Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43870   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7289   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Extension (OLE) Study with ABT-122 in Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Completed the Preceding M12-963 Phase 2 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2014-001471-31
    Trial protocol
    HU   CZ   DE   BG   RO  
    Global end of trial date
    23 May 2016

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    04 Jun 2017
    First version publication date
    04 Jun 2017
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    M12-965
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    NCT02433340
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co.KG
    Sponsor organisation address
    AbbVie House, Vanwall Business Park, Vanwall Road , Maidenhead, Berkshire , United Kingdom, SL6-4UB
    Public contact
    Lawrence McNamee, Clinical Lead, AbbVie, Lawrence.McNamee@abbvie.com
    Scientific contact
    Paul Peloso, Medical Director, AbbVie, heikki.mansikka@abbvie.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    23 May 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    23 May 2016
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    Yes
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    This is a Phase 2, multicenter, 24-week OLE study to assess the safety and tolerability of ABT-122 in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) therapy and who completed the preceding Study M12-963 randomized controlled trial, in which participants had been randomized to receive 1 of 3 doses of ABT-122 (60 mg every other week [EOW], 120 mg EOW, or 120 mg every week [EW]) or adalimumab 40 mg EOW given on background methotrexate.
    Protection of trial subjects
    Participant and/or legal guardian read and understood the information provided about the study and gave written permission.
    Background therapy
    -
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    20 Apr 2015
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    Yes
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Czech Republic: 17
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Bulgaria: 15
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Germany: 1
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Hungary: 11
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    New Zealand: 8
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Poland: 100
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Romania: 6
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    158
    EEA total number of subjects
    150
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    120
    From 65 to 84 years
    38
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    -

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    A total of 158 subjects (98% of those eligible) diagnosed with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on background methotrexate who had participated in the randomized controlled trial M12-963 (2014-001471-31) enrolled in this open-label extension. Results include analyses of data for these subjects from time points during M12-963, per protocol.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall Study (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Not applicable
    Blinding used
    Not blinded

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Arm description
    Double-blind Adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week (EOW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABT-122
    Investigational medicinal product code
    ABT-122
    Other name
    Remtolumab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for injection, Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABT-122 was provided as a lyophilized powder for reconstitution prior to injection; however, once the PFS became available, ABT-122 was provided as a solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. All subjects received ABT-122 120 mg EOW in an open-label fashion with the possibility of an extra 120 mg dose based upon the loss of ACR20 response.

    Arm title
    ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Arm description
    Double-blind ABT-122 60 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABT-122
    Investigational medicinal product code
    ABT-122
    Other name
    Remtolumab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for injection, Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABT-122 was provided as a lyophilized powder for reconstitution prior to injection; however, once the PFS became available, ABT-122 was provided as a solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. All subjects received ABT-122 120 mg EOW in an open-label fashion with the possibility of an extra 120 mg dose based upon the loss of ACR20 response.

    Arm title
    ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Arm description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABT-122
    Investigational medicinal product code
    ABT-122
    Other name
    Remtolumab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for injection, Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABT-122 was provided as a lyophilized powder for reconstitution prior to injection; however, once the PFS became available, ABT-122 was provided as a solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. All subjects received ABT-122 120 mg EOW in an open-label fashion with the possibility of an extra 120 mg dose based upon the loss of ACR20 response.

    Arm title
    ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW
    Arm description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg every week (EW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    ABT-122
    Investigational medicinal product code
    ABT-122
    Other name
    Remtolumab
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for injection, Solution for injection
    Routes of administration
    Subcutaneous use
    Dosage and administration details
    ABT-122 was provided as a lyophilized powder for reconstitution prior to injection; however, once the PFS became available, ABT-122 was provided as a solution for injection in a pre-filled syringe. All subjects received ABT-122 120 mg EOW in an open-label fashion with the possibility of an extra 120 mg dose based upon the loss of ACR20 response.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW
    Started
    42
    37
    39
    40
    Completed
    40
    35
    37
    38
    Not completed
    2
    2
    2
    2
         Consent withdrawn by subject
    1
    -
    1
    2
         Adverse event, non-fatal
    -
    -
    1
    -
         Not Specified
    -
    1
    -
    -
         Required Alternative/Prohibited Therapy
    1
    -
    -
    -
         Lost to follow-up
    -
    1
    -
    -

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind Adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week (EOW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 60 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg every week (EW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW Total
    Number of subjects
    42 37 39 40 158
    Age, Customized
    Units: Participants
        < 40 years
    4 5 7 5 21
        40 to < 65 years
    27 24 22 26 99
        >= 65 years
    11 8 10 9 38
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    30 29 33 32 124
        Male
    12 8 6 8 34

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind Adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every other week (EOW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 60 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg every week (EW) for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Subject analysis set title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Primary: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response Rate at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response Rate at Week 2 [1]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in tender joint count (TJC68), swollen joint count (SJC66), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, patient's global assessment of disease activity (PtGA); physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA), Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    38
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    43.2 (28.7 to 59.1)
    46.2 (31.6 to 61.4)
    47.4 (32.5 to 62.7)
    45.5 (37.8 to 53.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 4 [2]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    50 (35.5 to 64.5)
    64.9 (48.7 to 78.2)
    46.2 (31.6 to 61.4)
    74.4 (58.8 to 85.6)
    58.6 (50.8 to 66)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 6 [3]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    66.7 (51.5 to 79.1)
    70.3 (54.1 to 82.6)
    66.7 (50.9 to 79.4)
    79.5 (64.2 to 89.5)
    70.7 (63.1 to 77.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 8 [4]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    76.2 (61.3 to 86.7)
    75.7 (59.7 to 86.8)
    69.2 (53.5 to 81.5)
    80 (65 to 89.8)
    75.3 (68 to 81.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 12 [5]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    78.6 (63.8 to 88.5)
    70.3 (54.1 to 82.6)
    84.6 (69.9 to 93.1)
    82.5 (67.7 to 91.6)
    79.1 (72.1 to 84.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 16 [6]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [6] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    85.4 (71.2 to 93.5)
    77.8 (61.7 to 88.5)
    86.5 (71.5 to 94.6)
    77.5 (62.3 to 87.9)
    81.8 (74.9 to 87.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 20 [7]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [7] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    71.4 (56.3 to 82.9)
    77.8 (61.7 to 88.5)
    82.1 (67 to 91.3)
    79.5 (64.2 to 89.5)
    77.6 (70.4 to 83.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 24 [8]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [8] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    78.6 (63.8 to 88.5)
    77.8 (61.7 to 88.5)
    76.9 (61.5 to 87.6)
    84.6 (69.9 to 93.1)
    79.5 (72.4 to 85.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 28 [9]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [9] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    73.8 (58.8 to 84.8)
    75 (58.7 to 86.4)
    74.4 (58.8 to 85.6)
    82.1 (67 to 91.3)
    76.3 (69 to 82.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 32 [10]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data..
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [10] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    76.2 (61.3 to 86.7)
    72.2 (55.9 to 84.3)
    79.5 (64.2 to 89.5)
    80 (65 to 89.8)
    77.1 (69.9 to 83)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR20 Response Rate at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR20 Response Rate at Week 36 [11]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR20 response, defined as at least 20% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [11] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    71.4 (56.3 to 82.9)
    72.2 (55.9 to 84.3)
    84.6 (69.9 to 93.1)
    85 (70.5 to 93.3)
    78.3 (71.2 to 84.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 2 [12]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [12] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    39
    155
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    10 (3.4 to 23.6)
    8.1 (2.1 to 22)
    20.5 (10.5 to 35.8)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    15.5 (10.6 to 22.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 4 [13]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [13] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    14.3 (6.3 to 28.2)
    29.7 (17.4 to 45.9)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    35.9 (22.7 to 51.6)
    25.5 (19.3 to 32.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 6 [14]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [14] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    33.3 (20.9 to 48.5)
    35.1 (21.8 to 51.3)
    38.5 (24.9 to 54.1)
    42.5 (28.5 to 57.8)
    37.3 (30.2 to 45.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 8 [15]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [15] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45.2 (31.2 to 60.1)
    29.7 (17.4 to 45.9)
    41 (27.1 to 56.6)
    42.5 (28.5 to 57.8)
    39.9 (32.6 to 47.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 12 [16]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [16] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    52.4 (37.7 to 66.6)
    37.8 (24 to 53.9)
    51.3 (36.2 to 66.1)
    46.2 (31.6 to 61.4)
    47.1 (39.5 to 54.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 16 [17]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [17] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    35
    37
    39
    152
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    36.6 (23.5 to 51.9)
    51.4 (35.6 to 67)
    56.8 (40.9 to 71.3)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    50 (42.1 to 57.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 20 [18]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [18] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    42.9 (29.1 to 57.8)
    52.8 (37 to 68)
    51.3 (36.2 to 66.1)
    52.5 (37.5 to 67.1)
    49.7 (42 to 57.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 24 [19]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [19] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    40.5 (27 to 55.5)
    47.2 (32 to 63)
    53.8 (38.6 to 68.4)
    71.8 (56.1 to 83.6)
    53.2 (45.4 to 60.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 28 [20]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [20] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    50 (35.5 to 64.5)
    47.2 (32 to 63)
    51.3 (36.2 to 66.1)
    69.2 (53.5 to 81.5)
    54.5 (46.7 to 62.1)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 32 [21]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [21] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45.2 (31.2 to 60.1)
    58.3 (42.2 to 72.9)
    51.3 (36.2 to 66.1)
    62.5 (47 to 75.8)
    54.1 (46.3 to 61.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR50 Response Rate at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR50 Response Rate at Week 36 [22]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR50 response, defined as at least 50% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [22] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45.2 (31.2 to 60.1)
    50 (34.5 to 65.5)
    53.8 (38.6 to 68.4)
    62.5 (47 to 75.8)
    52.9 (45.1 to 60.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 2 [23]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [23] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    39
    155
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 10.4)
    2.7 (0 to 15.1)
    5.1 (0.5 to 17.8)
    5.1 (0.5 to 17.8)
    3.2 (1.2 to 7.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 4 [24]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [24] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    4.8 (0.5 to 16.6)
    10.8 (3.7 to 25.3)
    10.3 (3.5 to 24.2)
    17.5 (8.4 to 32.3)
    10.8 (6.7 to 16.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 6 [25]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [25] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    16.7 (8 to 30.9)
    13.5 (5.4 to 28.5)
    17.9 (8.7 to 33)
    20 (10.2 to 35)
    17.1 (12 to 23.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 8 [26]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    Notes
    [26] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    19 (9.7 to 33.6)
    8.1 (2.1 to 22)
    25.6 (14.4 to 41.2)
    27.5 (16 to 43)
    20.3 (14.7 to 27.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 12 [27]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [27] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    23.8 (13.3 to 38.7)
    24.3 (13.2 to 40.3)
    20.5 (10.5 to 35.8)
    35 (22.1 to 50.5)
    25.9 (19.7 to 33.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 16 [28]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [28] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    36
    39
    151
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    15 (6.7 to 29.5)
    30.6 (17.9 to 47)
    33.3 (20.1 to 49.7)
    25.6 (14.4 to 41.2)
    25.8 (19.5 to 33.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 20 [29]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [29] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    35
    39
    40
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    19 (9.7 to 33.6)
    31.4 (18.4 to 48.1)
    33.3 (20.6 to 49.1)
    32.5 (20 to 48.1)
    28.8 (22.3 to 36.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 24 [30]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [30] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    19 (9.7 to 33.6)
    25 (13.6 to 41.3)
    28.2 (16.4 to 43.9)
    40 (26.3 to 55.4)
    28 (21.6 to 35.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 28 [31]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [31] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    16.7 (8 to 30.9)
    27.8 (15.7 to 44.1)
    30.8 (18.5 to 46.5)
    41 (27.1 to 56.6)
    28.8 (22.3 to 36.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 32 [32]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [32] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    16.7 (8 to 30.9)
    27.8 (15.7 to 44.1)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    42.5 (28.5 to 57.8)
    27.4 (21 to 34.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: ACR70 Response Rate at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    ACR70 Response Rate at Week 36 [33]
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects with an ACR70 response, defined as at least 70% reduction (improvement) compared with baseline in TJC68, SJC66, and at least 3 of the 5 remaining ACR core set measures: patient's assessment of pain, PtGA; PGA, HAQ-DI, and hsCRP. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    Notes
    [33] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    23.8 (13.3 to 38.7)
    30.6 (17.9 to 47)
    35.9 (22.7 to 51.6)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    33.8 (26.8 to 41.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Primary: Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and Deaths

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs), AEs Leading to Discontinuation, and Deaths [34]
    End point description
    An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assessed the relationship of each event to the use of study drug as either probably related, possibly related, probably not related or not related. An SAE is an event that results in death, is life-threatening, requires or prolongs hospitalization, results in a congenital anomaly, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or is an important medical event that, based on medical judgment, may jeopardize the subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent any of the outcomes listed above. Treatment-emergent events (TEAEs/TESAEs) are defined as any event that began or worsened in severity after the first dose of study drug. For more details on adverse events please see the Adverse Event section.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    from the first dose of study drug in study M12-965 until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 32 weeks)
    Notes
    [34] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point.
    Justification: Descriptive statistics are presented, per protocol.
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: Participants
    number (not applicable)
        Any AE
    17
    15
    19
    14
    65
        AE possibly study drug-related
    5
    6
    6
    6
    23
        SAE possibly study drug-related
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Severe AE
    0
    1
    1
    0
    2
        SAE
    0
    1
    5
    0
    6
        AE leading to study drug discontinuation
    1
    0
    1
    0
    2
        AE leading to Death
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
        Death (includes non-treatment-emergent)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline In Tender Joint Count (TJC68) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline In Tender Joint Count (TJC68) at Week 2
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    40
    155
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -9.4 ± 10.28
    -11.6 ± 10.57
    -11 ± 11.12
    -12.9 ± 13.84
    -11.2 ± 11.52
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 4
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.1 ± 9.98
    -16.6 ± 12.48
    -13.6 ± 12
    -16.1 ± 12.77
    -14.8 ± 11.8
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 6
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -15.8 ± 10.18
    -16.9 ± 11.67
    -15.3 ± 11.05
    -16.6 ± 12.56
    -16.1 ± 11.28
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 8
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -17.3 ± 9.93
    -17.4 ± 10.85
    -17.1 ± 10.21
    -17.1 ± 13.33
    -17.2 ± 11.05
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 12
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.4 ± 11.78
    -16.9 ± 10.9
    -18.6 ± 10.16
    -18 ± 12.64
    -18 ± 11.34
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 16
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.3 ± 12.03
    -19.2 ± 10.57
    -17.6 ± 9.14
    -18.1 ± 12.38
    -18.3 ± 11.07
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 20
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -17.6 ± 11.93
    -19.7 ± 10.6
    -17.8 ± 10.31
    -19 ± 11.89
    -18.5 ± 11.16
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 24
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -19.3 ± 12.16
    -18.3 ± 10.27
    -17.4 ± 9.7
    -19.8 ± 12.32
    -18.7 ± 11.15
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 28
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.2 ± 10.88
    -18.9 ± 12.26
    -17.9 ± 10.31
    -21 ± 13.02
    -19 ± 11.6
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 32
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.2 ± 11.72
    -19.7 ± 11.04
    -17.9 ± 10.47
    -20.3 ± 13.38
    -19 ± 11.66
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in TJC68 at Week 36
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was "tender or painful" where presence of tenderness was scored as "1" and the absence of tenderness was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total TJC68, which is based on 68 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for TJC68 was 0 to 68, with a higher score indication a greater degree of tenderness. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.2 ± 10.92
    -18.5 ± 11.92
    -17.7 ± 10.06
    -20.3 ± 12.88
    -18.7 ± 11.42
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC66) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC66) at Week 2
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    40
    155
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -8 ± 9.07
    -8.8 ± 8.5
    -8.6 ± 10.84
    -10.8 ± 9.34
    -9 ± 9.46
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 4
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -8.8 ± 8.72
    -10.6 ± 8.04
    -10.3 ± 10.5
    -13.3 ± 9.29
    -10.7 ± 9.26
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 6
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -11.8 ± 8.09
    -11.9 ± 7.71
    -12.3 ± 10.15
    -13.3 ± 9.31
    -12.3 ± 8.81
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 8
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.2 ± 8.26
    -12.4 ± 7.76
    -13.8 ± 9.32
    -14.3 ± 9.43
    -13.2 ± 8.7
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 12
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.6 ± 8.73
    -11.8 ± 9.51
    -13.4 ± 9.13
    -14.8 ± 9
    -13.2 ± 9.06
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 16
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13 ± 8.5
    -13.5 ± 9.6
    -13.8 ± 8.9
    -14.5 ± 8.69
    -13.7 ± 8.84
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 20
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.2 ± 7.47
    -14.6 ± 8.97
    -13.8 ± 10.3
    -15.4 ± 8.95
    -14 ± 8.95
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 24
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -14 ± 8.21
    -13.8 ± 8.68
    -14.6 ± 9.87
    -15.6 ± 9.16
    -14.5 ± 8.93
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 28
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.3 ± 6.88
    -14 ± 10.12
    -14.9 ± 9.49
    -15.8 ± 9.29
    -14.5 ± 8.94
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 32
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.1 ± 8.14
    -13.9 ± 10.34
    -14.3 ± 9.81
    -14.9 ± 9.71
    -14.1 ± 9.43
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in SJC66 at Week 36
    End point description
    At each study visit, a joint evaluator assessed whether a particular joint was swollen where presence of swelling was scored as "1" and the absence of swelling was scored as "0," provided the joint was not replaced or could not be assessed due to other reasons. The total SJC66, which is based on 66 joints, was derived as the sum of all "1s" thus collected with no penalty considered for the joints not assessed or those which had been replaced. The range for SJC66 was 0 to 66, with a higher score indicating a greater degree of swelling. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.4 ± 7.76
    -14 ± 10.55
    -15 ± 9.57
    -14.8 ± 9.82
    -14 ± 9.4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 2
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    39
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -17.9 ± 22.82
    -20.1 ± 16.83
    -22.4 ± 23.49
    -22.3 ± 22.46
    -20.7 ± 21.53
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 4
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -24.5 ± 20.24
    -28.7 ± 20.76
    -24.8 ± 26.57
    -29.3 ± 23.07
    -26.8 ± 22.68
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 6
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -31.8 ± 21.24
    -29.1 ± 22.48
    -29.8 ± 27.07
    -29.9 ± 21.36
    -30.2 ± 22.92
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 8
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -30.5 ± 24.64
    -29.8 ± 21.56
    -30.2 ± 27.89
    -36 ± 23.11
    -31.7 ± 24.36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 12
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -36.2 ± 19.91
    -29.3 ± 22.34
    -37.9 ± 27.18
    -36.5 ± 23.52
    -35.1 ± 23.34
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 16
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -31.9 ± 24.68
    -33 ± 24.11
    -35 ± 28.43
    -38.5 ± 22.92
    -34.6 ± 24.96
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 20
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -30.2 ± 22.48
    -40.3 ± 24.12
    -37.8 ± 28.78
    -36.8 ± 21.72
    -36.1 ± 24.44
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 24
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -31.7 ± 21.86
    -35.9 ± 23.28
    -32 ± 30.31
    -39.4 ± 23.64
    -34.7 ± 24.92
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 28
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.5 ± 22.39
    -36.2 ± 28.88
    -35.3 ± 28.64
    -40.1 ± 22.61
    -34.9 ± 25.79
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 32
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -27.3 ± 22.16
    -37.4 ± 25.63
    -34.3 ± 32.99
    -42.8 ± 25.31
    -35.3 ± 27.1
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Week 36
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their pain in the previous week using a Patient's Global Assessment Pain visual analogue scale (VAS). The range is 0 to 100 mm with no pain being indicated by 0 and severe pain by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -31.3 ± 23.36
    -36.1 ± 28.9
    -39.3 ± 31.37
    -41.8 ± 28.21
    -37 ± 28.03
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 2
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    39
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -18.1 ± 23.77
    -14.2 ± 16.41
    -21.3 ± 19.92
    -17.2 ± 23.06
    -17.7 ± 21.03
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 4
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -20.6 ± 21.73
    -25.6 ± 22.33
    -20.7 ± 24.62
    -26.6 ± 21.79
    -23.3 ± 22.58
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 6
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -26.5 ± 20.97
    -23.2 ± 22.21
    -26.9 ± 24.17
    -27.9 ± 21.14
    -26.2 ± 21.98
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 8
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -27.1 ± 24.33
    -26.8 ± 23.25
    -31.8 ± 25.54
    -34.1 ± 22.93
    -30 ± 24.02
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 12
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -29.2 ± 23.39
    -29 ± 25.11
    -34.1 ± 21.41
    -35.6 ± 25.62
    -32 ± 23.86
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -26.8 ± 24.09
    -29.3 ± 24.91
    -34.8 ± 20.59
    -35.8 ± 22.51
    -31.6 ± 23.18
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 20
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.5 ± 20.98
    -35.6 ± 24.56
    -35.4 ± 26.44
    -35.4 ± 22.95
    -33.6 ± 23.72
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 24
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -31.5 ± 22.81
    -33.1 ± 24.25
    -32.7 ± 25.16
    -38.9 ± 23.63
    -34 ± 23.89
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 28
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -25 ± 23.25
    -33.1 ± 27.93
    -32.6 ± 27.33
    -39.7 ± 25.57
    -32.5 ± 26.29
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 32
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -27.4 ± 23.87
    -34.2 ± 26.17
    -32.8 ± 28.91
    -43.8 ± 23.56
    -34.5 ± 26.12
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 36
    End point description
    Subjects assessed their disease activity for the past 24 hours using a Patient's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -29.5 ± 26.04
    -32.5 ± 26.16
    -37.5 ± 25.73
    -38.3 ± 29.65
    -34.4 ± 26.96
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 2
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    36
    39
    39
    153
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -24.5 ± 21.8
    -25.8 ± 17.29
    -29.5 ± 21.25
    -26.5 ± 21.54
    -26.6 ± 20.49
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 4
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.6 ± 20.49
    -35.5 ± 21.15
    -34.5 ± 21.58
    -37.3 ± 23
    -33.8 ± 21.61
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 6
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -38.5 ± 18.77
    -39 ± 22.76
    -40.3 ± 23.63
    -40.1 ± 20.94
    -39.5 ± 21.33
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 8
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -41 ± 17.82
    -39.6 ± 20.94
    -45.6 ± 21.16
    -43.4 ± 22.87
    -42.4 ± 20.65
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 12
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -44.4 ± 20.3
    -42.9 ± 20.9
    -49.7 ± 20.54
    -47.6 ± 19.86
    -46.2 ± 20.36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 16
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    35
    36
    37
    148
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -46 ± 17.04
    -45.3 ± 24.23
    -47.3 ± 20.99
    -47.3 ± 21.46
    -46.4 ± 20.77
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 20
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    35
    38
    38
    153
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -44.3 ± 19.08
    -46.1 ± 20.28
    -45.6 ± 22.89
    -49.3 ± 21.64
    -46.3 ± 20.86
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 24
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -45.8 ± 18.06
    -46.7 ± 22
    -47.4 ± 23.02
    -49.9 ± 23.05
    -47.4 ± 21.4
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 28
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -44.5 ± 20.72
    -48.7 ± 22.19
    -48.2 ± 22.85
    -51.7 ± 20.85
    -48.2 ± 21.59
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 32
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -45.2 ± 23.07
    -50 ± 24.46
    -49.9 ± 24.42
    -51.7 ± 25.03
    -49.1 ± 24.12
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 36
    End point description
    The physician assessed the subject's disease activity at the time of visit using a Physician's Global Assessment of Disease VAS. The range is 0 to 100 mm with no activity being indicated by 0 and severe activity by 100. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -42.4 ± 23.72
    -48 ± 23.1
    -50.5 ± 24.55
    -51.8 ± 24.24
    -48.1 ± 23.98
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 2
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    39
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.25 ± 0.486
    -0.31 ± 0.463
    -0.29 ± 0.481
    -0.4 ± 0.538
    -0.31 ± 0.492
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 4
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.37 ± 0.552
    -0.4 ± 0.58
    -0.47 ± 0.625
    -0.62 ± 0.711
    -0.47 ± 0.622
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 6
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.53 ± 0.601
    -0.46 ± 0.607
    -0.63 ± 0.711
    -0.64 ± 0.584
    -0.57 ± 0.626
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 8
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.56 ± 0.619
    -0.52 ± 0.525
    -0.65 ± 0.648
    -0.71 ± 0.711
    -0.61 ± 0.63
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 12
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.69 ± 0.654
    -0.55 ± 0.611
    -0.66 ± 0.701
    -0.88 ± 0.677
    -0.7 ± 0.667
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 16
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    40
    154
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.59 ± 0.616
    -0.67 ± 0.631
    -0.67 ± 0.689
    -0.9 ± 0.649
    -0.71 ± 0.651
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 20
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.54 ± 0.662
    -0.73 ± 0.555
    -0.7 ± 0.788
    -0.88 ± 0.69
    -0.71 ± 0.685
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 24
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.63 ± 0.604
    -0.74 ± 0.617
    -0.6 ± 0.805
    -0.91 ± 0.704
    -0.72 ± 0.691
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 28
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.6 ± 0.6
    -0.77 ± 0.63
    -0.69 ± 0.727
    -0.99 ± 0.699
    -0.76 ± 0.676
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 32
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.54 ± 0.576
    -0.76 ± 0.674
    -0.66 ± 0.794
    -0.91 ± 0.659
    -0.71 ± 0.686
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 36
    End point description
    HAQ-DI is a self-reported subject outcome measurement. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from 8 following categories with a range 0 – 3: Dressing and Grooming, Rising, Eating, Walking, Hygiene, Reach, Grip, and Activities. The higher the score, the more likely to associate with morbidity and mortality for the subject. The minimum clinically important difference in HAQ-DI was defined as change from baseline ≤ –0.22. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -0.62 ± 0.619
    -0.73 ± 0.698
    -0.71 ± 0.674
    -0.81 ± 0.749
    -0.72 ± 0.683
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 2
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    36
    39
    40
    155
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.6 ± 25.19
    -9.9 ± 12.89
    -12.6 ± 18.56
    -14.9 ± 25.7
    -12.5 ± 21.3
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 4
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.3 ± 25.4
    -8 ± 12.37
    -11.7 ± 17.43
    -14.6 ± 26.51
    -12 ± 21.43
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 6
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.3 ± 25.15
    -8 ± 11.98
    -10.7 ± 18.84
    -14.9 ± 26.56
    -11.8 ± 21.63
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 8
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.2 ± 24.96
    -8 ± 13.13
    -10.7 ± 19
    -12.9 ± 28.42
    -11 ± 22.26
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 12
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had a baseline and post-baseline assessment. LOCF used for missing data; LOCF imputation was conducted separately for M12-963 and M12-965 (ie, data from M12-963 was not carried forward to visits in M12-965).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -12.3 ± 25.56
    -6.5 ± 14.05
    -10.8 ± 17.27
    -14.6 ± 25.22
    -11.2 ± 21.36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 16
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had a baseline and post-baseline assessment. LOCF used for missing data; LOCF imputation was conducted separately for M12-963 and M12-965 (ie, data from M12-963 was not carried forward to visits in M12-965).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    39
    153
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -13.5 ± 24.92
    -5.5 ± 17.44
    -10.8 ± 16.26
    -12.5 ± 24.65
    -10.7 ± 21.39
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 20
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -11.6 ± 24.46
    -6.4 ± 14.07
    -10.3 ± 18.66
    -11.6 ± 25.06
    -10.1 ± 21.16
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 24
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -11.3 ± 23.41
    -6.7 ± 13.93
    -9.1 ± 17.96
    -10.8 ± 27.79
    -9.6 ± 21.5
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 28
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had a baseline and post-baseline assessment. LOCF used for missing data; LOCF imputation was conducted separately for M12-963 and M12-965 (ie, data from M12-963 was not carried forward to visits in M12-965).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -3.5 ± 48.65
    -6.3 ± 17.24
    -11.3 ± 18.37
    -6.8 ± 26.24
    -6.9 ± 30.84
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 32
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -9.8 ± 26.15
    -7.6 ± 14.59
    -8 ± 20.16
    -10.4 ± 26.24
    -9 ± 22.36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change From Baseline in hsCRP at Week 36
    End point description
    For analysis purposes, all baseline are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: mg/L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -8.7 ± 26.17
    -6 ± 16.47
    -8.7 ± 17.56
    -9 ± 28.55
    -8.1 ± 22.83
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28[hsCRP]) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28[hsCRP]) at Week 2
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    39
    155
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.5 ± 1.23
    -1.5 ± 1.06
    -1.8 ± 1.27
    -1.7 ± 1.13
    -1.6 ± 1.17
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -1.9 ± 1.2
    -2.1 ± 1.37
    -2.1 ± 1.26
    -2.3 ± 1.2
    -2.1 ± 1.25
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.4 ± 1.37
    -2.2 ± 1.34
    -2.5 ± 1.27
    -2.4 ± 1.21
    -2.4 ± 1.29
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.4 ± 1.29
    -2.3 ± 1.25
    -2.7 ± 1.3
    -2.6 ± 1.32
    -2.5 ± 1.28
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.6 ± 1.32
    -2.3 ± 1.49
    -2.8 ± 1.17
    -2.7 ± 1.14
    -2.6 ± 1.28
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    39
    153
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.7 ± 1.21
    -2.6 ± 1.54
    -2.8 ± 1.19
    -2.6 ± 0.92
    -2.7 ± 1.22
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.7 ± 1.31
    -2.8 ± 1.37
    -2.7 ± 1.25
    -2.8 ± 1.08
    -2.7 ± 1.24
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.8 ± 1.26
    -2.6 ± 1.47
    -2.7 ± 1.41
    -2.9 ± 1.14
    -2.8 ± 1.31
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.5 ± 1.45
    -2.7 ± 1.46
    -2.9 ± 1.24
    -2.9 ± 1.06
    -2.7 ± 1.31
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.6 ± 1.44
    -2.8 ± 1.45
    -2.7 ± 1.17
    -2.9 ± 1.25
    -2.8 ± 1.32
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36
    End point description
    The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -2.6 ± 1.45
    -2.6 ± 1.48
    -2.8 ± 1.22
    -2.8 ± 1.32
    -2.7 ± 1.36
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at Week 2
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    37
    39
    38
    153
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -15.9 ± 15.74
    -17.4 ± 13.45
    -17.5 ± 14.61
    -18.2 ± 14.96
    -17.3 ± 14.6
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 4
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -20.3 ± 14.27
    -24.6 ± 15.61
    -22.1 ± 13.95
    -24.3 ± 14.03
    -22.7 ± 14.43
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 6
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -25.7 ± 14.64
    -25.6 ± 14.71
    -25.8 ± 13.1
    -25.6 ± 13.83
    -25.7 ± 13.95
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 8
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -26.7 ± 13.68
    -27 ± 13.69
    -28.2 ± 12.66
    -27.4 ± 13.92
    -27.3 ± 13.38
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 12
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    39
    157
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.4 ± 14.33
    -27.2 ± 16.72
    -29.7 ± 12.1
    -28.8 ± 11.88
    -28.5 ± 13.76
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 16
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    35
    36
    37
    148
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.1 ± 13.07
    -29.9 ± 16.04
    -28.5 ± 12.11
    -29.6 ± 10.03
    -29 ± 12.84
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 20
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    35
    38
    38
    153
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.1 ± 13.05
    -31.8 ± 14.47
    -28.2 ± 13.93
    -31.1 ± 11.44
    -29.7 ± 13.22
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 24
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -30.7 ± 13.81
    -30.1 ± 15.05
    -28.8 ± 14.09
    -31 ± 13.15
    -30.1 ± 13.91
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 28
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.1 ± 13.27
    -31.4 ± 15.09
    -29.8 ± 12.77
    -32.7 ± 12.79
    -30.4 ± 13.46
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 32
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -28.5 ± 15.08
    -32.4 ± 14.63
    -29.1 ± 13.4
    -31.6 ± 15.08
    -30.3 ± 14.52
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Change from Baseline in CDAI at Week 36
    End point description
    CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. For analysis purposes, all baseline values are defined as the last measurement on or before the first dose of study drug in Study M12-963. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF was used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    39
    156
    Units: units on a scale
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    -27.6 ± 14.87
    -30.9 ± 15.22
    -30 ± 12.28
    -30.9 ± 14.34
    -29.8 ± 14.15
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: Low Disease Activity (LDA) or Clinical Remission (CR) Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Low Disease Activity (LDA) or Clinical Remission (CR) Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 2
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    39
    155
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    12.5 (5 to 26.6)
    8.1 (2.1 to 22)
    28.2 (16.4 to 43.9)
    25.6 (14.4 to 41.2)
    18.7 (13.3 to 25.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    31 (19 to 46.1)
    32.4 (19.5 to 48.6)
    30.8 (18.5 to 46.5)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    34.8 (27.8 to 42.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45.2 (31.2 to 60.1)
    24.3 (13.2 to 40.3)
    43.6 (29.3 to 59)
    50 (35.2 to 64.8)
    41.1 (33.8 to 48.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received ≥ 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had a baseline and post-baseline assessment. LOCF used for missing data; LOCF imputation was conducted separately for M12-963 and M12-965 (ie, data from M12-963 was not carried forward to visits in M12-965).
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    45.2 (31.2 to 60.1)
    27 (15.2 to 43.1)
    53.8 (38.6 to 68.4)
    55 (39.8 to 69.3)
    45.6 (38 to 53.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    50 (35.5 to 64.5)
    35.1 (21.8 to 51.3)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    52.5 (37.5 to 67.1)
    48.7 (41.1 to 56.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    39
    153
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    51.2 (36.5 to 65.7)
    52.8 (37 to 68)
    62.2 (46.1 to 76)
    48.7 (33.9 to 63.8)
    53.6 (45.7 to 61.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    54.8 (39.9 to 68.8)
    55.6 (39.6 to 70.5)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    56.7 (48.9 to 64.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    61.9 (46.8 to 75)
    44.4 (29.5 to 60.4)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    56.1 (48.2 to 63.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    47.6 (33.4 to 62.3)
    41.7 (27.1 to 57.8)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    55 (39.8 to 69.3)
    50.3 (42.6 to 58)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    52.4 (37.7 to 66.6)
    52.8 (37 to 68)
    61.5 (45.9 to 75.1)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    56.7 (48.9 to 64.2)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    54.8 (39.9 to 68.8)
    41.7 (27.1 to 57.8)
    59 (43.4 to 72.9)
    47.5 (32.9 to 62.5)
    51 (43.2 to 58.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 2
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    37
    39
    39
    155
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    5 (0.5 to 17.4)
    5.4 (0.6 to 18.6)
    12.8 (5.1 to 27.2)
    10.3 (3.5 to 24.2)
    8.4 (4.9 to 13.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 4
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    14.3 (6.3 to 28.2)
    8.1 (2.1 to 22)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    25 (14 to 40.4)
    17.7 (12.5 to 24.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 6
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    31 (19 to 46.1)
    18.9 (9.2 to 34.5)
    33.3 (20.6 to 49.1)
    27.5 (16 to 43)
    27.8 (21.4 to 35.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 8
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    28.6 (17.1 to 43.7)
    21.6 (11.1 to 37.4)
    38.5 (24.9 to 54.1)
    37.5 (24.2 to 53)
    31.6 (24.9 to 39.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 12
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    31 (19 to 46.1)
    21.6 (11.1 to 37.4)
    38.5 (24.9 to 54.1)
    40 (26.3 to 55.4)
    32.9 (26.1 to 40.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 16
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    41
    36
    37
    39
    153
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    39 (25.6 to 54.3)
    30.6 (17.9 to 47)
    37.8 (24 to 53.9)
    30.8 (18.5 to 46.5)
    34.6 (27.6 to 42.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 20
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    40.5 (27 to 55.5)
    36.1 (22.4 to 52.5)
    25.6 (14.4 to 41.2)
    37.5 (24.2 to 53)
    35 (28 to 42.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 24
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    33.3 (20.9 to 48.5)
    30.6 (17.9 to 47)
    38.5 (24.9 to 54.1)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    36.9 (29.8 to 44.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 28
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    33.3 (20.9 to 48.5)
    27.8 (15.7 to 44.1)
    38.5 (24.9 to 54.1)
    42.5 (28.5 to 57.8)
    35.7 (28.6 to 43.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 32
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    38.1 (25 to 53.2)
    38.9 (24.8 to 55.2)
    35.9 (22.7 to 51.6)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    39.5 (32.2 to 47.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per DAS28 (hsCRP) at Week 36
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR on the DAS28 (hsCRP). The DAS28 (hsCRP) is a validated index of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Twenty-eight tender joint counts, 28 swollen joint counts, hsCRP, and general health are included in the DAS28 (hsCRP) score. Scores range from 0 (no disease activity) to 10 (highest degree of disease activity). LDA was defined as a score from 2.6 to < 3.2, and CR was defined as a score < 2.6. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    38.1 (25 to 53.2)
    19.4 (9.4 to 35.3)
    43.6 (29.3 to 59)
    37.5 (24.2 to 53)
    35 (28 to 42.8)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 2
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    37
    39
    39
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    7.7 (1.9 to 21)
    5.4 (0.6 to 18.6)
    12.8 (5.1 to 27.2)
    15.4 (6.9 to 30.1)
    10.4 (6.4 to 16.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 4
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    23.8 (13.3 to 38.7)
    21.6 (11.1 to 37.4)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    35 (22.1 to 50.5)
    25.9 (19.7 to 33.3)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 6
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    40.5 (27 to 55.5)
    21.6 (11.1 to 37.4)
    43.6 (29.3 to 59)
    45 (30.7 to 60.2)
    38 (30.8 to 45.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 8
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    35.7 (22.9 to 50.9)
    27 (15.2 to 43.1)
    46.2 (31.6 to 61.4)
    47.5 (32.9 to 62.5)
    39.2 (32 to 47)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 12
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    40.5 (27 to 55.5)
    37.8 (24 to 53.9)
    46.2 (31.6 to 61.4)
    50 (35.2 to 64.8)
    43.7 (36.2 to 51.5)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 16
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    35
    36
    38
    149
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    47.5 (32.9 to 62.5)
    45.7 (30.5 to 61.8)
    55.6 (39.6 to 70.5)
    50 (34.8 to 65.2)
    49.7 (41.7 to 57.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 20
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    35
    38
    39
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    47.6 (33.4 to 62.3)
    45.7 (30.5 to 61.8)
    36.8 (23.3 to 52.8)
    56.4 (41 to 70.7)
    46.8 (39 to 54.6)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 24
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    54.8 (39.9 to 68.8)
    44.4 (29.5 to 60.4)
    43.6 (29.3 to 59)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    51 (43.2 to 58.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 28
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    47.6 (33.4 to 62.3)
    44.4 (29.5 to 60.4)
    48.7 (33.9 to 63.8)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    50.3 (42.6 to 58)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 32
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    42.9 (29.1 to 57.8)
    55.6 (39.6 to 70.5)
    51.3 (36.2 to 66.1)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    52.2 (44.5 to 59.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    LDA or CR Response Rate per CDAI at Week 36
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving LDA or CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. LDA was defined as a score from 2.8 to ≤ 10; CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    52.4 (37.7 to 66.6)
    44.4 (29.5 to 60.4)
    59 (43.4 to 72.9)
    60 (44.6 to 73.7)
    54.1 (46.3 to 61.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 2

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 2
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 2 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    39
    37
    39
    39
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 10.7)
    0 (0 to 11.2)
    2.6 (0 to 14.4)
    0 (0 to 10.7)
    0.6 (0 to 4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 4

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 4
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 4 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    0 (0 to 10)
    2.7 (0 to 15.1)
    5.1 (0.5 to 17.8)
    5 (0.5 to 17.4)
    3.2 (1.2 to 7.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 6

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 6
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 6 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    2.4 (0 to 13.4)
    0 (0 to 11.2)
    10.3 (3.5 to 24.2)
    5 (0.5 to 17.4)
    4.4 (2 to 9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 8

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 8
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 8 of Study M12-963
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    4.8 (0.5 to 16.6)
    0 (0 to 11.2)
    17.9 (8.7 to 33)
    17.5 (8.4 to 32.3)
    10.1 (6.2 to 15.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 12

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 12
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 12 of Study M12-963 (considered Week 0 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    37
    39
    40
    158
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    7.1 (1.8 to 19.7)
    8.1 (2.1 to 22)
    12.8 (5.1 to 27.2)
    12.5 (5 to 26.6)
    10.1 (6.2 to 15.9)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 16

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 16
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 16 (Week 4 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    40
    35
    36
    38
    149
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    7.5 (1.9 to 20.6)
    5.7 (0.6 to 19.6)
    11.1 (3.8 to 25.9)
    15.8 (7.1 to 30.8)
    10.1 (6.1 to 16)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 20

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 20
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 20 (Week 8 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    35
    38
    39
    154
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    9.5 (3.2 to 22.6)
    11.4 (3.9 to 26.5)
    15.8 (7.1 to 30.8)
    17.9 (8.7 to 33)
    13.6 (9 to 20)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 24

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 24
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 24 (Week 12 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    7.1 (1.8 to 19.7)
    5.6 (0.6 to 19.1)
    23.1 (12.4 to 38.5)
    20 (10.2 to 35)
    14 (9.4 to 20.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 28

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 28
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 28 (Week 16 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    9.5 (3.2 to 22.6)
    5.6 (0.6 to 19.1)
    20.5 (10.5 to 35.8)
    20 (10.2 to 35)
    14 (9.4 to 20.4)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 32

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 32
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 32 (Week 20 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    7.1 (1.8 to 19.7)
    5.6 (0.6 to 19.1)
    12.8 (5.1 to 27.2)
    15 (6.7 to 29.5)
    10.2 (6.3 to 16)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 36

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    CR Response Rate Per CDAI Criteria at Week 36
    End point description
    Percentage of subjects achieving CR per CDAI criteria. The CDAI is a composite index for assessing disease activity based on the summation of the counts of TJC28 and SJC28, patient global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm, and physician global assessment of disease activity measured on a VAS from 0 to 10 cm. The total CDAI score ranges from 0 to 78 with higher scores indicating higher disease activity. CR was defined as a score ≤ 2.8. Estimates of the 95% confidence interval of the response rates for each treatment group were calculated using the Agrestil-Coull method. Safety Analysis Set: all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication in M12-965 and had an assessment. LOCF used for missing data.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Week 36 (Week 24 of Study M12-965)
    End point values
    ADA 40 mg EOW / ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Number of subjects analysed
    42
    36
    39
    40
    157
    Units: percentage of participants
        number (confidence interval 95%)
    9.5 (3.2 to 22.6)
    11.1 (3.8 to 25.9)
    17.9 (8.7 to 33)
    15 (6.7 to 29.5)
    13.4 (8.8 to 19.7)
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    Protocol-related treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were collected from the first dose of study drug in study M12-965 until 70 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 32 weeks).
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    A protocol-related TEAE or TESAE is defined as any AE with onset or worsening reported by a participant from the first dose of study drug in study M12-965 until 70 days have elapsed following discontinuation of ABT-122 administration. Events were collected whether elicited or spontaneously reported by the participant.
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    17.1
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    ADA 40 mg EOW/ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ADA 40 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 60 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg EOW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Double-blind ABT-122 120 mg EW for 11 weeks. Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Reporting group title
    All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Reporting group description
    Open-label ABT-122 120 mg EOW.

    Serious adverse events
    ADA 40 mg EOW/ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    5 / 39 (12.82%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    6 / 158 (3.80%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
    0
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    HUMERUS FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    INFLAMMATION OF WOUND
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    JOINT DISLOCATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Cardiac disorders
    MYOCARDIAL ISCHAEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 2
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Blood and lymphatic system disorders
    ANAEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    ENTEROCOLITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    MENORRHAGIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    SKIN ULCER
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
    0 / 0
    0 / 1
         deaths causally related to treatment / all
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    0 / 0
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    ADA 40 mg EOW/ABT-122 120 mg EOW ABT-122 60 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EOW / 120 mg EOW ABT-122 120 mg EW / 120 mg EOW All ABT-122 120 mg EOW
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    17 / 42 (40.48%)
    14 / 37 (37.84%)
    16 / 39 (41.03%)
    14 / 40 (35.00%)
    61 / 158 (38.61%)
    Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
    BASAL CELL CARCINOMA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Vascular disorders
    HYPERTENSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    1
    2
    HAEMATOMA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    VARICOSE VEIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    NODULE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Immune system disorders
    FOOD ALLERGY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    2
    2
    HYPERSENSITIVITY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    1
    2
    Reproductive system and breast disorders
    ADNEXA UTERI CYST
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    OVARIAN CYST
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Investigations
    ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ABNORMAL
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    1
    0
    2
    ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    0
    1
    0
    3
    BLOOD CHOLESTEROL INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    2
    BLOOD SODIUM DECREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    BLOOD TRIGLYCERIDES INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    2
    EOSINOPHIL COUNT INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    HAEMOGLOBIN DECREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    HEPATIC ENZYME INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    LIVER FUNCTION TEST ABNORMAL
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    TRANSAMINASES INCREASED
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    CHEST INJURY
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    CONTUSION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    LIMB INJURY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    RIB FRACTURE
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    SKIN ABRASION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    SUBCUTANEOUS HAEMATOMA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    THERMAL BURN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Nervous system disorders
    DIZZINESS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    0
    2
    Ear and labyrinth disorders
    VERTIGO
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    DENTAL CARIES
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    GASTRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    NAUSEA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    VOMITING
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    0
    2
    Hepatobiliary disorders
    HEPATIC STEATOSIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    HEPATOBILIARY DISEASE
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    LIVER DISORDER
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
    DERMATITIS ALLERGIC
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    PRURITUS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    NAIL DISCOLOURATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    RASH
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    RASH PRURITIC
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    RASH VESICULAR
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Renal and urinary disorders
    NEPHROLITHIASIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
    ARTHRALGIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    4 / 39 (10.26%)
    2 / 40 (5.00%)
    9 / 158 (5.70%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    4
    2
    9
    ARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 42 (4.76%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    4
    0
    0
    0
    4
    INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    BURSITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    1
    2
    OSTEOARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    3 / 158 (1.90%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    1
    1
    3
    OSTEOPOROSIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    PAIN IN EXTREMITY
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    2 / 39 (5.13%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    3
    0
    3
    RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    3 / 37 (8.11%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    4 / 158 (2.53%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    1
    0
    4
    TENDON DISORDER
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    ATYPICAL PNEUMONIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    BRONCHITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    3 / 37 (8.11%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    3 / 158 (1.90%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    3
    0
    0
    3
    CYSTITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    HERPES VIRUS INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    NASOPHARYNGITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    4 / 42 (9.52%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    4 / 158 (2.53%)
         occurrences all number
    6
    0
    0
    0
    6
    ORAL HERPES
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    PARAMETRITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    PARONYCHIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    0
    1
    1
    PHARYNGITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    1
    2
    PNEUMONIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    PULPITIS DENTAL
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    RASH PUSTULAR
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    SINUSITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    0
    1
    TONSILLITIS
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    3 / 37 (8.11%)
    6 / 39 (15.38%)
    5 / 40 (12.50%)
    15 / 158 (9.49%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    3
    10
    7
    21
    URINARY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    1 / 39 (2.56%)
    1 / 40 (2.50%)
    2 / 158 (1.27%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    0
    1
    2
    3
    VARICELLA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    VIRAL UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1
    Metabolism and nutrition disorders
    HYPERCHOLESTEROLAEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    DIABETES MELLITUS
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 42 (0.00%)
    1 / 37 (2.70%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    0
    0
    1
    HYPERLIPIDAEMIA
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 42 (2.38%)
    0 / 37 (0.00%)
    0 / 39 (0.00%)
    0 / 40 (0.00%)
    1 / 158 (0.63%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    0
    0
    1

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    01 May 2015
    ● Revised the investigational plan to include self-administration of ABT-122 once the prefilled syringe (PFS) was approved and the subject was trained on self-administration. Once self-administration began, site visits were allowed to occur monthly rather than EOW. ● Updated inclusion criteria concerning female and male reproductive language to be consistent with updated safety language. ● Updated the electrocardiogram procedure to clarify that a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was to be obtained at the timepoint indicated in the Table of Study Activities (Week 24). ● Removed the 24-hour methylhistamine laboratory tests in the evaluation of a hypersensitivity reaction and urine drug screen. ● Added injection site reaction language to allow sites to further assess and investigate skin reactions (e.g., photographs or skin biopsies). An injection site assessment was to be completed by the investigator only for an injection site reaction. ● Updated the study drug section to describe the PFS, in order to enable a more convenient drug self-administration and to eliminate the site burden of reconstituting ABT-122. ● Added investigational product information for the ABT-122 solution for PFS, including related information (e.g., packaging and labeling, storage). ● Added written instructions for self-administration and dosing diary to allow subjects to follow site training on self-administration and to allow the subject to document dosing information on a subject diary.
    29 Sep 2015
    ● Revised to reflect the: increase in planned enrollment from 160 to 225, to reflect the update in planned enrollment into RCT Study M12-963; increase in the number of randomized subjects from approximately 80 to approximately 160, to allow all subjects enrolled in Study M12-963 to enroll in the OLE Study M13-965; decrease in the number of study sites from approximately 60 to approximately 32, i.e. those sites that enrolled subjects into Study M12-963 ● Added new standard medical and nonmedical complaint language. ● Updated the ABT-122 PFS dosing instructions.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    None reported
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Tue Apr 30 22:04:45 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA