Clinical Trial Results:
Evaluation of the suitability of PD P 506 A in the photodynamic therapy of Distal Subungual Onychomycosis (DSO) of the great toenail.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-001493-34 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
23 Aug 2017
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
23 Apr 2020
|
First version publication date |
23 Apr 2020
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
OM01
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
photonamic GmbH & Co. KG
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Eggerstedter Weg 12, Pinneberg, Germany,
|
||
Public contact |
Clinical Project Management, photonamic GmbH & Co. KG, info@photonamic.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Clinical Project Management, photonamic GmbH & Co. KG, info@photonamic.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
01 Mar 2019
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Aug 2017
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of PD P 506 A photodynamic therapy of DSO of the great toenail(s) on nail basis 12 months after treating participants.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
None specified.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
05 Jan 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 22
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
22
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
22
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
12
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
10
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||
Screening details |
At Screening Visit, small nail clippings of the diseased toenails were taken for the confirmation of clinical DSO diagnosis using the methods of tests on native preparation, mycological culture, and histopathological examination with periodic acid Schiff (PAS) staining. | ||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
PD P 506 A PDT | ||||||||||
Arm description |
PD P 506 A is a square, skin coloured, self-adhesive patch with rounded corners. One patch contains 2 mg 5-aminolevulinic acid (present as 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride) per cm² and has a sizeof 4 cm². As there is evidence from literature that PDT for onychomycosis needs repeating in order to show maximum efficacy, PDT in this study was performed four times in intervals of one week. One patch of PD P 506 A was administered to the patient’s diseased great toenail(s) for 4 hours at Visits 1-4. After removal of the study medication and degreasing, the study nail(s) were illuminated (PDT) with a predefined light dose (37 J/cm²) at 630 ± 5 nm. | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
PD P 506 A
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Cutaneous patch
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Topical use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
One patch of PD P 506 A were administered to the patient’s diseased great toenail(s) for four hours at Visits 1 - 4
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis sets
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
FAS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one application of the study medication and who showed one valid efficacy assessment after last PDT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
SFS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one application of the study medication showing at least one safety assessment.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set title |
PPS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received four applications of study treatment, who showed no major protocol violation, and who provided valid efficacy data at Visit 7 (12 months after last PDT).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
PD P 506 A PDT
|
||
Reporting group description |
PD P 506 A is a square, skin coloured, self-adhesive patch with rounded corners. One patch contains 2 mg 5-aminolevulinic acid (present as 5-aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride) per cm² and has a sizeof 4 cm². As there is evidence from literature that PDT for onychomycosis needs repeating in order to show maximum efficacy, PDT in this study was performed four times in intervals of one week. One patch of PD P 506 A was administered to the patient’s diseased great toenail(s) for 4 hours at Visits 1-4. After removal of the study medication and degreasing, the study nail(s) were illuminated (PDT) with a predefined light dose (37 J/cm²) at 630 ± 5 nm. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
FAS
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Full analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one application of the study medication and who showed one valid efficacy assessment after last PDT
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
SFS
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received at least one application of the study medication showing at least one safety assessment.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
PPS
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All patients who received four applications of study treatment, who showed no major protocol violation, and who provided valid efficacy data at Visit 7 (12 months after last PDT).
|
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of PD P 506 A photodynamic therapy of DSO of the great toenail(s) on nail basis 12 months after treating participants. [1] | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 months after last study treatment
|
|||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: The statistical analysis of study data was done in a descriptive way only. No statistical tests were performed. |
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of the efficacy of PD P 506 A photodynamic therapy of DSO of the great toenail(s) on nail basis 12 months after treating participants as measured by laboratory methods. | |||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Percentage of nails with negative result after 12 months using laboratory methods (KOH test, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) stain and mycology culture).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
12 months after the last study treatment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of the efficacy of PD P 506 A photodynamic therapy of DSO of the great toenail(s) on nail basis 3 and 6 months after treating participants. | ||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
3 and 6 months after treating participants
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Evaluation of safety and tolerability of PD P 506 A photodynamic therapy of DSO of the great toenail(s). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
During 3m after first PDT
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Between patient inclusion and Visit 5.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
20.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Adverse Events
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All patients who received at least one application of the study medication showing at least one safety assessment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Local reactions
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Local reactions to application of study medication and study procedure (PDT at Visit 1, 2, 3, 4) are known adverse reactions to PD P 506 A-PDT and therefore always regarded as being related to the procedure. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
18 Nov 2014 |
Reason:
Request by IEC Westfalen-Lippe (1)
Request by competent authority BfArM (2, 3, 4, 5)
Amendments:
1. Addition of exclusion criterion “Diagnosis of polyneuropathy”
2. Re-check of inclusion/exclusion criteria on visits 2, 3 and 4
3. Patient to be asked for AEs and changes in concomitant medication at Visit 1 (day of first PDT)
4. Documentation of actions taken in case of local reactions in CRF
5. Documentation of AEs in CRF between patient inclusion and Visit 4 (instead of “between study treatment and Visit 4”) |
||
21 Apr 2015 |
Reason:
Adaptation of inclusion / exclusion criteria due to low recruitment
Amendments:
1. Raising of upper maximum age to 75 (instead of 64)
2. Inclusion of female patients. Females need to be postmenopausal or not of childbearing potential because of tubal ligation or hysterectomy. |
||
11 Dec 2015 |
Reason:
Administrative reasons (1, 3)
Change of study sites (2)
Amendments:
Change of responsibility for PV from medac GmbH to spm² – safety projects & more GmbH including revision of the affected chapters of CSP
2. Site Fürth was replaced by site Detmold (site Fürth had not recruited any patient)
3. Appendices 2 (SPC Alacare) and 3 (SAE form) were replaced by current versions |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |