Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43871   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7290   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase 2a double-blind placebo-controlled 2-period crossover study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of BCX4161 as a prophylactic treatment to reduce the frequency of attacks in subjects with hereditary angioedema

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2013-002319-82
    Trial protocol
    DE   GB  
    Global end of trial date
    13 May 2014

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    11 Mar 2021
    First version publication date
    11 Mar 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    BCX4161-203
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT01984788
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc
    Sponsor organisation address
    4505 Emperor Blvd, Durham, United States, NC 27703
    Public contact
    Study Director, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc, 001 919 859 1302, clinicaltrials@biocryst.com
    Scientific contact
    Study Director, BioCryst Pharmaceuticals Inc, 001 919 859 1302, clinicaltrials@biocryst.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    29 May 2015
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    Yes
    Primary completion date
    13 May 2014
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    13 May 2014
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the effect of prophylactic Avoralstat (BCX4161) as measured by the frequency of attacks in subjects with hereditary angioedema (HAE)
    Protection of trial subjects
    This trial was conducted in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines for conducting, recording, and reporting trials, and in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent form (ICF), protocol and amendments for this trial were submitted to and approved by an appropriate Independent Ethics Committee (IEC). Routine monitoring was performed to verify that rights and well-being of subjects were protected. Emergency equipment and medications were available within the clinical unit as per current standard procedures. Any medication considered necessary for the subject’s safety and well-being was given at the discretion of the Investigator. A signed informed consent form (ICF) was obtained from each subject prior to performing any study-related procedures. The informed consent process took place under conditions where the subject had adequate time to consider the risks and benefits associated with his/her participation in the study. The Investigator explained to potential subjects the aims, methods, reasonably anticipated benefits, and potential hazards of the trial and any discomfort it may entail.
    Background therapy
    Subjects used their prescribed standard of care medication to treat any breakthrough HAE attacks on study
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    23 Oct 2013
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 4
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 20
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    24
    EEA total number of subjects
    24
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    24
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Subjects attended a Screening Visit up to 14 days before dosing for assessment of eligibility to participate in the study. Healthy male and healthy non-pregnant, non lactating female subjects aged 18 to 65 years who had a clinical diagnosis of hereditary angioedema with an average of 1 attack per week over at least a 3 month period were eligible.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Subject, Carer, Assessor

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    No

    Arm title
    Avoralstat
    Arm description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Avoralstat
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    BCX4161
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, hard
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat 4× 100-mg capsules for oral administration 3 times per day (total daily dose of 1200 mg)

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Capsule, hard
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Subjects received 28 days of matching placebo capsules administered as 4 capsules 3 times per day.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Started
    24
    24
    Completed
    24
    24

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Overall Study
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group values
    Overall Study Total
    Number of subjects
    24 24
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    24 24
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    42.4 ( 11.4 ) -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    15 15
        Male
    9 9

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Avoralstat
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).

    Primary: Rate of Confirmed Acute Attacks

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Rate of Confirmed Acute Attacks
    End point description
    Efficacy was evaluated by the rate of acute HAE attacks. To ensure that consistent, objective assessments were used in accepting subject-reported attack data, a panel of expert physicians in the treatment of HAE patients adjudicated all subject-reported attacks prior to their inclusion in primary efficacy analyses.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Investigators collected data from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 28 of each dosing period.
    End point values
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    24
    Units: HAE attacks/week
        least squares mean (standard deviation)
    0.821 ( 0.5514 )
    1.274 ( 0.5006 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference in HAE attack rates
    Comparison groups
    Avoralstat v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    48
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    < 0.001
    Method
    Fixed Effect
    Parameter type
    Difference Least Mean Square
    Point estimate
    -0.453
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.679
         upper limit
    -0.227

    Secondary: Number of Attack Free Days

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Number of Attack Free Days
    End point description
    Assessment of the number of days each subject experienced no HAE attacks during each treatment period with Avoralstat or Placebo
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Investigators collected data on HAE attacks from patient diaries from the first day of dosing through to Day 28 of each dosing period.
    End point values
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    24
    Units: Attack-free Days
        least squares mean (standard deviation)
    22.1 ( 4.88 )
    19.0 ( 3.82 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Difference in HAE attack-free Days
    Comparison groups
    Avoralstat v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    48
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    = 0.008
    Method
    Fixed Effect
    Parameter type
    Difference Least Mean Square
    Point estimate
    3.083
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.888
         upper limit
    5.279

    Secondary: Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Angioedema Quality of Life (AE-QoL)
    End point description
    Quality of Life (QoL) specific to hereditary angioedema (HAE) was assessed at baseline and Day 29 of each treatment period by a questionnaire (i.e. AE-QoL) consisting of 17 questions that spanned 4 domains (functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, and nutrition). Each AE-QoL question had 5 answer options (scored 1-5), with lower and higher scores indicting less and more adverse impact, respectively. Per-subject scores for each domain were computed using the appropriate scoring algorithm applied to the question response scores for each domain. Per-subject total scores (including all 4 domains) were similarly computed using the question response scores for all 17 questions. The outputs from the scoring algorithm were normalized on a scale ranging from 0 (less adverse impact) to 100 (most adverse impact). The statistical analysis of the AE-QoL total score change from baseline to Day 29 is presented below.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 & 29 of each treatment period
    End point values
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    24
    24
    Units: AE-QoL score - change from baseline
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -8.5 ( 13.38 )
    -0.6 ( 8.76 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Total AE-QoL Change from Baseline Score
    Comparison groups
    Avoralstat v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    48
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    equivalence
    P-value
    = 0.004
    Method
    Fixed Effect
    Parameter type
    Difference Least Mean Square
    Point estimate
    -7.904
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -12.981
         upper limit
    -2.827

    Secondary: Pharmacokinetics - Avoralstat Day 14 AUC(0-3)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Pharmacokinetics - Avoralstat Day 14 AUC(0-3) [1]
    End point description
    Avoralstat plasma concentrations were evaluated in all 24 subjects during both treatment periods on Days 1 and 14 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hours post morning dose and on Day 7 at pre-morning dose and also on Day 29. For 15 subjects who consented for the PK sub-study, Avoralstat plasma concentrations were also evaluated during both treatment periods on Day 14 at 4, 6, and 8 hours post-morning dose. Mean Avoralstat plasma concentration versus time profile after oral administration of multiple doses of Avoralstat was used to determine AUC(0-3) at Day 14.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Both treatment periods: Day 1 & 14 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 & 3 hrs post-morning dose; Day 7 pre-morning dose; Day 29. Optional - Both treatment periods: Day 14 at 4, 6 & 8 hrs post-morning dose
    Notes
    [1] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period.
    Justification: Avoralstat PK parameters only reported for Avoralstat treatment periods; not applicable for placebo treatment periods.
    End point values
    Avoralstat
    Number of subjects analysed
    23 [2]
    Units: hr*ng/mL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    307.85 ( 250.63 )
    Notes
    [2] - PK parameter cannot be estimated in 1 subject due to insufficient data.
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Plasma Kallikrein Inhibition - Day 29

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Plasma Kallikrein Inhibition - Day 29
    End point description
    Kallikrein activity was evaluated in all 24 subjects during Avoralstat treatment and in 22 subjects during placebo treatment on Days 1 & 14 at pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 hrs after the morning dose, on Day 7 prior to dosing and on Day 29. In addition, kallikrein activity was evaluated over the 8-hr dosing interval in a subset of 15 subjects on Day 14. Mean kallikrein inhibition was determined after oral administration of multiple doses of Avoralstat and placebo. Mean kallikrein inhibition at the end of each treatment period (Avoralstat or placebo) is presented below.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Both treatment periods: Day 1 & 14 pre-dose, 0.5, 1, 2 & 3 hrs post-morning dose; Day 7 pre-morning dose; Day 29. Optional - Both treatment periods: Day 14 at 4, 6 & 8 hrs post-morning dose
    End point values
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    22
    18
    Units: % Inhibition
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    19.10 ( 30.138 )
    -17.51 ( 43.878 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1 INH) Levels - Day 29

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    C1 Esterase Inhibitor (C1 INH) Levels - Day 29
    End point description
    C1 INH antigen levels were evaluated in 23 subjects during Avoralstat or placebo treatment on Days 1, 29, and 36. Mean C1 INH antigen level change from baseline on Day 29 of each treatment period (Avoralstat or placebo) is presented below.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days 1, 29 and 36.
    End point values
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    18
    16
    Units: mg/dL
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.28 ( 4.827 )
    0.26 ( 3.613 )
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Adverse Events (AEs) reported from informed consent signature until the follow-up visit (8 days +/-2 days after last dose IMP) or until the AE is resolved or the subject is in a clinically stable condition with regards to the AE.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    16
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Avoralstat
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects who met all eligibility criteria were randomized to 1 of 2 treatment sequences. Treatment Sequence 1: Subjects received 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day. Treatment Sequence 2: Subjects received 28 days of placebo treatment administered 3 times per day, followed by 28 days of Avoralstat at a dose of 400 mg administered 3 times per day. A washout period of at least 7 days was imposed between administration of each 28-day regimen of study drug (Avoralstat or placebo).

    Serious adverse events
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    0
    0
    Immune system disorders
    Hereditary angioedema
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Avoralstat Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 24 (70.83%)
    20 / 24 (83.33%)
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Contusion
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    4
    Vertigo
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    Splenomegaly
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 24 (12.50%)
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Flatulence
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
    6 / 24 (25.00%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    6
    Diarrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 24 (12.50%)
    5 / 24 (20.83%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    5
    Dyspepsia
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    1 / 24 (4.17%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    3 / 24 (12.50%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    Cold sweat
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    Musculoskeletal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 24 (0.00%)
    2 / 24 (8.33%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    2
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 24 (16.67%)
    7 / 24 (29.17%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    7

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    09 Sep 2013
    An independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) was added to periodically review safety data in accordance with a separate DMC Charter. Inclusion criterion number 5a was modified to indicate that estrogen-containing hormonal contraception was only permitted if it had been used for at least 60 days prior to screening. The washout period between Periods 1 and 2 was expanded to indicate a minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 14 days to allow for flexibility.
    01 Nov 2013
    an intravenous or subcutaneous treatment indicated for treatment of acute attacks to treat symptoms. The ITT population was modified to include all subjects who were randomized and received at least 1 dose of study drug in both study periods.
    11 Feb 2014
    A Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Panel (CEAP) was implemented to review and confirm subject-reported attacks for inclusion in all efficacy analyses. The CEAP was defined in a separate charter that delineated membership, roles, and processes. Inclusion criterion number 5a was modified to indicate that progestin-containing hormonal contraception was only permitted if it had been used for at least 60 days prior to screening although IUDs with progestin would be permitted to be placed any time prior to or during screening. Temporary treatment interruptions were made permissible

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Mon May 06 00:02:36 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA