Flag of the European Union EU Clinical Trials Register Help

Clinical trials

The European Union Clinical Trials Register   allows you to search for protocol and results information on:
  • interventional clinical trials that were approved in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) under the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC
  • clinical trials conducted outside the EU/EEA that are linked to European paediatric-medicine development

  • EU/EEA interventional clinical trials approved under or transitioned to the Clinical Trial Regulation 536/2014 are publicly accessible through the
    Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS).


    The EU Clinical Trials Register currently displays   43875   clinical trials with a EudraCT protocol, of which   7295   are clinical trials conducted with subjects less than 18 years old.   The register also displays information on   18700   older paediatric trials (in scope of Article 45 of the Paediatric Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006).

    Phase 1 trials conducted solely on adults and that are not part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) are not publicly available (see Frequently Asked Questions ).  
     
    Examples: Cancer AND drug name. Pneumonia AND sponsor name.
    How to search [pdf]
    Search Tips: Under advanced search you can use filters for Country, Age Group, Gender, Trial Phase, Trial Status, Date Range, Rare Diseases and Orphan Designation. For these items you should use the filters and not add them to your search terms in the text field.
    Advanced Search: Search tools
     

    < Back to search results

    Download PDF

    Clinical Trial Results:
    A Phase IIA randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over study to evaluate the effects of multiple doses of inhaled RNS60 and Budesonide on the late phase asthmatic response to allergen challenge in patients with mild asthma. Note: Following Protocol Amendment 2.1, this study was conducted as a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel (RNS60/Placebo) 1 period study and no longer involves the administration of budesonide.

    Summary
    EudraCT number
    2014-003846-29
    Trial protocol
    GB  
    Global end of trial date
    10 Nov 2015

    Results information
    Results version number
    v1(current)
    This version publication date
    03 Jul 2022
    First version publication date
    03 Jul 2022
    Other versions

    Trial information

    Close Top of page
    Trial identification
    Sponsor protocol code
    01.1.1.H3
    Additional study identifiers
    ISRCTN number
    -
    US NCT number
    -
    WHO universal trial number (UTN)
    -
    Sponsors
    Sponsor organisation name
    Revalesio Corporation
    Sponsor organisation address
    1202 East D Street, Tacoma, United States, 98421
    Public contact
    Clinical trial manager, Revalesio Corporation, 1 253 922 2600, info@revalesio.com
    Scientific contact
    Clinical trial manager, Revalesio Corporation, 1 253 922 2600, info@revalesio.com
    Paediatric regulatory details
    Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP)
    No
    Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial?
    No
    Results analysis stage
    Analysis stage
    Final
    Date of interim/final analysis
    24 May 2016
    Is this the analysis of the primary completion data?
    No
    Global end of trial reached?
    Yes
    Global end of trial date
    10 Nov 2015
    Was the trial ended prematurely?
    No
    General information about the trial
    Main objective of the trial
    1) Assess the effect of treatment with RNS60 on the response to allergen challenge compared with placebo (0.9% saline), in subjects with mild asthma. 2) Assess the safety and tolerability of multiple doses of RNS60 in subjects with mild asthma. The efficacy of nebulized RNS60 was investigated through the assessment of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) responses during the late asthmatic response (LAR) after inhaled allergen challenge in subjects with mild allergic asthma. The allergen challenge model allowed the evaluation of several features of the physiology of mainly Th2 cell-driven asthma in relation to the kinetics of the underlying airway pathology during the allergen-induced late response. RNS60 is an electrokinetically altered aqueous fluid consisting of 0.9% sodium chloride and dissolved oxygen, generated using modified Taylor-Couette-Poiseuille (TCP) flow under elevated oxygen pressure, hypothesized to produce oxygen nanobubbles.
    Protection of trial subjects
    The study was conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) as required by the International Council on Harmonisation (ICH) guidelines and in accordance with country-specific laws and regulations governing clinical studies of investigational products. Compliance with these requirements also constitutes conformity with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
    Background therapy
    Background therapy - Not applicable Additional relevant information regarding study conduct: Due to the Protocol Amendment 2.1, introduced after the study start, there were 2 cohorts in the study. Cohort 1 (comprised of 12 subjects) and Cohort 2 (comprised of 18 subjects). Subjects in Cohort 1 were enrolled prior to the change in study design described in Protocol Amendment 2.1. After screening and a baseline allergen challenge, these subjects received either RNS60 or placebo, twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21. Cohort 1 subjects then received a second allergen challenge on Day 42; the study design was amended prior to these subjects commencing the crossover portion of the original protocol. Post Day 21 data were excluded from the primary and secondary efficacy endpoint analyses for Cohort 1 subjects. Thus, the follow-up visit for Cohort 1 occurred after approval of the amended study design and was scheduled according to the availability of the subjects. Subjects in Cohort 2 were enrolled as per Protocol Amendment 2.1. After screening and a baseline allergen challenge, these subjects received either RNS60 or placebo, twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment. The final overall data analysis was performed on subject groups, i.e. subjects who received the study drug RNS60 (N= 16) or placebo (N=14).
    Evidence for comparator
    -
    Actual start date of recruitment
    07 Apr 2015
    Long term follow-up planned
    No
    Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement?
    No
    Population of trial subjects
    Number of subjects enrolled per country
    Country: Number of subjects enrolled
    United Kingdom: 30
    Worldwide total number of subjects
    30
    EEA total number of subjects
    0
    Number of subjects enrolled per age group
    In utero
    0
    Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk
    0
    Newborns (0-27 days)
    0
    Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months)
    0
    Children (2-11 years)
    0
    Adolescents (12-17 years)
    0
    Adults (18-64 years)
    30
    From 65 to 84 years
    0
    85 years and over
    0

    Subject disposition

    Close Top of page
    Recruitment
    Recruitment details
    Overall, 30 subjects (male and female) diagnosed with mild asthma were recruited according to the study inclusion and exclusion criteria.

    Pre-assignment
    Screening details
    Eligible subjects had to show a positive methacholine with a provocative concentration of methacholine, leading to a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20 methacholine) of equal to or less than 8 mg/mL. Subject or legal representative gave written consent prior to any treatment procedures after receiving detailed information about the study.

    Period 1
    Period 1 title
    Overall study period (overall period)
    Is this the baseline period?
    Yes
    Allocation method
    Randomised - controlled
    Blinding used
    Double blind
    Roles blinded
    Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Data analyst, Carer, Assessor
    Blinding implementation details
    This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with limited access to the randomization code. Study medication and placebo were identical in physical appearance.

    Arms
    Are arms mutually exclusive
    Yes

    Arm title
    RNS60
    Arm description
    Subjects received RNS60 twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.
    Arm type
    Experimental

    Investigational medicinal product name
    RNS60
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    RNS60 chemically is a 0.9% sodium chloride for irrigation with added USP Oxygen, processed using modified Taylor-Couette-Poiseuille (TCP) flow under elevated oxygen pressure. RNS60 drug product was supplied as a sterile solution for nebulized inhalation. Treatments were administered as a nebulized dose using a Pari Mini nebulizer system with Pari LC Sprint reusable, disposable nebulizers. 4 mL dose, twice daily dosing for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) with a single dose on Day 21. Treatment was administered under supervision in the clinical unit and self-administered by the subjects when they were not attending the clinical unit. The subjects entered the details of self-administration into diary cards. Diary cards were reviewed by the clinical staff when the subjects returned to the clinic.

    Arm title
    Placebo
    Arm description
    Subjects received placebo (0.9% saline) twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.
    Arm type
    Placebo

    Investigational medicinal product name
    Saline
    Investigational medicinal product code
    Other name
    Pharmaceutical forms
    Inhalation solution
    Routes of administration
    Inhalation use
    Dosage and administration details
    Placebo: Normal saline placebo was 0.9% sodium chloride for irrigation. Normal saline drug product was supplied as a sterile solution for nebulized inhalation Treatments were administered as a nebulized dose using a Pari Mini nebulizer system with Pari LC Sprint reusable, disposable nebulizers. 4 mL, twice daily dosing for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) with a single dose on Day 21. Treatment was administered under supervision in the clinical unit and self-administered by the subjects when they were not attending the clinical unit. The subjects entered the details of self-administration into diary cards. Diary cards were reviewed by the clinical staff when the subjects returned to the clinic.

    Number of subjects in period 1
    RNS60 Placebo
    Started
    16
    14
    Completed
    16
    14

    Baseline characteristics

    Close Top of page
    Baseline characteristics reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RNS60
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received RNS60 twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received placebo (0.9% saline) twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.

    Reporting group values
    RNS60 Placebo Total
    Number of subjects
    16 14 30
    Age categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Adults (18-64 years)
    16 14 30
    Age continuous
    Units: years
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    33 ± 9 31 ± 9 -
    Gender categorical
    Units: Subjects
        Female
    3 4 7
        Male
    13 10 23
    Race
    Units: Subjects
        Asian
    1 4 5
        Black
    2 1 3
        White
    13 9 22
    Body mass index
    Units: kg/m²
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    25.63 ± 2.88 24.91 ± 2.02 -

    End points

    Close Top of page
    End points reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RNS60
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received RNS60 twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    Subjects received placebo (0.9% saline) twice daily for 20 days (Day 1 to Day 20) and a single dose in the morning of Day 21. The subjects received an allergen challenge on Day 21 after the final treatment.

    Primary: 1_Emax(3-8) -- Allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    1_Emax(3-8) -- Allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR)
    End point description
    Emax(3-8) Evaluate the allergen-induced late asthmatic response (LAR), as measured by maximal percent decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from the baseline (pre-allergen challenge) to the period beginning 3 hours and ending 8 hours post allergen challenge. Inhaled methacholine was used as the challenge agent, to cause airway tightening (bronchospasm), followed by measurement of FEV1 using established spirometry methods. Emax(3-8) = The maximal percentage decrease (% change from baseline/baseline) from the pre-allergen challenge (i.e., baseline was the post-diluent value) in FEV1 between 3 hours and 8 hours after allergen challenge Efficacy analysis set included all subjects who received at least one dose of study medication (RNS60 or placebo) and had at least one scheduled post-dose efficacy measurement. Subjects in this analysis set were used for all efficacy analyses.
    End point type
    Primary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (screening, pre-allergen challenge), and after 21 days of treatment i.e. on Day 21: at 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 h after allergen challenge.
    End point values
    RNS60 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16 [1]
    13 [2]
    Units: Percent (%)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    28.0 ± 16.80
    26.51 ± 15.05
    Notes
    [1] - Efficacy analysis set
    [2] - Efficacy analysis set
    Statistical analysis title
    Emax(3-8)
    Statistical analysis description
    The primary efficacy endpoints for FEV1 were compared between RNS60 and placebo using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline value as a covariate. Least-squares (LS) means for each treatment with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and LS mean differences for comparison with 95% CI between the two treatments are presented.
    Comparison groups
    RNS60 v Placebo
    Number of subjects included in analysis
    29
    Analysis specification
    Pre-specified
    Analysis type
    superiority
    P-value
    = 0.8371
    Method
    ANCOVA
    Parameter type
    least-squares mean difference
    Confidence interval
         level
    95%
         sides
    2-sided
         lower limit
    -11.03
         upper limit
    13.5

    Secondary: 2_Emax(0-3) -- Allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    2_Emax(0-3) -- Allergen-induced early asthmatic response (EAR)
    End point description
    Emax(0-3) Evaluate the allergen-induced early phase asthmatic response (EAR) as measured by maximal percent decrease in the FEV1 from the baseline (pre-allergen diluent challenge) during the first 3 hours post-allergen challenge (0 to 3 hours). Emax(0-3) = Maximal percentage decrease from the pre-allergen challenge (i.e., baseline was the post-diluent value) in FEV1 during the first 3 hours post-allergen challenge (0 to 3 hours) EAR: The inhalation of allergens by allergic asthmatics leads to the early asthmatic response (EAR), which is characterized by acute airway obstruction beginning within a few minutes.
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (screening, pre-allergen challenge), and after 21 days of treatment i.e. Day 21: at 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 h after allergen challenge.
    End point values
    RNS60 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16 [3]
    13 [4]
    Units: Percent (%)
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    27.66 ± 6.17
    27.3 ± 9.51
    Notes
    [3] - Efficacy analysis set
    [4] - Efficacy analysis set
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 3_AUEC(0-3) -- Area under the effect curve post-allergen challenge (between 0 and 3 h post-allergen challenge)

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    3_AUEC(0-3) -- Area under the effect curve post-allergen challenge (between 0 and 3 h post-allergen challenge)
    End point description
    AUEC(0-3) The AUEC between 0 hours and 3 hours post-allergen challenge (using change-from-baseline FEV1 values, with the post-diluent challenge value in FEV1 as baseline), was calculated using the linear trapezoidal method. AUEC=Area under the effect curve
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (screening, pre-allergen challenge), and after 21 days of treatment i.e. Day 21: at 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 h after allergen challenge.
    End point values
    RNS60 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16 [5]
    13 [6]
    Units: h*L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    1.234 ± 0.521
    1.077 ± 0.536
    Notes
    [5] - Efficacy analysis set
    [6] - Efficacy analysis set
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Secondary: 4_AUEC(3-8) -- Area under the effect curve post-allergen challenge (between 3 and 8 h post-allergen challenge )

    Close Top of page
    End point title
    4_AUEC(3-8) -- Area under the effect curve post-allergen challenge (between 3 and 8 h post-allergen challenge )
    End point description
    AUEC(3-8) Evaluate the AUEC between 3 hours and 8 hours post-allergen challenge (using change-from-baseline FEV1 values, with post-diluent challenge value in FEV1 as the baseline), using the linear trapezoidal method. AUEC=Area under the effect curve
    End point type
    Secondary
    End point timeframe
    Baseline (screening, pre-allergen challenge), and after 21 days of treatment i.e. on Day 21: at 10, 15, 20, 30, and 45 min and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 h after allergen challenge.
    End point values
    RNS60 Placebo
    Number of subjects analysed
    16 [7]
    13 [8]
    Units: h*L
        arithmetic mean (standard deviation)
    3.12 ± 2.176
    2.991 ± 1.518
    Notes
    [7] - Efficacy analysis set
    [8] - Efficacy analysis set
    No statistical analyses for this end point

    Adverse events

    Close Top of page
    Adverse events information
    Timeframe for reporting adverse events
    From the time of study information consent signature to the end of the study (follow-up visit). Follow-up: Cohort 1=about 28 - 46 days after the allergen challenge on Day 42; Cohort 2=about 7 days after the final study drug administration (Day 28).
    Adverse event reporting additional description
    Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are reported and defined as AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study medication. The Safety Analysis Set was used to evaluate adverse events (AE). The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least one dose of study medication (RNS60 or placebo).
    Assessment type
    Systematic
    Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
    Dictionary name
    MedDRA
    Dictionary version
    18.0
    Reporting groups
    Reporting group title
    RNS60
    Reporting group description
    -

    Reporting group title
    Placebo
    Reporting group description
    -

    Serious adverse events
    RNS60 Placebo
    Total subjects affected by serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         number of deaths (all causes)
    0
    0
         number of deaths resulting from adverse events
    Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 0%
    Non-serious adverse events
    RNS60 Placebo
    Total subjects affected by non serious adverse events
         subjects affected / exposed
    8 / 16 (50.00%)
    9 / 14 (64.29%)
    Investigations
    Weight decreased
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
    Limb injury
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Nervous system disorders
    Headache
         subjects affected / exposed
    3 / 16 (18.75%)
    3 / 14 (21.43%)
         occurrences all number
    3
    3
    General disorders and administration site conditions
    Chest discomfort
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Gastrointestinal disorders
    Nausea
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
    Oropharyngeal pain
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    2 / 14 (14.29%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    2
    Cough
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    1
    Asthma
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Dyspnoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Rhinorrhoea
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0
    Wheezing
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Infections and infestations
    Rhinitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    2 / 16 (12.50%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    2
    1
    Nasopharyngitis
         subjects affected / exposed
    0 / 16 (0.00%)
    1 / 14 (7.14%)
         occurrences all number
    0
    1
    Oral herpes
         subjects affected / exposed
    1 / 16 (6.25%)
    0 / 14 (0.00%)
         occurrences all number
    1
    0

    More information

    Close Top of page

    Substantial protocol amendments (globally)

    Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes
    Date
    Amendment
    08 Jun 2015
    Protocol Amendment 2 Amending the study design (submitted for approval to the MHRA and EC). The MHRA approved the amendment, with additional changes requested by the EC.
    15 Jul 2015
    Protocol Amendment 2.1 After incorporating the changes requested by EC for amendment 2.0, amendment 2.1 was submitted and approval was granted by the EC. Summary of the main changes to the study protocol is provided below. The original study design, a randomized, placebo controlled, 3-period crossover design was amended to a randomized, placebo controlled, 1-period parallel design. The delay in the start of the study meant that patients would be crossing over between treatment arms during the season of peak tree and grass pollen levels. After consultation with experts in the asthma field and allergen stress tests it was determined that the study would be more reliable if modified to a simple 2 arm randomized, placebo controlled trial and the study design was amended prior to any subjects entering the crossover arms. The amended study design did not include the active control arm (budesonide); the original protocol was not powered to compare the efficacy of RNS60 versus budesonide. As the original protocol was powered to detect a difference between RNS60 and placebo, removal of the budesonide arm did not impact the essential objective of the study. The secondary objective of the study, to assess the persistency of effect of twice daily dosing with RNS60 for 21 days, was removed from the amended study design.

    Interruptions (globally)

    Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No

    Limitations and caveats

    Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data.
    No limitations and caveats applicable to this summary of results were used.
    For support, Contact us.
    The status and protocol content of GB trials is no longer updated since 1 January 2021. For the UK, as of 31 January 2021, EU Law applies only to the territory of Northern Ireland (NI) to the extent foreseen in the Protocol on Ireland/NI. Legal notice
    As of 31 January 2023, all EU/EEA initial clinical trial applications must be submitted through CTIS . Updated EudraCT trials information and information on PIP/Art 46 trials conducted exclusively in third countries continues to be submitted through EudraCT and published on this website.

    European Medicines Agency © 1995-Fri May 17 13:41:06 CEST 2024 | Domenico Scarlattilaan 6, 1083 HS Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    EMA HMA