Clinical Trial Results:
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Platelet P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Study
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-004238-25 |
Trial protocol |
GB |
Global end of trial date |
30 Nov 2015
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
11 Jul 2019
|
First version publication date |
11 Jul 2019
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
2012-004-0402-CARD
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02376283 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom, WV10 0QP
|
||
Public contact |
James Cotton, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, 01902 307999, jamescotton@nhs.net
|
||
Scientific contact |
James Cotton, The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, 01902 307999, jamescotton@nhs.net
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
31 Mar 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
30 Nov 2015
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
30 Nov 2015
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
1) To demonstrate the degree of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor given acutely before emergency primary angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), during the procedure and in the following 4 hours, to determine whether the condition of STEMI per se reduces the efficacy of orally administered P2Y12 inhibitors.
2) To determine the degree and time-course of platelet inhibition of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticagrelor) given acutely before emergency primary angioplasty for STEMI, during the procedure and in the following 4 hours. This will be compared with a cohort of patients presenting with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) treated with either oral P2Y12 inhibitor to determine whether the condition of STEMI per se reduces the efficacy of ticagrelor treatment.
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
All drugs were prescribed and administered in line with their licensed indications, and in accordance with local and national guideline recommendations. All patients were monitored for adverse events as per routine clinical practice. Patients were not considered for inclusion if they were unable to provide written or verbal informed consent, were under 18 years of age, had a documented allergy to aspirin or clopidogrel/prasugrel/ticagrelor.
|
||
Background therapy |
All patients were administered oral aspirin 300mg as a single dose following by a maintenance dose of 75mg daily. The oral P2Y12 inhibitor dose was in line with licensed/guideline recommendations; clopidogrel 600mg loading followed by 75mg daily maintenance, prasugrel 60mg loading followed by 10mg daily and ticagrelor 180mg loading followed by 90mg twice daily thereafter. Background antithrombotic therapy with unfractionated heparin was administered during the procedure. | ||
Evidence for comparator |
The comparative efficacy of orally administered P2Y12 inhibitors was determined using the point of care VerifyNow assay and expressed as a measure of P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU). The PRU measurement provides an indication of the degree of platelet inhibition achieved following the administration of a P2Y12 inhibitor loading dose on admission. | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
10 Jun 2013
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
Yes
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United Kingdom: 87
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
87
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
87
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
38
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
42
|
||
85 years and over |
7
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Location: Cardiology catheter laboratory and cardiology ward, Heart and Lung Centre, The Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK Recruitment period: 2 years and 10 months (34 months) | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
Clopidogrel and prasugrel were included only as the P2Y12 inhibitors under investigation initially. Amendment incorporated ticagrelor as addition. Recruitment to the prasugrel NSTEMI arm was unusually slow; therefore indications for use were changed to reflect the manufacturers recommendations and not NICE guidance. | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Non-randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Clopidogrel | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a clopidogrel 600mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
pharmacological drug handling | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Clopidogrel hydrogen sulphate
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
B01AC-04
|
||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
600mg one off, loading dose, followed by 75mg daily maintenance dose for 12 months
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Prasugrel | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
drug handling of prasugrel | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Prasugrel hydrochloride
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
B01AC22
|
||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Prasugrel 60mg one-off loading dose following by a 10mg daily maintenance dose for 12 months
(For the purposes of our protocol, prasugrel was prescribed and administered only in those patients over 60kg and under the age of 75 years, as per the manufacturers recommendations)
|
||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Ticagrelor | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
pharmacological drug handling of ticagrelor | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Ticagrelor
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
B01AC24
|
||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Film-coated tablet
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Oral use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Ticagrelor 180mg one-off loading dose, followed by 90mg twice daily maintenance dose for 12 months.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Clopidogrel
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a clopidogrel 600mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Prasugrel
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ticagrelor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Clopidogrel
|
||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a clopidogrel 600mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||
Reporting group title |
Prasugrel
|
||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||
Reporting group title |
Ticagrelor
|
||
Reporting group description |
All STEMI and NSTEMI patients were administered a prasugrel 60mg loading dose following confirmation of their diagnosis and receipt of verbal assent/informed consent prior to whole blood samples being collected for pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic assessment of the degree and time course of platelet inhibition. | ||
Subject analysis set title |
Ticagrelor parent compound
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
STEMI/NSTEMI patients.
Ticagrelor was used in our centre only after the use of prasugrel was discontinued. Other analysis with active metabolite.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pharmacodynamic assessment of degree of platelet inhibition as determined by VerifyNow point of care assay and expressed as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pharmacodynamic assessment of degree of platelet inhibition as determined by VerifyNow point of care assay and expressed as P2Y12 reaction units (PRU)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
240 minutes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pharmacodynamic assessment - VerifyNow | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequencies (%).
Continuous variables were analysed individually using student’s independent sample t-tests. Categorical variables were assessed using separate Fisher’s exact (Chi-sqaure) test.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Clopidogrel v Prasugrel v Ticagrelor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
87
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Comparison of means between groups was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique. ANOVA allowed for a comparison of more than two means and enabled an assessment to be made of the relationship between, different drugs (clopidogrel vs prasugrel vs ticagrelor), different clinical states (STEMI vs NSTEMI/UA) and different time points. [2] - Considered significant |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pharmacokinetic quantification of the plasma concentration of clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite and ticagrelor parent compound and active metabolite | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pharmacokinetic quantification of the plasma concentration of clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite and ticagrelor parent compound and active metabolite assessed using liquid chromatography in tandem with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and expressed as ng/ml
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
240 minutes
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pharmacokinetic quantification | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Pharmacokinetic quantification of the plasma concentration of clopidogrel and prasugrel active metabolite and ticagrelor parent compound and active metabolite assessed using liquid chromatography in tandem with mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and expressed as ng/ml.
Continuous variables expressed as mean ± SEM and categorical variables as frequencies (%). Continuous variables were analysed individually using student’s independent sample t-tests.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Clopidogrel v Prasugrel v Ticagrelor v Ticagrelor parent compound
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
117
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [3] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 [4] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - Categorical variables assessed using separate Fisher’s exact (Chi-sqaure) test. A p value < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant. Comparison of means between groups assessed using ANOVA technique. ANOVA allowed comparison of more than two means and enabled assessment of the relationship between different drugs (clopidogrel active metabolite vs prasugrel active metabolite vs ticagrelor parent compound & active metabolite), different clinical states and different time points. [4] - Considered significant |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Pharmacodynamic assessment of degree of platelet inhibition as determined by VASP flow cytometry and expressed as %PRI (platelet reactivity index) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Pharmacodynamic assessment of degree of platelet inhibition as determined by VASP flow cytometry and expressed as %PRI (platelet reactivity index)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
240 minutes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Pharmacodynamic assessment - VASP | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis description |
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD and categorical variables as frequencies (%).
Continuous variables were analysed individually using student’s independent sample t-tests. Categorical variables were assessed using separate Fisher’s exact (Chi-sqaure) test.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Clopidogrel v Prasugrel v Ticagrelor
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
87
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
equivalence [5] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 [6] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
t-test, 2-sided | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard deviation
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [5] - A p value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Comparison of means between groups was assessed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique. ANOVA allowed for a comparison of more than two means and enabled an assessment to be made of the relationship between, different drugs (clopidogrel vs prasugrel vs ticagrelor), different clinical states (STEMI vs NSTEMI/UA) and different time points. [6] - Considered significant |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
24 hours
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
An SAE form will be completed and submitted to R&D by the chief investigator within 24 hours of an event being noted.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
SNOMED CT | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
UK
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Clopidogrel
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
STEMI/NSTEMI treatment in patients who are not eligible for treatment with prasugrel/ticagrelor (based on clinical characteristics and as per study protocol) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Prasugrel
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
STEMI/NSTEMI patients over the 60kg in weight and under 75 years of age. (Prasugrel use was discontinued in our centre following a change in protocol to ticagrelor) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Ticagrelor
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
STEMI/NSTEMI patients. (Ticagrelor was used in our centre only after the use of prasugrel was discontinued) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: Due to the short reporting time of 4 hours, no adverse events took place during this time. |
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
16 Dec 2014 |
Due to difficulties in recruitment to the prasugrel NSTEMI group, a substantial amendment was submitted and approved, REC ref no: 14/WM/1236 |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |