Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43884   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7296   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    EFFECTS OF BENFOTIAMINE ON INTRAEPIDERMAL NERVE FIBER DENSITY (IENFD) AND DIABETIC NEUROPATHY IN SUBJECTS WITH SENSORIMOTOR DIABETIC POLYNEUROPATHY: A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP PILOT STUDY OVER 12 MONTHS

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-001058-85
    Trial protocol
    DE  
    Global end of trial date
    07 Sep 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1
    This version publication date
    13 Dec 2016
    First version publication date
    13 Dec 2016
    Other versions
    v2
    Summary report(s)
    Development Safety Update Report

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    WOE_2013_SB
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01868191
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    U1111-1140-6958
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Woerwag Pharma GmbH & Co. KG
    Sponsor organisation address
    Calwer Strasse 7, Boeblingen, Germany, 71034
    Public contact
    Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Ovidiu Alin Stirban, Himmelgeister Landstrasse 174 40589 Duesseldorf, Germany , 0049 2191465140, stirban@web.de
    Scientific contact
    Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Ovidiu Alin Stirban , Himmelgeister Landstrasse 174 40589 Duesseldorf, Germany , 0049 2191465140, stirban@web.de
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    19 Apr 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    07 Sep 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The aim of the present study was to assess before, as well as 6 and 12 months following a therapy with benfotiamine the influence of therapy on intraepidermal nerve fiber density (an early marker of nerve damage) in 22 people with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The trial was not initiated before the protocol and all other relevant documents according to German GCP Ordinance had been reviewed, and received favourable opinion from the local Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) and approval by the Competent Authority, respectively. Should a protocol amendment be made that needed IEC favourable opinion and/or authority approval, the changes in the protocol were not to be instituted until the amendment had been reviewed and received favourable opinion by the local IEC, and approval by the Competent Authority. A protocol amendment intended to eliminate an apparent immediate hazard to subjects could have been implemented immediately providing that the regulatory authority and IEC were notified as soon as possible and an approval would have been requested. The constitution of the IEC met the requirements of ICH GCP and of the participating country. The IEC performed all duties outlined by the requirements of ICH GCP and of the participating country. Prior to subject participation in the trial, written informed consent was obtained from each subject according to ICH GCP and to the regulatory and legal requirements of the participating country. Each signature was personally dated by each signatory and the informed consent and any additional subject information form retained by the investigator as part of the trial records. A signed copy of the informed consent and any additional subject information was given to each subject. The subject was informed that his/her personal trial-related data would be used in accordance with the local data protection law. The level of disclosure was also explained to the subject. The subject was informed that his / her medical records could be examined by authorised monitors or Clinical Quality Assurance auditors appointed by the sponsor, by appropriate IEC members, and by inspectors from regulatory authorities. Should a protocol amendment become necessary, the subject
    Background therapy
    Benfotiamine 300 mg was approved on 23.06.2005 for the treatment or prophylaxis of clinical manifest vitamin B1 deficiency if a dietary supplementation is not effective. Though, benfotiamine is used for many years in the treatment of diabetic and alcoholic polyneuropathies. Clinical trials have been performed with benfotiamine for the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy, alcoholic polyneuropathy, alleviation of endothelial dysfunction in subjects with type 2 diabetes or in healthy smokers and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Study durations were up to 2 years at a dose of 300 mg/day and the highest doses were 1050 mg for 3 days and 900 mg/day administered for 12 weeks.
    Evidence for comparator
    Placebo tablets were provided in a blinded manner by the Sponsor for the 12 months therapy.
    Actual start date of recruitment
    30 Apr 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 22
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    22
    EEA total number of subjects
    22
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    16
    From 65 to 84 years
    6
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Subjects were recruited from the patients of the Diabetes Schwerpunktpraxis Essen (Camillo-Sitte Platz 1, 45136 Essen) and all study-related activities took place there.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    It was planned that 22 participants with T1DM or T2DM on a stable regimen of antidiabetic treatment with no possibility of therapy intensification, with DSP, between 18 and 75 years of age, with a BMI between 25 and 45 kg/m2, HbA1c ≤9.5 % will be randomized, ensuring 18 completers (at least 9 in each group) at 6 months.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Duration of study participation (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor
    Blinding implementation details
    The medication was provided in a blinded manner by the Sponsor for the 12 months therapy, along with emergency envelops for unblinding single participants. Tablets packaged: Benfotiamin 300 mg: 1 tablet Placebo : 1 tablet Approximately 13.5 months (12.5-15 months), including 5 ambulatory and 3

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Group 1
    Arm description
    Benfotiamine 600 mg/day for 3 months followed by benfotiamine 300 mg/day for the rest of the study duration
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Benfotiamine 300 mg
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    The recommended daily dose for the treatment of neuropathies is 300 mg, but doses as high as 900 mg/day have been given for 3 months and doses of 300 mg/day for 2 years. Therefore it was decided to administer 600 mg/day for 3 months and decrease the dose to 300 mg/day for the next 9 months. Study medication was administered in a blinded manner. The first administration was undertaken by subjects on an outpatient basis in the morning of day 2 after being instructed with regard to the procedure and receiving the medication at Visit 2 (day 1), Visit 3 (day 91±7) for the next at least 100 days (3 months + 1 week) and at Visit 5 (day 181±7) for the next 6 months and 1 week. The medication was taken as one tablet in the morning and one in the evening (before meals) until Visit 3 (600 mg/day) and one tablet in the morning afterwards (300 mg/day).

    Arm title
    Group 2
    Arm description
    Placebo
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo (identical appearance to benfotiamine)

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Group 1 Group 2
    Started
    11
    11
    Completed
    11
    11

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Duration of study participation
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Duration of study participation Total
    Number of subjects
    22 22
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0
        From 65-84 years
    0
        85 years and over
    0
    Age continuous
    22 participants with T1DM or T2DM on a stable regimen of antidiabetic treatment with no possibility of therapy intensification, with DSP, between 18 and 75 years of age were enrolled.
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    62.09 ( 8.86 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    10 10
        Male
    12 12
    Body Mass Index
    Units: kg/m2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    34.49 ( 5.78 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Group 1
    Reporting group description
    Benfotiamine 600 mg/day for 3 months followed by benfotiamine 300 mg/day for the rest of the study duration

    Reporting group title
    Group 2
    Reporting group description
    Placebo

    Primary: Primary

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Primary
    End point description
    Change from baseline in IENFD after 6 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo. Change from baseline in IENFD after 12 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Study participation
    End point values
    Group 1 Group 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Fibers/mm
    11
    11
    Statistical analysis title
    Double blinded
    Comparison groups
    Group 1 v Group 2
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    22
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.05
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Parameter type
    Mean difference (final values)
    Point estimate
    2
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    1
         upper limit
    2

    Secondary: Secondary Pharmacodynamic

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary Pharmacodynamic
    End point description
    Change from baseline in MNSI questionnaire after 6 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo. Change from baseline in MNSI examination after 6 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo Change from baseline in MNSI questionnaire after 12 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo. Change from baseline in MNSI examination after 12 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Study participation
    End point values
    Group 1 Group 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Points
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2 ( 1 )
    2 ( 1 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Secondary Pharmacokinetic

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Secondary Pharmacokinetic
    End point description
    Change from baseline in plasma thiamine concentration after 6 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo Change from baseline in plasma thiamine concentration after 12 months of benfotiamine treatment compared to placebo
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Study participation
    End point values
    Group 1 Group 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: mg/dl
        number (not applicable)
    11
    11
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Other pre-specified: Safety

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Safety
    End point description
    Adverse events Laboratory safety variables Physical examination Vital signs
    End point type
    Other pre-specified
    End point timeframe
    Study participation
    End point values
    Group 1 Group 2
    Number of subjects analysed
    11
    11
    Units: Number of AEs
    11
    11
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    The investigator was to submit all SUSARs that occur during the period of observation (from the time the informed consent form is signed until the Follow-up visit), to the Sponsor within 24 hours. The Sponsor was to report within 15 days electronically.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    7 days after initial report from the investigator and the follow up report will be submitted maximum 8 days later via the notification form. Life threatening SUSARs or such that led to death were to be reported within 7 days.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    4
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Adverse Events
    Reporting group description
    AEs were collected from the subject enrolment until the last visit. Concomitant illnesses, which existed prior to entry into the clinical study, were not considered AEs unless they increased in frequency or severity, or worsen in nature during the treatment period. Medical occurrences prior to randomisation but after obtaining informed consent were recorded on the Medical History/Current Medical Conditions CRF. The cannula inserted in a forearm vein for the collection of blood samples could have lead to superficial irritation of the vein. This was appropriately treated by the study staff and not reported as an AE in the clinical study report. Skin biopsy could have led to bleeding, local infections, and wound healing or sensitivity disturbances. These will be recorder as AEs. An AE that meets serious criteria should be recorded both on the AE Report Form and on the Serious Adverse Event Report Form.

    Serious adverse events
    Adverse Events
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 16 (43.75%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    1
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    In-stent coronary artery restensosis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    Angina pectoris
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Cerebrovascular accident prophylaxis
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Sudden cardiac death
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Dyspnoea paroxysmal nocturnal
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 16 (12.50%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    1 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Adverse Events
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 16 (56.25%)
    Investigations
    Non-serious AEs
         subjects affected / exposed
    9 / 16 (56.25%)
         occurrences all number
    9

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue May 21 12:30:39 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA