Clinical Trial Results:
Immunomodulatory effect of esomeprazole antitumoral and high-dose under neoadjuvant and adjuvant in patients with melanoma in stage III. Randomized pilot study treatment vs control
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-000334-30 |
Trial protocol |
IT |
Global end of trial date |
29 Nov 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
13 Dec 2021
|
First version publication date |
13 Dec 2021
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
INT27/14
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Fondazione IRCCS ''Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori''
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
via G. Venezian 1, Milano, Italy, 20133
|
||
Public contact |
Segreteria Tecnico Scientifica, Fondazione IRCCS ''IStituto Nazionale dei Tumori'' , etico@istitutotumori.mi.it
|
||
Scientific contact |
PI: Licia Rivoltini (licia.rivoltini@istitutotumori.mi.it)
Project Manager: Paola Frati, Fondazione IRCCS ''IStituto Nazionale dei Tumori'' , paola.frati@istitutotumori.mi.it
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
29 Nov 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
29 Nov 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
29 Nov 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To evaluate the effect of immunomodulatory and anti-tumor effect of treatment with high doses of esomeprazole in patients with metastatic melanoma
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
Each patient will be informed about the study and, if accepted, must sign the consent to participate. Patients will be informed of the contingencies associated with the Protocol procedures in order to provide adequate information about potential risks. However, through the adverse events monitoring, the protection of the interests and safety of the participants will be guaranteed.
|
||
Background therapy |
None | ||
Evidence for comparator |
Not Applicable | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
03 Oct 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 109
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
109
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
109
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
84
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
23
|
||
85 years and over |
2
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
As for the phaseA of the study,23 stage III melanoma patients,received oral treatment with Esom prior to surgery(5-7weeks,mean:5,7).A control group of 86 patients receiving no Esom treatment for logistic reasons(interval to surgery≤5weeks) was also included(9DO/failure).PhaseB was never activated to the rapidly evolving scenario of melanoma therapy | ||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Clinical data have been collected to ascertain patient eligibility;signed ICF has been obtained & blood sample for immunological studies was withdrawn.In case surgery was scheduled at a≥5weeks interval,enrolment into the ESOM pre-surgery treatment study arm was proposed.For surgery planned before 5weeks, pts were offered to enter the Control Group | ||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Esom Group (treatment) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The Esom treatment arm foreseen the administration of Esom to stage III melanoma patients undergoing lymph node surgical dissection. The treatment was given in the interval prior to surgery for a period ranging from 5 to 7 weeks, depending on the individual patients’ waiting list. Patients enrolled in this group were 23, 20 of which completed the whole treatment program. | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Esomeprazole
|
||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
034972416/M(40mg)
|
||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Nexium
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Capsule
|
||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Patients enrolled in the Esom arm received Esom orally according to an intermittent schedule which provided a dose of 2,5 mg/kg/die for three days, followed by a maintenance dose (20 mg/die) for four days. This weekly schedule was repeated form a mean of 5-7 weeks, up to 24 h prior to surgical intervention.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Control Group (Control) | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
A group of stage III melanoma patients (not entering the Esom group for logistic reasons, i.e. surgery scheduled before 5 weeks) was included in the study as controls to gain parallel information about blood and LN immune status in the absence of ESOM administration | ||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
No intervention | ||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall Trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Esom Group (treatment): Esomeprazole was administrated orally according to an intermittent schedule which provided a dose of 2,5 mg/kg/die for three days, followed by a maintenance dose (20 mg/die) for four days. This weekly schedule was repeated up to 24 h before the surgical intervention. Control Group (Control): A group of stage, gender and age-matched melanoma patients (not entering the tratment group for logistic reasons) included in the study as controls to gain parallel information about blood and LN immune status in the absence of ESOM administration | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Esom Group (treatment)
|
||
Reporting group description |
The Esom treatment arm foreseen the administration of Esom to stage III melanoma patients undergoing lymph node surgical dissection. The treatment was given in the interval prior to surgery for a period ranging from 5 to 7 weeks, depending on the individual patients’ waiting list. Patients enrolled in this group were 23, 20 of which completed the whole treatment program. | ||
Reporting group title |
Control Group (Control)
|
||
Reporting group description |
A group of stage III melanoma patients (not entering the Esom group for logistic reasons, i.e. surgery scheduled before 5 weeks) was included in the study as controls to gain parallel information about blood and LN immune status in the absence of ESOM administration | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Primary Analysis
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
Patiens involved in the immunological analyses were 100, of which 20 in the Esom Group (Treatment Arm) and 80 in the Control Group (Control Arm)
|
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Primary_1 | |||||||||
End point description |
The phase A of the study was successfully completed,with a high patient compliance (>90% patients adhered to the full pre-surgery treatment schedule) and good safety profile of the Esom administration (about 10% patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicity).The primary endpoints were to test the modulation of the frequency and/or function of diverse immune cell subset in peripheral blood (PB) and lymph nodes of patients receiving pre-surgery Esom, and to search for signs of reduced tumor viability (decrease in ki67 proliferation marker expression and/or mitosis, and /or increase of apoptosis)in metastatic LN.The immunoprofiling of LN cell suspension andPB immune cells showed a significant increment of cytotoxic and activated T and NK cells, indicating a boost of antitumor immunity.In contrast, cells with inhibitory functions such as monocytes, MDSC and regulatory T cells were reduced, proving a reduction in local and systemic immunosuppression.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
5-7 weeks
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Statistical analysis | |||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
The individual tests performed for the variables group were verified with the Hochberg procedure, to consider the multiplicity of the analysis. None of the observed significance are missed because of the adjustment procedures above mentioned.
|
|||||||||
Comparison groups |
Esom Group (treatment) v Control Group (Control)
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
100
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
other [1] | |||||||||
P-value |
= 0.05 [2] | |||||||||
Method |
Hochberg | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
Notes [1] - immunomodulation [2] - no P-value considered |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Primary_2 [3] | |||||||||
End point description |
In terms of effects of the treatment on tumor viability, in patients having stage IIIC and receiving pre-surgery Esom (n=8), the expression of melanoma markers (TRP1 and gp100) was significantly lower with respect to the stage IIIc (n=15) patients of the control group, implying a inferior tumor load in metastatic LN in the group receiving Esom, either to the investigational treatment or different distribution in tumor burden among the two groups.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
5-7 weeks
|
|||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: No statistical analyses for the second of the primary end point. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
5-7 weeks
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
19.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
AE _Group
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 1% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||||||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||||||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? Yes | |||||||
|
|||||||
Limitations and caveats |
|||||||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||||||
The approval of new therapies for stage III melanoma in adjuvant setting patients completely overwhelmed the field and made any clinical testing of additional new strategies impossible to be performed. | |||||||
Online references |
|||||||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28267587 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27827921 |