Clinical Trial Results:
Muscle relaxation during open upper abdominal surgery
-can the surgical conditions be optimized?
(The laparotomy study)
Influence of deep neuromuscular blockade on the surgeons´ assessment of surgical conditions during laparotomy: a randomized controlled double blinded trial with rocuronium and sugammadex
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-001155-22 |
Trial protocol |
DK |
Global end of trial date |
04 Aug 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
21 Jul 2022
|
First version publication date |
21 Jul 2022
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
Lap2014NMB
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02140593 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Herlev Hospital
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Herlev Ringvej, Herlev, Denmark,
|
||
Public contact |
Department of Anesthesiology, Mona Ring Gätke, mona.gatke@regionh.dk
|
||
Scientific contact |
Department of Anesthesiology, Mona Ring Gätke, mona.gatke@regionh.dk
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Jun 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 May 2016
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
04 Aug 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The aim of the study is to investigate if intense NMB improves surgical conditions during operation in patients scheduled for elective open upper abdominal surgery. Hypothesis: Intense NMB (PTC 0-1) compared to standard NMB improves average of surgical condition scores evaluated on a subjective rating scale.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
An epidural catheter was placed preoperatively, and a test dose of 3 ml of lidocaine 20 mg ml-1 with adrenalin was installed. No further medicine was given in the epidural catheter until after closure of the abdominal wall. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg kg-1 and remifentanil 1.0 µg kg-1 min-1. Anaesthesia was maintained with propofol 0.5 mg kg-1 hour-1 and remifentanil 0.25-0.5 µg kg-1 min-1, and adjusted according to depth of anaesthesia under guidance of arterial blood pressure and entropy 30-50 (Entropy Sensor, GE Healthcare, Hillerød, Denmark). The protocol allowed change to sevoflurane anaesthesia during surgery if the attending anaesthesiologist deemed this necessary.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 May 2014
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Denmark: 128
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
128
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
128
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
56
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
71
|
||
85 years and over |
1
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
Patients aged > 18 years scheduled for elective open upper abdominal surgery (Whipple, gastrectomy, splenectomy, gastric resection, liver resection and laparotomies due to bile obstruction, i.e. hepaticojejunostomy (not cholecystectomy)) were eligible. | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
overall trial (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator | |||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
Intervention medicine was prepared in the operating room before surgery under double control by a nurse anaesthetist and by the investigator who also performed the randomization. The TOF-Watch and the arm with the neuromuscular equipment were covered and the readings from the TOF-Watch were only seen on the connected computer by the nurse anaesthetist and the investigator. The surgeon and any surgical personnel were blinded to the patients’ group allocation.
|
|||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Deep NMB | |||||||||
Arm description |
Deep neuromuscular blockade | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
rocuronium
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
25246
|
|||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Endotracheal intubation was performed two minutes after administration of rocuronium 0.6 mg kg-1. In group DEEP after tracheal intubation patients received rocuronium infusion (2 mg ml-1) with a target level of PTC 0-1. Just before skin incision, 1 ml of saline (placebo) was administered.
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Standard NMB | |||||||||
Arm description |
Standard neuromuscular blockade | |||||||||
Arm type |
standard treatment | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
No investigational medicinal product assigned in this arm
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Deep NMB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Deep neuromuscular blockade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Standard NMB
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Standard neuromuscular blockade | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Deep NMB
|
||
Reporting group description |
Deep neuromuscular blockade | ||
Reporting group title |
Standard NMB
|
||
Reporting group description |
Standard neuromuscular blockade |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
surgical rating scale | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During surgery
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Mann-Whitney | |||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare ordinal or continuous variables that were not normally distributed
|
|||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Deep NMB v Standard NMB
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
128
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | |||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
Mean difference (final values) | |||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|
|||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
September 2014 and May 2016
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
10
|
||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Adverse events were monitored according to agreement with Danish Medicines Agency and monitored by the GCP unit. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29040455 |