E.1 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.1 | Medical condition(s) being investigated |
Healthy volunteers. Results will be used for optimizing the treatment of post-operative pain after total knee arthroplasty |
|
E.1.1.1 | Medical condition in easily understood language |
|
E.1.1.2 | Therapeutic area | Diseases [C] - Musculoskeletal Diseases [C05] |
MedDRA Classification |
E.1.2 Medical condition or disease under investigation |
E.1.2 | Version | 17.1 |
E.1.2 | Level | SOC |
E.1.2 | Classification code | 10022891 |
E.1.2 | Term | Investigations |
E.1.2 | System Organ Class | 10022891 - Investigations |
|
E.1.3 | Condition being studied is a rare disease | No |
E.2 Objective of the trial |
E.2.1 | Main objective of the trial |
We do not know the optimal volume for the ACB and we find it relevant to investigate to what extent and which parts of the quadriceps muscle gets affected when different volumes of a local anesthetic are injected into the adductor canal. Selective affection of the different components of the femoral quadriceps muscle can be assessed by non-invasive EMG record-ings. Further, the quadriceps femoris muscle strength will be evaluated by measuring the MVIC following the different volumes. The EMG recordings will be voluntary (vEMG) meas-ured during MVIC and stimulated (sEMG). sEMG is measured during transcutaneous electri-cal stimulation of the femoral nerve. The healthy volunteers will not gain from this study but it is our firm belief that the obtained knowledge can help future TKA patients as we hope to come closer in answering the ques-tion; “what is the optimal volume for the ACB?” — Thereby, enabling us to provide pain relief with fewer side effects and adverse events. |
We do not know the optimal volume for the ACB and we find it relevant to investigate to what extent and which parts of the quadriceps muscle gets affected when different volumes of a local anesthetic are injected into the adductor canal. Selective affection of the different components of the femoral quadriceps muscle can be assessed by non-invasive EMG record-ings. Further, the quadriceps femoris muscle strength will be evaluated by measuring the MVIC following the different volumes. The EMG recordings will be voluntary (vEMG) meas-ured during MVIC and stimulated (sEMG). sEMG is measured during transcutaneous electri-cal stimulation of the femoral nerve. The healthy volunteers will not gain from this study but it is our firm belief that the obtained knowledge can help future TKA patients as we hope to come closer in answering the ques-tion; “what is the optimal volume for the ACB?” — Thereby, enabling us to provide pain relief with fewer side effects and adverse events. |
|
E.2.2 | Secondary objectives of the trial |
|
E.2.3 | Trial contains a sub-study | No |
E.3 | Principal inclusion criteria |
• Age > 18 years old • Subjects who gave their written informed consent to participating in the study after having fully understood the contents of the protocol and re-strictions. • ASA 1 • Male • BMI 18–30 • Physical exercise 1-3 hours/week
|
|
E.4 | Principal exclusion criteria |
• Subjects who cannot cooperate with the study. • Subjects who cannot understand or speak Danish. • Subjects with allergy to the medicines used in the study. • Subjects suffering from alcohol and/or drug abuse – based on the inves-tigator's opinion. • Pathology or previous surgery or trauma to the lower limb. • Intense exercise 24 h before the tests • Intake of any analgesics 24 h prior to baseline measurements.
|
|
E.5 End points |
E.5.1 | Primary end point(s) |
• Difference between ACB-groups, one hour post-block, in amplitude of the rectified vEMG signal from the vastus medialis, expressed as percentage of the pre-block value. |
|
E.5.1.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Pre block and one hour post-block |
|
E.5.2 | Secondary end point(s) |
• Difference between ACB-groups, one hour post-block, in amplitude of the rectified vEMG signal from the vastus lateralis, expressed as percentage of the pre-block value. • Difference between groups, one hour post-block, in MVIC expressed as percentage of the pre-block value • Difference between ACB-groups, one hour post-block, in amplitude of the rectified sEMG signal from the vastus medialis, expressed as percentage of the pre-block value. • Difference between ACB-groups, one hour post-block, in amplitude of the rectified sEMG signal from the vastus lateralis, expressed as percentage of the pre-block value. • Correlation between volume and MVIC. MVIC expressed as a percentage of the pre-block value. • Difference in proportions between ACB-groups having an affection of both the saphe-nous nerve and the vastus medialis (but no other components of the quadriceps femoris muscle), one hour post block evaluated by EMG. (see below for establishment of the cut-off point for affected/not affected:
|
|
E.5.2.1 | Timepoint(s) of evaluation of this end point |
Pre block and one hour post block |
|
E.6 and E.7 Scope of the trial |
E.6 | Scope of the trial |
E.6.1 | Diagnosis | No |
E.6.2 | Prophylaxis | No |
E.6.3 | Therapy | Yes |
E.6.4 | Safety | No |
E.6.5 | Efficacy | Yes |
E.6.6 | Pharmacokinetic | No |
E.6.7 | Pharmacodynamic | No |
E.6.8 | Bioequivalence | No |
E.6.9 | Dose response | Yes |
E.6.10 | Pharmacogenetic | No |
E.6.11 | Pharmacogenomic | No |
E.6.12 | Pharmacoeconomic | No |
E.6.13 | Others | No |
E.7 | Trial type and phase |
E.7.1 | Human pharmacology (Phase I) | No |
E.7.1.1 | First administration to humans | No |
E.7.1.2 | Bioequivalence study | No |
E.7.1.3 | Other | No |
E.7.1.3.1 | Other trial type description | |
E.7.2 | Therapeutic exploratory (Phase II) | No |
E.7.3 | Therapeutic confirmatory (Phase III) | No |
E.7.4 | Therapeutic use (Phase IV) | Yes |
E.8 Design of the trial |
E.8.1 | Controlled | Yes |
E.8.1.1 | Randomised | Yes |
E.8.1.2 | Open | No |
E.8.1.3 | Single blind | No |
E.8.1.4 | Double blind | Yes |
E.8.1.5 | Parallel group | No |
E.8.1.6 | Cross over | Yes |
E.8.1.7 | Other | No |
E.8.2 | Comparator of controlled trial |
E.8.2.1 | Other medicinal product(s) | No |
E.8.2.2 | Placebo | Yes |
E.8.2.3 | Other | No |
E.8.2.4 | Number of treatment arms in the trial | 5 |
E.8.3 |
The trial involves single site in the Member State concerned
| Yes |
E.8.4 | The trial involves multiple sites in the Member State concerned | No |
E.8.5 | The trial involves multiple Member States | No |
E.8.6 Trial involving sites outside the EEA |
E.8.6.1 | Trial being conducted both within and outside the EEA | No |
E.8.6.2 | Trial being conducted completely outside of the EEA | No |
E.8.7 | Trial has a data monitoring committee | Yes |
E.8.8 |
Definition of the end of the trial and justification where it is not the last
visit of the last subject undergoing the trial
|
|
E.8.9 Initial estimate of the duration of the trial |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned years | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned months | 0 |
E.8.9.1 | In the Member State concerned days | 2 |