Clinical Trial Results:
Shamrock versus Lumbar Ultrasound Trident – Ultrasound guided block of the lumbar plexus
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2013-005346-10 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
08 Mar 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
23 Mar 2016
|
First version publication date |
23 Mar 2016
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
AUH-TFB-SR
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02255591 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Dep. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus University Hospital, Nørrebrogade 44, Aarhus C, Denmark, DK-8000
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Trial Info – Shamrock, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, +45 51542997, tfb@dadlnet.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Trial Info – Shamrock, Thomas Fichtner Bendtsen, +45 51542997, tfb@dadlnet.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
15 Feb 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
08 Mar 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
08 Mar 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main objective of the trial is to complete a double-blinded randomized controlled trial with crossover design of a lumbar plexus block with the Shamrock technique versus the Lumbar Ultrasound Trident technique by estimating the time for performance of lumbar plexus block in healthy volunteers.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The trial subjects were asked about general well-being and any prior disease and discomfort upon arrival to the trial venue.
The trial subjects were monitored with 3-lead electrocardiography, noninvasive pressure, and pulse oximetry from five minutes before the pre-scan to five minutes after completed intervention. During the intervention, the research anaesthesiologist and the assistent communicated with the trail subject reassuring the well-being of the trial subject. Immediately after completed intervention, trial subject discomfort during the procedure was assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10).
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
09 Feb 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 20
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
20
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
20
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
20
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
All volunteers were recruited through a Danish website for research volunteers from Feb 9, 2015 to Feb 24, 2015. | |||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
22 volunteers were screened and 20 volunteers were included in the study. One of the excluded screened subjects had a knee injury (exclusion criteria). One of the excluded screened subjects was not available for participation on the pre-set dates of the trial. | |||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind [1] | |||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Data analyst, Assessor, Subject | |||||||||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
No
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Shamrock | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
All included trial subjects received a lumbar plexus block with the Shamrock technique either on the first or the second trial day (randomized). | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lidokain-adrenalin SAD
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
20 ml 2% lidocaine with 0.0005% adrenaline was injected.
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dotarem
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.13 ml Dotarem (279.3 mg gadoterate meglumine) was added to the lidocaine-adrenaline prior to injection in order to enhance visualization of the anatomical spread of lidocaine-adrenaline on MRI after the intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Lumbar Ultrasound Trident (LUT) | |||||||||||||||
Arm description |
All included trial subjects received a lumbar plexus block with the LUT technique either on the first or the second trial day (randomized). | |||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | |||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Lidokain-adrenalin SAD
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
20 ml 2% lidocaine with 0.0005% adrenaline was injected.
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Dotarem
|
|||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
|||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Perineural use
|
|||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.13 ml Dotarem (279.3 mg gadoterate meglumine) was added to the lidocaine-adrenaline prior to injection in order to enhance visualization of the anatomical spread of lidocaine-adrenaline on MRI after the intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - The roles blinded appear to be inconsistent with a double blind trial. Justification: All trial subjects and observers and analysts of data were blinded. The principal investigator was also the anesthesiologist who performed all lumbar plexus blocks and could therefore not be blinded. The P.I. was not involved in collecting or analyzing data. |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Shamrock
|
||
Reporting group description |
All included trial subjects received a lumbar plexus block with the Shamrock technique either on the first or the second trial day (randomized). | ||
Reporting group title |
Lumbar Ultrasound Trident (LUT)
|
||
Reporting group description |
All included trial subjects received a lumbar plexus block with the LUT technique either on the first or the second trial day (randomized). |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Block procedure time | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed after pre-scanning from the time the ultrasound transducer was placed on the skin of the trial subject to the block needle was withdrawn after completed injection.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Block procedure time | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Comparison of normal distributed difference between two paired continuous variabels.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Shamrock v Lumbar Ultrasound Trident (LUT)
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
39
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority [1] | ||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.0089 | ||||||||||||
Method |
One-sample Student t test | ||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | ||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-98
|
||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||
lower limit |
-168 | ||||||||||||
upper limit |
-28 | ||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Because this is a statistical test of paired variables, only the 19 subjects that completed both interventions were included in the comparative analysis. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of block needle insertions | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The number of block needle insertions was defined as the number of retractions of the block needle followed by advancement regardless of the number of skin insertions.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Counted from the start of the block procedure time to the end of injection.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Block needle insertion point | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The block needle insertion point was estimated as the horizontal distance (cm) from the needle insertion point in the skin to the sagittal midline.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Measured immediately after completed injection.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Block needle depth | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The distance from skin to the block needle tip was estimated as the distance (cm) from the block needle insertion point in the skin to the block needle tip gauged by reading of the cm markings on the needle shaft.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Measured immediately after completed injection.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Minimal electrical nerve stimulation | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The minimum electrical nerve stimulation level in mA required triggering a response was measured in order to confirm the position of the block needle tip before injection.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed immediately prior to injection.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Response on electrical nerve stimulation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed immediately prior to injection.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Discomfort during block procedure | ||||||||||||
End point description |
The trial subject's discomfort during block procedure was assessed on a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0-10, where 0 = no discomfort and 10 = worst possible discomfort.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed immediately after completed intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Change in mean arterial pressure (MAP) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
ΔMAP was measured as the change of MAP from the time immediately prior to pre-scanning to 5 minutes after completed intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Perineural spread of local anaesthetics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Perineural spread of local anaesthetic was assessed as positive when visual contact between the local anaesthetic and the nerve on MRI was confirmed. Perineural spread was assessed for: anterior rami L1-S1; the femoral, the obturator, and the lateral femoral cutaneous nerves; and the lumbosacral trunk on the ipsilateral side as the block injection.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Perineural spread of lidocaine was assessed on MRI scans sampled 15 minutes after completed intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Epidural spread of local anaesthetics | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Epidural spread was assessed to be present when circumferential epidural spread of the injectate was observed on MRI and decreased or absent sensation for cold was observed in at least one pair of bilateral dermatomes during the sensory mapping.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Epidural spread of local anaesthetics was assessed on MRI sampled 15 minutes after completed intervention and during sensory mapping 45 minutes after completed intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Motor block | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Motor block of the femoral nerve (knee extension), obturator nerve (hip adduction), superior gluteal nerve (hip abduction), and lumbosacral trunk (knee flexion), respectively, was assessed as present when the post-block muscle force of each motion was ≤ 50% of baseline muscle force.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline muscle force (mmHg) was assessed on the first trial day prior to intervention. Post-block muscle force (mmHg) was assessed 30 min after completed intervention on each trial day.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Sensory block - Cold | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sensory block for cold in the dermatomes T8-S3 and in the skin area innervated by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, respectively, was assessed as present when the somatosensation for cold was absent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed 45 minutes after completed intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Sensory block - Warmth | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sensory block for warmth in the dermatomes T8-S3 and in the skin area innervated by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, respectively, was assessed as present when the somatosensation for warmth was absent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed 45 minutes after completed intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Sensory block - Touch | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sensory block for touch in the dermatomes T8-S3 and in the skin area innervated by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, respectively, was assessed as present when the somatosensation for touch was absent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed 45 minutes after completed intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Sensory block - Pain | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Sensory block for pinprick (pain) in the dermatomes T8-S3 and in the skin area innervated by the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, respectively, was assessed as present when the somatosensation for pinprick (pain) was absent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed 45 minutes after completed intervention.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Block success | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
Block success was assessed as motor block of the femoral and obturator nerves, and sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve. Motor block is a proxy marker for sensory block and was assessed as successful when the post-block muscle strength of the femoral and obturator nerves, respectively, was ≤ 50% of baseline muscle force. Success of sensory block of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) was assessed as present when the sensory for cold and/or pinprick (pain) was absent.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Motor block of the femoral and obturator nerves was assessed at 30 min after completed injection. Sensor block of cold and/or pinprick of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was assessed at 45 min after completed injection.
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Maximum concentration (Cmax) of plasma lidocaine (p-lidocaine) | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Cmax of p-lidocaine was assessed in blood sampled at 0, 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 90 minutes after intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Time to Cmax p-lidocaine | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Time to Cmax was estimated in the period 0-90 minutes after completed intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Lidocaine concentration-area under the curve | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Assessed in the period 0-90 minutes after completed intervention.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Cost-effectiveness | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Cost-effectiveness of the interventions was estimated as the difference in mean marginal cost for the Shamrock vs. the LUT technique.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Calculated in the end of the data analysis after last subject last visit.
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Continuous assessment of adverse events from the start of pre-scanning until the discharge after intervention on the trial day. All trial subjects were urged to self-report any adverse events after discharge.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Regular assessment of adverse events from the start of pre-scanning until the end of observation. All trial subjects were systematically asked about any adverse events by the time of discharge. All trial subjects were urged to self-report any adverse events after discharge - both between the trial days and after the last trial day.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
19.0
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Shamrock lumbar plexus block
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Lumbar Ultrasound Trident lumbar plexus block
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |