Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   44334   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7366   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A 12-Week, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Efficacy and Safety Study of Fluticasone Propionate Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler Compared with Fluticasone/ Salmeterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Persistent Asthma Symptomatic Despite Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2014-000923-25
    Trial protocol
    CZ   DE   HU   PL  
    Global end of trial date
    26 Sep 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    18 May 2016
    First version publication date
    18 May 2016
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    FSS-AS-30017
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02141854
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc
    Sponsor organisation address
    41 Moores Road, Frazer, Pennsylvania, United States, 19355
    Public contact
    Director, Clinical Research, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc., 1 215-591-3000, ustevatrials@tevapharm.com
    Scientific contact
    Director, Clinical Research, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products, R&D Inc., 1 215-591-3000, ustevatrials@tevapharm.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    16 Feb 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    26 Sep 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Fp MDPI and FS MDPI when administered over 12 weeks in patients 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma.
    Protection of trial subjects
    This study was conducted in full accordance with the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Consolidated Guideline (E6) and any applicable national and local laws and regulations (eg, Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Title 21, Parts 50, 54, 56, 312, and 314; European Union [EU] Directive 2001/20/EC on the approximation of the laws, regulations, and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use). Information regarding any investigational centers participating in this study that could not comply with these standards was documented. Written and/or oral information about the study was provided to all patients (or, in the case of minor patients [age 12 to 17 years or per local regulations], to patients and their parents/legally authorized representatives) in a language understandable by the patients (to the extent practical for minor patients) and/or representatives. The information included an adequate explanation of the aims, methods, anticipated benefits, potential hazards, and insurance arrangements in force. Written informed consent was obtained before any study procedures or assessments were done. It was explained that patients were free to refuse entry into the study and free to withdraw from the study at any time without prejudice to future treatment. Each patient’s willingness to participate in the study was documented in writing in an informed consent form (ICF) that was signed by the patient (or legally acceptable representative) with the date of that signature indicated. Each investigator kept the original ICFs, and copies were given to the patients. Analogous procedures applied to assent forms.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    30 Jun 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Canada: 3
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United States: 540
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    South Africa: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Russian Federation: 46
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Ukraine: 36
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 137
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 5
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 98
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    882
    EEA total number of subjects
    240
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    64
    Adults (18-64 years)
    722
    From 65 to 84 years
    96
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 1661 patients with persistent asthma were screened and 882 patients enrolled. 154 patients were not randomized, most commonly (76 patients) because of not meeting randomization criteria.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Run-In Period
    Is this the baseline period?
    No
    Allocation method
    Non-randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject
    Blinding implementation details
    All patients replace their current inhaled corticosteroid and instead take 1 inhalation twice a day from a single-blinded fluticasone propionate 50 mcg multidose dry powder inhaler device.

    Arms
    Arm title
    Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg BID
    Arm description
    During the 14-21 day run-in period, patients discontinued their current inhaled corticosteroid and instead took a single-blinded fluticasone propionate (Fp) multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) 50 mcg 1 inhalation twice a day for a total daily dose of 100 mcg. Albuterol/salbutamol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), a short acting beta2 adrenergic agonist (SABA) inhaler, was provided to replace the patient’s current rescue medication.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Fluticasone propionate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler (Fp MDPI) 50 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 100 mcg.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Albuterol/Salbutamol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    ProAir
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Albuterol/salbutamol hydrofluoroalkane (specifically, HFA 134a) metered dose inhaler (MDI), for use on an as-needed basis for the immediate relief of asthma symptoms.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg BID
    Started
    882
    Completed
    728
    Not completed
    154
         Exclusion criteria met
    14
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    9
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    10
         Not specified
    14
         Randomization criteria not met
    76
         Lost to follow-up
    6
         Inclusion criteria not met
    25
    Period 2
    Period 2 title
    Treatment Period
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes [1]
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients were randomly assigned to one of 5 treatments; a permanent unique randomization number and treatment kit number was generated using interactive response technology (IRT). Patients and investigators remained blinded to treatment assignment during the study. The sponsor’s clinical personnel involved in the study were blinded until the database was locked for analysis.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Placebo MDPI
    Arm description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Placebo
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    The placebo multidose dry powder inhaler was identical to the devices used to deliver active drug, and indistinguishable from the active treatments. Patients took one inhalation twice a day (approximately 12 hours apart). Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Arm title
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Arm description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Fluticasone propionate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler (Fp MDPI) 100 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 200 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Arm title
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Arm description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Fluticasone propionate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Fluticasone propionate multidose dry powder inhaler (Fp MDPI) 200 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 400 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Arm title
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Arm description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Fluticasone propionate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Fluticasone propionate (combined with salmeterol) multidose dry powder inhaler 100 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 200 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salmeterol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Salmeterol (combined with fluticasone propionate ) multidose dry powder inhaler 12.5 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 25 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Arm title
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Arm description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Fluticasone propionate
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Fluticasone propionate (combined with salmeterol) multidose dry powder inhaler 200 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 400 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Salmeterol
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation powder
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Salmeterol (combined with fluticasone propionate ) multidose dry powder inhaler 12.5 mcg in the morning and evening for a total daily dose of 25 mcg. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth and expectorate (not swallow) after study drug administration.

    Notes
    [1] - Period 1 is not the baseline period. It is expected that period 1 will be the baseline period.
    Justification: Period 1 is the Run-In Period in which all patients were given the same medications and qualifying tests. Patients who successfully met study criteria were randomized and treated in the Treatment Period. Hence baseline information is offered for those patients who entered the Treatment Period.
    Number of subjects in period 2 [2]
    Placebo MDPI Fp MDPI 100 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Started
    145
    146
    146
    145
    146
    Intent to treat population
    145
    146
    146
    145
    146
    Safety population
    144
    145
    146
    143
    145
    Full analysis set
    143
    145
    146
    141
    145
    Completed
    107
    136
    135
    136
    136
    Not completed
    38
    10
    11
    9
    10
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    7
    4
    3
    3
    2
         Disease progression
    18
    -
    3
    1
    2
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    2
    2
    -
    2
    2
         Not specified
    2
    1
    -
    2
    1
         Pregnancy
    -
    -
    -
    -
    1
         Non-compliance
    -
    -
    1
    -
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    1
    -
    1
    1
    1
         Protocol deviation
    1
    2
    2
    -
    1
         Lack of efficacy
    7
    1
    1
    -
    -
    Notes
    [2] - The number of subjects reported to be in the baseline period are not the same as the worldwide number enrolled in the trial. It is expected that these numbers will be the same.
    Justification: The number of subjects enrolled matches the number of subjects in the Run-In Period.

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo MDPI
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group values
    Placebo MDPI Fp MDPI 100 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg Total
    Number of subjects
    145 146 146 145 146 728
    Age categorical
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        Adolescents (12-17 years)
    6 9 10 8 12 45
        Adults (18-64 years)
    125 124 119 125 115 608
        From 65-84 years
    14 13 17 12 19 75
    Age continuous
    ITT population
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    44.5 ( 16.05 ) 45.7 ( 15.64 ) 44.4 ( 16.36 ) 44.3 ( 14.88 ) 44.7 ( 16.93 ) -
    Gender categorical
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    91 94 88 79 87 439
        Male
    54 52 58 66 59 289
    Race
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        White
    124 111 116 112 125 588
        Black or African American
    18 31 23 28 20 120
        Asian
    2 0 2 0 0 4
        American Indian or Alaska Native
    0 0 2 0 0 2
        Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander
    0 0 0 0 0 0
        Other
    1 4 3 5 1 14
    Ethnicity
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        Not Hispanic or Latino
    136 134 136 135 136 677
        Hispanic or Latino
    8 11 10 10 10 49
        Unknown
    1 1 0 0 0 2
    History of Smoking
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        Prior Smoker
    23 28 21 28 20 120
        No tobacco use
    122 118 125 117 126 608
    Previous Asthma Therapy
    ITT population
    Units: Subjects
        Inhaled corticosteroid
    68 58 63 67 73 329
        Inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta2-agonist
    77 88 83 78 73 399
    Body Mass Index
    ITT population
    Units: kg/m^2
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    29.3 ( 7.41 ) 29.9 ( 7.62 ) 29.9 ( 7.27 ) 30.2 ( 7.6 ) 29.4 ( 7.35 ) -
    Forced Expiratory Volune in 1 second (FEV1)
    n=144, 145, 146, 142, 145
    Units: liters
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    2.141 ( 0.6849 ) 2.069 ( 0.6017 ) 2.075 ( 0.5696 ) 2.157 ( 0.6402 ) 2.083 ( 0.6532 ) -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Fluticasone Propionate 50 mcg BID
    Reporting group description
    During the 14-21 day run-in period, patients discontinued their current inhaled corticosteroid and instead took a single-blinded fluticasone propionate (Fp) multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) 50 mcg 1 inhalation twice a day for a total daily dose of 100 mcg. Albuterol/salbutamol hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI), a short acting beta2 adrenergic agonist (SABA) inhaler, was provided to replace the patient’s current rescue medication.
    Reporting group title
    Placebo MDPI
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Subject analysis set title
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. The full analysis set included intent-to-treat patients with >=1 dose of study drug and >=1 postbaseline trough FEV1.

    Subject analysis set title
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks. The full analysis set included intent-to-treat patients with >=1 dose of study drug and >=1 postbaseline trough FEV1.

    Subject analysis set title
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks. The full analysis set included intent-to-treat patients with >=1 dose of study drug and >=1 postbaseline trough FEV1.

    Subject analysis set title
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks. The full analysis set included intent-to-treat patients with >=1 dose of study drug and >=1 postbaseline trough FEV1.

    Subject analysis set title
    Placebo MDPI
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks. The full analysis set included intent-to-treat patients with >=1 dose of study drug and >=1 postbaseline trough FEV1.

    Subject analysis set title
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12, and were randomized to the fluticasone propionate 200 mcg and salmeterol 12.5 mcg/dose BID treatment group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12, and were randomized to the fluticasone propionate 100 mcg and salmeterol 12.5 mcg/dose BID treatment group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12, and were randomized to the fluticasone propionate 200 mcg/dose BID treatment group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12, and were randomized to the fluticasone propionate 100 mcg/dose BID treatment group.

    Subject analysis set title
    Serial Spirometry Subset: Placebo MDPI
    Subject analysis set type
    Sub-group analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    A subset of patients who performed postdose serial spirometry at the baseline visit and week 12, and were randomized to the placebo treatment group.

    Primary: Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve from Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Standardized Baseline-Adjusted Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) Area Under the Effect Curve from Time Zero to 12 Hours PostDose (FEV1 AUEC0-12) at Week 12
    End point description
    A subset of patients performed postdose serial spirometry. Data from these assessments were used to analyze the primary endpoint of baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 using the trapezoidal rule based on actual time of measurement. It was standardized by dividing it by the number of hours between the start time of dose administration and the end time of the last nonmissing FEV1 measurement. The baseline FEV1 was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose). If 1 of these was missing, the nonmissing value was used; if both were missing, baseline was treated as missing. Baseline-adjusted FEV1 was calculated as postdose FEV1 after subtracting the baseline FEV1 value.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12 and was performed at the following times relative to the administration of study drug (±5 minutes): 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours.
    End point values
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 200 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 100 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    68
    58
    61
    64
    61
    Units: liters
        least squares mean (standard error)
    0.446 ( 0.0463 )
    0.442 ( 0.0496 )
    0.267 ( 0.0466 )
    0.26 ( 0.0463 )
    0.121 ( 0.0472 )
    Statistical analysis title
    AUEC0-12: FS 200/12.5 vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the first in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    129
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0009 [1]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.179
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.074
         upper limit
    0.285
    Notes
    [1] - Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1.
    Statistical analysis title
    AUEC0-12: FS 100/12.5 vs Fp 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the second in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    122
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.001 [2]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.182
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.074
         upper limit
    0.291
    Notes
    [2] - Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1.
    Statistical analysis title
    AUEC0-12: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the third in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Serial Spirometry Subset: Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    129
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [3]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.326
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.221
         upper limit
    0.431
    Notes
    [3] - Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1.
    Statistical analysis title
    AUEC0-12: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fourth in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Serial Spirometry Subset: Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    119
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [4]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.322
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.212
         upper limit
    0.432
    Notes
    [4] - Fixed effects of treatment, sex, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and covariates of age and baseline FEV1.

    Primary: Change from Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Morning Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) at Week 12
    End point description
    Trough FEV1 is a morning spirometry taken predose and pre-rescue bronchodilator. If the patient inadvertently administered asthma medication/study drug at home on the AM of the visit, or if the patient took rescue medication within 6 hours of testing, the visit was rescheduled. The baseline for predose FEV1 was defined as the average of the 30-minute and 10-minute predose measurements obtained at the randomization visit (Day 1).
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (predose, baseline), Week 12
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    143
    140
    145
    144
    143
    Units: liters
        least squares mean (standard error)
    0.272 ( 0.0307 )
    0.271 ( 0.0311 )
    0.179 ( 0.0308 )
    0.119 ( 0.0311 )
    -0.004 ( 0.0312 )
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the fifth in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [5]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.276
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.191
         upper limit
    0.361
    Notes
    [5] - Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment.
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the sixth in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    283
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [6]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.274
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.189
         upper limit
    0.36
    Notes
    [6] - Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment.
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1: Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the seventh in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [7]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.183
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.098
         upper limit
    0.268
    Notes
    [7] - Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment.
    Statistical analysis title
    FEV1: Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    A fixed-sequence multiple testing procedure was used to control the overall Type I error rate at the 0.05 level (2-sided) for the primary endpoints analyses. Analyses appear in the defined sequence. This is the eighth in the sequence.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0047 [8]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.123
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.038
         upper limit
    0.208
    Notes
    [8] - Effects due to baseline trough AM FEV1, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment.

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Daily Morning Trough Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Over the 12 Week Treatment
    End point description
    Morning PEF tests were performed before administration of study drug or rescue medications (data were excluded if the time of PEF measurement was more than 5 minutes after the dose time). The patient recorded the highest value of 3 measurements obtained in the patient diary. The baseline PEF was the average value of recorded (nonmissing) morning assessments over the 7 days prior to randomization on Day 1. For efficacy analyses of weekly average morning PEF measurements, values were the averages based on available data for that week.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), Day 1 (postdose) daily until Week 12
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    145
    141
    146
    145
    142
    Units: liters/minute
        least squares mean (standard error)
    20.235 ( 2.3845 )
    18.61 ( 2.4137 )
    7.464 ( 2.3887 )
    5.731 ( 2.4102 )
    -10.987 ( 2.4784 )
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [9]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    18.45
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    11.751
         upper limit
    25.15
    Notes
    [9] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [10]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    16.718
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    9.988
         upper limit
    23.449
    Notes
    [10] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [11]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    31.221
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    24.513
         upper limit
    37.93
    Notes
    [11] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    283
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [12]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    29.597
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    22.839
         upper limit
    36.354
    Notes
    [12] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs FP 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    291
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0002 [13]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    12.771
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.179
         upper limit
    19.363
    Notes
    [13] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs FP 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0002 [14]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    12.879
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    6.216
         upper limit
    19.541
    Notes
    [14] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AM PEF: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs FP 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The analysis of change from baseline in weekly average of daily (AM predose and pre rescue bronchodilator) PEF over the 12-week treatment period was performed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline weekly average of daily AM PEF, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.001 [15]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    11.146
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    4.511
         upper limit
    17.782
    Notes
    [15] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily Asthma Symptom Score Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
    End point description
    The total daily asthma symptom score is the average of the daytime and nighttime scores as recorded in the patient diary. Daytime Symptom Score: 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms for 1 short period 2=Symptoms for 2+ short periods 3=Symptoms for most of the day - did not affect normal daily activities 4=Symptoms for most of the day - did affect normal daily activities 5=Symptoms so severe that I could not go to work or perform normal daily activities Nighttime Symptom Score (determined in the AM): 0=No symptoms 1=Symptoms causing me to wake once (or wake early) 2=Symptoms causing me to wake twice or more (including waking early) 3=Symptoms causing me to be awake for most of the night 4=Symptoms so severe that I did not sleep Baseline was the average of recorded scores over the 7 days before randomization. The change from baseline in the weekly average over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), to Week 12
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    145
    141
    146
    145
    142
    Units: units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.391 ( 0.0328 )
    -0.364 ( 0.0332 )
    -0.242 ( 0.0329 )
    -0.282 ( 0.0333 )
    -0.087 ( 0.0342 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.001 [16]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.156
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.248
         upper limit
    -0.063
    Notes
    [16] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [17]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.195
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.288
         upper limit
    -0.102
    Notes
    [17] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [18]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.304
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.397
         upper limit
    -0.212
    Notes
    [18] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    283
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [19]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.277
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.37
         upper limit
    -0.184
    Notes
    [19] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    291
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0014 [20]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.149
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.239
         upper limit
    -0.058
    Notes
    [20] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0818 [21]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.082
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.174
         upper limit
    -0.01
    Notes
    [21] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Asthma Symptoms: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of the total daily asthma symptom scores over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0094 [22]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.121
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.213
         upper limit
    -0.03
    Notes
    [22] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in the Weekly Average of the Total Daily (24-hour) Use of Albuterol/Salbutamol Inhalation Aerosol Over the 12-Week Treatment Period
    End point description
    Patients recorded the number of inhalations of rescue medication (albuterol/salbutamol HFA MDI) each AM and PM in the diary. The average number of daily inhalations over the 7 days before the randomization visit was the baseline value. The weekly average was based on the available data for the 7 days before each analysis week. The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Days -6 to Day 1 (predose, baseline), up to week 12
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    145
    141
    146
    145
    143
    Units: puffs
        least squares mean (standard error)
    -0.898 ( 0.1069 )
    -0.821 ( 0.108 )
    -0.534 ( 0.107 )
    -0.439 ( 0.1081 )
    0.168 ( 0.1102 )
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    289
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [23]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.702
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.001
         upper limit
    -0.403
    Notes
    [23] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [24]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.607
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.908
         upper limit
    -0.307
    Notes
    [24] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [25]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -1.066
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.365
         upper limit
    -0.766
    Notes
    [25] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    284
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [26]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.989
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -1.291
         upper limit
    -0.686
    Notes
    [26] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    291
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.016 [27]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.364
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.659
         upper limit
    -0.068
    Notes
    [27] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0124 [28]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.382
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.681
         upper limit
    -0.083
    Notes
    [28] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Rescue Meds: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in the weekly average of total daily (24-hour) use of albuterol/ salbutamol inhalation aerosol (number of inhalations) over weeks 1 to 12 was analyzed using an MMRM with an unstructured covariance matrix and with effects due to baseline value, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), week, treatment, and week-by-treatment interaction.
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0588 [29]
    Method
    mixed model for repeated measures
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    -0.287
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.584
         upper limit
    -0.011
    Notes
    [29] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Probability of Remaining in Study At Week 12
    End point description
    The analysis of probability of remaining in the study at Week 12 used the time to patient withdrawal for worsening asthma, defined as the number of days elapsed from the date of randomization to the date of withdrawal due to worsening asthma. Patients who were lost to follow-up, who had not withdrawn due to worsening asthma by week 12, or who had withdrawn due to reasons other than worsening asthma were right-censored at the date of last assessment.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    up to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    145
    141
    146
    145
    143
    Units: probability
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0.9719 (0.927 to 0.989)
    0.9929 (0.95 to 0.999)
    0.9786 (0.935 to 0.993)
    0.993 (0.951 to 0.999)
    0.8528 (0.781 to 0.903)
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    289
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0001 [30]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [30] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [31]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [31] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    288
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0003 [32]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [32] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    284
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    < 0.0001 [33]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [33] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mc
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    291
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.7203 [34]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [34] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp100 mcg
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    286
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.996 [35]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [35] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    Probability 12 Weeks: FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp200 mcg
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    287
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.325 [36]
    Method
    Logrank
    Confidence interval
    Notes
    [36] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire with Standardized Activities (AQLQ(S)) Score at Endpoint for Patients >=18 Years Old
    End point description
    The AQLQ(S) (September 2010 version; patients aged ≥18 years) was self administered by the patients at the investigational center at the randomization visit and at Week 12 or end of trial. The questionnaire is a tool to measure the impact of asthma on a patient’s quality of life (physical, emotional, social, and occupational) with a recall period of 2 weeks. The AQLQ(S) was administered only to patients 18 years and older. The 32 individual questions in the AQLQ were equally weighted. The overall AQLQ score was the mean of the responses to each of the 32 questions, and ranged from 1 to 7. A score 7.0 indicated that the patient had no impairments due to asthma and a score of 1.0 indicated severe impairment. Positive change from baseline scores indicate improved quality of life.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 (predose, baseline), end of trial (up to week 12)
    End point values
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg Fp MDPI 100 mcg Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    131 [37]
    135 [38]
    132 [39]
    133 [40]
    129 [41]
    Units: units on a scale
        least squares mean (standard error)
    0.534 ( 0.0741 )
    0.592 ( 0.0725 )
    0.384 ( 0.0742 )
    0.34 ( 0.074 )
    -0.089 ( 0.0747 )
    Notes
    [37] - patients who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old
    [38] - patients who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old
    [39] - patients who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old
    [40] - patients who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old
    [41] - patients who contributed at least once to analysis and were >= 18 years old
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): Fp 200 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    261
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [42]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.473
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.269
         upper limit
    0.677
    Notes
    [42] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): Fp 100 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    262
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [43]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.428
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.224
         upper limit
    0.632
    Notes
    [43] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    260
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [44]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.623
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.418
         upper limit
    0.828
    Notes
    [44] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Placebo
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    264
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0 [45]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.681
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.478
         upper limit
    0.885
    Notes
    [45] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): FS 200/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    263
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.149 [46]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.15
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -0.054
         upper limit
    0.354
    Notes
    [46] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 100 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    268
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0143 [47]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.253
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.051
         upper limit
    0.455
    Notes
    [47] - Significance level of 0.05.
    Statistical analysis title
    AQLQ(S): FS 100/12.5 mcg vs Fp 200 mcg
    Statistical analysis description
    The change from baseline in AQLQ(S) score (patients ≥18 years of age) at endpoint (ie, last postbaseline observation) was analyzed using an ANCOVA model with effects due to baseline AQLQ(S) score, sex, age, (pooled) center, previous therapy (ICS or ICS/LABA), and treatment, imputing missing data via last observation carried forward (LOCF).
    Comparison groups
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg v Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    267
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.0435 [48]
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    LSM difference
    Point estimate
    0.209
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    0.006
         upper limit
    0.411
    Notes
    [48] - Significance level of 0.05.

    Secondary: Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement from Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Time to 15% and 12% Improvement from Baseline in FEV1 Postdose on Day 1
    End point description
    The baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was the average of the 2 predose FEV1 measurements (30 and 10 minutes predose) on Day 1. If one of these was missing, the other measurement was used as baseline value. If both were missing, the baseline trough FEV1 was treated as missing. Time to target improvement (15% or 12%) was defined as the time elapsed from the time of first dose to the first time the target improvement in FEV1 was achieved. If an exact target increase was not achieved at a measured timepoint, then the time was estimated by linear interpolation between the timepoint when target was reached and the timepoint immediately before. Patients who did not achieve the target improvement were censored at the time of last serial spirometry assessment. Values of 9999 indicate the values could not be estimated which happened when the estimated probability of not achieving target is more than 50%.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 of the Treatment Period (predose and postdose)
    End point values
    Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset:FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 200 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Fp MDPI 100 mcg Serial Spirometry Subset: Placebo MDPI
    Number of subjects analysed
    68
    58
    61
    64
    61
    Units: hours
    median (confidence interval 95%)
        15% improvement
    0.8 (0.31 to 1.77)
    0.9 (0.48 to 11.96)
    9999 (3.84 to 9999)
    9999 (9999 to 9999)
    9999 (9999 to 9999)
        12% improvement
    0.4 (0.25 to 0.81)
    0.4 (0.29 to 1.68)
    6.9 (2.69 to 9999)
    9999 (5.58 to 9999)
    9999 (5.68 to 9999)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Patients with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Patients with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Experiences (TEAE) During the Treatment Period
    End point description
    An adverse event was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Day 1 to Week 12 of the Treatment Period
    End point values
    Placebo MDPI Fp MDPI 100 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Number of subjects analysed
    144 [49]
    145 [50]
    146 [51]
    143 [52]
    145 [53]
    Units: patients
        >=1 TEAE
    52
    53
    60
    59
    61
        >=1 severe TEAE
    1
    1
    0
    2
    3
        >=1 treatment-related TEAE
    5
    6
    9
    4
    8
        >=1 severe treatment-related TEAE
    0
    0
    0
    0
    1
        >=1 serious TEAE
    1
    1
    1
    2
    2
        >=1 TEAE leading to withdrawal
    2
    2
    0
    2
    2
        >=1 nonserious TEAE
    52
    52
    60
    58
    61
        >=1 TEAE resulting in death
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
    Notes
    [49] - Safety population
    [50] - Safety population
    [51] - Safety population
    [52] - Safety population
    [53] - Safety population
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Day 1 up to Week 14
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Placebo MDPI
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of placebo for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 100 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 200 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    Fp MDPI 200 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate for a total daily dose of 400 mcg for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 100 mcg (for a total daily dose of 200 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Reporting group title
    FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Reporting group description
    Patients took 1 inhalation using a multidose dry powder inhaler (MDPI) twice a day of fluticasone propionate 200 mcg (for a total daily dose of 400 mcg) and salmeterol 12.5 mcg (for a total daily dose of 25 mcg) for 12 weeks.

    Serious adverse events
    Placebo MDPI Fp MDPI 100 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 144 (0.69%)
    1 / 145 (0.69%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    2 / 143 (1.40%)
    2 / 145 (1.38%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    1
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    Breast cancer
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 144 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Nervous system disorders
    Grand mal convulsion
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 144 (0.00%)
    1 / 145 (0.69%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Pyrexia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 144 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
    1 / 146 (0.68%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    Jaundice
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 144 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    1 / 143 (0.70%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 144 (0.69%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 145 (0.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    1 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Infections and infestations
    Pneumonia
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 144 (0.00%)
    0 / 145 (0.00%)
    0 / 146 (0.00%)
    0 / 143 (0.00%)
    1 / 145 (0.69%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Non-serious adverse events
    Placebo MDPI Fp MDPI 100 mcg Fp MDPI 200 mcg FS MDPI 100 / 12.5 mcg FS MDPI 200 / 12.5 mcg
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    20 / 144 (13.89%)
    26 / 145 (17.93%)
    20 / 146 (13.70%)
    21 / 143 (14.69%)
    20 / 145 (13.79%)
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 144 (4.86%)
    11 / 145 (7.59%)
    7 / 146 (4.79%)
    6 / 143 (4.20%)
    4 / 145 (2.76%)
         occurrences all number
    10
    18
    7
    21
    5
    Infections and infestations
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 144 (5.56%)
    7 / 145 (4.83%)
    7 / 146 (4.79%)
    10 / 143 (6.99%)
    10 / 145 (6.90%)
         occurrences all number
    9
    7
    8
    10
    12
    Upper respiratory tract infection
         subjects affected / exposed
    7 / 144 (4.86%)
    9 / 145 (6.21%)
    8 / 146 (5.48%)
    6 / 143 (4.20%)
    6 / 145 (4.14%)
         occurrences all number
    7
    11
    9
    6
    6

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    02 Dec 2014
    Amendment 1 (dated 02 December 2014) to the protocol was issued after 147 patients had been enrolled into the study. The following major procedural changes (not all-inclusive) were made to the protocol: • Rescreening and retesting procedures for spirometry and reversibility were clarified. • Spirometry procedures were updated from 5 to 8 permissible efforts per test. • Clarification was provided about when a severe asthma exacerbation would be considered a serious adverse event.
    10 Dec 2014
    Amendment 2 (dated 10 December 2014) to the protocol was issued when 147 patients had been enrolled into the study to correct the EudraCT number on the signature page.
    19 Feb 2015
    Amendment 3 (dated 19 February 2015) to the protocol was issued when 543 patients had been enrolled into the study. The following major procedural changes (not all-inclusive) were made to the protocol: • Inclusion criteria were updated to allow patients who had had changes in their ICS treatment over 1 month prior to screening to participate. • The determination of potentially exclusionary ECG findings was clarified.
    09 Apr 2015
    Amendment 4 (dated 09 April 2015) to the protocol was issued when 602 patients had been enrolled into the study. The following major procedural changes (not all-inclusive) were made to the protocol: • Based on discussions with the US FDA, the analysis of the primary endpoint of change from baseline in trough FEV1 was changed from over the 12-week treatment period to at week 12 (TV9), and the primary endpoint for serial spirometry was specified as standardized baseline-adjusted FEV1 AUEC0-12h at week 12 (TV9). • As recommended by the FDA for a similar study, the CPRA graph was added to examine all possible response levels of interest. • Related to the change in the primary endpoint, the analysis methods were changed, the methods for handling missing data were modified, and the sequential order of comparisons was adjusted. • Statistical power considerations were recalculated based on the change in the primary endpoint and on newly available data from Teva studies. • A subgroup analysis by region (US and non-US) was added.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu May 08 01:46:39 CEST 2025 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA