Clinical Trial Results:
A 12-month, open-label, interventional, multicentre study to investigate the current criteria driving re-treatment with ranibizumab upon relapse in patients with visual impairment due to choroidal neovascularization secondary to pathologic myopia
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-003334-33 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
15 Jul 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
27 Jul 2017
|
First version publication date |
27 Jul 2017
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CRFB002FIT01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02034006 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Novartis Pharma AG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland,
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Disclosure Office, Novartis Pharma AG, 41 613241111,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Disclosure Office, Novartis Pharma AG, 41 613241111,
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
15 Jul 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
15 Jul 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study was to investigate current criteria driving retreatment in patients affected by CNV secondary to PM and experiencing a relapse of the disease after the first administration of ranibizumab. The criteria for retreatment may have consisted in patient subjectivity or in clinical findings following examination (BCVA, fundus), and/or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or fluorescein angiography (FAG).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was in compliance with the ethical principles derived from the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines. All the local regulatory requirements pertinent to safety of trial subjects were also followed during the conduct of the trial. The investigator could prescribe any medication and/or supportive care during the study based on clinical needs.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
10 Jun 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 200
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
200
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
200
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
114
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
85
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Two hundred fifteen (215) subjects were screened in this study (i.e. provided written informed consent). Two hundred (200) subjects underwent baseline visit and received at least one injection of ranibizumab. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Ranibizumab | ||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Patients treated with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection. Further injections might be required when monitoring reveals disease activity. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ranibizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
RFB002
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Ocular use
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
All patients received a single initial intravitreal injection of ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 ml as per Committee for Human Medicinal Products (CHMP)approval. Further injections might have been required when monitoring reveals disease activity. Disease activity, defined as reduced visual acuity and/or signs of lesion activity, was evaluated based on clinical examination (BCVA, fundus), and/or optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or fluorescein angiography (FAG). Bilateral treatment was allowed provided at least 14 days of intercurrence.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Out of total patients who took at least one ranibizumab injection, these patients received more than once. [2] - The number of subjects at this milestone seems inconsistent with the number of subjects in the arm. It is expected that the number of subjects will be greater than, or equal to the number that completed, minus those who left. Justification: Out of total patients who took at least one ranibizumab injection, these patients only received once. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ranibizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients treated with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection. Further injections might be required when monitoring reveals disease activity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Ranibizumab
|
||
Reporting group description |
Patients treated with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection. Further injections might be required when monitoring reveals disease activity. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients treated only once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patients treated more than once with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of active leakage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of active leakage on fluorescein angiography (FAG) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2 and month 6. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of active leakage (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of active leakage was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing Fluorescein angiography during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Presence vs. absence of active leakage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
72.37
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
23.44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
223.42 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of macular edema | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of macular edema from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of macular edema (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of macular edema was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. *NE = Not evaluable. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Presence vs. absence of macular edema | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
9.33
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
3.18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
27.36 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of cysts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of cysts from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of cysts (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of cysts was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. *NE = Not evaluable
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Presence vs. absence of cysts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
12.66
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
3.76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
42.67 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of Intra-retinal fluid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of Intra-retinal fluid from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of Intra-retinal fluid (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of Intra-retinal fluid was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. *NE = Not evaluable
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Presence vs. absence of intra-retinal fluid | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.0001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
49.8
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
11.62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
213.5 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Central subfield thickness (CSFT) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Central subfield thickness (CSFT) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change in CSFT versus previous visit. For retreated patients, the change in CSFT was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. *NE = Not evaluable
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change in CST vs previous vist | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1514 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.99 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
1 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in Central subfield volume (CSV) | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Central subfield volume (CSV) from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change in CSV versus previous visit. For retreated patients, the change in CSV was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. *NE = Not evaluable
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change in Central subfield volume vs previous vist | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.1265 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
5.63 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of sub-retinal fluid [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of sub-retinal fluid from optical coherence tomography (OCT) was assessed at screening (14 to 3 days before baseline visit), month 2, month 6 and month 12. The regression model for sub-retinal fluid was not valid because “Yes” was reported in almost all subjects causing a quasi-complete separation of data points. *NE = Not Evaluable
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing OCT during that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Screening, Month 2, Month 6, Month 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The regression model for sub-retinal fluid was not valid hence no analysis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on presence/absence of Clinically significant abnormalities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Presence of clinically significant abnormalities was assessed at baseline, month 1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of presence of clinically significant abnormalities (Yes/No). For retreated patients, the presence/absence of clinically significant abnormalities was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients undergoing ocular examination during that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Clinically significant abnormalities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Presence vs. absence of clinically significant abnormalities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
6.91
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.58 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
30.23 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on improvement in best corrective visual acuity (BCVA) < 5 letters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Improvement in BCVA < 5 letters (Yes/No) was assessed at month1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of improvement in BCVA < 5 letters (Yes/No) which was reported as Gain >= 5 letters versus Gain < 5 letters. For retreated patients, Gain >= 5 letters and Gain < 5 letters were considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis.
Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients with improvement in BCVA < 5 letters from baseline to that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Month1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Gain < 5 letters vs. Gain >= 5 letters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.19
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
5.33 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients treated and re-treated based on improvement in best corrective visual acuity (BCVA) < 10 letters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Improvement in BCVA < 10 letters (Yes/No) was assessed at month1, month 2, month 3, month 6 and month 12. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of improvement in BCVA < 10 letters (Yes/No) which was reported as Gain >= 10 letters versus Gain < 10 letters. For retreated patients, Gain >= 10 letters and Gain < 10 letters were considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value on the scheduled assessment, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. 'n' represents number of patients with improvement in BCVA < 10 letters from baseline to that time point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Month1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Gain < 10 letters vs. Gain >= 10 letters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0114 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.52
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
5.17 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients in different categories of changes from baseline in BCVA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Changes from baseline in BCVA are described for the ETDRS parameter considering the following categories at each assessment: “no change” if the change was equal to 0 letter, “worsening” if change < 0 letter , "improvement" if change > 0 letter. A univariate logistic regression model was applied expressing the presence/absence of the first retreatment in function of change from baseline in BCVA (improved/worsened/stable) which was reported as Improved versus no change and worsened versus no change. For retreated patients, this variable was considered at the closest time-point to the first re-treatment: the last scheduled assessment immediately before the first re-treatment was considered. For treated patients, the last scheduled assessment available was considered. In case of missing value, the value was considered as missing for this analysis. 'n' represents number of patients in FAS set with evaluable BCVA at baseline and that time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, Month1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change from BL in BCVA: Improved vs. No change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0049 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.47
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Change from BL in BCVA: Worsened vs. No change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Ranibizumab: Treated Once v Ranibizumab: Re-treated Once
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
200
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0461 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
5.53
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.69 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
44.52 |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Mean change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from baseline to Month 6 and month 12 on study eye | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in BCVA (Best Corrected Visual Acuity) was Measured by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Letter Score. Patients with a BCVA ETDRS letter score of 78 to 24 in the study eye were included; A higher score represents better functioning of the study eye. A positive change from baseline shows improvement. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all patients who received at least one dose of ranibizumab. The study eyes of the patients belong to FAS were analyzed.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 6, month 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Mean number of ranibizumab injection | ||||||||
End point description |
Mean number of ranibizumab injection is reported as number of injections per patient. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
baseline to month 12
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Time to re-treatment | ||||||||
End point description |
Time to re-treatment, defined as time in months from the data of first dose of ranibizumab to the date of re-treatment, was evaluated. Full Analysis Set (FAS): all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Month 12
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of patients having ocular and/or systemic adverse event (AE) | ||||||||||||||
End point description |
Number of patients with any systemic AE, with serious systemic AE, with an ocular AE, with an ocular serious AE are reported. Safety Population: all subjects who received at least one dose of ranibizumab and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment
|
||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
baseline to month 12
|
||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in patient quality of life from baseline to month 2 and month 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Patient quality of life was assessed by Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire. IVI is a 32-item instrument, either self- or interviewer-administered, developed to measure the impact of vision impairment on daily activities in five domains. The 32 items were divided into 5 domains as follows: Leisure and work (items 1 to 5), Social and consumer interaction (items 6 to 10 and items 23-24), Household and personal care (items 11 to 14 and items 20-21), Mobility (items 15 to 19 and item 22), Emotional reaction to vision loss (items 25 to 32). Responses to the IVI items were rated on a five-category Likert scale: not at all, 0; hardly at all, 1; a little, 2; a fair amount, 3; a lot, 4; and can’t do because of eyesight, 5. Total score was an arithmetic average of the items rated between 0 (the best score) and 5 (the worst score). A negative change indicates improvement. Data was computed on items with non missing response.
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline, month 2, month 12
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Adverse Events are collected from First Patient First Visit (FPFV) until Last Patient Last Visit (LPLV). All Adverse events are reported in this record from First Patient First Treatment until Last Patient Last Visit.(up to 12 months)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Consistent with EudraCT disclosure specifications, Novartis has reported under the Serious adverse events field “number of deaths resulting from adverse events” all those deaths, resulting from serious adverse events that are deemed to be causally related to treatment by the investigator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
18.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ranibizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Patients treated with a single ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05ml intravitreal injection. Further injections might be required when monitoring reveals disease activity. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
03 Mar 2014 |
- The amendment made some laboratory evaluations (high sensivity C-reactive protein - hsCRP, serum amyloid associated protein - SAA, C3 and C4, S100, fibrinogen) optional due to the difficulties in performing these assessments at several sites.
- Minor revisions were made with regard to inclusion criteria (eligibility in bilateral mCNV patients), exclusion criteria (definition of pregnancy), concomitant medications and reference therapy. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |