Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Study to Measure Serum Periostin, Asthma-Related Biomarkers and Response to Prednisolone in Adult and Adolescent Patients With Severe Oral Corticosteroid-Dependent Asthma

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-000900-41
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    28 Apr 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    21 Apr 2016
    First version publication date
    21 Apr 2016
    Other versions
    Summary report(s)
    Supporting document for 1 participant with missing age

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    WB28850
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01948401
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd
    Sponsor organisation address
    Grenzacherstrasse 124, Basel, Switzerland, 4070
    Public contact
    Regulatory Affairs, Roche Trial Information Hotline, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
    Scientific contact
    Regulatory Affairs, Roche Trial Information Hotline, +41 61 6878333, global.trial_information@roche.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    06 Mar 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    28 Apr 2014
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    28 Apr 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the levels of serum periostin in a population of patients with severe oral corticosteroid (OCS) dependent asthma at Baseline To examine the stability of serum periostin levels and individual patient phenotypes in relation to sputum eosinophils (as defined by % eosinophils), blood eosinophil count, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO [parts-per-billion]), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]), and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-7) To examine the changes in serum periostin levels in a study population with uncontrolled asthma that receives 7 days of high-dose OCS treatment and relate these changes to blood eosinophils, FeNO, lung function, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire for adults and adolescents age 12 years and older [AQLQ12+], and ACQ-7
    Protection of trial subjects
    The conduct of this clinical study met all local legal and regulatory requirements. The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization guideline E6: Good Clinical Practice. Before entering the study, the informed consent form was read by and explained to all participants and/or their legally authorized representative. Participants signed informed consent form and could withdraw from the study at any time without any disadvantage and without having to provide a reason for this decision. Only investigators qualified by training and experience were selected as appropriate experts to investigate the study drug.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    01 Jul 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    Yes
    Long term follow-up rationale
    Safety, Efficacy
    Long term follow-up duration
    3 Months
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 54
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    54
    EEA total number of subjects
    54
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    47
    From 65 to 84 years
    7
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Overall 54 participants were randomized. Of these, 42 participated in the follow-up phase and 40 participants completed the study.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Approximately 130 participants were planned at study centers in the UK. However, the study was terminated early due to slow recruitment. Sites were planned to participate in Study WB28182 and participation in Study WB28850 ended when Study WB28182 was ready to begin enrolment. Therefore, the final number of participants enrolled was 54.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Non-randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Controlled Asthma
    Arm description
    Participants with controlled asthma were included in this arm. Participants not meeting the “uncontrolled” asthma criteria listed were defined as “controlled”. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria were: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/milliliter [mL]) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Arm title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS
    Arm description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who consented to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Prednisolone
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma were administered prednisolone tablets 0.5 mg/kg (to the nearest 5 mg) be taken daily for 7 days in addition to their maintenance OCS.

    Arm title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Arm description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who did not consent to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.
    Arm type
    No intervention

    Investigational medicinal product name
    No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Started
    3
    45
    6
    Completed
    3
    43
    6
    Not completed
    0
    2
    0
         Unavailable/do not wish to attend the last visit
    -
    2
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Controlled Asthma
    Reporting group description
    Participants with controlled asthma were included in this arm. Participants not meeting the “uncontrolled” asthma criteria listed were defined as “controlled”. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria were: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/milliliter [mL]) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who consented to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who did not consent to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS Total
    Number of subjects
    3 45 6 54
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    2 40 4 46
        From 65-84 years
    1 4 2 7
        Missing
    0 1 0 1
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    57.3 ( 7.5 ) 52.9 ( 10.4 ) 56.3 ( 13.9 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Male
    3 21 2 26
        Female
    0 24 4 28

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Controlled Asthma
    Reporting group description
    Participants with controlled asthma were included in this arm. Participants not meeting the “uncontrolled” asthma criteria listed were defined as “controlled”. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria were: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/milliliter [mL]) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who consented to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who did not consent to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Subject analysis set title
    Full-analysis set
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    The full-analysis set (FAS) was used in all analyses and consisted of all participants who met the criteria for entering the study.

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin levels at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin levels at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [1]
    End point description
    Change from Baseline values were measured by participant group and by serum periostin level, where Baseline was Day 0 (Visit 1) or last non-missing measurement of screening. Baseline periostin <50 ng/mL was classed as low (PL) and Baseline serum periostin >=50 ng/mL was classed as high (PH). Change from Baseline: Post baseline value — Baseline value. The full-analysis set (FAS) was used for analysis and consisted of all participants who met the criteria for entering the study. Participants only with a value at Baseline and post-baseline are analysed and are represented by n=X, X, X. Parameters for which values are not calculated are presented as zero (0).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: nanogram/milliliter
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        PL Visit 2, n=2, 23, 3
    1.39 ( 0.35 )
    -3.81 ( 5.05 )
    -0.68 ( 3.91 )
        PL Visit 3, n=1, 21, 2
    3.43 ( 0 )
    1.15 ( 7.09 )
    11.44 ( 9.02 )
        PL Visit 4, n=1, 21, 2
    3.12 ( 0 )
    0.4 ( 5.5 )
    1.02 ( 8.63 )
        PL Visit 5, n=1, 20, 2
    2.91 ( 0 )
    -0.88 ( 7.42 )
    3.23 ( 8.62 )
        PH Visit 2, n=1, 20, 2
    -0.46 ( 0 )
    -11.09 ( 5.35 )
    4.03 ( 12.39 )
        PH Visit 3, n=0, 17, 0
    0 ( 0 )
    -0.19 ( 9.6 )
    0 ( 0 )
        PH Visit 4, n=0, 16, 0
    0 ( 0 )
    -1.94 ( 8.48 )
    0 ( 0 )
        PH Visit 5, n=0, 14, 0
    0 ( 0 )
    1.56 ( 7.22 )
    0 ( 0 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to blood eosinophil count at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to blood eosinophil count at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [2]
    End point description
    Change from baseline values were measured in serum periostin in relation to blood eosinophil count, where baseline was Day 0 (Visit 1) or last non-missing measurement of screening. Change from Baseline: Post baseline value — Baseline value. The FAS was used for analysis. Participants only with a value at Baseline and post-baseline are analysed and are represented by n=X, X, X. Parameters for which values are not calculated are presented as zero (0). A line plot of serum periostin versus blood eosinophil counts by low baseline serum periostin level and high baseline serum periostin level is provided in Figure 2 (as attachment). The figure illustrates that both blood eosinophil counts and serum periostin decrease in a response to additional OCS but then return to baseline levels, the effect being more pronounced in the group with high baseline serum periostin.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: Giga Cells Per Liter
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 2, n=3, 44, 5
    0.03 ( 0.08 )
    -0.15 ( 0.21 )
    0.04 ( 0.16 )
        Visit 3, n=1, 37, 2
    -0.06 ( 0 )
    0.04 ( 0.25 )
    0.04 ( 0.12 )
        Visit 4, n=1, 35, 2
    0.15 ( 0 )
    -0.02 ( 0.2 )
    0.05 ( 0.1 )
        Visit 5, n=1, 36, 2
    -0.03 ( 0 )
    -0.01 ( 0.18 )
    -0.04 ( 0.05 )
    Attachments
    Serum Periostin in relation Blood Eosinophils
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [3]
    End point description
    Change from Baseline values were measured in serum periostin in relation to FeNO, where Baseline is Day 0 (Visit 1) or last non-missing measurement of screening. Change from Baseline: Post baseline value — Baseline value. FeNO is a quantitative, noninvasive, simple, and safe method of measuring airway inflammation that provides a complementary tool to other ways of assessing airways disease, including asthma. The FAS was used for analysis. Participants only with a value at Baseline and post-baseline are analysed and are represented by n=X, X, X. Parameters for which values are not calculated are presented as zero (0). A line plot of serum periostin versus FeNO by low baseline serum periostin level and high baseline serum periostin level is provided in Figure 4 (as attachment). The figure illustrates that both FeNO and serum periostin decrease in a response to additional OCS, the effect being more pronounced in the group with high baseline serum periostin.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: Parts per billion
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 2, n=3, 39, 4
    -3.67 ( 7.57 )
    -19.61 ( 29.59 )
    -14.38 ( 29.85 )
        Visit 3, n=1, 35, 2
    2 ( 0 )
    -6.28 ( 37.04 )
    -18.25 ( 42.78 )
        Visit 4, n=1, 35, 2
    25 ( 0 )
    -0.39 ( 39.21 )
    -0.5 ( 12.02 )
        Visit 5, n=1, 35, 2
    8 ( 0 )
    -2.59 ( 30.98 )
    -3.5 ( 9.19 )
    Attachments
    Serum Periostin in Relation to FeNO
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 score at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 score at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [4]
    End point description
    Change from Baseline (BL) was measured in serum periostin (SP) in relation to ACQ-7 score. It describes questions related to frequency and severity of asthma. Participants recall about their asthma during the previous week and have to respond to questions about symptoms and bronchodilator use on a 7-point scale (where 0=no impairment, 6=maximum impairment). The ACQ score is the mean of the 7 questions; scores lie between 0 (totally controlled) and 6 (severely uncontrolled). The FAS was used for analysis. Participants only with a value at BL and Post-BL are analysed (presented as n=X, X, X). Change from BL (BL: Day 0 or last non-missing value): Post BL value —BL value. Not calculated parameters are presented as 0. A line plot of SP in relation to ACQ-7 is presented in Figure 6, which illustrates that both ACQ-7 score and SP decrease in a response to additional OCS but then return to BL levels, the effect being more pronounced in the group with high baseline serum periostin levels.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: Scores on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 2, n=3, 45, 5
    0.29 ( 0.14 )
    -0.45 ( 0.88 )
    0.23 ( 0.37 )
        Visit 3, n=1, 39, 2
    0.15 ( 0 )
    0.07 ( 0.65 )
    0.14 ( 0.01 )
        Visit 4, n=1, 37, 2
    0.86 ( 0 )
    0.26 ( 0.82 )
    0.28 ( 0.4 )
        Visit 5, n=1, 37, 2
    0.72 ( 0 )
    0.12 ( 0.92 )
    0.07 ( 0.5 )
    Attachments
    Serum Periostin in Relation to ACQ-7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire 12+ at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire 12+ at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [5]
    End point description
    Change from Baseline (BL) was measured in serum periostin (SP) in relation to AQLQ12+ score by participant group. The questionnaire contains 4 domains: activity limitations, symptoms, emotional function, and environmental stimuli. The AQLQ12+ is based on a 2-week recall period and consists of 32 questions, each scored from 1 (Worse) to 7 (Better). An increase in the AQLQ score indicates a better quality of life. The FAS was used for analysis. Participants only with a value at BL and Post-BL are analysed (presented as n=X, X, X). Change from BL (BL: Day 0 or last non-missing value): Post BL value —BL value. Not calculated parameters are presented as 0. A line plot of SP in relation to AQLQ12+ is presented in Figure 8. The figure illustrates a small increase between BL and subsequent visits for AQLQ12+ score. However, overall the AQLQ12+ scores remain stable and do not appear to be meaningfully impacted by the increase in OCS. A similar pattern was observed between the BL SP levels.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: Scores on a scale
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 2, n=2, 42, 5
    0.1 ( 0.18 )
    0.25 ( 0.5 )
    0.06 ( 0.37 )
        Visit 3, n=1, 34, 2
    -0.15 ( 0 )
    0.13 ( 0.48 )
    0.14 ( 0.33 )
        Visit 4, n=1, 34, 2
    -0.25 ( 0 )
    -0.09 ( 0.64 )
    -0.31 ( 0.71 )
        Visit 5, n=1, 33, 2
    -0.25 ( 0 )
    -0.03 ( 0.81 )
    0.02 ( 0.16 )
    Attachments
    Serum Periostin in Relation to AQLQ12+
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to FEV1 at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in serum periostin in relation to FEV1 at Visits 2, 3, 4 and 5 [6]
    End point description
    Pulmonary function was measured by forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled from the lungs in one second. Change from baseline value in serum periostin in relation to pre-bronchodilator FEV1 was measured, where baseline was Day 0 (Visit 1) or last non-missing measurement prior to dosing. Change from Baseline: Post baseline value — Baseline value. The FAS was used for analysis. Participants only with a value at Baseline and post-baseline are analysed and are represented by n=X, X, X. Parameters for which values are not calculated are presented as zero (0). A line plot of serum periostin versus FEV1 by low baseline serum periostin level and high baseline serum periostin level is provided in Figure 10 (as attachment). The figure illustrates that FEV1 levels show an increase with an increase in OCS, the effect being more pronounced in the group with high baseline serum periostin levels.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    From Baseline (Day 0) to Visit 2 (Day 8), Visit 3 (Day 39), Visit 4 (Day 67) and Visit 5 (Day 95)
    Notes
    [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: No statistical analyses was performed.
    End point values
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Number of subjects analysed
    3
    45
    6
    Units: Liter
    arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
        Visit 2, n=3, 43, 5
    -0.06 ( 0.46 )
    0.19 ( 0.35 )
    -0.07 ( 0.23 )
        Visit 3, n=1, 37, 2
    -0.11 ( 0 )
    0.03 ( 0.31 )
    0.1 ( 0.47 )
        Visit 4, n=1, 34, 2
    -0.42 ( 0 )
    -0.03 ( 0.36 )
    0.12 ( 0.31 )
        Visit 5, n=1, 34, 2
    -0.32 ( 0 )
    0.04 ( 0.43 )
    0.58 ( 0.21 )
    Attachments
    Serum Periostin in Relation to FEV1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Approximately up to 95 days
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events are reported in Full Analysis Set, which consists of all participants who met the criteria for entering the study.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    15.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Controlled Asthma
    Reporting group description
    Participants with controlled asthma were included in this arm. Participants not meeting the “uncontrolled” asthma criteria listed were defined as “controlled”. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who consented to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose.

    Reporting group title
    Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Reporting group description
    Participants with uncontrolled asthma who did not consent to additional use of oral corticosteroid were included in this arm. “Uncontrolled” asthma criteria: ACQ-7 >1.25 or persistent blood eosinophil count (>0.4 X 10^9/mL) or persistent sputum eosinophilia (>3%) or recurrent exacerbations requiring a boost in steroid dose

    Serious adverse events
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    7 / 45 (15.56%)
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Patella fracture
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    0 / 45 (0.00%)
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Myocardial infarction
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    1 / 45 (2.22%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Non-cardiac chest pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    2 / 45 (4.44%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    5 / 45 (11.11%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 5
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Controlled Asthma Uncontrolled Asthma with OCS Uncontrolled Asthma with No OCS
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 3 (33.33%)
    35 / 45 (77.78%)
    3 / 6 (50.00%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    3 / 45 (6.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Chest discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    5 / 45 (11.11%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    7
    0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    17 / 45 (37.78%)
    2 / 6 (33.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    18
    2
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    3 / 45 (6.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    0
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    4 / 45 (8.89%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    6
    0
    Wheezing
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    3 / 45 (6.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    5
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Back pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 3 (33.33%)
    3 / 45 (6.67%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    4
    0
    Infections and infestations
    Lower respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    4 / 45 (8.89%)
    0 / 6 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    4
    0
    Oral candidiasis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 3 (0.00%)
    1 / 45 (2.22%)
    1 / 6 (16.67%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    27 Feb 2013
    After seeking advice from Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), the trial was classified as interventional due to the use of Prednisolone as an investigational product. The protocol was amended and the word 'non-investigational' was replaced by 'investigational'.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 27 06:21:08 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA