Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43874   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7294   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    Antibiotic prophylaxis oral vs parenteral + parenteral in colonic surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2014-002345-21
    Trial protocol
    ES  
    Global end of trial date
    28 Apr 2017

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    30 Sep 2021
    First version publication date
    30 Sep 2021
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    2011/001/PROF-ATB
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    VHIR
    Sponsor organisation address
    Passeig Vall dHebron 119-129, Barcelona, Spain, 08035
    Public contact
    VHIR/Technical Secretariat, Joaquin Lopez-Soriano, 34 934893807, joaquin.lopez.soriano@vhir.org
    Scientific contact
    Colorectal Surgery Unit, Dr Eloy Espin, 934893807 9342720006587, eespinbasany@gmail.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    28 Apr 2017
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    28 Apr 2017
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    Patients undergoing colon surgery were recruited from five major hospitals in Spain. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with neoplasia or diverticular disease and if a partial colon resection or total colectomy was indicated. Participants were randomly assigned to either administration of oral antibiotics the day before surgery (experimental group) or no administration of oral antibiotics before surgery (control group). For the experimental group, ciprofloxacin 750 mg was given every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) and metronidazole 250 mg every 8 h (three doses at 1200 h, 1800 h, and 0000 h) the day before surgery. All patients were given intravenous cefuroxime 1·5 g and metronidazole 1 g at the time of anaesthetic induction. The primary outcome was incidence of surgical-site infections. Patients were followed up for 1 month after surgery and all postsurgical complications were registered.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The detection and evaluation of surgical-site infections and complications after surgery followed current clinical practice guidelines, consisting of daily physical examination of the patient in the immediate period after surgery and outpatient visits at the study centre in the first, second, and fourth weeks after surgery. All examinations for surgical-site infections were done by a nurse specialising in infections. Complementary tests for the screening of infections after surgery were blood tests, cultures of wound exudates of intra-abdominal abscesses, abdomen–pelvic CT, and surgical exploration.
    Background therapy
    Mechanical bowel preparation is a relevant confounder if associated with oral antibiotics.
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    04 Aug 2014
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    Spain: 536
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    536
    EEA total number of subjects
    536
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    501
    From 65 to 84 years
    35
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Patients were recruited from five hospitals in Spain: the Vall d’Hebron University Hospital (Barcelona), Bellvitge University Hospital (Barcelona), the Josep Trueta University Hospital (Girona), Lucus Augusti Hospital (Lugo), and the Cruces University Hospital (Bilbao).

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Patients were eligible if they were diagnosed with neoplasia or diverticular disease and if a partial colon resection or total colectomy was indicated. Patients were excluded if they had been given antibiotic treatment in the 2 weeks before surgery or had undergone mechanical bowel preparation the day before surgery.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall trial (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Single blind
    Roles blinded
    Monitor [1]
    Blinding implementation details
    Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using online randomisation software, stratified by study site, to two parallel groups, the control group (no oral antibiotics) or the experimental group (oral antibiotics). Randomisation was done by an external statistician.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    Control
    Arm description
    No oral antibiotics
    Arm type
    Active comparator

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Cefuroxime
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    1500 mg at the time of anaesthetic induction.

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Metronidazole
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Powder for infusion
    Routes of administration
    Intravenous use
    Dosage and administration details
    1 g at the time of anaesthetic induction.

    Arm title
    Oral antibiotic
    Arm description
    The experimental group was treated with a regimen of ciprofloxacin 750 mg every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) and metronidazole 250 mg every 8 h (three doses at 1200 h, 1800 h, and 0000 h) orally the day before the scheduled surgery.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Ciprofloxacin
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Tablet
    Routes of administration
    Oral use
    Dosage and administration details
    Ciprofloxacin 750 mg every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) orally

    Notes
    [1] - The roles blinded appear inconsistent with a simple blinded trial.
    Justification: The investigators, surgeons, patients, and statistician were unmasked to the group the patient was randomly assigned to, but the nurse who assessed the presence or absence of a surgical-site infection was masked to treatment assignment.
    Number of subjects in period 1
    Control Oral antibiotic
    Started
    269
    267
    Completed
    269
    267

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Control
    Reporting group description
    No oral antibiotics

    Reporting group title
    Oral antibiotic
    Reporting group description
    The experimental group was treated with a regimen of ciprofloxacin 750 mg every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) and metronidazole 250 mg every 8 h (three doses at 1200 h, 1800 h, and 0000 h) orally the day before the scheduled surgery.

    Reporting group values
    Control Oral antibiotic Total
    Number of subjects
    269 267 536
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    74 82 156
        From 65-84 years
    195 185 380
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    117 125 242
        Male
    152 142 294

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    Control
    Reporting group description
    No oral antibiotics

    Reporting group title
    Oral antibiotic
    Reporting group description
    The experimental group was treated with a regimen of ciprofloxacin 750 mg every 12 h (two doses at 1200 h and 0000 h) and metronidazole 250 mg every 8 h (three doses at 1200 h, 1800 h, and 0000 h) orally the day before the scheduled surgery.

    Subject analysis set title
    Full study
    Subject analysis set type
    Full analysis
    Subject analysis set description
    All patients

    Primary: Surgical-site infections

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Surgical-site infections
    End point description
    The primary endpoint was the incidence of surgical-site infections, defined as the sum of skin superficial, deep incisional, and organ-space infections, according to the criteria of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    End of study
    End point values
    Control Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects analysed
    269
    267
    Units: Number
        number (not applicable)
    30
    13
    Statistical analysis title
    Site infections
    Comparison groups
    Control v Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    536
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.013
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Duration of stay in hospital

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Duration of stay in hospital
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    End of study
    End point values
    Control Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects analysed
    269
    267
    Units: day
        arithmetic mean (full range (min-max))
    5 (4 to 9)
    5 (4 to 7)
    Statistical analysis title
    Stay in hospital
    Comparison groups
    Control v Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    536
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.088
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Time from surgery to infection detection

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Time from surgery to infection detection
    End point description
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    All the study
    End point values
    Control Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects analysed
    269
    267
    Units: day
        arithmetic mean (full range (min-max))
    5 (4 to 9)
    9 (5 to 14)
    Statistical analysis title
    Time to infection
    Comparison groups
    Control v Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    536
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.115
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Secondary: Complication

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    Complication
    End point description
    Not including surgical-site infection
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    All the study
    End point values
    Control Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects analysed
    269
    267
    Units: Number
        number (not applicable)
    76
    51
    Statistical analysis title
    Complications
    Comparison groups
    Control v Oral antibiotic
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    536
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    non-inferiority
    P-value
    = 0.017
    Method
    Chi-squared
    Confidence interval

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information [1]
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    All the study
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    14.1
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5%
    Notes
    [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported.
    Justification: No adverse events associated with the oral antibiotics were recorded. A full list of local, surgical, and medical complications is given in the publication, recorded as secondary end points.

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    Placebo was not used for the control group, which might be a source of bias. Additionally, surgeons and patients were not masked to treatment group assignment because of logistical issues, which could be regarded as a source of bias.

    Online references

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32325012
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Thu May 16 18:02:18 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA