Clinical Trial Results:
Fast-track rehabilitation protocol for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial comparing Local Infiltration Analgesia with Femoral Nerve Block
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-001008-13 |
Trial protocol |
NL |
Global end of trial date |
06 Nov 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
11 Jan 2022
|
First version publication date |
11 Jan 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Femoral nerve catheter vs local infiltration for analgesia in fast track total knee arthroplasty: short-term and long-term outcomes |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
497
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01966263 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Sint Maartenskliniek
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Hengstdal 3, Ubbergen, Netherlands,
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Information, Sint Maartenskliniek, +31 243659935, m.fenten@maartenskliniek.nl
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Information, Sint Maartenskliniek, +31 243659935, m.fenten@maartenskliniek.nl
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
03 Sep 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
06 Nov 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Nov 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Identifying the optimal anesthesia technique for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty according to the fast track protocol giving the best functional outcome
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
escape medication for pain consisted of oxycodon 5 mg per os
|
||
Background therapy |
paracetamol 1000 mg q.i.d., etoricoxib 90 mg once daily, and gabapentin 600 mg b.i.d. (300 mg if age >60 yr) | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
01 Jun 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Netherlands: 80
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
80
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
80
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
41
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
39
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Eligible participants were all adults aged 50-80 years with ASA physical health classification I, II or III. Patients presented with non-inflammatory knee osteoarthritis and were scheduled for fast track, primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind [1] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Investigator, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
group LIA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Infiltration
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
local infiltration of the anterior capsule with ropivacaine 0.2%, 50 ml plus epinephrine 1:200.000 and of the subcutaneous tissue with ropivacaine 0.2%, 50 ml without epinephrine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
group FNB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
ropivacaine
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Infiltration
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
local infiltration of the anterior capsule with ropivacaine 0.2%, 50 ml plus epinephrine 1:200.000 and of the subcutaneous tissue with ropivacaine 0.2%, 50 ml without epinephrine.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The roles blinded appear to be inconsistent with a double blind trial. Justification: it was not possible to completely blind the patients, for they are aware whether they receive medication through the perineural catheter or not. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
group LIA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
group FNB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
group LIA
|
||
Reporting group description |
- | ||
Reporting group title |
group FNB
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Timed Up and Go Test | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at 3 months and at 12 months postoperatievly
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
timed Up and Go Test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
group FNB v group LIA
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
73
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.5
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.2 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.1 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Six Minute Walk Test | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at 12 months postoperatively
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Six Minute Walk Test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
group LIA v group FNB
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
72
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-32
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-64 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.4 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Stair Climb Test | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at 12 months
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Stai Climb Test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
group LIA v group FNB
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
73
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1.9
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.7 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.5 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Pain score (NRS) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
at 3 months postoperative
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
NRS pain scores | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
group LIA v group FNB
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
73
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
≤ 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Linear | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (net) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
- | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
- |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
from start of anetshesia on the day of surgery untill the last follow up visit at 12 months post operatively
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
toetsingonline | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
group LIA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
group FNB
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: non serious adverse events are not recorded during the study |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30236246 |