Clinical Trial Results:
Will intrathecal analgesia contribute to a faster recovery compared with epidural analgesia after open surgery for gynecological cancer. An open controlled randomized study.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-001873-25 |
Trial protocol |
SE |
Global end of trial date |
17 Mar 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Apr 2024
|
First version publication date |
27 Apr 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
vers20130714
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02026687 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Region Östergötland
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden, 581 83
|
||
Public contact |
Lena Nilsson, Region Östergötland, +46 0101031838, lena.nilsson@regionostergotland.se
|
||
Scientific contact |
Lena Nilsson, Region Östergötland, +46 0101031838, lena.nilsson@regionostergotland.se
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
17 Mar 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
17 Mar 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
- to decide if one in a fast track program by the use of intrathecal analgesia and standardized criteria for discharge will have a faster physical recovery, so a larger proportion of patients can be discharged on the third day after surgery, than if epidural analgesia has been used per- and postoperatively.
- to decide if the use of perioperative intrathecal analgesia contributes to a faster recovery of health related quality of health, less postoperative symptom and influence on vital signs compared with postoperative epidural analgesia
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
According to ethical committées approval and Sedish Regulations. Authorised monitoring.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
04 Mar 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Sweden: 80
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
80
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
80
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
60
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
20
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
From March 2014 to January 2016, all women who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden due to a proven or assumed gynaeco- logical abdominal malignancy were eligible for the study. | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
• Women 18 – 70 years. • Gynecological cancer (suspected or verified) planned for explorative laparatomy through a middle-line with a curative purpose. • WHO performance status < 2. • ASA 1-2. • Understand and can express themselves in Swedish. • After verbal and written information accept participation iand signed informed consent. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Intra thecal morphine (ITM) | |||||||||
Arm description |
intrathecal combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg, morphine 0.2mg and clonidine 75μg before surgery | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Catapresan
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR2
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intradural use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
clonidine 75μg injected intrathecally in a combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg and morphine 0.2mg through a spinal needle
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Marcain spinal 5 mg/ml
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR6
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intrathecal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
an intrathecal combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg, morphine 0.2mg and clonidine 75μg, through a spinal needle
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Morfin Special 0,4 mg/ml
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR7
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intratracheal use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
An intrathecal combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg, morphine 0.2mg and clonidine 75μg, through a spinal needle
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Epidural analgesia (EDA) | |||||||||
Arm description |
The EDA group had the standard EDA regime used in the hospital. The EDA was performed by a low thoracic puncture. The epidural infusion was started after induction of the general anaesthesia but before surgery by a bolus dose of fentanyl 50–100 μg and a bolus from a mixture of bupivacaine 2.4 mg/mL, adrenalin 2.4 μg/mL and fentanyl 1.8 μg/mL. The same mixture was used as a continuous infusion, typically 4–8mL/hour, throughout surgery. | |||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Carbocain adrenalin 20mg/ml + 5 mikrogram/ml
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR1
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection/infusion
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Epidural use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Used as a continuous infusion, typically 4–8mL/hour, throughout surgery.
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Fentanyl B Braun 50 mikrogram/ml
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
PR3
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Epidural use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
The epidural infusion was started after induction of the general anaesthesia but before surgery by a bolus dose of fentanyl 50–100 μg
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Intra thecal morphine (ITM)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
intrathecal combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg, morphine 0.2mg and clonidine 75μg before surgery | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Epidural analgesia (EDA)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The EDA group had the standard EDA regime used in the hospital. The EDA was performed by a low thoracic puncture. The epidural infusion was started after induction of the general anaesthesia but before surgery by a bolus dose of fentanyl 50–100 μg and a bolus from a mixture of bupivacaine 2.4 mg/mL, adrenalin 2.4 μg/mL and fentanyl 1.8 μg/mL. The same mixture was used as a continuous infusion, typically 4–8mL/hour, throughout surgery. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Intra thecal morphine (ITM)
|
||
Reporting group description |
intrathecal combination of a single-dose isobar bupivacaine 15mg, morphine 0.2mg and clonidine 75μg before surgery | ||
Reporting group title |
Epidural analgesia (EDA)
|
||
Reporting group description |
The EDA group had the standard EDA regime used in the hospital. The EDA was performed by a low thoracic puncture. The epidural infusion was started after induction of the general anaesthesia but before surgery by a bolus dose of fentanyl 50–100 μg and a bolus from a mixture of bupivacaine 2.4 mg/mL, adrenalin 2.4 μg/mL and fentanyl 1.8 μg/mL. The same mixture was used as a continuous infusion, typically 4–8mL/hour, throughout surgery. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Hospital stay | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Lenght of hospital stay
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Days
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney U test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Intra thecal morphine (ITM) v Epidural analgesia (EDA)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
80
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Quality of life | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (preoperatively) and 42 days after surgery
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann_whitney U-test | ||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Intra thecal morphine (ITM) v Epidural analgesia (EDA)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
77
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
From day of surgery until 6 weeks postoperatively
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
CRF | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
2013-12-23
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Intra thecal morphine (ITM)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Epidural analgesia (EDA)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30837253 |