Clinical Trial Results:
Randomized Assessment of patients with clinically suspected Prostate cancer after multiparametric metabolic hybrid Imaging to evaluate its potential clinical Domain:
A prospective, randomized, multi-arm, multi-treatment clinical trial
|
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-004758-33 |
Trial protocol |
AT |
Global end of trial date |
01 May 2022
|
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
08 Apr 2026
|
First version publication date |
08 Apr 2026
|
Other versions |
|
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
|
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
Rapid-study
|
||
|
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
- | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
|
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Medical University of Vienna
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria, 1090
|
||
Public contact |
Prof. Marcus Hacker, Medical University of Vienna, marcus.hacker@meduniwien.ac.at
|
||
Scientific contact |
Prof. Marcus Hacker, Medical University of Vienna, marcus.hacker@meduniwien.ac.at
|
||
|
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
|
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
12 Nov 2024
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
Yes
|
||
Primary completion date |
01 May 2022
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
01 May 2022
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
|
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
We hypothesize that the image guided biopsy using multiparametric metabolic hybrid imaging with [18F]Fluoroethylcholine (FEC)/[68]Ga-PSMA-PET/MRI is superior in the detection of primary localized prostate cancer than the conventional biopsy approach with transrectal ultrasound in patients with suspected prostate cancer (according to the inclusion criteria) and could therefore significantly improve the detection rate of the dominant intraprostatic tumor lesion and reduce the number of biopsies needed for a correct histopathological diagnosis to a minimum in the future (PET/MRI guided biopsy).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
In this prospective randomized clinical trial including 220 men clinically suspicious of having prostate cancer, PSMA-targeted PET/MRI identified 91/113 histologically confirmed prostate cancers, 57/60 ISUP grade >2 tumors and predicted unfavorable disease in 23/25 patients in a median 3 years follow-up. 4-core PET/MRI-guided biopsy showed a comparable diagnostic efficacy as more invasive standard random biopsy. The results support the integration of this reliable imaging technique into clinical practice to improve the non-invasive diagnosis and prognostic categorization of prostate cancer, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies and overtreatment.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
18 Jan 2016
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
|
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Austria: 220
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
220
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
220
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
149
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
71
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Eligible participants were men with clinical signs suggestive of PCa, including elevated (.4.0 ng/mL) and progressively rising blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels despite antibiotic treatment, or a free-to-total PSA ratio of less than 22%. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Eligible participants were men with clinical signs suggestive of PCa, including elevated (.4.0 ng/mL) and progressively rising blood prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels despite antibiotic treatment, or a free-to-total PSA ratio of less than 22%. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
active phase (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
random biopsy Arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
18F fluoroethylcholine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
3MBq/kg Bodyweight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
68Ga PSMA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
2MBq/kg Bodyweight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Arm title
|
Image guided biopsy arm | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
18F fluoroethylcholine
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
3MBq/kg Bodyweight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
68Ga PSMA
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
2MBq/kg Bodyweight
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
random biopsy Arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Image guided biopsy arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||
|
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
random biopsy Arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||
Reporting group title |
Image guided biopsy arm
|
||
Reporting group description |
The study randomly assigned patients (target of 220) to either the standard (random biopsy [RB]) group with a 12-core or greater standardized random needle biopsy (masked to PET/MRI results), or the image-guided biopsy (IGB) group, which involved the standardized 12-core needle biopsy plus 4 computer-assisted PET/MRI-guided targeted biopsies. An electronically generated randomization list was used to assign patients to each group after inclusion and exclusion criteria were checked for suitability by the principal investigator. All patients were to undergo multiparametric endorectal [18F]fluoroethylcholine PSMA PET/MRI. Within 1 mo of imaging and randomization, patients were scheduled for RB or IGB, followed by an end-of-study visit within 2 wk or by surgery with an end-of-study visit. Follow-up visits were planned at 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo after the end-of-study visit. Further reporting on follow-up was performed voluntarily until the study closed on June 15, 2023. | ||
|
||||||||||
End point title |
Superior cancer detaction | |||||||||
End point description |
To demonstrate that multiparametric metabolic hybrid imaging with FEC/ PSMA-PET/MRI is superior in the detection of primary localized prostate cancer than the conventional biopsy approach (TRUS-guided) in patients with suspected prostate cancer (according to the inclusion criteria) and to significantly improve the detection rate of the dominant intraprostatic tumor lesion and reduce the number of biopsies needed for a correct histopathological diagnosis to a minimum in the future (PET/MRI guided biopsy).
|
|||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
|||||||||
End point timeframe |
Between February 5, 2016, and February 4, 2020
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Analysis primary endpoint | |||||||||
Comparison groups |
random biopsy Arm v Image guided biopsy arm
|
|||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
220
|
|||||||||
Analysis specification |
Post-hoc
|
|||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | |||||||||
P-value |
< 0.05 | |||||||||
Method |
Chi-squared corrected | |||||||||
Confidence interval |
||||||||||
|
|||
|
Adverse events information [1]
|
|||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Between February 5, 2016, and February 4, 2020
|
||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||
|
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||
Dictionary version |
27.0
|
||
| Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||
| Notes [1] - There are no non-serious adverse events recorded for these results. It is expected that there will be at least one non-serious adverse event reported. Justification: There was no adverse events |
|||
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
| Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
| Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
| None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/41266255 |
|||