Clinical Trial Results:
Proof of effectiveness of Pascoflair using qantitative measurement of electric brain activity during examination stress in 40 subjects suffering from test anxiety.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-armed, Phase IV study in parallel design.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-003369-50 |
Trial protocol |
DE |
Global end of trial date |
20 Aug 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Apr 2022
|
First version publication date |
28 Apr 2022
|
Other versions |
|
Summary report(s) |
Dimpfel et al. 2016 Summary for German Authorities |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
200S14PF
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Pascoe pharmazeutische Präparate
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Schiffenberger Weg 55, Giessen, Germany, 35394
|
||
Public contact |
Klinische Forschung H. Michels, PASCOE pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH, 0049 641-796-0958, holger.michels@pascoe.de
|
||
Scientific contact |
Klinische Forschung H. Michels, PASCOE pharmazeutische Präparate GmbH, 6417960963 641-7960-958, holger.michels@pascoe.de
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
18 Mar 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
20 Aug 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
20 Aug 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
Anxiolytic effects of PASCOFLAIR® shall be tested in subjects suffering from test anxiety after single intake by aid of a newly developed, validated method consisting of a combination of eye tracking (following glances) with neurocode tracking (quantitative EEG with a time resolution of 364 ms).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The only measure in this trial with a potential risk for the participants was blood sampling, where e.g. pain, bruises, hematoma, injury of nerves or infections may occur. No adverse events due to the blood
sampling occured. Further risks due to the trial design or trial measures were not expected.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
30 Apr 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 40
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
40
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
40
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
40
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
||||||||||
Recruitment
|
||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Germany: May 2015 - Aug 2015: 40 subjects were randomized and received treatment (20x verum and 20x placebo) | |||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
||||||||||
Screening details |
During recruitment 9 people dropped out before randomized: 7 people "were no longer interested in or had no time for participating in the study" and 2 people were excluded due to "taking medications (exclusion criterion)" | |||||||||
Period 1
|
||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Treatment (overall period)
|
|||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | |||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
|||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | |||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor | |||||||||
Arms
|
||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Verum | |||||||||
Arm description |
subject received 2 tbl once | |||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
PASCOFLAIR®
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
single dose of 2 tbl
|
|||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | |||||||||
Arm description |
subject received 2 tbl once | |||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | |||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
|||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
||||||||||
Other name |
||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Coated tablet
|
|||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
|||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
single dose of 2 tbl
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Treatment (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Verum
|
||
Reporting group description |
subject received 2 tbl once | ||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
subject received 2 tbl once |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Effect of Placebo or Verum on spectral beta1 power | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of Placebo or Verum on spectral beta1 power
averaged including either all or selected electrode positions given on the right upper side. Data are given as
% of baseline (ref) before intake. Statistical significance (Wilcoxon-Test) in comparison to Placebo is
documented by stars: *=p<0.10; **=p<0.05.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
About 45 minutes after intake of study medication
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
verum vs. placebo beta1 |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Wilcoxon test | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
For explorative statistical evaluation the nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Verum
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 [1] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [1] - For statistical significance p<0.10 was also described. |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
Effect of Placebo or Verum on spectral beta2 power | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Effect of Placebo or Verum (PASCOFLAIR®) on spectral beta2 power
averaged including either all or selected electrode positions given on the right upper side. Data are given as
% of baseline (ref) before intake. Statistical significance (Wilcoxon-Test) in comparison to Placebo is
documented by stars: *=p<0.10; **=p<0.05.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
45 minutes after intake of study medication (verum or placebo)
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
Attachments |
verum vs. placebo beta2 |
||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Wilcoxon test | ||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
For explorative statistical evaluation the nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used.
|
||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Verum v Placebo
|
||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
40
|
||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||
Analysis type |
other | ||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 [2] | ||||||||||||
Method |
Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) | ||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||
Notes [2] - For statistical significance p<0.10 was also described. |
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Tolerability | |||||||||
End point description |
At the end of the measurements, the tolerability of verum or placebo was assessed: very good, good, moderately, poor.
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
One study day for each patient
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Attachments |
Tolerability |
|||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Overall period
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
24.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Verum
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
15 Apr 2015 |
Changes in study protocol (version 2.0)
Changes in ICF (version 3.0)
Changes labeling study medication |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |