Clinical Trial Results:
A MULTINATIONAL, MULTICENTRE, RANDOMISED, DOUBLE BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED , 2-WAY CROSSOVER STUDY TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GLYCOPYRROLATE BROMIDE ADMINISTERED VIA PMDI (CHF 5259), FOR THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE
Due to the EudraCT – Results system being out of service between 31 July 2015 and 12 January 2016, these results have been published in compliance with revised timelines.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-005268-25 |
Trial protocol |
GB DE BG |
Global end of trial date |
06 Feb 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Jul 2016
|
First version publication date |
28 Jul 2016
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
CCD-05993AA1-09
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02189577 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via Palermo 26/A, Parma, Italy, 43122
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Transparency, CHIESI FARMACEUTICI SPA, +39 0521 2791, ClinicalTrial_info@chiesi.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Transparency, CHIESI FARMACEUTICI SPA, +39 0521 2791, ClinicalTrial_info@chiesi.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
06 Feb 2015
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
06 Feb 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
06 Feb 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To demonstrate the superiority of CHF 5259 pMDI versus placebo in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 28.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and local law requirements. Other than routine care, no specific measures for protection of trial subjects were implemented.
|
||
Background therapy |
The background medication (Qvar, extrafine BDP at 100 μg per actuation) was administered to all patients via inhalation by pMDI from V1 until V5. During the two treatment periods, the background medication was administered concomitantly and always after the study medication. The dose was adjusted by the Investigator according to the patient’s previous treatment based on the reference table; this dose remained unchanged throughout the entire study. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
27 Jun 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 43
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 1
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Bulgaria: 17
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 39
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
100
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
100
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
64
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
36
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
A total of 98 patients (49 patients per sequence) were planned to be randomised to obtain 78 completed and evaluable patients. The study involved a run-in period of 2 weeks (±2 days) followed by a treatment phase consisting of two 4-week (±2 days) treatment period (P1 and P2) separated by 1-week (+2 days) wash-out period. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
A total of 161 patients were screened, of whom 100 were randomised to one of the two treatment sequences: • CHF 5259 pMDI/placebo: n=50; • Placebo/CHF 5259 pMDI: n=50. Only 8 (8.0%) patients discontinued the study due to AEs (5 patients), death (1 patient), protocol violation (1 patient) and withdrawal of consent (1 patient). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial by sequence (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The randomisation list was prepared by a specialised external provider and the whole study team, the Investigators and the patients were blind to sequence assignment. To maintain the blind, during the treatment periods, patients inhaled study medication from two canisters daily, regardless of treatment period.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Sequence CHF 5259 pMDI - placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
CHF 5259 pMDI or Test Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
experimental - placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
CHF 5259 pMDI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Glycopyrronium bromide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Inhalation solution
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Inhalation use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Test product: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI.
Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg
GB.
Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Inhalation solution
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Inhalation use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Reference product: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI.
Dose: 2 puffs, bid.
Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Sequence Placebo - CHF 5259 pMDI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. CHF 5259 pMDI or Tests Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
placebo - experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Inhalation solution
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Inhalation use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Reference product: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI.
Dose: 2 puffs, bid.
Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
CHF 5259 pMDI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
GB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Glycopyrronium bromide
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Inhalation solution
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Inhalation use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Test product: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI.
Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg
GB.
Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Sequence CHF 5259 pMDI - placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
CHF 5259 pMDI or Test Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Sequence Placebo - CHF 5259 pMDI
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. CHF 5259 pMDI or Tests Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Sequence CHF 5259 pMDI - placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
CHF 5259 pMDI or Test Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||
Reporting group title |
Sequence Placebo - CHF 5259 pMDI
|
||
Reporting group description |
Placebo or Reference therapy: Placebo of CHF 5259 administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, bid. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. CHF 5259 pMDI or Tests Treatment or Treatment T: Glycopyrronium bromide (GB, CHF 5259) administered via pMDI. Dose: 2 puffs, twice daily (bid) of CHF 5259 pMDI at 12.5 μg GB per actuation. Total daily dose: 50 μg GB. Mode of action: Metered dose inhalation of pressurised solution using a standard actuator. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the
study medication and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy after baseline.
One patient was allocated to the treatment sequence placebo-CHF 5259 pMDI, received a placebo kit in both treatment
periods. He was counted only in the placebo column in the Safety population (i.e. actual treatment) and in both the CHF 5259
pMDI column and the placebo column in the ITT population (i.e. planned treatment).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
CHF 5259 pMDI - safety
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety population: all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study medication.
Patient 202302 was allocated to the treatment sequence placebo-CHF 5259 pMDI, received a placebo kit in both treatment
periods. He was counted only in the placebo column in the Safety population (i.e. actual treatment) and in both the CHF 5259
pMDI column and the placebo column in the ITT population (i.e. planned treatment).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
CHF 5259 pMDI - Per protocol
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Per-Protocol (PP) population: all patients from the ITT population without any major protocol
deviations;
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo - ITT population
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Intention-to-Treat (ITT) population: all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the
study medication and with at least one available evaluation of efficacy after baseline;
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo - Safety
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Safety population: all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study medication.
Patient 202302 was allocated to the treatment sequence placebo-CHF 5259 pMDI, received a placebo kit in both treatment
periods. He was counted only in the placebo column in the Safety population (i.e. actual treatment) and in both the CHF 5259
pMDI column and the placebo column in the ITT population (i.e. planned treatment).
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Placebo - Per protocol
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Per-Protocol (PP) population: all patients from the ITT population without any major protocol
deviations;
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
All pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC and IC) were carried out under medical supervision at either a clinic or hospital and were recorded using a computer-operated spirometer. At screening (V1), the post-bronchodilator FEV1 values (30 minutes after administration of 4 x 100 μg salbutamol for reversibility testing) were considered for eligibility.
Lung function measurements and daily calibration of the spirometer were done according to the recommendation of the Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. For FEV1 (L) and FVC (L) measurements, the highest value from three technically satisfactory attempts (irrespective of the curve they were derived from) was recorded. The chosen value should have not exceeded the next one by more than 150 mL. If the difference was larger, up to 8 measurements were performed and the largest value was reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Pre-dose morning spirometry was performed at screening (Visit 1), Visit 2 (Period 1 Day 1), Visit 3 (Period 1 Day 28), Visit 4 (Period 2 Day 1), Visit 5 (Period 2 Day 28). FEV1 value at baseline is the mean of measures at 45- and 10-min predose on Day 1.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [2] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=192 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
192
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [3] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.088
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.039 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.137 | ||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The primary variable was analysed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model, including treatment, patient and period as fixed effects and baseline FEV1 (mean of the two measurements at 45- and 10-minute pre-dose on Day 1 in each treatment period) as covariate. The adjusted mean change from baseline for each treatment and the adjusted mean difference between CHF 5259 pMDI and placebo with their 95% CIs and p-values were estimated by the model. Superiority was demonstrated. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
FEV1 AUC0-12h normalised by time on day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 AUC0-12h normalised by time on Day 28 was a key secondary efficacy variable .
All pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC and IC) were carried out under medical supervision at either a clinic or hospital and were recorded using a computer-operated spirometer. At screening (V1), the post-bronchodilator FEV1 values (30 minutes after administration of 4 x 100 μg salbutamol for reversibility testing) were considered for eligibility.
Lung function measurements and daily calibration of the spirometer were done according to the recommendation of the Official Statement of the European Respiratory Society and American Thoracic Society. For FEV1 (L) and FVC (L) measurements, the highest value from three technically satisfactory attempts (irrespective of the curve they were derived from) was recorded. The chosen value should have not exceeded the next one by more than 150 mL. If the difference was larger, up to 8 measurements were performed and the largest value was reported.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
On day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [4] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [5] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=187 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [6] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.121
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.079 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.162 | ||||||||||||
Notes [6] - The key secondary efficacy variable was FEV1 AUC0-12h normalised by time on Day 28 and was analysed using an ANCOVA model, including treatment, patient and period as fixed effects and baseline FEV1 as covariate. The adjusted mean for each treatment and the adjusted mean difference between CHF 5259 pMDI and placebo with their 95% CIs and p-values were estimated by the model. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
FEV1 response on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
A patient was considered a responder if he/she had a change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 28 ≥ 100 mL. If a patient had a change from baseline in pre-dose morning FEV1 on Day 28 < 100 mL or missing, he/she was considered as non-responder.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=194 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
194
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [7] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.036 | ||||||||||||
Method |
Regression, Logistic | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Odds ratio (OR) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
2.871
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
1.07 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
7.708 | ||||||||||||
Notes [7] - FEV1 response on Day 28 was analysed using a conditional logistic regression with treatment and period as fixed effects, baseline FEV1 as covariate and patient as strata. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
FEV1 AUC0-12h normalized by time on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 AUC0-12h normalised by time on Day 1 is one of the secondary efficacy variables of the study.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
On day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [8] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [9] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=190 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
190
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [10] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.081
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.044 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.118 | ||||||||||||
Notes [10] - Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 1 and Day 28 (mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose), were all analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
FEV1 AUC0-4h normalized by time on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 AUC0-4h normalised by time on Day 1 is one of the secondary efficacy variables of the study.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [11] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [12] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=192 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
192
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [13] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.081
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.044 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.118 | ||||||||||||
Notes [13] - Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-4h normalised by time on Day 1 and Day 28 were all analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
FEV1 AUC 0-4h normalized by time on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
FEV1 AUC0-4h normalised by time on Day 28 is one of the secondary efficacy variables of the study.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [14] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [15] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=188 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
188
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [16] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.156
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.112 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.2 | ||||||||||||
Notes [16] - Change from baseline in FEV1 AUC0-4h normalised by time on Day 1 and Day 28 were all analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 1 was the mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [17] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [18] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a Cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=192 (subject analysis set) is an
innate error of the EudraCT database system
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
192
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [19] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.006 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.063
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.018 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.107 | ||||||||||||
Notes [19] - Change from baseline in through FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 1 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 28 was the mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [20] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [21] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a Cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=187 (subject analysis set) is an
innate error of the EudraCT database system
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [22] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.017 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.061
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.011 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.11 | ||||||||||||
Notes [22] - Change from baseline in trough FEV1 at 12 hours on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 1 was calculated as the mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [23] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [24] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=192 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
192
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [25] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.193 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.049
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.025 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.123 | ||||||||||||
Notes [25] - Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 1 (mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose) was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline FVC instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 28 was calculated as the mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [26] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [27] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=187 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
187
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [28] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.052 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.079
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.001 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.159 | ||||||||||||
Notes [28] - Change from baseline in trough FVC at 12 hours on Day 28 (mean of the two measurements at 11.5 and 12-hour post-dose) was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline FVC instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in peak FEV1 over 12 hours on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The maximum value obtained between 15 min and 12h post-dose assessments.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [29] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [30] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=194 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
194
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [31] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.092
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.052 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.133 | ||||||||||||
Notes [31] - Peak FEV1 over 12 hours on Day 1 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in peak FEV1 over 12 hours on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [32] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [33] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=188 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
188
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [34] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.112
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.068 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.156 | ||||||||||||
Notes [34] - Peak FEV1 over 12 hours on Day 1 and Day 28, were analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in peak FVC over 12 hours on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The maximum value obtained between 15 min and 12h post-dose assessments.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=194 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
194
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [35] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.002 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean difference | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.107
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.041 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.172 | ||||||||||||
Notes [35] - Peak FVC over 12 hours on Day 1 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline FVC as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in peak FVC over 12 hours on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The maximum value obtained between 15 min and 12h post-dose assessments.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [36] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [37] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=188 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
188
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [38] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.001 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.168
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.094 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.242 | ||||||||||||
Notes [38] - Peak FVC over 12 hours on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline FVC as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in pre-dose morning IC on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
For IC, at Day 1 (both Visits 2 and 4), the measurement performed 45 min pre-dose was considered as the baseline value for the period.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [39] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [40] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=188 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
188
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [41] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.076 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.068
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.007 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.144 | ||||||||||||
Notes [41] - Change from baseline in pre-dose morning IC on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline IC instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in 2-hour post-dose IC on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
For IC, at Day 1 (both Visits 2 and 4), the measurement performed 45 min pre-dose was considered as the baseline value for the period.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a Cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=194 (subject analysis set) is an
innate error of the EudraCT database system
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
194
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [42] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.011 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.089
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.021 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.157 | ||||||||||||
Notes [42] - Change from baseline in 2h post-dose IC on Day 1 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline IC instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in 2-hour post-dose IC on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
For IC, at Day 1 (both Visits 2 and 4), the measurement performed 45 min pre-dose was considered as the baseline value for the period.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
on Day 28
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [43] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [44] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=188 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
188
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [45] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.003 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0.106
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
0.036 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.176 | ||||||||||||
Notes [45] - Change from baseline in 2h post-dose IC on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline IC instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SGRQ total score on day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was filled by the patient at all visits during the treatment phase. This questionnaire comprised 50 items, with 76 weighted responses, developed to measure health in chronic airflow limitation. Three component scores were calculated: symptoms, activity and impacts on daily life and a total score was then calculated, with lower scores corresponding to a better health.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At all visits from Visit 1 (screening) until the last day of the second treatment period (Visit 5).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [46] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [47] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a Cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=186 (subject analysis set) is an
innate error of the EudraCT database system
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
186
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [48] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.029 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-2.15
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-4.08 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.23 | ||||||||||||
Notes [48] - Change from baseline in SGRQ total score Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline SGRQ total score (score on Day 1) instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SGRQ symptoms score on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was filled by the patient at all visits during the treatment phase. This questionnaire comprised 50 items, with 76 weighted responses, developed to measure health in chronic airflow limitation. Three component scores were calculated: symptoms, activity and impacts on daily life and a total score was then calculated, with lower scores corresponding to a better health.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At all visits from Visit 1 (screening) until the last day of the second treatment period (Visit 5).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [49] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [50] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=189 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
189
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [51] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.02 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-3.67
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-6.75 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.59 | ||||||||||||
Notes [51] - Change from baseline in the SGRQ total score and domain scores on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline SGRQ total/domain score (score on Day 1) instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SGRQ activity score on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was filled by the patient at all visits during the treatment phase. This questionnaire comprised 50 items, with 76 weighted responses, developed to measure health in chronic airflow limitation. Three component scores were calculated: symptoms, activity and impacts on daily life and a total score was then calculated, with lower scores corresponding to a better health.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At all visits from Visit 1 (screening) until the last day of the second treatment period (Visit 5).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [52] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [53] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=189 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
189
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [54] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.064 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-2.38
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-4.89 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
0.14 | ||||||||||||
Notes [54] - Change from baseline in the SGRQ activity score was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline SGRQ total/domain score (score on Day 1) instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SGRQ impact score on Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was filled by the patient at all visits during the treatment phase. This questionnaire comprised 50 items, with 76 weighted responses, developed to measure health in chronic airflow limitation. Three component scores were calculated: symptoms, activity and impacts on daily life and a total score was then calculated, with lower scores corresponding to a better health.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At all visits from Visit 1 (screening) until the last day of the second treatment period (Visit 5).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [55] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [56] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=191 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
191
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [57] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.427 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANCOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-1.02
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-3.55 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
1.52 | ||||||||||||
Notes [57] - Change from baseline in the SGRQ impact score on Day 28 was analysed using the same model used for the primary efficacy variable, including baseline SGRQ total/domain score (score on Day 1) instead of baseline FEV1 as covariate. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Percentage of days without intake of rescue medication | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Use of rescue medication was evaluated by treatment in terms of percentage of days without intake of rescue medication (secondary efficacy variable), average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) (secondary efficacy variable) and average number of times rescue medication used per day (secondary efficacy variable).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Dispensation of rescue medication has been at each visit from Visit 1 (screening) to Visit 4; collection of rescue medication has been at Visit 5. Information on rescue medication was collected through all the study using a diary.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [58] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [59] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=178 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
178
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [60] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.056 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
4.88
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.12 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
9.89 | ||||||||||||
Notes [60] - Percentage of days without intake of rescue medication will be analysed using an ANOVA model with treatment, period and patient as fixed effects. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Use of rescue medication was evaluated by treatment in terms of percentage of days without intake of rescue medication (secondary efficacy variable), average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) (secondary efficacy variable) and average number of times rescue medication used per day (secondary efficacy variable).
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Dispensation of rescue medication has been at each visit from Visit 1 (screening) to Visit 4; collection of rescue medication has been at Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [61] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [62] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=179 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
179
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [63] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.021 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.32
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.6 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.05 | ||||||||||||
Notes [63] - Average use of rescue medication will be analysed using an ANOVA model with treatment, period and patient as fixed effects. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Average number of times rescue medication used per day | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Use of rescue medication was evaluated by treatment in terms of percentage of days without intake of rescue medication (secondary efficacy variable), average use of rescue medication (number of puffs/day) (secondary efficacy variable) and average number of times rescue medication used per day (secondary efficacy variable). The average number of times rescue medication as used per day was statistically significantly lower with CHF 5259 pMDI than with placebo.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Dispensation of rescue medication has been at each visit from Visit 1 (screening) to Visit 4; collection of rescue medication has been at Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [64] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed [65] - number of subjects of the ITT population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
CHF 5259 pMDI vs Placebo | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
In a cross-over study, groups examined should not be added. The number N=180 (subject analysis set) is an innate error of the EudraCT database system.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
CHF 5259 pMDI - ITT v Placebo - ITT population
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
180
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [66] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.035 | ||||||||||||
Method |
ANOVA | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
adjusted mean differencej | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-0.17
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-0.32 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-0.01 | ||||||||||||
Notes [66] - Average number of times rescue medication is used per day will be analysed using an ANOVA model with treatment, period and patient as fixed effects. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SBP post-dose Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SBP pre-dose Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [67] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [68] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in SBP post-dose Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [69] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [70] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in SBP Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [71] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [72] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in DBP post-dose Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in DBP pre-dose Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [73] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from baseline in DBP post-dose Day 28 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [74] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [75] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in DBP Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
SBP and DBP measurement are made after a 10-minute rest in sitting position. Measurements were performed at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and
2-hour post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Notes [76] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in HR Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The 12-lead ECG was performed in triplicate at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and 1 hour-45 minute post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in QTcF Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The 12-lead ECG was performed in triplicate at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and 1 hour-45 minute post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in PR Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The 12-lead ECG was performed in triplicate at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and 1 hour-45 minute post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in QRS Day 28 post-dose from Day 28 pre-dose | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The 12-lead ECG was performed in triplicate at pre-dose at V1 and at pre- and 1 hour-45 minute post-dose from V2 to V5.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
At each visit, from visit 1 (screening) to visit 5.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Males with abnormalities in QTcF values (>450 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males
and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
post- dose on Day 1 and on Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [77] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [78] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Males with abnormalities in QTcF values (>480 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [79] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [80] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Males with abnormalities in QTcF values (>500 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [81] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [82] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Females with abnormalities in QTcF values (>470 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [83] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [84] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Females with abnormalities in QTcF values (>500 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Notes [85] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed [86] - number of subjects of the safety population actually analysed |
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Patients with abnormalities in change from baseline QTcF values (>30 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Patients with abnormalities in change from baseline QTcF values (>60 ms) | |||||||||
End point description |
The following QTcF abnormalities were reported:
• 1 (1.8%) male patient during treatment with placebo had a QTcF value > 450 ms at post-dose on Day 1. No other abnormalities were reported in male patients;
• 1 (2.6%) female patient during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post- dose on Day 28 and the same patient had a QTcF value > 470 ms at post-dose on Day 1 and at post-dose on Day 28 during treatment with placebo;
• 4 (4.1%) patients had change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with CHF 5259 pMDI and 1 (1.0%) patient had a change from baseline > 30 ms during treatment with placebo. In all cases, QTcF value was below the normal threshold (i.e. 450 ms for males and 470 ms for females).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Post-dose on Day 1 and Day 28
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
BDI focal score on Day 1 | ||||||||||||
End point description |
BDI was collected at Visits 1, 2 and 4.
BDI focal score on Day 1 and TDI focal score on Day 28 are presented by treatment
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
On Day 1
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
At each Visit from visit 1 (screening) to Visit 6 (follow-up call)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
CHF 5259 pMDI - safety population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo - safety population
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The Safety population was defined as all randomised patients who received at least one dose of the study medication. Patient 202302 was allocated to the treatment sequence placebo-CHF 5259 pMDI, received a placebo kit in both treatment periods. He was counted only in the placebo column in the Safety population (i.e. actual treatment) and in both the CHF 5259 pMDI column and the placebo column in the ITT population (i.e. planned treatment). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
There are no limitation or caveats to this summary of results |