Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43851   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7283   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Print Download

    Summary
    EudraCT Number:2014-002600-24
    Sponsor's Protocol Code Number:Z7219L02
    National Competent Authority:Spain - AEMPS
    Clinical Trial Type:EEA CTA
    Trial Status:Prematurely Ended
    Date on which this record was first entered in the EudraCT database:2015-10-05
    Trial results View results
    Index
    A. PROTOCOL INFORMATION
    B. SPONSOR INFORMATION
    C. APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION
    D. IMP IDENTIFICATION
    D.8 INFORMATION ON PLACEBO
    E. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TRIAL
    F. POPULATION OF TRIAL SUBJECTS
    G. INVESTIGATOR NETWORKS TO BE INVOLVED IN THE TRIAL
    N. REVIEW BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY OR ETHICS COMMITTEE IN THE COUNTRY CONCERNED
    P. END OF TRIAL
    Expand All   Collapse All
    A. Protocol Information
    A.1Member State ConcernedSpain - AEMPS
    A.2EudraCT number2014-002600-24
    A.3Full title of the trial
    A TWO YEAR, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE LONG TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF SAFINAMIDE 100 MG, ONCE DAILY, AS ADD ON THERAPY, IN IDIOPATHIC PARKINSON?S DISEASE PATIENTS WITH MOTOR FLUCTUATIONS
    ESTUDIO MULTICÉNTRICO, ALEATORIZADO, DOBLE CIEGO, CONTROLADO CON PLACEBO Y DE DOS AÑOS DE DURACIÓN PARA EVALUAR LA EFICACIA Y LA SEGURIDAD A LARGO PLAZO DE SAFINAMIDA 100 MG, UNA VEZ AL DÍA, COMO TRATAMIENTO ADICIONAL, EN PACIENTES CON ENFERMEDAD DE PARKINSON IDIOPÁTICA CON FLUCTUACIONES MOTORAS
    A.3.1Title of the trial for lay people, in easily understood, i.e. non-technical, language
    Safinamide versus placebo in patients with Parkinson?s disease for improvement of motor complications
    Safinamide frente a placebo en pacientes con enfermedad de Parkinson para la mejora de las complicaciones motoras
    A.3.2Name or abbreviated title of the trial where available
    EVEREST
    A.4.1Sponsor's protocol code numberZ7219L02
    A.7Trial is part of a Paediatric Investigation Plan No
    A.8EMA Decision number of Paediatric Investigation Plan
    B. Sponsor Information
    B.Sponsor: 1
    B.1.1Name of SponsorZambon S.P.A.
    B.1.3.4CountryItaly
    B.3.1 and B.3.2Status of the sponsorCommercial
    B.4 Source(s) of Monetary or Material Support for the clinical trial:
    B.4.1Name of organisation providing supportZambon S.P.A.
    B.4.2CountryItaly
    B.5 Contact point designated by the sponsor for further information on the trial
    B.5.1Name of organisationZambon S.P.A.
    B.5.2Functional name of contact pointClinical Trials
    B.5.3 Address:
    B.5.3.1Street AddressVia Lillo del Duca 10
    B.5.3.2Town/ cityBresso (Milano)
    B.5.3.3Post code20091
    B.5.3.4CountryItaly
    B.5.4Telephone number+3493553 72 53na
    B.5.6E-mailACampolongo@santpau.cat
    D. IMP Identification
    D.IMP: 1
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Xadago
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderZambon S.P.A.
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product namesafinamide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Film-coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNsafinamide
    D.3.9.1CAS number 133865-89-1
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameSAFINAMIDE
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB32946
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number50
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.IMP: 2
    D.1.2 and D.1.3IMP RoleTest
    D.2 Status of the IMP to be used in the clinical trial
    D.2.1IMP to be used in the trial has a marketing authorisation Yes
    D.2.1.1.1Trade name Xadago
    D.2.1.1.2Name of the Marketing Authorisation holderZambon S.P.A.
    D.2.1.2Country which granted the Marketing AuthorisationEuropean Union
    D.2.5The IMP has been designated in this indication as an orphan drug in the Community No
    D.2.5.1Orphan drug designation number
    D.3 Description of the IMP
    D.3.1Product namesafinamide
    D.3.4Pharmaceutical form Film-coated tablet
    D.3.4.1Specific paediatric formulation No
    D.3.7Routes of administration for this IMPOral use
    D.3.8 to D.3.10 IMP Identification Details (Active Substances)
    D.3.8INN - Proposed INNsafinamide
    D.3.9.1CAS number 133865-89-1
    D.3.9.3Other descriptive nameSAFINAMIDE
    D.3.9.4EV Substance CodeSUB32946
    D.3.10 Strength
    D.3.10.1Concentration unit mg milligram(s)
    D.3.10.2Concentration typeequal
    D.3.10.3Concentration number100
    D.3.11 The IMP contains an:
    D.3.11.1Active substance of chemical origin Yes
    D.3.11.2Active substance of biological/ biotechnological origin (other than Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    The IMP is a:
    D.3.11.3Advanced Therapy IMP (ATIMP) No
    D.3.11.3.1Somatic cell therapy medicinal product No
    D.3.11.3.2Gene therapy medical product No
    D.3.11.3.3Tissue Engineered Product No
    D.3.11.3.4Combination ATIMP (i.e. one involving a medical device) No
    D.3.11.3.5Committee on Advanced therapies (CAT) has issued a classification for this product No
    D.3.11.4Combination product that includes a device, but does not involve an Advanced Therapy No
    D.3.11.5Radiopharmaceutical medicinal product No
    D.3.11.6Immunological medicinal product (such as vaccine, allergen, immune serum) No
    D.3.11.7Plasma derived medicinal product No
    D.3.11.8Extractive medicinal product No
    D.3.11.9Recombinant medicinal product No
    D.3.11.10Medicinal product containing genetically modified organisms No
    D.3.11.11Herbal medicinal product No
    D.3.11.12Homeopathic medicinal product No
    D.3.11.13Another type of medicinal product No
    D.8 Information on Placebo
    D.8 Placebo: 1
    D.8.1Is a Placebo used in this Trial?Yes
    D.8.3Pharmaceutical form of the placeboFilm-coated tablet
    D.8.4Route of administration of the placeboOral use
    E. General Information on the Trial
    E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.1Medical condition(s) being investigated
    Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
    Enfermedad de Pakinson Idiopática
    E.1.1.1Medical condition in easily understood language
    Chronic, progressive disease of the nervous system that affects the movements
    Enfermedad crónica, progresiva del sistema nervioso que afecta a los movimientos
    E.1.1.2Therapeutic area Diseases [C] - Nervous System Diseases [C10]
    MedDRA Classification
    E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation
    E.1.2Version 18.0
    E.1.2Level PT
    E.1.2Classification code 10061536
    E.1.2Term Parkinson's disease
    E.1.2System Organ Class 10029205 - Nervous system disorders
    E.1.3Condition being studied is a rare disease No
    E.2 Objective of the trial
    E.2.1Main objective of the trial
    To evaluate the change from Baseline to Endpoint in the daily ?OFF? time of safinamide compared to placebo
    Evaluar el cambio desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96) durante el periodo de registro diario de 24 horas en el tiempo diario en fase ?OFF? de la safinamida comparado con placebo
    E.2.2Secondary objectives of the trial
    Key secondary:
    To evaluate the change from Baseline to Endpoint in the daily ?ON? time without dyskinesia.
    Other main secondary:
    To evaluate the change from Baseline to Endpoint in PDQ-39, UDysRS, UPDRS II, UPDRS III, UPDRS total score, NMS, daily ?ON? time with troublesome dyskinesia
    Safety:
    To evaluate the long-term safety and tolerability of safinamide compared with placebo
    Eficacia secundaria clave:
    ? Evaluar el cambio desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96) en el tiempo diario en fase ?ON? sin discinesia.
    Otros secundarios:
    ? Evaluar el cambio desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96) en el PQD-39, UDysRS, UPDRS II, UPDRS III, ) en la puntuación total de la escala unificada para la valoración de discinesias UPDRS, NMS y en el tiempo diario en fase ?ON? con discinesia problemática.).
    Seguridad:
    Evaluar la seguridad y tolerabilidad a largo plazo de la safinamida frente a placebo .
    E.2.3Trial contains a sub-study No
    E.3Principal inclusion criteria
    1. Male or female subjects aged ?40 to ?85 years old.
    2. Able and willing to provide informed consent.
    3. Able to maintain an accurate and complete diary with the help of a caregiver.
    4. Diagnosis of IPD using the United Kingdom Parkinson?s Disease Society Brain Bank criteria.
    5. Subjects must be receiving treatment with a stable dose of L dopa (including controlled release [CR], immediate release [IR] or a combination of CR/IR), with and without benserazide/carbidopa, with or without addition of a catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor and may be receiving concomitant treatment with stable doses of a dopamine agonist, an anticholinergic and/or amantadine for at least 4 weeks prior to the randomization visit.
    6. Subjects must have a Hoehn and Yahr between 2-3 inclusive. during the ?ON? phase.
    7. Subjects must be experiencing motor fluctuations following optimum titration of treatment medications and within the four weeks immediately prior to randomization.
    8. Subjects must be experiencing a minimum of 2.0 hours/day of ?OFF? time during the day (excluding morning akinesia).
    9. If female, either post-menopausal for at least two years, surgically sterilized or have undergone hysterectomy. Female subjects of child-bearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy, have a negative pregnancy test, and should use a highly effective method of birth control for one month prior to randomization, throughout the study duration and up to one month after the last dose of study drug, which include:
    ? Double barrier (e.g., condom + spermicide; diaphragm + spermicide; condom + diaphragm).
    ? Intrauterine device.
    ? Oral contraception needs to be supplemented with a barrier method (e.g., condom or diaphragm).
    1. Varones o mujeres ?40 y ?85 años de edad.
    2. Capacidad y voluntad de otorgar el consentimiento informado.
    3. Ser capaz de mantener un diario riguroso y completo con ayuda de un cuidador.
    4. Diagnóstico de EPI según los criterios del Banco de Cerebros de la Sociedad de la enfermedad de Parkinson del Reino Unido.
    5. Los sujetos deben estar recibiendo tratamiento con una dosis estable de L-dopa (incluida la L-dopa de liberación controlada [CR], la L-dopa de liberación inmediata [IR] o una combinación de CR/IR), con y sin benserazida/carbidopa, con o sin la adición de un inhibidor de la catecol-O-metiltransferasa (COMT) y pueden estar recibiendo tratamiento simultáneo con dosis estables de agonistas de la dopamina, un anticolinérgico o amantadina durante al menos las 4 semanas anteriores a la visita de aleatorización.
    6. Los sujetos deben tener un estadio de Hoehn y Yahr entre 2 y 3, ambos inclusive durante la fase ?ON?.
    7. Los sujetos deben tener fluctuaciones motoras después de un ajuste óptimo de los fármacos de tratamiento y en las cuatro semanas inmediatamente anteriores a la aleatorización.
    8. Los sujetos deben tener un mínimo de 2,0 horas/día de tiempo en fase ?OFF? durante el día (excluida la acinesia matutina).
    9. Si es mujer, debe ser posmenopáusica desde al menos dos años antes, estéril por métodos quirúrgicos o haberse sometido a una histerectomía. Las mujeres en edad fértil deben estar dispuestas a evitar un embarazo, tener resultados negativos en una prueba de embarazo y deben utilizar un método anticonceptivo muy eficaz el mes anterior a la aleatorización, durante todo el estudio y hasta un mes después de la última dosis del fármaco del estudio, que incluye:
    ? Doble barrera (p. ej., preservativo + espermicida; diafragma + espermicida; preservativo + diafragma).
    ? Dispositivo intrauterino.
    ? Los anticonceptivos orales deben complementarse con un método de barrera (p. ej., preservativo o diafragma).
    E.4Principal exclusion criteria
    1. Any form of parkinsonism other than IPD.
    2. History of neurosurgical procedure.
    3. History of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder.
    4. Untreated depressive disorder.
    5. Imminent risk of self-harm based on Investigator?s clinical judgment, with a ?yes? answer on item 4 or 5 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS) at Screening.
    6. History of drug and/or alcohol abuse as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM IV-TR) criteria within 12 months prior to Baseline.
    7. A Mini Mental State exam (MMSE) total score <24 at Screening.
    8. Use of any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening or five half-lives, whichever is the longest.
    9. Allergy/sensitivity to the IMPs or their excipients.
    10. A severe or ongoing unstable medical condition (e.g., cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, renal, metabolic or endocrine).
    11. Any clinically significant condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the study medication (e.g., capable of altering absorption, metabolism or elimination), the study evaluations or optimal participation in the study.
    12. A current history of severe dizziness or fainting on standing due to postural hypotension.
    13. Any significant laboratory results which, in the Investigator?s opinion, would not be compatible with study participation or represent a risk for subjects while in the study.
    14. A female subject must not be pregnant, breast-feeding or considering breast feeding.
    15. History of malignant disease within the five years prior to Screening, in particular melanoma (a dermatological visit will be performed at the Screening visit), with the exception of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin that have been completely excised, treated in situ cervical cancer, treated in situ prostate cancer with a normal prostate specific antigen.
    16. Moderate or severe liver failure using the Child-Pugh classification score.
    17. Subjects with known history of hepatitis B or C or human immunodeficiency virus.
    18. QTcF > 500 ms.
    19. Second- or third-degree atrio-ventricular block or sick sinus syndrome, uncontrolled atrial fibrillation, severe or unstable angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within three months prior to the randomization visit.
    20. Subjects should not have received concomitant treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), pethidine, opioids, serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), dextromethorphan or sympathomimetics including nasal and oral decongestants and cold remedies (i.e., preparations that contain vasoconstrictors such as ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine, and phenylpropanolamine) in the four weeks prior to the randomization visit.
    21. Subjects should not have received treatment with an oral or depot neuroleptic within 12 weeks prior to the randomization visit.
    22. Subjects should not have severe, disabling peak dose or biphasic dyskinesia and/or unpredictable or widely swinging fluctuations.
    23. Subjects should not have signs and symptoms suggestive of transmissible spongiform encephalopathy or family member who suffer(ed) from such.
    24. Subjects should not have ophthalmologic history including any of the following conditions: albinism, uveitis, retinitis pigmentosa, retinal degeneration, active retinopathy, severe progressive diabetic retinopathy, inherited retinopathy or family history of hereditary retinal disease.
    1. Cualquier forma de parkinsonismo diferente a la EPI.
    2. Antecedentes de un procedimiento neuroquirúrgico.
    3. Antecedentes de un trastorno bipolar, esquizofrenia u otro trastorno psiquiátrico.
    4. Trastorno depresivo no tratado.
    5. Riesgo inminente de autolesión según el criterio clínico del investigador, con respuesta ?afirmativa? en los ítems 4 o 5 de la escala de Columbia de valoración de la gravedad de la conducta suicida (CSSRS) en la selección.
    6. Antecedentes de toxicomanía o alcoholismo, según los criterios del Manual diagnóstico y estadístico de los trastornos mentales, 4.ª ed., texto revisado (DSM-IV-TR), en los 12 meses anteriores al inicio del estudio.
    7. Puntuación total <24 en el miniexamen cognoscitivo (MMSE) en la selección.
    8. Empleo de cualquier fármaco en investigación en los 30 días anteriores a la selección o cinco semividas, lo que sea más prolongado.
    9. Alergia/sensibilidad al PEI o a sus excipientes.
    10. Trastorno médico grave o inestable en curso (p. ej., cardíaco, pulmonar, hepático, renal, metabólico o endocrino).
    11. Cualquier trastorno clínicamente significativo que, según la opinión del investigador, interfiera con el fármaco del estudio (p. ej., capaz de alterar la absorción, el metabolismo o la eliminación), las evaluaciones del estudio o una participación óptima en el estudio.
    12. Historia actual de mareos intensos o síncopes al ponerse de pie debidos a hipotensión postural.
    13. Cualquier resultado analítico significativo que, en opinión del investigador, no sería compatible con la participación en el estudio o que representa un riesgo para los sujetos mientras se encuentran en el estudio.
    14. Las mujeres en edad fértil no deben estar embarazadas, en periodo de lactancia ni considerar la lactancia materna.
    15. Antecedentes de una enfermedad maligna en los cinco años anteriores a la selección, en especial un melanoma (se realizará una visita dermatológica en la visita de selección), con la excepción del carcinoma de células basales y el carcinoma de células escamosas de la piel que hayan sido completamente extirpados, el cáncer cervical in situ tratado y el cáncer de próstata in situ tratado con valores normales del antígeno prostático específico.
    16. Insuficiencia hepática moderada o grave según la clasificación de Child-Pugh.
    17. Sujetos con antecedentes conocidos de hepatitis B o C o infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.
    18. QTcF >500 ms.
    19. Bloqueo auriculoventricular de segundo o tercer grado o síndrome de disfunción sinusal, fibrilación auricular no controlada, angina de pecho grave o inestable, insuficiencia cardíaca congestiva o infarto de miocardio en los tres meses anteriores a la visita de aleatorización.
    20. Los sujetos no deben haber recibido tratamiento simultáneo con inhibidores de la monoaminooxidasa (IMAO), petidina, opioides, inhibidores de la recaptación de la serotonina-norepinefrina (IRSN), dextrometorfano o simpaticomiméticos, incluidos los descongestionantes orales y nasales y los medicamentos para el resfriado (p. ej., preparaciones que contienen vasoconstrictores, como efedrina, pseudoefedrina, fenilefrina y fenilpropanolamina) en las cuatro semanas anteriores a la visita de aleatorización.
    21. Los sujetos no deben haber recibido tratamiento con neurolépticos por vía oral o neurolépticos de absorción prolongada en las 12 semanas anteriores a la visita de aleatorización.
    22. Los sujetos no deben tener discinesia bifásica o de efecto máximo grave e incapacitante o fluctuaciones de balanceo muy extensas o impredecibles.
    23. Los sujetos no deben tener signos ni síntomas sugerentes de encefalopatía espongiforme transmisible ni ser familiares de una persona con esta enfermedad.
    24. Los sujetos no deben tener antecedentes oftalmológicos que incluyan cualquiera de los siguientes trastornos: albinismo, uveítis, retinitis pigmentosa, degeneración retiniana, retinopatía activa, retinopatía diabética progresiva grave, retinopatía hereditaria o antecedentes familiares de enfermedad retiniana hereditaria.
    E.5 End points
    E.5.1Primary end point(s)
    Primary Efficacy Endpoint:
    ? Mean change in the daily ?OFF? time from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    Criterio de valoración principal de la eficacia:
    ? Media del cambio en el tiempo diario en fase ?OFF? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    E.5.1.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    96 weeks
    96 semanas
    E.5.2Secondary end point(s)
    Secondary Efficacy Endpoints:
    Key secondary efficacy endpoint:
    ? Mean change in the daily ?ON? time without dyskinesia from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    Other secondary efficacy endpoints:
    ? Mean change in the PDQ-39 total score from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the UDysRS total score during the ?ON? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the daily ?ON? time with troublesome dyskinesia from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the UPDRS Part II (ADL) score during the ?ON? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the UPDRS motor score Part III during the ?ON? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the UPDRS total score during the ?ON? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in the NMS assessment scale for PD score from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Mean change in dyskinesia score (using the UDysRS scale) at the end of the study in patients with or without dyskinesia at baseline.
    Exploratory Secondary Efficacy Endpoints:
    ? Mean change in the UPDRS Part IV score of items 32-34 during the ?ON? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Time to first intervention (increase of at least 20% of the L dopa dose, add-on of other anti-Parkinsonian drugs or increase of their dosages).
    ? Percentage of patients with dyskinesia unchanged, improved or deteriorated at the end of the study, based on baseline condition (patients with or without dyskinesia at baseline) and UDysRS total score.
    ? Mean change in the UPDRS Part II (ADL) score during the ?OFF? phase from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    ? Percentage of responders, defined as defined as meeting at least 1 of the following 3 criteria:
    - improvement ?30 minutes in ?ON? time, ?OFF? time and ?ON? + ?OFF?;
    - improvement ?30 minutes in ?ON? time, ?OFF? time and ?ON? + ?OFF? time with no increase in troublesome dyskinesia;
    - improvement ?30% in motor symptoms (UPDRS part III).
    ? Percentage of patients with <25% ?OFF? time.
    ? Change from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96) in the daily ?OFF? time following the first morning dose of L dopa.
    ? Percentage of reduction in L dopa dose from Baseline to Endpoint (Week 96).
    Safety Endpoints:
    ? The nature, frequency, severity, relationship (to study drug), actions taken, and outcome of TEAEs and SAEs.
    ? Changes in physical examination findings.
    ? Changes in vital sign (heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure) values, including occurrence of abnormalities.
    ? Changes in 12-lead ECG parameter measures, including occurrence of abnormalities.
    ? Changes in clinical chemistry and hematology values, including shifts from Baseline and occurrence of abnormalities.
    Criterios de valoración secundarios de la eficacia:
    Criterio de valoración secundario clave de la eficacia:
    ? Media del cambio en el tiempo diario en fase ?ON? sin discinesia desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    Otros criterios de valoración secundarios de la eficacia:
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación total de PDQ-39 desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación total de UDysRS durante la fase ?ON? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en el tiempo diario en fase ?ON? con discinesia problemática desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación de la parte II (AVD) de UPDRS durante la fase ?ON? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación motora de la parte III de UPDRS durante la fase ?ON? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación total de UPDRS durante la fase ?ON? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación de la escala de valoración de SNM para la EP desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación de discinesia (por medio de la escala UDysRS) al final del estudio en pacientes con o sin discinesia al inicio del estudio.
    Criterios de valoración secundarios exploratorios de la eficacia:
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación de los ítems 32-34 de la parte IV de UPDRS durante la fase ?ON? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Periodo de tiempo hasta la primera intervención (aumento mínimo del 20 % de la dosis de L-dopa, adición de otros fármacos antiparkinsonianos o aumento de las dosis).
    ? Porcentaje de pacientes sin cambios, mejoría o deterioro de la discinesia al final del estudio, en función de la enfermedad al inicio (pacientes con o sin discinesia al inicio del estudio) y puntuación total en UDysRS.
    ? Media del cambio en la puntuación de la parte II (AVD) de UPDRS durante la fase ?OFF? desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    ? Porcentaje de sujetos que responden, definidos como aquellos que cumplen al menos 1 de los 3 siguientes criterios:
    - mejoría ?30 minutos en el tiempo en fase ?ON?, en fase ?OFF? y en fases ?ON? + ?OFF?;
    - mejoría ?30 minutos en el tiempo en fase ?ON?, en fase ?OFF? y en fases ?ON? + ?OFF? sin incremento de discinesia problemática;
    - mejoría ?30 % en los síntomas motores (parte III de UPDRS).
    ? Porcentaje de pacientes con <25 % de tiempo en fase ?OFF?.
    ? Cambio desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96) en el tiempo diario en fase ?OFF? después de la primera dosis de L-dopa de la mañana.
    ? Porcentaje de reducción de la dosis de L-dopa desde el inicio del estudio hasta el criterio de valoración (Semana 96).
    Criterios de valoración de la seguridad:
    ? Naturaleza, frecuencia, gravedad, relación (con el fármaco del estudio), acciones realizadas y resultado de los AAST y de los AAG.
    ? Cambios en los hallazgos de las exploraciones físicas.
    ? Cambios en los valores de las constantes vitales (frecuencia cardíaca, tensión arterial sistólica y diastólica), incluido el desarrollo de alteraciones.
    ? Cambios en las determinaciones de los parámetros del ECG de 12 derivaciones, incluido el desarrollo de alteraciones.
    ? Cambios en los valores de hematología y bioquímica clínica, incluidos los cambios desde el inicio del estudio y el desarrollo de alteraciones.
    E.5.2.1Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point
    96 weeks.
    An optional interim analysis will be conducted if a regulatory approval body requests an analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint after all subjects have completed 6 months of treatment in the study. If conducted, this interim analysis will only include the analysis of the primary efficacy endpoint, at Week 24 instead of Week 96.
    96 semanas.
    Unanálisis provisional opcional se podrá efectuar si un organismo regulador (p. ej., la FDA) solicita un análisis del criterio de valoración principal de la eficacia después de que todos los sujetos hayan completado 6 meses de tratamiento en el estudio. En caso de realizarse, este análisis provisional solo incluirá el análisis del criterio de valoración principal de la eficacia, se llevará a cabo en la Semana 24 en lugar de en la Semana 96.
    E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial
    E.6Scope of the trial
    E.6.1Diagnosis No
    E.6.2Prophylaxis No
    E.6.3Therapy Yes
    E.6.4Safety Yes
    E.6.5Efficacy Yes
    E.6.6Pharmacokinetic No
    E.6.7Pharmacodynamic No
    E.6.8Bioequivalence No
    E.6.9Dose response No
    E.6.10Pharmacogenetic No
    E.6.11Pharmacogenomic No
    E.6.12Pharmacoeconomic No
    E.6.13Others No
    E.7Trial type and phase
    E.7.1Human pharmacology (Phase I) No
    E.7.1.1First administration to humans No
    E.7.1.2Bioequivalence study No
    E.7.1.3Other No
    E.7.1.3.1Other trial type description
    E.7.2Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) No
    E.7.3Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) Yes
    E.7.4Therapeutic use (Phase IV) No
    E.8 Design of the trial
    E.8.1Controlled Yes
    E.8.1.1Randomised Yes
    E.8.1.2Open No
    E.8.1.3Single blind No
    E.8.1.4Double blind Yes
    E.8.1.5Parallel group Yes
    E.8.1.6Cross over No
    E.8.1.7Other No
    E.8.2 Comparator of controlled trial
    E.8.2.1Other medicinal product(s) No
    E.8.2.2Placebo Yes
    E.8.2.3Other No
    E.8.2.4Number of treatment arms in the trial2
    E.8.3 The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned No
    E.8.4 The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned Yes
    E.8.4.1Number of sites anticipated in Member State concerned12
    E.8.5The trial involves multiple Member States Yes
    E.8.5.1Number of sites anticipated in the EEA61
    E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA
    E.8.6.1Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA Yes
    E.8.6.2Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA No
    E.8.6.3If E.8.6.1 or E.8.6.2 are Yes, specify the regions in which trial sites are planned
    Austria
    France
    Germany
    Italy
    Russian Federation
    Spain
    Sweden
    Switzerland
    United Kingdom
    E.8.7Trial has a data monitoring committee No
    E.8.8 Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
    LVLS
    E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned years3
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned months2
    E.8.9.1In the Member State concerned days14
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial years3
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial months2
    E.8.9.2In all countries concerned by the trial days14
    F. Population of Trial Subjects
    F.1 Age Range
    F.1.1Trial has subjects under 18 No
    F.1.1.1In Utero No
    F.1.1.2Preterm newborn infants (up to gestational age < 37 weeks) No
    F.1.1.3Newborns (0-27 days) No
    F.1.1.4Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) No
    F.1.1.5Children (2-11years) No
    F.1.1.6Adolescents (12-17 years) No
    F.1.2Adults (18-64 years) Yes
    F.1.2.1Number of subjects for this age range: 445
    F.1.3Elderly (>=65 years) Yes
    F.1.3.1Number of subjects for this age range: 111
    F.2 Gender
    F.2.1Female Yes
    F.2.2Male Yes
    F.3 Group of trial subjects
    F.3.1Healthy volunteers No
    F.3.2Patients Yes
    F.3.3Specific vulnerable populations Yes
    F.3.3.1Women of childbearing potential not using contraception No
    F.3.3.2Women of child-bearing potential using contraception Yes
    F.3.3.3Pregnant women No
    F.3.3.4Nursing women No
    F.3.3.5Emergency situation No
    F.3.3.6Subjects incapable of giving consent personally No
    F.3.3.7Others No
    F.4 Planned number of subjects to be included
    F.4.1In the member state96
    F.4.2 For a multinational trial
    F.4.2.1In the EEA 490
    F.4.2.2In the whole clinical trial 556
    F.5 Plans for treatment or care after the subject has ended the participation in the trial (if it is different from the expected normal treatment of that condition)
    The test drug, safinamide recently received marketing authorization in the EU, the drug is expected to be commercially available by the time the study is completed.
    G. Investigator Networks to be involved in the Trial
    N. Review by the Competent Authority or Ethics Committee in the country concerned
    N.Competent Authority Decision Authorised
    N.Date of Competent Authority Decision2015-11-19
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion of the trial applicationFavourable
    N.Ethics Committee Opinion: Reason(s) for unfavourable opinion
    N.Date of Ethics Committee Opinion2015-11-11
    P. End of Trial
    P.End of Trial StatusPrematurely Ended
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Sat Apr 20 13:49:32 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA