Clinical Trial Results:
Prospective, randomized, multi-center, double-blind, controlled, two-period, two-treatment,
crossover, phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-protec® in peritoneal
dialysis in patients with chronic renal failure
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-000400-42 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
10 Nov 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
17 Dec 2021
|
First version publication date |
17 Dec 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
ZP_PDProtec-201
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Zytoprotec GmbH
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Mariannengasse 28/2, Vienna, Austria, 1090
|
||
Public contact |
Bernd Seibel, Zytoprotec GmbH, 0043 14062002, office@zytoprotec.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Bernd Seibel, Zytoprotec GmbH, 0043 14062002, office@zytoprotec.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
10 Nov 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
10 Nov 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of the trial was to examine if PD-protec provides benefits for peritoneal health by measuring cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) appearance rate and ex vivo stimulated interleukin (IL)-6 release in 1 hour PD effluent.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All study participants were required to read and sign an Informed Consent Form.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
26 Jun 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 50
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
50
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
50
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
33
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
17
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
First patient in: 26-Jun-2014 Last patient out: 10-Nov-2016 Recruitment Duration: 24 months Countries: Austria Number of centers: 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Screening tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of the treatment I period. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Run-in
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Physioneal 40
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A: Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and 3.86% (as DCB).
Dose: volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body weight and based on patient’s pre-randomization
PD prescription by physician
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A: Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and 3.86% (as DCB).
Dose: volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body weight and based on patient’s pre-randomization
PD prescription by physician
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Treatment period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment period 1 Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A: Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and 3.86% (as DCB) with an added placebo (Aqua bidest®:
water for injection)
Dose: volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body weight and based on patient’s pre-randomization
PD prescription by physician
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment period 1 Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Sequence A-B: Physioneal40 (Reference Product) - PD-protec (IMP) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
PD-protec DCB 8.0
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dipeptiven (N(2)-Alanyl-L-Glutamine 200 mg/mL) added to Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and
3.86% to a final concentration of 8 mM (1.74 g/L).
Dose: amount of AGD per liter PDF is constant (8 mM); volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body
weight and individual PD prescription by physician.
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 3 title |
Treatment period 2
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment period 2 Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Sequence A-B: Physioneal40 (Reference Product) - PD-protec (IMP) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence A-B | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
PD-protec DCB 8.0
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Dipeptiven (N(2)-Alanyl-L-Glutamine 200 mg/mL) added to Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and
3.86% to a final concentration of 8 mM (1.74 g/L).
Dose: amount of AGD per liter PDF is constant (8 mM); volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body
weight and individual PD prescription by physician.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Treatment period 2 Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Sequence B-A | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Concentrate for solution for peritoneal dialysis
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraperitoneal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
A: Physioneal 40 Glucose 1.36%, 2.27% and 3.86% (as DCB) with an added placebo (Aqua bidest®:
water for injection)
Dose: volume of PDF will vary with patient’s body weight and based on patient’s pre-randomization
PD prescription by physician
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Sequence A-B
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Sequence B-A
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Sequence A-B
|
||
Reporting group description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||
Reporting group title |
Sequence B-A
|
||
Reporting group description |
Screening Tests have been conducted within 35 days prior to the beginning of Treatment Period I. | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment period 1 Sequence A-B
|
||
Reporting group description |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest) | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment period 1 Sequence B-A
|
||
Reporting group description |
Sequence A-B: Physioneal40 (Reference Product) - PD-protec (IMP) | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment period 2 Sequence A-B
|
||
Reporting group description |
Sequence A-B: Physioneal40 (Reference Product) - PD-protec (IMP) | ||
Reporting group title |
Treatment period 2 Sequence B-A
|
||
Reporting group description |
Physioneal 40 with added Placebo (Aqua bidest) | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Physioneal
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
CA-125: concentration at 4-hour PDE; volume alone: concentration (4-hour) – concentration(0-hour);
and (concentration (4-hour) – concentration (0-hour))*volume / time
• IL-6 release: IL-6 release at 1-hour PDE / basal IL-6 release at 4-hour PDE
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
PD-Protec
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
CA-125: concentration at 4-hour PDE; volume alone: concentration (4-hour) – concentration(0-hour);
and (concentration (4-hour) – concentration (0-hour))*volume / time
• IL-6 release: IL-6 release at 1-hour PDE / basal IL-6 release at 4-hour PDE
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
CA-125 apperance rate (U/min), FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
CA-125: concentration at 4-hour PDE; volume alone: concentration (4-hour) – concentration(0-hour); and (concentration (4-hour) – concentration (0-hour))*volume / time
• IL-6 release: IL-6 release at 1-hour PDE / basal IL-6 release at 4-hour PDE
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The sample size calculation was based on the effect on the CA-125
concentration using data from the previous first-in-man trial.18
Sample sizes between 32 and 36 patients would result in power
values between 89% and 92% assuming a difference in means of
7 units and a crossover analysis of variance root mean square error of
8.5 using a 1-sided 2-group t-test. An effect of 7 units in concen-
tration would translate to mean difference of approximately 58 U/min
in the CA-125 appearance rate.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Physioneal v PD-Protec
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
82
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Log-transformed | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
stimulated IL-6 release (1 h) ([log10] pg/ml), FAS | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
CA-125: concentration at 4-hour PDE; volume alone: concentration (4-hour) – concentration(0-hour);
and (concentration (4-hour) – concentration (0-hour))*volume / time
• IL-6 release: IL-6 release at 1-hour PDE / basal IL-6 release at 4-hour PDE
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Primary | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The sample size calculation was based on the effect on the CA-125
concentration using data from the previous first-in-man trial.18
Sample sizes between 32 and 36 patients would result in power
values between 89% and 92% assuming a difference in means of
7 units and a crossover analysis of variance root mean square error of
8.5 using a 1-sided 2-group t-test. An effect of 7 units in concentration
would translate to mean difference of approximately 58 U/min
in the CA-125 appearance rate.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Physioneal v PD-Protec
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
82
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.004 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Log-transformed | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From signing of the informed consent until the end of the study (end of study visit).
|
||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Safety population: All patients treated at least once with the study medication. All patients were
analyzed according to the treatment they received.
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
19.1
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: No serious AE was related to the study treatment, less than 5% of the non serious AEs were assessed as at least possibly related to study treatment |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
18 Mar 2014 |
Version 1.2
In addition to a number of minor changes, relevant changes included:
• Change in inclusion criteria no. 4 (“Extraneal allowed; Nutrineal not allowed” was deleted) and no. 5 (text was added “in CAPD patients or, in
the case of APD, during nightly cycler treatment [additional exchange with Extraneal allowed; Nutrineal not allowed])
• Clarifications with respect to the following were added: i) IMP handling manual will be provided to patients: ii) up to 3-month data for some
PD parameters will be acceptable to be documented at baseline, III) performance of PET procedure at Visit 1
|
||
24 Jun 2014 |
Version 1.3
The following changes were implemented in the protocol:
• Study medication (IMP and reference product) was to be mixed by a study nurse at patient’s home within 72 hours prior to drug
administration.
• In case of an infection, the PET could be delayed for additional 7 days.
|
||
06 Mar 2015 |
Version 1.4
Study will not be conducted in Hungary, as initially planned, but only in Austria. This resulted in a number of changes in the protocol, including:
• Total number of centers and patients to be enrolled were reduced
• One stratification factor (SCB) was excluded
• Re-estimation of sample size
• Implementation of a complementary randomization schedule and additional emergency envelops with additional 48 randomization
numbers stratified by peritonitis status
|
||
05 Nov 2015 |
Version 1.5
In addition to few minor changes, relevant changes included:
• Change in inclusion criteria no. 5 (text added is shown in bold“…in CAPD patients or, in the case of APD, during nightly cycler treatment on at
least 5 out of 7 days per week [additional exchange with Extraneal allowed; Nutrineal not allowed])
• Randomization was to performed after screening, and not at baseline (Visit 1)
|
||
08 Apr 2016 |
Version 1.6
Major changes in the study design were implemented with this protocol amendment. Relevant changes included:
• Change in study title (“adaptive design” was excluded from the title)
• Re-estimation of sample size and study power
• Cancelation of interim analysis and related changes in the primary analysis
• Cancelation of data monitoring committee involvement
• Modification of the stratification by previous peritonitis (yes/no), aiming for 1:1 ratio if a sufficient number of patients with positive
peritonitis could be enrolled
|
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30360960 |