Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43865   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7286   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Exploratory, controlled, randomized, observer-blind intrainidividual clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of topically applied 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-001716-30
    Trial protocol
    DE  
    Global end of trial date
    13 Mar 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Sep 2021
    First version publication date
    04 Sep 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    CRC-ACNE-AC-04
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
    Sponsor organisation address
    Charitéplatz 1, Berlin, Germany, 10117
    Public contact
    Dr. Kathrin Hillmann, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Dept. of Dermatology Clinical Research Center for HairSkin Scie, 0049 30450518499, kathrin.hillmann@charite.de
    Scientific contact
    Dr. Kathrin Hillmann, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Dept. of Dermatology Clinical Research Center for HairSkin Scie, 0049 30450518499, kathrin.hillmann@charite.de
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    07 Jul 2014
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    13 Mar 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The objective of this trial is to evaluate the efficacy and the tolerability of topically applied 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne in comparison to a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide or to benzoyl peroxide alone.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The medical history of the patient was documented with special emphasis on other skin diseases, like e.g. eczema or contact dermatitis. Furthermore the patient were subjected to a clinical examination in order to measure e.g. the blood pressure and pulse rate and to examine for skin status. Additionally adverse events, serious adverse events and local intolerances were recorded throughout the whole treatment period.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    15 Oct 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 24
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    24
    EEA total number of subjects
    24
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    24
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Recruitment started on the 17th of September 2013. Subjects were recruited through IEC approved advertisements in the Berlin subway, CRC subject database, CRC homepage, digital Charité intranet notice board, leaflets and addressing patients during consulting hours for acne at the Department for Dermatology at the Charité.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    27 people were pre-screened. Screening criterium included 18-25 year old female or males with Fitzpatrick Skin phototype I-III with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne, comparable in appearance on both sides of the face. Female subjects must have had a negative pregnancy test as well as a reliable contraception method.

    Pre-assignment period milestones
    Number of subjects started
    24
    Number of subjects completed
    24

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Inclusion
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [1]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1 % Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [1] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 1
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    24
    12
    12
    Inclusion/exclusion
    24
    12
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    24
    12
    12
    Vital parameters
    24
    12
    12
    Urine pregnancy test
    24
    12
    12
    Concomitant medication
    24
    12
    12
    Application of trial medication
    24
    12
    12
    Lesion count
    24
    12
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visipor)
    24
    12
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    24
    12
    12
    ISGA
    24
    12
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion counting
    24
    12
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    24
    12
    12
    Adverse events
    24
    12
    12
    Completed
    24
    12
    12
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Visit 2
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [2]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamcin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [2] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 2
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamcin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    24
    12
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    24
    12
    12
    Concomitant medication
    24
    12
    12
    Application of trial medication
    24
    12
    12
    Lesion count
    24
    12
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    24
    12
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    24
    12
    12
    ISGA
    24
    12
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion counting
    24
    12
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    24
    12
    12
    Adverse events
    24
    12
    12
    Completed
    24
    12
    12
    Period 3
    Period 3 title
    Visit 3
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [3]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [3] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 3
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    24
    12
    12
    Physical examination of the skin
    24
    12
    12
    Concomitant medication
    24
    12
    12
    Application of trial medication
    24
    12
    12
    Lesion count
    24
    12
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    24
    12
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    24
    12
    12
    ISGA
    24
    12
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion counting
    24
    12
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    24
    12
    12
    Adverse events
    24
    12
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12
    Not completed
    1
    1
    0
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    1
    1
    -
    Period 4
    Period 4 title
    Visit 4
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [4]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [4] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 4
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    23
    11
    12
    Physical examination of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Concomitant medication
    23
    11
    12
    Application of trial medication
    23
    11
    12
    Lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    23
    11
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    23
    11
    12
    ISGA
    23
    11
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion counting
    23
    11
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Adverse events
    23
    11
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12
    Period 5
    Period 5 title
    Visit 5
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [5]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [5] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 5
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    23
    11
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    23
    11
    12
    Concomitant medication
    23
    11
    12
    Application of trial medication
    23
    11
    12
    Lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    23
    11
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    23
    11
    12
    ISGA
    23
    11
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Adverse events
    23
    11
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12
    Period 6
    Period 6 title
    Visit 6
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [6]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [6] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 6
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    23
    11
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    23
    11
    12
    Concomitant medication
    23
    11
    12
    Application of trial medication
    23
    11
    12
    Lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    23
    11
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    23
    11
    12
    ISGA
    23
    11
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Adverse events
    23
    11
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12
    Period 7
    Period 7 title
    Visit 7
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [7]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [7] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 7
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    23
    11
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    23
    11
    12
    Concomitant medication
    23
    11
    12
    Application of trial medication
    23
    11
    12
    Lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    23
    11
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    23
    11
    12
    ISGA
    23
    11
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion counting
    23
    11
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Adverse events
    23
    11
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12
    Period 8
    Period 8 title
    Visit 8
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator [8]
    Blinding implementation details
    In this clinical trial, a single blind concept was chosen. The investigators were blinded to the study medication and had neither access to the randomization list nor to the drug accountability log and were not present during product application. Product application was conducted solely by the study nurses. Due to original, unblinded packaging of the products, subjects and responsible study nurses were not blinded to the study medication.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Tyrosur Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. Every patient received treatment with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) on one half of the face in a thin layer. The side of the face treated with 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) was randomized.No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Duac Acne Gel
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Clindamycin and BPO
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not assigned to Tyrosur Gel, a combination of clindamycin and BPO (Duac Acne Gel®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Arm title
    BPO 5%
    Arm description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    BPO 5%
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Aknefug Oxid mild 5%
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Gel
    Routes of administration
    Topical
    Dosage and administration details
    On 24 consecutive days, the study products were applied topically according to the randomization list once daily in the evening at the study center on the related areas of patient´s face over a trial period of 25 days by the study nurse. On the other half of the patient's face, not allocated to Tyrosur Gel, BPO 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%®) was applied in a thin layer on the related areas according to randomization. No application was performed in the direct area around the eyes and on the lips of the patients.

    Notes
    [8] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: This was an investigator blinded study. The subject could not be blinded as he/she saw which product was on which facial side
    Number of subjects in period 8
    0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5%
    Started
    23
    11
    12
    Physical examination of skin
    23
    11
    12
    Vital parameters
    23
    11
    12
    Urine pregnancy test
    23
    11
    12
    Concomitant medication
    23
    11
    12
    Application of trial medication
    23
    11
    12
    Lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Fluorescence intensity (Visiopor)
    23
    11
    12
    Sebum content (Sebumeter)
    23
    11
    12
    ISGA
    23
    11
    12
    Photodocumentation and lesion count
    23
    11
    12
    Local tolerability of the skin
    23
    11
    12
    Adverse events
    23
    11
    12
    Completed
    23
    11
    12

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    0.1 % Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% Total
    Number of subjects
    24 12 12 24
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        In utero
    0 0 0 0
        Preterm newborn infants (gestational age < 37 wks)
    0 0 0 0
        Newborns (0-27 days)
    0 0 0 0
        Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0 0 0 0
        Children (2-11 years)
    0 0 0 0
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0 0 0 0
        Adults (18-64 years)
    0 0 0 0
        From 65-84 years
    0 0 0 0
        85 years and over
    0 0 0 0
        18-25 years
    24 12 12 24
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (full range (min-max))
    20.7 (18 to 25) 21.3 (18 to 25) 20.2 (19 to 23) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    15 7 8 15
        Male
    9 5 4 9

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    0.1 % Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamcin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.
    Reporting group title
    0.1% Tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days every subject (n=24) received 0.1% tyrothricin (Tyrosur® Gel) applied to one half of the face, which was assigned according to randomization. This was compared to either a combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide (Duac Acne Gel) or to benzoyl peroxide alone, which was applied to the other side of the face, in patients with mild to severe facial papulopustular acne.

    Reporting group title
    Clindamycin + BPO
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 1 received the combination of Clindamycin + BPO (Duac Acne Gel). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Reporting group title
    BPO 5%
    Reporting group description
    Over 24 consecutive days, 12 subjects randomly assigned to group 2 received Benzoyl peroxide 5% alone (Aknefug Oxid mild 5%). This was applied to the other half of the face that was not randomly assigned to 0.1% Tyrothricin.

    Primary: Inflammatory lesion count

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Inflammatory lesion count
    End point description
    At the screening / inclusion visit the inflammatory lesions (papules and pustules, nodules and cysts) in the patient´s face (forehead, cheeks and region of the chin) excluding the nasal region were counted by the investigator. Each side of the face was assessed separately. The counting was repeated on Day 4 and 8 ± 1d (visit 2, 3), Day 12 and 15 ± 1d (visit 4, 5), Day 18 and 22 ± 1d (visit 6, 7), and Day 25 ± 1d (visit 8). The absolute change or the reduction of inflammatory lesion count between the inclusion visit and each subsequent visit was determined. Finally, the change in inflammatory lesion counts over all measurement time points was considered.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Over 25 consecutive days. The count of lesion numbers occured only on Day 4 and 8 ± 1d (visit 2, 3), Day 12 and 15 ± 1d (visit 4, 5), Day 18 and 22 ± 1d (visit 6, 7), and Day 25 ± 1d (visit 8).
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    23
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: Lesion count (n)
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    21.5 (16 to 27.1)
    23.1 (13.5 to 32.7)
    19.9 (13.3 to 26.5)
    17.8 (13.2 to 22.5)
    13.8 (10.4 to 17.3)
    13.9 (9.3 to 16.9)
    10.8 (5.8 to 15.7)
    14.1 (10.1 to 18.1)
    9.8 (6.8 to 12.7)
    Statistical analysis title
    wilcoxon test
    Comparison groups
    0.1 % Tyrothricin v Clindamycin + BPO v BPO 5% v 0.1% Tyrothricin v 0.1% Tyrothricin v Clindamycin + BPO v Clindamycin + BPO v BPO 5% v BPO 5%
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    140
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Primary: Non-inflammatory lesion count

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Non-inflammatory lesion count
    End point description
    At screening / inclusion visit the non-inflammatory lesions (open and closed comedones) in the patient´s face (forehead, cheeks and region of the chin) excluding the nasal region were counted by the investigator. Each side of the face was assessed separately. The counting was repeated on Day 4 and 8 ± 1d (visit 2, 3), Day 12 and 15 ± 1d (visit 4, 5), Day 18 and 22 ± 1d (visit 6, 7), and Day 25 ± 1d (visit 8). Then the absolute change or the reduction of noninflammatory lesion count between the inclusion visit and each subsequent visit was determined respectively. Finally, the change in non-inflammatory lesion counts over all measurement time points was considered.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    The counting was conducted at the inclusion visit, and repeated on Day 4 and 8 ± 1d (visit 2, 3), Day 12 and 15 ± 1d (visit 4, 5), Day 18 and 22 ± 1d (visit 6, 7), and Day 25 ± 1d (visit 8).
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    12
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: Lesion count
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    34.5 (27.8 to 41.3)
    37.5 (25.7 to 49.3)
    35.5 (24.7 to 46.3)
    31.1 (25.3 to 37.0)
    28.0 (23.2 to 32.9)
    30.7 (23.0 to 38.5)
    21.4 (15.2 to 27.7)
    25.2 (18.1 to 32.2)
    18.8 (14.1 to 23.4)
    Statistical analysis title
    Wilcoxon test
    Comparison groups
    0.1 % Tyrothricin v Clindamycin + BPO v BPO 5% v 0.1% Tyrothricin v 0.1% Tyrothricin v Clindamycin + BPO v Clindamycin + BPO v BPO 5% v BPO 5%
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    129
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA)
    End point description
    Treatment success was determined by the improvement in ISGA. At inclusion visit and at each following visit (2 - 8) the investigator assessed the acne severity by using the ISGA 6- point scale. Only patients with an Investigator´s Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) of 2 to 4 will were enrolled in the trial. Each side of the face was assessed separately. Finally, the absolute and relative ISGA score change between inclusion and each subsequent visit was determined. According to the recommendation of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the ISGA score was also dichotomized. Treatment success was defined as improvement by at least two grades from the baseline score. Subjects were discontinued from the trial by the investigator at any time if the ISGA increased for one or more grades from baseline.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    At inclusion visit and at each following visit (2 - 8) the investigator assessed the acne severity by using the ISGA 6-point scale.
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    23
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: IGSA Score
        arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
    2.7 (2.4 to 3.0)
    2.8 (2.3 to 3.4)
    2.6 (2.3 to 2.9)
    2.4 (2.2 to 2.7)
    2.4 (2.1 to 2.7)
    2.5 (2.1 to 2.8)
    2.3 (1.6 to 2.9)
    2.4 (2.1 to 2.7)
    2.3 (1.8 to 2.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Sebum content

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Sebum content
    End point description
    At the inclusion visit and at each of the following visits the sebum level was determined with a photometric device (Sebumeter®, Courage+Khazaka electronic GmbH). The early, mild non-inflammatory lesions (microcomedones and comedones) are associated with higher sebum amount and higher fluorescence intensity, while the late, severe inflammatory lesions (pustules, papules, nodules and cysts) are associated with lower sebum amount and lower fluorescence intensity. This suggests that the increased sebum secretion and the presence of Propionibacteria are predominantly involved in the initial stages of acne development. A special opaque plastic tape (64 mm2) was pressed onto the designated skin areas (separately for left and right)25 for 30 seconds with a slight pressure to collect the sebum. The resulting increase in transparency of the tape was be measured. The displayed values corresponded to the sebum amount on the skin surface in micrograms of sebum per square centimeters.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Sebum content was measured at the inclusion visit and every subsequent visit (Visit 2-8).
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    23
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: µg/cm^2
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Forehead
    110.7 (65.6 to 155.8)
    101.3 (46.2 to 156.4)
    128.1 (52.1 to 204)
    125.2 (88.4 to 162)
    211.5 (167.3 to 255.8)
    161.4 (80.1 to 242.7)
    172.8 (103 to 242.7)
    131.3 (87.8 to 175.0)
    320.3 (235.8 to 404.8)
        Cheek
    130.8 (82.3 to 179.2)
    132.3 (75.3 to 189.2)
    174.8 (101.6 to 248.0)
    151.9 (103.4 to 200.4)
    251.1 (196.4 to 305.8)
    204.3 (115.2 to 293.4)
    203.4 (155.3 to 251.6)
    134.4 (73.3 to 195.6)
    284.5 (192.7 to 376.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Fluorescence Quantity (Visiopor)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fluorescence Quantity (Visiopor)
    End point description
    At the inclusion visit and at each of the following visits follicular fluorescence was determined by Visiopor® PP34N camera. The camera head was placed on the relevant skin areas.23 Measurements were made separately on the right and left side of the face on four designated areas. The parameters analyzed were the number and the percentage of the area covered by orange-red spots. The orange-red fluorescence shows stronger correlation with the presence of non-inflammatory acne lesions (comedones) and high sebum amount than the presence of inflammatory acne lesions (pustules) and low sebum amount. Yellow color spots in the images were excluded from the analysis. The absolute change in follicular fluorescence was evaluated. The measurement was repeated twice.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Visiopor was measured at the inclusion visit as well as all subsequent visits (Visit 2-8).
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    23
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: Quantity
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Forehead
    15.1 (6.3 to 24.0)
    5.8 (2.0 to 9.6)
    23.3 (5.0 to 41.6)
    11.6 (5.6 to 17.5)
    11.6 (7.0 to 16.1)
    3.6 (1.4 to 5.9)
    4.9 (2.7 to 7.2)
    5.0 (2.2 to 7.7)
    4.9 (1.7 to 8.2)
        Cheek
    26.8 (13.4 to 40.1)
    19.3 (4.8 to 33.7)
    28.4 (9.5 to 47.3)
    20.5 (11.8 to 29.3)
    18.1 (10.3 to 25.8)
    7.4 (3.7 to 11.2)
    7.7 (2.3 to 13.0)
    5.4 (2.1 to 8.7)
    6.0 (2.2 to 9.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Fluoresence size (Visiopor)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Fluoresence size (Visiopor)
    End point description
    At the inclusion visit and at each of the following visits follicular fluorescence was determined by Visiopor® PP34N camera. The camera head was placed on the relevant skin areas.23 Measurements were made separately on the right and left side of the face on four designated areas. The parameters analyzed were the number and the percentage of the area covered by orange-red spots. Yellow color spots in the images were excluded from the analysis. The absolute change in follicular fluorescence was evaluated. The measurement was repeated twice.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Fluorensce size (Visipor) was measured at inclusion visit, as well as all subseuqent visits (Visit 2-8).
    End point values
    0.1 % Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% 0.1% Tyrothricin 0.1% Tyrothricin Clindamycin + BPO Clindamycin + BPO BPO 5% BPO 5%
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    12
    12
    23
    23
    11
    11
    12
    12
    Units: Size (%)
    arithmetic mean (confidence interval 95%)
        Forehead
    1.1 (0.4 to 1.8)
    0.3 (0.1 to 0.6)
    2.1 (0.4 to 3.9)
    0.7 (0.3 to 1.2)
    0.7 (0.3 to 1.1)
    0.1 (0.04 to 0.2)
    0.1 (0.07 to 0.2)
    0.1 (0.04 to 0.2)
    0.2 (0.02 to 0.3)
        Cheek
    1.9 (0.9 to 2.8)
    1.0 (0.1 to 2)
    2.1 (0.7 to 3.5)
    1.5 (0.9 to 2.1)
    1.3 (0.7 to 2.0)
    0.2 (0.1 to 0.4)
    0.3 (0.05 to 0.5)
    0.2 (0.1 to 0.3)
    0.3 (0.08 to 0.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    AEs and SAEs were followed throughout the duration of the study. At each subject visit the investigator enquired about any local intolerance or AE using open questions, taking care not to influence the subjects answer.
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    At each visit the investigator enquired about any AE by interviewing the subject using an open question, taking care not to influence the subject’s answer, and if appropriate a clinical examination. Information regarding AE was immediately recorded in the CRF, and if a concomitant medication was reported an AE and reason for use was documented.
    Assessment type
    Non-systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Edema to tyrothricin
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    Edema to tyrothricin
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Edema to tyrothricin
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    edema
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
         occurrences all number
    2

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    The limitations of our proof-of-concept study were the size of the investigational cohort and the short study duration of 25 days. Longer treatment periods are more appropriate to study long-term changes in acne trials.

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26458265
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon Apr 29 15:49:44 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA