Clinical Trial Results:
An Open-labelled, Single-arm, Multicentre Clinical Study to Evaluate the Usability and Safety of the Pre-filled Pen and Pre-filled Syringe of SB5 in Subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-004887-39 |
Trial protocol |
PL |
Global end of trial date |
08 Mar 2016
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
28 Dec 2018
|
First version publication date |
28 Dec 2018
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
SB5-G21-RA
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT02326233 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
107, Cheomdan-daero, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Korea, Republic of,
|
||
Public contact |
Information Desk, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., 82 032 455 3114, bioepisinfo@samsung.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Information Desk, Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd., 82 032 455 3114, bioepisinfo@samsung.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
08 Mar 2016
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
08 Mar 2016
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate the comparability between subcutaneous (SC) delivery administration of SB5 via the pre-filled pen (Pen) versus the pre-filled syringe (PFS) in terms of injection site pain in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study and clinical study protocols were reviewed and approved by Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB).
This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki (2008) and that are consistent with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines (ICH E6) and applicable local regulatory requirements and laws.
The nature and purpose of the study was fully explained to each subject and written informed consent was obtained at Screening from each subject before any study related procedures were performed. The consent documents for the study was reviewed and approved by the appropriate IEC or IRB prior to use.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
14 Aug 2015
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 49
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
49
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
49
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
49
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||
Recruitment details |
- | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||
Screening details |
Of the 49 subjects enrolled, 48 (98.0%) subjects completed 6 weeks of treatment. Prior to Week 6, one (2.0%) subject withdrew from the study due to withdrawal of consent. These 48 (98.0%) subjects completed the 12 weeks of treatment as well as the study. No subjects withdrew from the study after Week 6. | ||||||||||
Pre-assignment period milestones
|
|||||||||||
Number of subjects started |
49 | ||||||||||
Number of subjects completed |
49 | ||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Open-label, single arm (overall period)
|
||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||
Arm title
|
SB5 Pen/PFS | ||||||||||
Arm description |
- | ||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
SB5
|
||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection in pre-filled pen, Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
|
||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
0.8 mL in 50 mg/mL solution for sc injection provided in Pen or PFS. 40 mg sc injection via PFS at Week 0 and Week 2 and then 40 mg sc injection via Pen st Week 4 and then every other week thereafter up to Week 10.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Open-label, single arm
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
SB5 Pen/PFS
|
||
Reporting group description |
- |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
The change in injection site pain score using an 11-point visual numeric scale [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
|||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Difference of injection site pain score (Week 6 - Week 2)
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: There is only one group (SB5 PFS then change to SB5 Pen) therefore it is impossible to enter values in statistical methods page (At least two comparison groups are needed to proceed entering the page). Equivalence between two dosing regimens was declared if the 97.5% confidence interval (CI) of the difference in the injection site pain score was entirely contained within the equivalence margin of ±5 with pre-defined alpha level of 0.025 for both the timepoints, i.e. overall alpha level was 0.05. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
20 weeks
|
||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
17.0
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
SB5 PFS/Pen
|
||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
19 Dec 2014 |
Administrative change: 11-point numeric rating scale was changed to 11-point visual numeric scale with other administrative changes and editorial changes |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |