E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Endometriosis - identification of endometrial tissue outside of the endometrium |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Female diseases of the urinary and reproductive systems and pregancy complications [C13] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 14.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | PT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10014778 |
E.1.2 | Term | Endometriosis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10038604 - Reproductive system and breast disorders |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
Main study principal objective To compare, in women undergoing conservative surgery for pain due to endometriosis, the effectiveness of some or all of the following four post-surgical treatment options in controlling the recurrence of symptoms and improving quality of life: 1) no treatment 2) levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine System (LNG IUS) 3) three monthly depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections (DMPA) 4) the combined oral contraceptive pill (COC), dependent on the groups carried forward from the pilot. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
Pilot study objectives: • To ascertain if randomising to one or more of the four treatment options will prove a barrier to overall recruitment, assess if a four-way randomisation is feasible and refine the research question. • To pilot and fine-tune study procedures, data capture forms and the assumptions around the sample size estimation • To understand which factors motivate women to agree to be randomised for follow up treatment following surgery for endometriosis • To explore barriers to recruitment to the trial Secondary clinical objectives: • To compare all four interventions in terms of pain relief, side-effects, acceptability, repeat surgery, recurrence of endometriotic ovarian cysts. Economic: • To compare the relative cost effectiveness of alternative hormonal interventions, DMPA injection, LNG-IUS,and combined contraceptive, to no hormonal treatment for the prevention of recurrent endometriosis. The main comparator will be no treatment but as with all decision a |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.2.3.1 | Full title, date and version of each sub-study and their related objectives |
A subset of women will also be asked to take part in the qualitative assessment of potential recruitment barriers during the pilot (first nine months) and then in the qualitative assessment of patient experience at one and three years. |
|
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
Investigators will be asked to confirm each eligibility criteria at randomisation. Inclusion Criteria: To be eligible for the PREEMPT Trial: • Women aged 16-45 • No immediate plans to conceive • Are scheduled to have laparoscopic conservative surgery, or a diagnostic laparoscopy with concurrent surgery if endometriosis is found, for pelvic pain associated with endometriosis. • (Pilot phase) willing to be randomised to at least one long acting progestogen (LNG-IUS/ DMPA) and either COCP or no treatment |
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
Any women, who at the point of randomisation, have any of the following are not eligible for the trial: • Current infertility (trying for a baby, receiving or contemplating fertility treatment) • Deep infiltrating endometriosis, involving the bowel or rectovaginal septum, and requiring complex surgery, whether pre-planned or identified at laparoscopy • Contraindications to the use of hormonal treatment with oestrogen or progestogens • Suspicion of malignancy |
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary outcome is the recurrence of symptoms as evaluated by the pain domain of the EHP-30 questionnaire at 36 months post-randomisation. The EHP-30 is a disease specific questionnaire to measure the health status of women with endometriosis. It demonstrates good reliability, validity, acceptability and responsiveness,with low floor and ceiling effects for the core questions. EHP-30 contains 30 core items with 5 scales, and six modular parts of 23 questions which are dependent on the woman’s circumstances e.g. impact on work, sexual activity and fertility. It will be assessed prior to randomisation and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
EHP-30 will be collected prior to randomisation and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-randomisation. |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
CLINICALEHP-30 The remaining four core domains of the EHP-30 (control, emotional aspects, social support and self-image) and the six modular domains (work, relationship with family, sexual intercourse, medical professions, treatment, infertility), where completed, will be compared between groups. Pain scores will be collected using visual analogue scales. Fatigue, as measured by Fatigue Severity Score (FSS) Use of dietary supplements, following a gluten free or otherwise restrictive diet, or are using complementary therapies such as acupuncture. Generic health related quality of life (EQ-5D) and capabilities (ICECAP-A) |
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Participant reported outcomes will be collected prior to randomisation and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months post-randomisation. |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | No |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | Yes |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No |
E.8.2.3 | Other | Yes |
E.8.2.3.1 | Comparator description |
No additional hormonal treatment |
|
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 4 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 30 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
The end of the trial will be defined as when the final participant recruited reaches the 3 year follow-up timepoint. Due to the long-term nature of some of the interventions, participants may remain on treatment beyond the end of the trial, and will be cared for by the general practitioner as they would outside of the trial. |
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 6 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 1 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 6 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 1 |