Clinical Trial Results:
SAF 001: A long-term safety follow-up study of patients suffering from Urea Cycle disorders (UCD) or Crigler-Najjar Syndrome (CN) having received infusions of HepaStem.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-001045-14 |
Trial protocol |
BE PT IT GB |
Global end of trial date |
20 Jun 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Apr 2022
|
First version publication date |
27 Apr 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
SAF001_Synopsis |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
SAF001
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02051049 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Promethera Therapeutics (formerly Promethera Biosciences)
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Rue Granbonpré 11, Mont-Saint-Guibert, Belgium, 1435
|
||
Public contact |
Welcome Desk, Promethera Therapeutics (formerly Promethera Biosciences), 32 10394300, regulatory@promethera.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Welcome Desk, Promethera Therapeutics (formerly Promethera Biosciences), 32 10394300, regulatory@promethera.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
Yes
|
||
EMA paediatric investigation plan number(s) |
EMEA-001155-PIP01-11 | ||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
04 Feb 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
20 Jun 2017
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
20 Jun 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective is to document the safety of HepaStem therapy during a period up to a maximum of 48 months (4 years (Y)) in the SAF001 study (SAF001 Y1+Y2+Y3+Y4).
This long term safety follow-up study will start when the patient is ending the period of active surveillance post infusion of Hepastem in any former interventional study (Study A) conducted by Promethera Biosciences (PB). The safety will be assessed in terms of clinical status, biochemical parameters and morphology of the liver, detection of circulating anti-HLA antibodies specific for donor cells or other immune markers related to liver diseases as well as Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs of Special Interest (AESI) related to HepaStem therapy.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Guideline for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), the ethical principles that have their origins in the revised Declaration of Helsinki and local regulations.
The protocol, all amendments and the informed consent forms (ICFs) / patient information sheets (PIS) were reviewed and approved by the competent authorities (CA) and relevant ethics committee (EC) in each participating country.
The safety monitoring was planned to last for a maximum of 4 years for each patient.
However, for different reasons, patients could have been removed from this study:
• In case of organ transplantation, if it was a liver transplantation, liver samples were to be collected from the exograft. An additional visit after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) including examinations and OLT questionnaire completion were also requested
• In case of intake of other investigational treatments
Nevertheless, whenever possible, Promethera Biosciences was to continue to collect safety data of these patients once a year in collaboration with the center where the patient was followed.
If the patient terminated their participation prematurely, they were asked to have a last visit including the evaluation of all the study parameters, similar to those at 24- or 48-months, depending on the case.
|
||
Background therapy |
No investigational medicinal product was administered during this trial. All UCD and CN patients included in the trial continued their disease-specific treatment based on usual metabolic monitoring under the responsibility of the investigator/treating physician. A low level of immunosuppression was maintained after a HepaStem infusion (in the initial investigational HEP001 study) to avoid a potential risk of developing an immunization against HepaStem, which would be detrimental for HepaStem or any other future treatment with cells or organ transplant (Kaneku 2013, O`Leary 2011). Thus, in the SAF001 study, a close monitoring was set up to follow the level of immunosuppression of the patients. Patients might have been maintained under immunosuppressive treatment based on investigator’s judgement and in some cases based on the results of functional 13C tests. For patients who received HepaStem 12 months ago, the recommended target through blood level for tacrolimus was 4 ± 2 ng/mL. However, immunosuppression could have been terminated at any time following the decision taken by the investigator/treating physician. Any termination was to be carefully documented. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Not applicable | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
17 Apr 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Portugal: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 2
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Belgium: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 4
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Israel: 4
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
17
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
11
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
11
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
6
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Ten centers were active in 5 countries (Belgium, France, the UK, Italy and Israel). Date of first patient screened: 17-APR-2013; date of first patient enrolled: 17-APR-2013. | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 17 patients (12 UCD and 5 CN) were enrolled. All received infusions of HepaStem during the former interventional clinical HEP001 study and had terminated their participation in that study. All signed an informed consent form. None received mature liver cell or stem cell transplantation other than HepaStem, or organ liver transplantation. | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Visit 0 Month
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Crigler-Najar | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
HepaStem
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Heterologous human adult liver-derived progenitor cells (HHALPC)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Dispersion for infusion
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intraportal use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
HepaStem was administrated in the previous interventionnal trial HEP001
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 2 title |
Visit 6 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 3
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 3 title |
Visit 12 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 4
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 4 title |
Visit 18 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 5 title |
Visit 24 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 6
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 6 title |
Visit 30 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 7
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 7 title |
Visit 36 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 8
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 8 title |
Visit 42 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from CN | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 9
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 9 title |
Visit 48 Months
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
No | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety analysis set: All patients included in this follow-up study were analyzed.
The following subgroups have been considered for the analysis:
• The study population includes 2 types of indication:
o patients suffering from UCD with specific associated subtypes being UCD NAGS, UCD CPS I, UCD OTC, UCD ASS, UCD ASL and UCD Arginase
o patients suffering from CN with specific associated subtypes being CN I and CN II
Analyses were reported separately for each indication and some analyses were reported per indication (sub)type.
Some analyses were performed according to cohorts that were defined in the previous HEP001 study and based on:
• Theoretical assigned dose group: low dose cohort (12.5x10^6 cells/kg), intermediate dose (50x10^6 cells/kg) and high dose (200x10^6 cells/kg).
• Weight: cohort > 20 kg, cohort ≥ 10 kg-20 kg and cohort < 10 kg.
• Age at the time of the first treatment infusion: Age cohort ≤ 12 years and age cohort > 12 years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety analysis set: All patients included in this follow-up study were analyzed.
The following subgroups have been considered for the analysis:
• The study population includes 2 types of indication:
o patients suffering from UCD with specific associated subtypes being UCD NAGS, UCD CPS I, UCD OTC, UCD ASS, UCD ASL and UCD Arginase
o patients suffering from CN with specific associated subtypes being CN I and CN II
Analyses were reported separately for each indication and some analyses were reported per indication (sub)type.
Some analyses were performed according to cohorts that were defined in the previous HEP001 study and based on:
• Theoretical assigned dose group: low dose cohort (12.5x10^6 cells/kg), intermediate dose (50x10^6 cells/kg) and high dose (200x10^6 cells/kg).
• Weight: cohort > 20 kg, cohort ≥ 10 kg-20 kg and cohort < 10 kg.
• Age at the time of the first treatment infusion: Age cohort ≤ 12 years and age cohort > 12 years
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Reporting group description |
CN pediatric patients presenting with Crigler-Najjar syndrome type I or type II (poorly controlled under phenobarbital treatment or experiencing serious impairment in QoL) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Reporting group description |
UCD pediatric patients diagnosed with of one of the UCD subtypes (CPSID, OTCD, ASSD, ASLD, ARGD or NAGSD) in the former interventional clinical HEP001 study | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Pediatric patients suffering from CN
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety analysis set: All patients included in this follow-up study were analyzed.
The following subgroups have been considered for the analysis:
• The study population includes 2 types of indication:
o patients suffering from UCD with specific associated subtypes being UCD NAGS, UCD CPS I, UCD OTC, UCD ASS, UCD ASL and UCD Arginase
o patients suffering from CN with specific associated subtypes being CN I and CN II
Analyses were reported separately for each indication and some analyses were reported per indication (sub)type.
Some analyses were performed according to cohorts that were defined in the previous HEP001 study and based on:
• Theoretical assigned dose group: low dose cohort (12.5x10^6 cells/kg), intermediate dose (50x10^6 cells/kg) and high dose (200x10^6 cells/kg).
• Weight: cohort > 20 kg, cohort ≥ 10 kg-20 kg and cohort < 10 kg.
• Age at the time of the first treatment infusion: Age cohort ≤ 12 years and age cohort > 12 years
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety analysis set: All patients included in this follow-up study were analyzed.
The following subgroups have been considered for the analysis:
• The study population includes 2 types of indication:
o patients suffering from UCD with specific associated subtypes being UCD NAGS, UCD CPS I, UCD OTC, UCD ASS, UCD ASL and UCD Arginase
o patients suffering from CN with specific associated subtypes being CN I and CN II
Analyses were reported separately for each indication and some analyses were reported per indication (sub)type.
Some analyses were performed according to cohorts that were defined in the previous HEP001 study and based on:
• Theoretical assigned dose group: low dose cohort (12.5x10^6 cells/kg), intermediate dose (50x10^6 cells/kg) and high dose (200x10^6 cells/kg).
• Weight: cohort > 20 kg, cohort ≥ 10 kg-20 kg and cohort < 10 kg.
• Age at the time of the first treatment infusion: Age cohort ≤ 12 years and age cohort > 12 years
|
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Long-term safety profile of HepaStem [1] | |||||||||
End point description |
The primary endpoint was to characterize the long-term safety profile of HepaStem. Safety was assessed by evaluating the following parameters:
• Physical examination
• Vital signs
• Laboratory tests
• Liver tumor marker
• Autoimmune markers related to liver pathology
• Anti-human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies specific for donor cell haplotypes
• Morphology of liver, bile ducts and portal system by ultrasound
• Morphology of the kidneys by ultrasound
• Non-serious or serious adverse events of special interest (AESI) and serious adverse events (SAEs) related to HepaStem therapy
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
During a period up to a maximum of 48 months (4 years) in the SAF001 study (SAF001 Year 1 + Year 2 + Year 3 + Year 4)
|
|||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Only descriptive analysis has been done, not possible to enter descriptive analysis in system |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||
End point title |
Long-term disease evolution and general safety after having received HepaStem | ||||||
End point description |
The secondary endpoints were to characterize the disease evolution and the general safety post HepaStem infusion through the evaluation of the report on cognitive skills, behavior, and health-related QoL indicators, and the frequency and severity of metabolic decompensation reported as AESI.
The general safety was also evaluated based on the following parameters:
For CN patients:
•Metabolic parameters: serum total and unconjugated bilirubin levels
•Report on supportive treatment and any adjustment of phototherapy and medication
For UCD patients:
•Metabolic parameters: ammonia values, amino acids in plasma (alanine, arginine, citrulline, glutamine and argininosuccinate acid for UCD ASL patients only), orotic acid in urine (for UCD OTC patients only), argininosuccinate acid in urine (for UCD ASL patients only)
•Report on supportive treatment and any adjustment of diet (natural protein intake, total protein intake, amino acid supplements) and medication (e.g., nitrogen scavengers)
|
||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||
End point timeframe |
During a period up to a maximum of 60 months post HepaStem infusion (HEP001 study + SAF001 year 1 + year 2 + year 3 + year 4)
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Notes [2] - Descriptive analysis |
|||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Each patient was to be followed up for a maximum of 48 months.
For each patient, the entire period of follow-up post HepaStem infusion could then be up to a maximum of 60 months (HEP001 study + 4 years in SAF001).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Only SAEs or AESIs were reported in this study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
18.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Pediatric patients suffering from UCD or CN
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
05 Dec 2013 |
Amendment A (Protocol version 2.0 dated 05-Dec-2013):
• To allow all patients who received HepaStem infusion to be included in the study (modification of study title, primary objective, inclusion criteria)
• To justify more precisely the maintenance of a low level of immunosuppression following HepaStem therapy, and to define, on the request of ANSM (French regulatory authority), rules to stop or adapt the immunosuppressive regimen rules
• To adapt the procedures:
o use of a notebook to record relevant information in between visits in order to detect AE of special interest
o specifications of physical examination and vital signs measurements
o addition of 2 psychological assessments (WAIS for patients who turned 18 years old and the Leiter International Performance Scale for children and adult patients who are cognitively delayed, non-English speaking, hearing impaired, speech impaired, or autistic) and a behavioral psychological assessments for patients who turned 18 years old,
o addition of a statement to allow collection of essential information in terms of cell engraftment (collection of liver samples from the exograft in case of premature discontinuation because of a liver transplantation)
o addition of definitions for metabolic decompensation to clarify AESI
o deletion of some information about efficacy parameters
• To described in more details the primary objective in order to be in alignment with the assessments previously approved by the EC/Health Authority
• To clarify the frequency of interim analyses
• To update the number of pediatric patients (from 18 to 20 patients) |
||
14 Jul 2016 |
Amendment B (Protocol version 3.0 dated 14-Jul-2016):
• To clarify the procedure of consent for minors or adults legally incapable
• To specify how the decision to maintain the immunosuppressive treatment should be taken (by the investigator, in agreement with the patient’s family, based on the clinical
condition / evolution of the patient)
• To clarify some procedures (identity of the proteins measured by serum protein electrophoresis was clarified; precision on the baseline visit in case of the patient was
not enrolled within 4 weeks after the last visit of the former study)
• To ensure that previous infusions of HepaStem do not impact in any way the outcome of OLT, a last visit after OLT including examinations and OLT questionnaire
completion was added
• To specify the outsourcing of monitoring activities |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |