 (n=96)
    19
        Week 4 (n=95)
    19
        Week 8 (n=93)
    23
        Week 12 (n=87)
    9
        Week 16 (n=85)
    13
        Week 20 (n=82)
    16
        Week 24 (n=80)
    9
        Week 28 (n=79)
    13
        Week 32 (n=74)
    10
        Week 36 (n=74)
    11
        Week 40 (n=74)
    10
        Week 44 (n=72)
    12
        Week 48 (n=71)
    13
        Week 52 (n=67)
    15
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or No Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With Good, Moderate, or No Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Criteria
    End point description
    Response to treatment was determined using EULAR criteria based upon DAS28 absolute scores at the assessment visit and the DAS28 reduction from the baseline visit. Participants with a score lesser than or equal to (</=) 3.2 and reduction of greater than (>) 1.2 points were assessed as having a 'good' response. Participants with a score >3.2 with reduction of >1.2 points, or a score </=5.1 with reduction of >0.6 to </=1.2 points, were assessed as having a 'moderate' response. Participants with a score >5.1 with reduction of >0.6 to </=1.2 points, or any score with reduction </=0.6 points, were assessed as having 'no response'. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 2 (n=96): Good response
    9.4
        Week 2 (n=96): Moderate response
    44.8
        Week 2 (n=96): No response
    45.8
        Week 4 (n=95): Good response
    9.5
        Week 4 (n=95): Moderate response
    38.9
        Week 4 (n=95): No response
    51.6
        Week 8 (n=93): Good response
    10.8
        Week 8 (n=93): Moderate response
    23.6
        Week 8 (n=93): No response
    65.6
        Week 12 (n=87): Good response
    9.2
        Week 12 (n=87): Moderate response
    20.7
        Week 12 (n=87): No response
    70.1
        Week 16 (n=85): Good response
    5.9
        Week 16 (n=85): Moderate response
    15.3
        Week 16 (n=85): No response
    78.8
        Week 20 (n=82): Good response
    6.1
        Week 20 (n=82): Moderate response
    26.8
        Week 20 (n=82): No response
    67.1
        Week 24 (n=80): Good response
    6.2
        Week 24 (n=80): Moderate response
    21.2
        Week 24 (n=80): No response
    72.6
        Week 28 (n=79): Good response
    6.3
        Week 28 (n=79): Moderate response
    11.4
        Week 28 (n=79): No response
    82.3
        Week 32 (n=74): Good response
    0
        Week 32 (n=74): Moderate response
    18.9
        Week 32 (n=74): No response
    81.1
        Week 36 (n=74): Good response
    1.3
        Week 36 (n=74): Moderate response
    14.9
        Week 36 (n=74): No response
    83.8
        Week 40 (n=74): Good response
    5.4
        Week 40 (n=74): Moderate response
    17.6
        Week 40 (n=74): No response
    77
        Week 44 (n=72): Good response
    2.8
        Week 44 (n=72): Moderate response
    13.9
        Week 44 (n=72): No response
    83.3
        Week 48 (n=71): Good response
    5.7
        Week 48 (n=71): Moderate response
    11.4
        Week 48 (n=71): No response
    82.9
        Week 52 (n=67): Good response
    94
        Week 52 (n=67): Moderate response
    6
        Week 52 (n=67): No response
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score up to Week 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score up to Week 52
    End point description
    SDAI is an index for measuring disease activity. SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC28 and SJC28, PGA and physician global assessment of disease activity assessed on VAS (0 centimeter [cm]-10 cm); 0 cm= no disease activity and 10 cm= worst disease activity, and CRP (in milligrams per deciliter [mg/dL]). SDAI total score ranges from 0 to 86, with higher scores indicating increased (or severe) disease activity. SDAI score </=3.3 indicates clinical remission, >3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, >11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and >26 = high (or severe) disease activity. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Change at Week 2 (n=96)
    -3.41 (-7.17 to 0.12)
        Change at Week 4 (n=95)
    -6.54 (-10.26 to -2.97)
        Change at Week 8 (n=93)
    -8.72 (-12.89 to -5.18)
        Change at Week 12 (n=87)
    -11.07 (-14.74 to -8.04)
        Change at Week 16 (n=85)
    -13.47 (-17 to -10.6)
        Change at Week 20 (n=82)
    -13.88 (-17.42 to -10.94)
        Change at Week 24 (n=80)
    -14.08 (-17.72 to -11.25)
        Change at Week 28 (n=79)
    -15.37 (-18.87 to -12.41)
        Change at Week 32 (n=74)
    -16.09 (-19.63 to -13.07)
        Change at Week 36 (n=74)
    -15.61 (-19.14 to -12.58)
        Change at Week 40 (n=74)
    -14.86 (-18.66 to -11.84)
        Change at Week 44 (n=71)
    -16.31 (-20.06 to -13.24)
        Change at Week 48 (n=70)
    -16.47 (-20.13 to -13.45)
        Change at Week 52 (n=67)
    -17.35 (-21.01 to -14.16)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC28 up to Week 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC28 up to Week 52
    End point description
    28 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 28. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: tender joints
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Change at Week 2 (n=96)
    -1.3 (-3.18 to -0.56)
        Change at Week 4 (n=95)
    -3.26 (-5.09 to -1.42)
        Change at Week 8 (n=93)
    -4.97 (-6.69 to -3.25)
        Change at Week 12 (n=87)
    -5.82 (-7.55 to -4.09)
        Change at Week 16 (n=85)
    -6.39 (-8.08 to -4.7)
        Change at Week 20 (n=82)
    -7.03 (-8.67 to -5.38)
        Change at Week 24 (n=80)
    -7.72 (-9.34 to -6.09)
        Change at Week 28 (n=79)
    -7.91 (-9.51 to -6.31)
        Change at Week 32 (n=74)
    -8.38 (-10 to -6.77)
        Change at Week 36 (n=74)
    -8.28 (-9.86 to -6.66)
        Change at Week 40 (n=74)
    -8.22 (-9.84 to -6.59)
        Change at Week 44 (n=71)
    -8.63 (-10.25 to -7.01)
        Change at Week 48 (n=70)
    -8.26 (-9.97 to -6.54)
        Change at Week 52 (n=67)
    -8.75 (-10.41 to -7.09)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC28 up to Week 52

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC28 up to Week 52
    End point description
    28 joints were assessed for swelling and joints were classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 28. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants evaluable for this endpoint. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    96
    Units: swollen joints
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Change at Week 2 (n=96)
    -1.82 (-3.51 to -0.13)
        Change at Week 4 (n=95)
    -3.08 (-4.7 to -1.46)
        Change at Week 8 (n=93)
    -4.71 (-6.2 to -3.21)
        Change at Week 12 (n=87)
    -5.24 (-6.68 to -3.79)
        Change at Week 16 (n=85)
    -5.79 (-7.27 to -4.31)
        Change at Week 20 (n=82)
    -6.06 (-7.55 to -4.57)
        Change at Week 24 (n=80)
    -6.6 (-8.03 to -5.18)
        Change at Week 28 (n=79)
    -6.65 (-8.09 to -5.21)
        Change at Week 32 (n=74)
    -6.73 (-8.19 to -5.27)
        Change at Week 36 (n=74)
    -6.76 (-8.22 to -5.28)
        Change at Week 40 (n=74)
    -6.91 (-8.37 to -5.44)
        Change at Week 44 (n=71)
    -6.82 (-8.31 to -5.33)
        Change at Week 48 (n=70)
    -6.63 (-8.15 to -5.1)
        Change at Week 52 (n=67)
    -6.98 (-8.52 to -5.44)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Dose Reduction or Discontinuation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Dose Reduction or Discontinuation
    End point description
    Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants who used corticosteroids during the study.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline up to Week 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    37
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (not applicable)
    48.6
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Participants by Reasons (Categories) for Corticosteroid Dose Reduction or Discontinuation

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants by Reasons (Categories) for Corticosteroid Dose Reduction or Discontinuation
    End point description
    Reasons for corticosteroid dose reduction included: Safety Reasons (including elevated liver function test results, respiratory infections, infections and infestations, gastrointestinal disorders etc.); Other Reasons (disease remission, improvement etc.); and Unknown Reasons (including no reason). Number of participants by reasons (Safety, Other, Unknown) for corticosteroid dose reduction or discontinuation were reported. Full analysis set. Number of subjects analyzed = participants with corticosteroid dose reduction/discontinuation.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline up to Week 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    18
    Units: participants
        Safety
    6
        Other
    10
        Unknown
    2
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies (ATA)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Participants With Anti-Tocilizumab Antibodies (ATA)
    End point description
    All samples were tested using a screening assay and, if positive, by a confirmation assay to determine specificity and a neutralizing assay to test for the ability to inhibit the activity of tocilizumab. Number of participants with a positive assay result for screening assay (ATA - Screen), confirmatory assay (ATA - Confirmatory), and neutralizing assay (ATA - Neutralizing) was reported separately. Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, and 8 weeks after Week 52 dose (Week 60)
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: participants
        Week 1 (n=97): ATA - Screen
    7
        Week 1 (n=97): ATA - Confirmatory
    4
        Week 1 (n=97): ATA - Neutralizing
    0
        Week 12 (n=87): ATA - Screen
    3
        Week 12 (n=87): ATA - Confirmatory
    0
        Week 12 (n=87): ATA - Neutralizing
    0
        Week 24 (n=78): ATA - Screen
    3
        Week 24 (n=78): ATA - Confirmatory
    1
        Week 24 (n=78): ATA - Neutralizing
    1
        Week 36 (n=73): ATA - Screen
    2
        Week 36 (n=73): ATA - Confirmatory
    0
        Week 36 (n=73): ATA - Neutralizing
    0
        Week 52 (n=67): ATA - Screen
    2
        Week 52 (n=67): ATA - Confirmatory
    0
        Week 52 (n=67): ATA - Neutralizing
    0
        Week 60 (n=41): ATA - Screen
    1
        Week 60 (n=41): ATA - Confirmatory
    1
        Week 60 (n=41): ATA - Neutralizing
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Levels

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Soluble Interleukin-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Levels
    End point description
    Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, and 8 weeks after Week 52 dose (Week 60)
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL)
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    39450 ( 10740 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    553.43 ( 120.36 )
        Week 24 (n=78)
    572.03 ( 136.68 )
        Week 36 (n=73)
    570.78 ( 139.16 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    537.73 ( 152.55 )
        Week 60 (n=41)
    42850 ( 13800 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Tocilizumab Serum Levels

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Tocilizumab Serum Levels
    End point description
    Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 52, and 8 weeks after Week 52 dose (Week 60)
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: microgrms per milliliter (mcg/mL)
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    0.38 ( 0.17 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    41.98 ( 25.04 )
        Week 24 (n=78)
    44.67 ( 28.83 )
        Week 36 (n=73)
    47.9 ( 28.29 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    45.37 ( 28.13 )
        Week 60 (n=41)
    6.46 ( 4.28 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: PGA, Using VAS Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    PGA, Using VAS Score
    End point description
    PGA was assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The extreme left end of the line = 0 mm, and was described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the extreme right end = 100 mm, and was described as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (high disease activity). Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: mm
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    28.26 ( 20.25 )
        Week 2 (n=96)
    27.57 ( 20.08 )
        Week 4 (n=95)
    28.36 ( 19.37 )
        Week 8 (n=93)
    32.28 ( 22.09 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    28.73 ( 23.01 )
        Week 16 (n=85)
    24.4 ( 19.02 )
        Week 20 (n=82)
    28.15 ( 20.22 )
        Week 24 (n=80)
    32.63 ( 23.44 )
        Week 28 (n=79)
    26.02 ( 18.79 )
        Week 32 (n=74)
    27.08 ( 20.98 )
        Week 36 (n=74)
    30.79 ( 22.37 )
        Week 40 (n=74)
    30.5 ( 21.93 )
        Week 44 (n=71)
    25.79 ( 16.33 )
        Week 48 (n=70)
    23.86 ( 19.11 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    23.08 ( 17.08 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Patient Assessment of Pain, Using VAS Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Patient Assessment of Pain, Using VAS Score
    End point description
    The participant's level of pain was assessed on a 0 to 100 mm horizontal VAS. The extreme left end of the line = 0 mm, and was described as "no pain" and the extreme right end = 100 mm, and was described as "unbearable pain". Higher values correspond to worst state of participant (higher level of pain). Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: mm
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    46.4 ( 27.43 )
        Week 2 (n=96)
    52.04 ( 24.46 )
        Week 4 (n=95)
    49.87 ( 23.35 )
        Week 8 (n=93)
    42.72 ( 23.2 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    37.21 ( 21.29 )
        Week 16 (n=85)
    34.24 ( 22.49 )
        Week 20 (n=82)
    31 ( 19.42 )
        Week 24 (n=80)
    29.57 ( 19.66 )
        Week 28 (n=79)
    29.63 ( 19.07 )
        Week 32 (n=74)
    25.5 ( 17.95 )
        Week 36 (n=74)
    26.78 ( 22.13 )
        Week 40 (n=74)
    27.5 ( 21.93 )
        Week 44 (n=71)
    26.88 ( 19.96 )
        Week 48 (n=70)
    23.61 ( 18.63 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    23.98 ( 20.19 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: HAQ-DI Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    HAQ-DI Score
    End point description
    The Stanford HAQ-DI is a patient-reported questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 component sets: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. Responses in each component set were scored from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). The highest score recorded for any question in a category determines the score for the category, unless aids, devices, or help from another person was required. The HAQ-DI score was calculated as the sum of the category scores divided by the number of categories scored, giving a possible range of scores from 0 to 3. Scores of 0 to 1 are generally considered to represent "mild to moderate difficulty", 1 to 2 as "moderate to severe disability", and 2 to 3 as "severe to very severe disability". Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    1.31 ( 0.66 )
        Week 2 (n=96)
    1.22 ( 0.64 )
        Week 4 (n=95)
    1.09 ( 0.66 )
        Week 8 (n=93)
    0.91 ( 0.66 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    0.82 ( 0.58 )
        Week 16 (n=85)
    0.72 ( 0.59 )
        Week 20 (n=82)
    0.68 ( 0.56 )
        Week 24 (n=80)
    0.66 ( 0.55 )
        Week 28 (n=79)
    0.66 ( 0.57 )
        Week 32 (n=74)
    0.59 ( 0.58 )
        Week 36 (n=74)
    0.63 ( 0.58 )
        Week 40 (n=74)
    0.6 ( 0.59 )
        Week 44 (n=71)
    0.59 ( 0.61 )
        Week 48 (n=70)
    0.56 ( 0.59 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    0.54 ( 0.6 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Percentage of Participants Who Received All Planned Study Medication (Compliance)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Percentage of Participants Who Received All Planned Study Medication (Compliance)
    End point description
    Compliance (in terms of percentage of participants who received all planned study medication) was assessed on the basis of participant diary cards and return records. Full analysis set. Here, n = number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: percentage of participants
    number (not applicable)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    66
        Week 2 (n=96)
    97.9
        Week 4 (n=95)
    100
        Week 8 (n=93)
    100
        Week 12 (n=87)
    98.9
        Week 16 (n=85)
    97.6
        Week 20 (n=82)
    98.8
        Week 24 (n=80)
    100
        Week 28 (n=79)
    100
        Week 32 (n=74)
    100
        Week 36 (n=74)
    100
        Week 40 (n=74)
    100
        Week 44 (n=71)
    100
        Week 48 (n=70)
    100
        Week 52 (n=67)
    100
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Total Score
    End point description
    FACIT-Fatigue (FACIT-F) total score is sum of FACIT-General (FACIT-G) subscale score and FACIT-F subscale score. FACIT-G consists of 27 questions grouped in 4 domains of general health-related quality of life: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being; each item ranges from 0 (not at all) to 4(very much). FACIT-G score ranges between 0-108. FACIT-F subscale is 13-item questionnaire that evaluates self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities. Each item ranges from 0(Not at all) to 4 (Very much). For all items, except for 2 negatively stated ones, code was reversed and new score was calculated as 4 minus participant's response. Sum of all responses resulted in FACIT-F subscale score for total possible score of 0(worse score) to 52(better score). FACIT-F total score (FACIT-G plus FACIT-F subscale scores) ranges from 0 (better score) to 160 (worse score). Full analysis set. Here, n=number of participants analyzed for this endpoint at specified timepoint.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (Week 1), Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 48, 52
    End point values
    Tocilizumab
    Number of subjects analysed
    97
    Units: units on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Week 1 (n=97)
    89.68 ( 24.32 )
        Week 2 (n=96)
    91.83 ( 22.91 )
        Week 4 (n=95)
    100.38 ( 24.36 )
        Week 8 (n=93)
    103.16 ( 26.28 )
        Week 12 (n=87)
    106.39 ( 24.74 )
        Week 16 (n=85)
    110.17 ( 24.96 )
        Week 20 (n=82)
    112.6 ( 25.5 )
        Week 24 (n=80)
    114.21 ( 25.23 )
        Week 28 (n=79)
    114.85 ( 26.95 )
        Week 32 (n=74)
    117.01 ( 26 )
        Week 36 (n=74)
    116.5 ( 26.17 )
        Week 40 (n=74)
    116.59 ( 26.2 )
        Week 44 (n=71)
    119.67 ( 26.64 )
        Week 48 (n=70)
    119.83 ( 26.51 )
        Week 52 (n=67)
    121.82 ( 25.34 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From Baseline up to end of study (Week 60)
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Safety population included all participants who received at least one dose of SC tocilizumab. Adverse events were reported separately for the participants who received tocilizumab monotherapy and tocilizumab in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    19.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Tocilizumab + Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs
    Reporting group description
    Participants received tocilizumab 162 mg SC injection QW in combination with methotrexate or other non-biologic DMARDs during the treatment period of 52 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Tocilizumab Monotherapy
    Reporting group description
    Participants received tocilizumab 162 mg SC injection QW as monotherapy during the treatment period of 52 weeks.

    Serious adverse events
    Tocilizumab + Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs Tocilizumab Monotherapy
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Cardiac disorders
    Acute coronary syndrome
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Pancreatitis acute
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    2 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Dehydration
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Tocilizumab + Methotrexate or Other Non-Biologic DMARDs Tocilizumab Monotherapy
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    38 / 66 (57.58%)
    19 / 31 (61.29%)
    Investigations
    Alanine aminotransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    13 / 66 (19.70%)
    9 / 31 (29.03%)
         occurrences all number
    24
    17
    Aspartate aminotransferase increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 66 (13.64%)
    8 / 31 (25.81%)
         occurrences all number
    14
    15
    Blood glucose increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 66 (4.55%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    7
    Blood triglycerides increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 66 (4.55%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    4
    Blood urea increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 66 (4.55%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    1
    Blood uric acid increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    5
    White blood cell count decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    Hepatic enzyme increased
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    3
    Neutrophil count decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    4
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    4
    Vascular disorders
    Hypertension
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    2
    Nervous system disorders
    Dizziness
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Sciatica
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    3
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Leukopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 66 (12.12%)
    4 / 31 (12.90%)
         occurrences all number
    12
    13
    Lymphopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    Neutropenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    6 / 31 (19.35%)
         occurrences all number
    8
    16
    Thrombocytopenia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    3
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Injection site erythema
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    2
    Oedema peripheral
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    2
    Injection site pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    6
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 66 (3.03%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    2
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 66 (0.00%)
    4 / 31 (12.90%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    5
    Abdominal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Hypertransaminasaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    6 / 66 (9.09%)
    1 / 31 (3.23%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Pruritus
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    5 / 31 (16.13%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    5
    Infections and infestations
    Bronchitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    3
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 66 (12.12%)
    4 / 31 (12.90%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    5
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    2
    Viral upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    5 / 66 (7.58%)
    2 / 31 (6.45%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    3
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    Hypercholesterolaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 66 (6.06%)
    0 / 31 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    5
    0
    Hypertriglyceridaemia
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 66 (1.52%)
    3 / 31 (9.68%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    7

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    14 Oct 2014
    Protocol ML28695 had been amended in order to provide participants the investigational medicinal product (IMP) until it becomes commercially available and reimbursed in Greek market. Additional changes to the protocol were as follows: • Participants who completed 60 weeks in the study before tocilizumab SC became commercially available and reimbursed, would enter an extension phase until the IMP became commercially available and reimbursed in the Greek market. • Efficacy and Safety outcome measures would continue to be collected/ monitored according to the revised schedule of assessments.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon May 05 20:16:28 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA