| E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation | 
| E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated | 
| Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal origin |  | 
| E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language | 
| Metastases on the peritoneum from bowel cancer |  | 
| E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Cancer [C04] | 
| MedDRA Classification | 
| E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation | 
| 
| E.1.2 | Version | 18.1 |  
| E.1.2 | Level | PT |  
| E.1.2 | Classification code | 10052358 |  
| E.1.2 | Term | Colorectal cancer metastatic |  
| E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10029104 - Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) |  | 
| E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No | 
| E.2 Objective of the trial | 
| E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial | 
| - Evaluate tumour detection sensitivity and specificity with the following image enhancement modalities: - 1 ‘narrow-band imaging’, 2 ‘autofluorescent imaging’, 3 ‘near-infrared indocyanin green imaging’, 4 ‘5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescent imaging’, 5 ‘three-dimensional imaging’ and 6 ‘spray-dye chromoendoscopy’ compared to conventional white light laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in order to achieve best tumour detection.
 
 |  | 
| E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial | 
| - To evaluate if the use of narrow-band imaging is feasible for this procedure. - To evaluate if the use of autofluorescent imaging is feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of intravenous indocyanin green injection visualized by near-infrared imaging is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of fluorescent imaging with 5-aminolevulinic acid is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of three-dimensional imaging is feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of spray-dye chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine blue is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate extra operating time  by the use of these image enhancement modalities
 - To evaluate possible adverse effects
 
 |  | 
| E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No | 
| E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria | 
| •	Oral and written informed consent •	Age 18 years and older
 •	Elective cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC
 •	Regular preoperative work-up
 •	Laparoscopic approach
 
 |  | 
| E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria | 
| •	Patients who are legally or mentally incapable or unable to give informed consent •	Patients younger than 18 years
 •	ASA (American Society of Anaesthesiologists) score higher than 3
 •	Exclusion criteria for cytoreductive surgery followed by HIPEC
 •	Exclusion criteria for resection of colorectal cancer
 •	Patients who have had major open abdominal surgery
 •	Hypersensitivity reaction to prior usage of indigo carmine or other dyes
 •	Severe high blood pressure, cardiac ischemia and heart insufficiency
 •	Iodine allergy
 •	Patients with hyperthyroidism or autonomous hyperthyroid adenoma
 •	Interaction with any of the following medication: any anticonvulsive medicine, bisulphites, haloperidol, heroin, meperidine, metamizol, methadone, morfine, nitrofurantoine, opiate alkaloids, fenobarbital, fenylbutazon, cyclopropane, probenicid, rifamycin, tetracyclines, sulphonamides, fluoroquinolones and hypericin extracts
 •	Hypersensitivity reaction to prior usage of indocyanin green injection
 •	Hypersensitivity to 5-ALA or porphyrins
 •	Acute or chronic types of porphyria
 •	Urgent indication for surgery
 •	Pregnancy
 •	Chronic kidney failure (eGFR<55)
 •	Chronic liver failure
 
 |  | 
| E.5 End points | 
| E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) | 
| -Evaluate tumour detection sensitivity and specificity with the following image enhancement modalities: 1 ‘narrow-band imaging’, 2 ‘autofluorescent imaging’, 3 ‘near-infrared indocyanin green imaging’, 4 ‘5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescent imaging’, 5 ‘three-dimensional imaging’ and 6 ‘spray-dye chromoendoscopy’ compared to conventional white light laparoscopy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in order to achieve best tumour detection.
 
 |  | 
| E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point | 
| After the surgical procedure when pathological examination of the specimen and biopsies is completed |  | 
| E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) | 
| - To evaluate if the use of narrow-band imaging is feasible for this procedure. - To evaluate if the use of autofluorescent imaging is feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of intravenous indocyanin green injection visualized by near-infrared imaging is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of fluorescent imaging with 5-aminolevulinic acid is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of three-dimensional imaging is feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate if the use of spray-dye chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine blue is safe and feasible for this procedure.
 - To evaluate extra operating time  by the use of these image enhancement modalities
 - To evaluate possible adverse effects
 
 |  | 
| E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point | 
| After the surgical procedure when pathological examination of the specimen and biopsies is completed |  | 
| E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial | 
| E.6 | Scope of the trial | 
| E.6.1 | Diagnosis | Yes | 
| E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No | 
| E.6.3 | Therapy | No | 
| E.6.4 | Safety | Yes | 
| E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes | 
| E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No | 
| E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No | 
| E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No | 
| E.6.9 | Dose response | No | 
| E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No | 
| E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No | 
| E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No | 
| E.6.13 | Others | No | 
| E.7 | Trial type and phase | 
| E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No | 
| E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No | 
| E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No | 
| E.7.1.3 | Other | No | 
| E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description |  | 
| E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No | 
| E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | Yes | 
| E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | No | 
| E.8 Design of the trial | 
| E.8.1 | Controlled | No | 
| E.8.1.1 | Randomised | No | 
| E.8.1.2 | Open | No | 
| E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No | 
| E.8.1.4 | Double blind | No | 
| E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No | 
| E.8.1.6 | Cross over | No | 
| E.8.1.7 | Other | Yes | 
| E.8.1.7.1 | Other trial design description |  | 
| E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial | 
| E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No | 
| E.8.2.2 | Placebo | No | 
| E.8.2.3 | Other | No | 
| E.8.3 | The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned | Yes | 
| E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No | 
| E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No | 
| E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA | 
| E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No | 
| E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No | 
| E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes | 
| E.8.8 | Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
                        visit of the last subject undergoing the trial | 
| The trial is completed when 10 patients are included |  | 
| E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 1 | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 | 
| E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 0 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial years | 1 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial months | 0 | 
| E.8.9.2 | In all countries concerned by the trial days | 0 |