Clinical Trial Results:
A Phase III, Single Arm, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Assess the Immunogenicity, Safety and Tolerability of a Fully Liquid Pentavalent Vaccine Quinvaxem® (DTwP-Hib-HepB Vaccine) when Administered to Indian Infants at 6, 10, and 14 Weeks of Age
Due to a system error, the data reported in v1 is not correct and has been removed from public view.
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2014-005309-18 |
Trial protocol |
Outside EU/EEA |
Global end of trial date |
23 Apr 2012
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v2(current) |
This version publication date |
03 Jun 2016
|
First version publication date |
02 Apr 2015
|
Other versions |
v1 (removed from public view) |
Version creation reason |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
V66_05
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT01470287 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
Via Fiorentina 1, Siena, Italy, 53100
|
||
Public contact |
Posting Director, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, RegistryContactVaccinesUS@novartis.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
Posting Director, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, RegistryContactVaccinesUS@novartis.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
Yes
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
25 Oct 2012
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
23 Apr 2012
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
To assess one month after third study injection, the percentage of subjects who develop:
•Seroprotective antibody concentrations to diphtheria, tetanus and Hepatitis B (HepB)
•Antibody concentrations ≥20 EIU/mL or a 4 fold increase from baseline for Bordetella pertussis,
•Anti polyribosyl phosphate (PRP) Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) antibody concentrations > 0.15 ug/mL for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) (short term protection).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
This clinical study was designed, implemented and reported in accordance with the International Conference of Harmonization (ICH) Harmonised Tripartite Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice (GCP), with applicable local regulations guidelines issued by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) and Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research on Human Subjects issued by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), (and also European Directive 2001/20/EC, US Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, and Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare), and with the ethical principles laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from parents or legal guardians of infants.
|
||
Background therapy |
- | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
28 Nov 2011
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
No
|
||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
India: 175
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
175
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
0
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
175
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
0
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
0
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Subjects were enrolled from 3 study centres in India. | ||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||
Screening details |
All enrolled subjects were included in the study. | ||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall trial (overall period)
|
||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Not applicable
|
||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Not blinded | ||||||||||||
Blinding implementation details |
The trial was designed as single arm and open label.
|
||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Quinvaxem | ||||||||||||
Arm description |
Infants, ≥42 to ≤64 days of age, receiving three doses of vaccine at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (study days 1, 29 and 57). | ||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
DTwP-Hib-HepB
|
||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Intramuscular use
|
||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Vaccination consisted of one 0.5 mL dose administered three times, IM into the antero-lateral area of the thigh, at day 1, 29 and 57.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Overall trial
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Quinvaxem
|
||
Reporting group description |
Infants, ≥42 to ≤64 days of age, receiving three doses of vaccine at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (study days 1, 29 and 57). | ||
Subject analysis set title |
All population enrolled
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Intention-to-treat | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects who signed an informed consent.
All subjects that underwent screening procedures.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Immunogenicity – Per Protocol Set (PPS)
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Per protocol | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects in the Full Analysis Set (FAS) who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||
Subject analysis set title |
Safety
|
||
Subject analysis set type |
Safety analysis | ||
Subject analysis set description |
All subjects in the enrolled population who received at least one dose of vaccine and provide post vaccination safety data.
|
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
1.Percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration to diphtheria. [1] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against diphtheria was defined as anti-diphtheria antibody concentration ≥0.1 IU/mL.
The percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity – PPS population, ie. all subjects in the FAS who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
Notes [1] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: statistical analyses not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
2.Percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration to tetanus. [2] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against tetanus was defined as anti-tetanus antibody concentration ≥0.1 IU/mL.
The percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population, ie. all subjects in the FAS who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
Notes [2] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: statistical analyses not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
3.Percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration to Hepatitis B. [3] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against Hepatitis B was defined as anti-Hepatitis B antibody concentration ≥10 IU/mL.
The percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population, ie. all subjects in the FAS who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
Notes [3] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: statistical analyses not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
4.Percentage of subjects who developed antibody concentration to pertussis above pre-specified threshold. [4] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against pertussis was defined as anti-pertussis antibody concentration ≥20 EIU/mL or a 4-fold increase from baseline
The percentage of subjects with antibody concentration above the pre-specified threshold was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population, ie. all subjects in the FAS who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
Notes [4] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: statistical analyses not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
5.Percentage of subjects who developed antibody to Haemophilus influenzae type b above pre-specified threshold. [5] | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against Haemophilus influenzae type b was defined as anti-Polyribosyl phosphate antibody concentration ≥0.15 mcg/ml.
The percentage of subjects with seroprotective antibody concentration was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population, ie. all subjects in the Full Analysis Set who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
Notes [5] - No statistical analyses have been specified for this primary end point. It is expected there is at least one statistical analysis for each primary end point. Justification: statistical analyses not applicable for this endpoint. |
|||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
6.Geometric Mean Concentration of antibody against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenza type b, one month after third vaccination with Quinvaxem. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The human Serum Bactericidal Activity (hSBA) antibody concentration, one month after receiving the third vaccination of Quinvaxem vaccination, is reported as geometric mean concentration (GMC).
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||
End point title |
7.Percentage of subjects with antibody concentration anti-Polyribosylphosphate (PRP) ≥1.0 mcg/mL | ||||||||||||
End point description |
Long term seroprotective activity of Quinvaxem against Haemophilus influenzae type b was defined as anti-PRP antibody concentration ≥1.0 mcg/mL.
The percentage of subjects with antibody concentration >=1.0 mcg/mL was evaluated one month after the third vaccination with Quinvaxem.
Analysis was done on Immunogenicity-PPS population, ie. all subjects in the FAS who received all three vaccinations, provided evaluable serum samples at defined end points and have no major protocol violation.
|
||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
One month after the third vaccination (day 85).
|
||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
8.Number of subjects reporting solicited local and systemic adverse events after each vaccination. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Safety was determined by solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) reported 7 days after each vaccination and defined by percentage of subjects with reactogenicity.
Analysis was done on Safety population. ie all subjects in the enrolled population who received at least one dose of vaccine and provided post vaccination safety data.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
7 days after each vaccination day (day 7, day 35 and day 63).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Throughout duration of the study.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
All AEs (including Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs leading to withdrawal of subject) and concomitant medications were collected throughout the duration of the study (day 1 through day 85 or time of early termination).
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Non-systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
15.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Quinvaxem
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Infants, ≥42 to ≤64 days of age, receiving three doses of vaccine at approximately 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age (study days 1, 29 and 57). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? No | |||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported | |||
Online references |
|||
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23783081 |