Clinical Trial Results:
Rapidity of onset of response to Adalimumab in luminal Crohn's disease. RAPIDA study.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-004781-34 |
Trial protocol |
ES |
Global end of trial date |
23 Jan 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
24 Jan 2018
|
First version publication date |
24 Jan 2018
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
W13-984
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02148718 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
AbbVie House, Vanwall Business Park, Vanwall Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, United Kingdom, SL6-4UB
|
||
Public contact |
Global Medical Services, AbbVie, 001 800-633-9110,
|
||
Scientific contact |
Maria Belen Garbayo Guijarro, AbbVie, belen.garbayo@abbvie.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
23 Jan 2017
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Jan 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the rapidity of onset of clinical response to adalimumab therapy in patients with luminal Crohn's disease
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Subject read and understood the information provided about the study and gave written permission.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
10 Jun 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 100
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
100
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
100
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
96
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
4
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 100 participants were enrolled in the study; 14 participants did not receive study drug and are excluded from the analyses. | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Adalimumab | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants received adalimumab for 12 weeks (160 mg at Week 0; 80 mg at week 2; then adalimumab 40 mg every other week starting at Week 4). | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
adalimumab
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
Humira, ABT-D2E7
|
||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Suspension for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Adalimumab pre-filled syringe, administered by subcutaneous injection
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same. Justification: Intent to Treat (ITT) population: all enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Adalimumab
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received adalimumab for 12 weeks (160 mg at Week 0; 80 mg at week 2; then adalimumab 40 mg every other week starting at Week 4). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Adalimumab
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants received adalimumab for 12 weeks (160 mg at Week 0; 80 mg at week 2; then adalimumab 40 mg every other week starting at Week 4). |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 4 [1] | ||||||||
End point description |
Clinical response defined as a decrease of at least 3 points in Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) score. The HBI consists of only clinical parameters (general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications): The first 3 items are scored for the previous day. Patients with Crohn's disease who scored 3 or less on the HBI are very likely to be in remission. Patients with a score of 8 to 9 or higher are considered to have severe disease.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 4
|
||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: Descriptive data are summarized for this end point per protocol. |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
Notes [2] - Intent to Treat (ITT) population: all enrolled participants who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 1 | ||||||||
End point description |
Clinical response defined as a decrease of at least 3 points in HBI score. The HBI consists of only clinical parameters (general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications): The first 3 items are scored for the previous day. Patients with Crohn's disease who scored 3 or less on the HBI are very likely to be in remission. Patients with a score of 8 to 9 or higher are considered to have severe disease.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 1
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Notes [3] - ITT population |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Weeks 2 and 4 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Clinical remission defined as HBI < 5. The HBI consists of only clinical parameters (general well-being, abdominal pain, number of liquid stools per day, abdominal mass, and complications): The first 3 items are scored for the previous day. Patients with Crohn's disease who scored 3 or less on the HBI are very likely to be in remission. Patients with a score of 8 to 9 or higher are considered to have severe disease.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Weeks 2 and 4
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - ITT population |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5 Dimensions 3 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score: Change From Baseline to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of HRQoL and consists of 2 components:
1.The EQ-5D-3L Index Score has five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) with 3 levels of severity for each dimension ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems'). The level of severity reported on each of the EQ-5D-3L dimensions determines a unique health state. Health states are converted into a weighted health state index. These weights lie on a scale on which full health has a value of 1 and dead has a value of 0.
2.The EQ-5D visual analog scale (VAS) is a 20-cm scale with endpoints labeled "best imaginable health" and "worst imaginable health" anchored at 100 and 0, respectively.
A positive change represents an improvement in HRQoL. Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the EQ-5D-3L Index Score are presented.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [5] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
European Quality of Life (EuroQol) 5 Dimensions 3 Levels Questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) Visual Analog Scale (VAS): Change From Baseline to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The EQ-5D-3L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of HRQoL and consists of 2 components:
1.The EQ-5D-3L Index Score has five dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) with 3 levels of severity for each dimension ('no problems', 'some problems', and 'extreme problems'). The level of severity reported on each of the EQ-5D-3L dimensions determines a unique health state. Health states are converted into a weighted health state index. These weights lie on a scale on which full health has a value of 1 and dead has a value of 0.
2.The EQ-5D VAS is a 20-cm scale with endpoints labeled "best imaginable health" and "worst imaginable health" anchored at 100 and 0, respectively.
A positive change represents an improvement in HRQoL. Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the EQ-5D-3L VAS are presented.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [6] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Inflammatory Bowel Disease Quality-36 (IBDQ-36) Questionnaire Overall Score: Change From Baseline to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The IBDQ-36 is used to assess the HRQoL related to bowel symptoms. The IBDQ-36 overall score is calculated as the sum of thirty-six items, each scored on a 1 to 7 likert point scale, and ranges from 7 to 252. The highest score indicates the best HRQoL related to bowel symptoms. A positive change in IBDQ-36 overall score indicates an improvement in HRQoL due to inflammatory bowel disease. Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 in the EQ-5D-3L VAS are presented.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [7] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Fatigue Impact Scale for Daily Use (D-FIS): Change From Baseline to Week 12 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The D-FIS is used to measure the impact of fatigue on the daily lives of persons. The D-FIS overall score was calculated as the sum of eight items, each scored on a 0 to 4 point scale, and ranges from 0 to 32. A higher score indicates a higher impact of fatigue on daily life. A negative change in D-FIS Overall Score means an improvement in HRQoL due to fatigue. Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [8] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Hemoglobin | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT], international normalized ratio [INR], and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [9] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Hematocrit | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [10] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Leukocytes, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Eosinophils, Basophils, and Platelets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [11] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [12] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: C-reactive Protein (CRP) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [13] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Fecal Calprotectin | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [14] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [15] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: International Normalized Ratio (INR) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [16] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Fibrinogen | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [17] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Day 4 or Week 12 and Clinical Remission at Week 12 | ||||||||
End point description |
The percentage of participants with clinical response (defined as decrease of at least 3 points in HBI score) at Day 4 or Week 1 and clinical remission (defined as a HBI < 5) at Week 12.
|
||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||
End point timeframe |
Up to Week 12
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Notes [18] - ITT population |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Analytic Markers of Inflammation: Erythrocytes | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Analytic markers of inflammation are hemogram (hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and platelets), erythrocytes, ESR, CRP, fecal calprotectin, and coagulation (aPTT, INR, and fibrinogen). Mean Baseline and mean change from Baseline to Week 12 for each parameter are presented. N=number of subjects with evaluable data at given time point.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [19] - All participants in the ITT population with evaluable data |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the time of study drug administration until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 20 weeks).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
TEAEs and TESAEs are defined as any AE or SAE with an onset date after the first dose of study drug until 70 days after the last dose of study drug and were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Adalimumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants received adalimumab for 12 weeks (160 mg at Week 0; 80 mg at week 2; then adalimumab 40 mg every other week starting at Week 4). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |