E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Patients suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
Patients suffering from allergic inflammation of the conjunctiva and rhinitis |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Body processes [G] - Immune system processes [G12] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 17.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | LLT |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10001728 |
E.1.2 | Term | Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 100000004853 |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with the allergoid LAIS® Birch-Alder tablets by the Total Combined Score (TCS) taking in account the Rhinoconjuncticitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) of the six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes and the Total Rescue Medication Score (TRMS) for the peak of the birch pollen season. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
o TCS: a) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and b) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days o Six individual symptom scores: a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days o RTSS: a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days o TRMS: a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days o Asthma rescue medication for the tree pollen season of 60 days o The mean improvement in the allergic severity S between baseline and visit V5 o The changes of the threshold allergen concentration for a positive response within conjunctival provocation test (CPT) o The “well days” o Birch pollen specific IgG4 o A global evaluation o Quality of Life o The rhinitis symptom control • Safety of the treatment
|
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
•Female or male patients aged 18–75 years with a history of at least two years of tree pollen induced allergic rhinitis and/or allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without seasonal controlled allergic asthma [From the Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2012. Available from: http://www.ginasthma.org] •Clinical sensitization to tree pollen. Patients with sensitization to perennial allergens like mites, cats and dogs may be included, in the case that these sensitizations are not clinically relevant during the evaluation season •Positive clinical history of tree pollen, proven by: -the majority of clinical symptoms appearing during the appropriate season for tree, -specific IgE reactivity to tree pollen CAP-radioallergoabsorbent test (CAP-RAST) ≥ 2 (0.70 kU/L) -positive screening Skin Prick Test (wheal diameter > 3 mm, negative control < 2 mm) -Positive response to conjunctival provocation testing with at least 10,000 SQ-E/ml of tree allergens at both visits V0 AND V1. The conjunctival allergen challenge will be conducted with solutions containing 100, 1,000 and 10,000 SQ-E/ml tree allergens. Additionally the difference in reacting concentration at visits V0 and V1 must not exceed one step of allergen concentration. Otherwise the test will be considered as irregular and the patient must be excluded. In the case that there is a difference between the reactive concentrations at visit V0 and V1 the higher concentration will be assumed as baseline reactivity. •planned antiallergic or antiasthmatic treatment with the following drugs: local Levocabastine (eye), Loratadine (oral), Beclomethasone (nasal) or inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting ß2-agonists •Compliance and ability of the patient to complete a diary card for self-evaluation of the symptoms and antisymptomatic medication •Signed and dated patient’s Informed Consent
Special criteria for patients with co-sensitizations: for all patients with co-sensitizations all of the following inclusion criteria must be fulfilled: •Patients do not suffer from typical symptoms against coseasonal prevalent allergens •Specific CAP-RAST results to coseasonal prevalent allergens less than the CAP-RAST result to tree pollen (the difference has to be ≥ 1), the patients with coseasonal prevalent allergies against animal dander must not be exposed to the specific allergen •The result of the Skin Prick Test against co-allergens is less than the result of the Skin Prick Test against tree
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
•Simultaneous participation in other clinical trials •Previous immunotherapy with birch-alder allergens or cross-reacting allergens within the last 5 years •Ongoing immunotherapy for any allergen •Patients being in any relationship or dependency with the sponsor and/or investigator •Other reasons contraindicating an inclusion into the trial according to the investigator’s estimation (e.g. poor compliance, inability of the patient to understand study documents and instructions) •Existing or intended pregnancy, lactation and/or lack of adequate contraceptive protection (see Annex XX.3) •Predominant perennial allergic rhinitis •Partly controlled or uncontrolled asthma •Chronic asthma or emphysema, particularly with a FEV <70% of the predicted value and/or PEF <70% of the individual optimum value •Infections of the oral cavity with severe symptoms •Patients with Galactose-intolerance, Lactase-deficiency, Glucose-Galactose-malabsorption •Patients with nasal abnormalities and/or polyps •Active tuberculosis •Generally inflammatory as well severe acute and chronic inflammatory diseases •Immune deficiency (for example induced by immunosuppressive drugs) •Auto-immune disorders •Physician diagnosed diseases of the liver, spleen, nervous system, thyroidal gland as well as rheumatic diseases, based on an autoimmune mechanism •Malignancy •Alcohol abuse as well as drug and/or medication abuse •Contra-indication for adrenalin (for example, acute or chronic symptomatic coronary heart disease, severe hypertension, hyperthyroidism) •Completed or ongoing long-term treatment with tranquilizer or psycho active drugs •Completed or ongoing treatment with anti-IgE-antibody •Patients treated with contra-indicated drugs.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with the allergoid LAIS® Birch-Alder tablets by the Total Combined Score (TCS) taking in account the Rhinoconjuncticitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS) of the six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (sneezing, rhinorrhea, nasal pruritus, nasal congestion, ocular pruritus and watery eyes and the Total Rescue Medication Score (TRMS) for the peak of the birch pollen season. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
14 days of highest birch pollen count in each region, the peak period of the birch pollen season |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
• To assess the efficacy of a sublingual immunotherapy with the allergoid LAIS® Birch-Alder tablets related to o The Total Combined Score (TCS): a) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and b) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days (March to April) o Six individual symptom scores of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS): a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days (March to April) o The Rhinoconjunctivitis Total Symptom Score (RTSS): a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days (March to April) o The Total Rescue Medication Score (TRMS): a) for the peak birch pollen season of 14 days, b) for the birch pollen season of 30 days and c) for the entire tree pollen season of 60 days (March to April), o The use of asthma rescue medication for the tree pollen season of 60 days (March to April) o The mean improvement in the allergic severity S between baseline and visit V5 within the conjunctival provocation test will be compared for both treatment groups. o The changes of the threshold allergen concentration for a positive response within conjunctival provocation test (CPT) will be compared for both treatment groups, according to the evaluation defined by Riechelmann H et al (2003) between baseline and visit V5. o The “well days”, being defined as days of the entire tree pollen season with a maximum symptom score of 2 and no rescue medication use according to Dahl (2006) and Durham (2006) o Assessment of birch pollen specific IgG4 o A global evaluation carried out by the patient for the total tree pollen season o To evaluate the Quality of Life by the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) o The rhinitis symptom control will be compared by RCAT between both treatment groups at the end of the tree pollen season
• To document the safety of the treatment by the physical examinations, the description of the adverse events (frequency, intensity, severity and duration of adverse events) and the safety laboratory data during the treatment with LAIS® Birch-Alder tablets.
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | Yes |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | No |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | Yes |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 2 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| No |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | Yes |
E.8.4.1 | Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned | 22 |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | No |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 4 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | |
E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 4 |